It's Bulking Season!

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

[quote]desolator wrote:
Well he is extremely lean right now and obviously when he gain 40 lbs there will be a huge difference. But this increase is at least 1/3 of his max. On a non beginner that’s really really hard. Just think if someone makes that progress for 10 years (not the same ofc, 100lbs in one year, 50 the other, 25 etc) will be near 600 lbs.[/quote]

Bench-wise he is still a beginner from my point of view.
315x1 is sort of the start of the intermediate level for pressing for guys of average leverages and below imo… Someone with nice bench leverages will laugh at that and get it in a few months training unless he messes up… Even at a relatively low bodyweight…

[/quote]

Completely agree; I still consider my self a beginner with benching. my bench was atrocious for yeeeears. I was 180 with a 205 bench at one point…not good. I read all the articles, got all the advice I could, and you know what? After 4 or 5 years of banging my head on the wall, one day I realized my breathing was royally fucking me up. This was right before the start of my bulk where I went up to 285 on benching. So that helped. Then there was that Dave Tate video on here a ways back where he talked about arching, and I realized my form looked nothing like that. That helped IMMENSELY.

I’m absolutely giddy about the prospects this time. I only lost 10 lbs. off my bench during this cut, and honestly I was doing DB work for a big portion of it. I can’t wait to crack 300, and then I can’t wait to get 3 wheels to a side.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Maybe hold your weight occasionally, at 230-240 or so, then 260 etc… Def. hold before you consider dieting or anything like that<

[/quote]

I’ve heard this said a lot. What exactly does it mean to hold your bodyweight? Does it mean lose a bit of fat and slowly gain muscle? How long would you have to “hold” a certain bodyweight for?

Thanks!

I will bite, I’ve had a few things I need to get off my chest, no matter if anyone is listening or not.

I’m just finishing up another diet here. I’ve gone under two ‘bulks’ now, (I’m getting out of the bulk/cut dynamic,) both of which were successful/unsuccessful. I definitely added some good size, but strength could have had a much more significant increase than it did, honestly. First bulk was like 5 months, second one was about eight-nine months and more successful. The first I got (in my opinion) pretty sloppy. But stronger. Second bulk I played around with a lot more things to see what works best for me, and as I finished and transitioned into this diet things started clicking really well.

I have a new training partner who’s inexperienced (extremely,) more so than me or many others in the gym. He pushes me and I push him, it’s just what I needed.

Now I’m probably 4-6 weeks out from finishing this diet. I’m pretty lean, but I recently shaved my stomach for shits and giggles (I’m a hairy dude) and was surprised by how much more visible my loose skin is compared to when I’m hairy. This encourages me because I always feel like during my bulk I take it too hard on myself because of the given circumstances for my body, I admit it’s been my Achilles heel thus far.

As I transition into a bulk, there’s going to be changes made overall. Less calories, most importantly. I have a SLOW metabolism, calorie-in wise. I can gain consistent weight at 3,000/day. At least I could… Anywho, I’m also going to be keeping 20-30 minute sessions of cardio (mostly elliptical) and maybe sometimes Prowler sessions after my lifting to help the good-sloppy ratio for gains. I know now what exercises I’m good at. I understand my body much more than before I ever bulked, which I am quite pleased about.

Anyway, I look forward to it very much. This is what I hope to be the true transition into finally understand what the long-term approach to bodybuilding entails. By the way, shooting for 315 for reps by December on the declie bench, 350 for reps on Smith Front Squats (with elevated heels) or just regular front squats if I switch to them at some point (315 for reps would be nice, if not more easily,) among many other notable expectations I’ve set for myself.

[quote]twiggy1 wrote:

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Maybe hold your weight occasionally, at 230-240 or so, then 260 etc… Def. hold before you consider dieting or anything like that<

[/quote]

I’ve heard this said a lot. What exactly does it mean to hold your bodyweight? Does it mean lose a bit of fat and slowly gain muscle? How long would you have to “hold” a certain bodyweight for?

Thanks![/quote]

I can’t give you exact numbers unfortunately. I (and many, many others long before me) have noticed that when you, say, go from 180 to 260 and then right the next day start dieting back down to 220 or so… You will likely get low net results… Lose strength/muscle… Your body I guess isn’t used to the new weight, it’s been forced to gain, gain, and gain more and now suddenly the opposite happens…

Instead it seems to be more effective to establish certain set points in your bodyweight… I.e. for me that was something like 200 lbs or so at first or 180 or whatever, then something like 240… Now I can basically stop training and start eating fairly crappy but I have to give it serious effort to end up below 260-270lbs of bodyweight (i.e. not talking about an actual diet, but basically what happens when things just don’t go so well)… My body is used to weighing 260-270 because I was around that weight a lot… I can go up to 300 but quickly lose that weight as well and restabilize at 260+.
I can in fact hold that weight on less calories and way less protein than I needed to reach a bodyweight 20 lbs lower…

It’s nice to have these set-points so that when you aren’t/don’t want to gain all-out and you want to relax a bit on your dietary intake, you won’t just lose a ton of weight, strength and muscle… I can “cruise” at that weight for a bit, take it easy, get my metabolism back under control and all that.

There is a thread about it in the t-cell I think.

There are several reasons for why so many people mess up on their bulks and do something like:
Go from 200 to 260, then diet down and end up with a 5-10 lbs net gain only.
One is the lack of adequate strength gains (I don’t mean getting the bar up via lots of cheating or a huge arch or whatever, but strength gains with the right kind of technique/exercises for the intended purpose) vs. bodyweight gain as mentioned before… Another is not allowing your body time to get used to the new weight and mass and just immedately doing a 180 when it coems to diet etc.

Note: I’m not sure how it works for guys on gear.

[quote]SSC wrote:
I will bite, I’ve had a few things I need to get off my chest, no matter if anyone is listening or not.

I’m just finishing up another diet here. I’ve gone under two ‘bulks’ now, (I’m getting out of the bulk/cut dynamic,) both of which were successful/unsuccessful. I definitely added some good size, but strength could have had a much more significant increase than it did, honestly. First bulk was like 5 months, second one was about eight-nine months and more successful. The first I got (in my opinion) pretty sloppy. But stronger. Second bulk I played around with a lot more things to see what works best for me, and as I finished and transitioned into this diet things started clicking really well.

I have a new training partner who’s inexperienced (extremely,) more so than me or many others in the gym. He pushes me and I push him, it’s just what I needed.

Now I’m probably 4-6 weeks out from finishing this diet. I’m pretty lean, but I recently shaved my stomach for shits and giggles (I’m a hairy dude) and was surprised by how much more visible my loose skin is compared to when I’m hairy. This encourages me because I always feel like during my bulk I take it too hard on myself because of the given circumstances for my body, I admit it’s been my Achilles heel thus far.

As I transition into a bulk, there’s going to be changes made overall. Less calories, most importantly. I have a SLOW metabolism, calorie-in wise. I can gain consistent weight at 3,000/day. At least I could… Anywho, I’m also going to be keeping 20-30 minute sessions of cardio (mostly elliptical) and maybe sometimes Prowler sessions after my lifting to help the good-sloppy ratio for gains. I know now what exercises I’m good at. I understand my body much more than before I ever bulked, which I am quite pleased about.

Anyway, I look forward to it very much. This is what I hope to be the true transition into finally understand what the long-term approach to bodybuilding entails. By the way, shooting for 315 for reps by December on the declie bench, 350 for reps on Smith Front Squats (with elevated heels) or just regular front squats if I switch to them at some point (315 for reps would be nice, if not more easily,) among many other notable expectations I’ve set for myself.[/quote]

How tall are you now and how much do you currently weigh?

If I remember right you lost a lot of weight originally… You managed that, you’ll manage this. Good luck, brother!

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

[quote]SSC wrote:
I will bite, I’ve had a few things I need to get off my chest, no matter if anyone is listening or not.

I’m just finishing up another diet here. I’ve gone under two ‘bulks’ now, (I’m getting out of the bulk/cut dynamic,) both of which were successful/unsuccessful. I definitely added some good size, but strength could have had a much more significant increase than it did, honestly. First bulk was like 5 months, second one was about eight-nine months and more successful. The first I got (in my opinion) pretty sloppy. But stronger. Second bulk I played around with a lot more things to see what works best for me, and as I finished and transitioned into this diet things started clicking really well.

I have a new training partner who’s inexperienced (extremely,) more so than me or many others in the gym. He pushes me and I push him, it’s just what I needed.

Now I’m probably 4-6 weeks out from finishing this diet. I’m pretty lean, but I recently shaved my stomach for shits and giggles (I’m a hairy dude) and was surprised by how much more visible my loose skin is compared to when I’m hairy. This encourages me because I always feel like during my bulk I take it too hard on myself because of the given circumstances for my body, I admit it’s been my Achilles heel thus far.

As I transition into a bulk, there’s going to be changes made overall. Less calories, most importantly. I have a SLOW metabolism, calorie-in wise. I can gain consistent weight at 3,000/day. At least I could… Anywho, I’m also going to be keeping 20-30 minute sessions of cardio (mostly elliptical) and maybe sometimes Prowler sessions after my lifting to help the good-sloppy ratio for gains. I know now what exercises I’m good at. I understand my body much more than before I ever bulked, which I am quite pleased about.

Anyway, I look forward to it very much. This is what I hope to be the true transition into finally understand what the long-term approach to bodybuilding entails. By the way, shooting for 315 for reps by December on the declie bench, 350 for reps on Smith Front Squats (with elevated heels) or just regular front squats if I switch to them at some point (315 for reps would be nice, if not more easily,) among many other notable expectations I’ve set for myself.[/quote]

How tall are you now and how much do you currently weigh?

If I remember right you lost a lot of weight originally… You managed that, you’ll manage this. Good luck, brother!

[/quote]

Just a hair under 6’, I’m currently just at or very slightly below 230. I have an estimated ~10-15 lbs of loose skin on my body, am looking to get down to 220 by mid-October.

And yup, went from 350 down to 200 at my lowest in February of '09.

And thanks, things are definitely currently in my favor.

[quote]AccipiterQ wrote:

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

[quote]desolator wrote:
Well he is extremely lean right now and obviously when he gain 40 lbs there will be a huge difference. But this increase is at least 1/3 of his max. On a non beginner that’s really really hard. Just think if someone makes that progress for 10 years (not the same ofc, 100lbs in one year, 50 the other, 25 etc) will be near 600 lbs.[/quote]

Bench-wise he is still a beginner from my point of view.
315x1 is sort of the start of the intermediate level for pressing for guys of average leverages and below imo… Someone with nice bench leverages will laugh at that and get it in a few months training unless he messes up… Even at a relatively low bodyweight…

[/quote]

Completely agree; I still consider my self a beginner with benching. my bench was atrocious for yeeeears. I was 180 with a 205 bench at one point…not good. I read all the articles, got all the advice I could, and you know what? After 4 or 5 years of banging my head on the wall, one day I realized my breathing was royally fucking me up. This was right before the start of my bulk where I went up to 285 on benching. So that helped. Then there was that Dave Tate video on here a ways back where he talked about arching, and I realized my form looked nothing like that. That helped IMMENSELY.

I’m absolutely giddy about the prospects this time. I only lost 10 lbs. off my bench during this cut, and honestly I was doing DB work for a big portion of it. I can’t wait to crack 300, and then I can’t wait to get 3 wheels to a side.

[/quote]

Good luck!

Cephalic_Carnage:
I respect your opinions and I need your help.
I have terrible leverages for bench press ( I am 6’5" with a very thin frame and currently 230 in the high teens bodyfat % wise) It seems like nothing I do helps my bench I have been stuck for many months at 210lbs 1rm and 185 for 5-6. But I can do legit body weight dips and 100 lb. dead skulls.What would you recommend for a guy like me?

To see things from my perspective CC (to understand better my arguements) I have been training for 2 years, 5’5 170 lbs skinny fat build. Right now I bench just above than 2x5x225. The interesting thing is that my bench started growing since I stopped ALL shoulder pressing, I should get 245x5 at this rate by february.

The thing is, since I have very small frame and skinny fat genetics, I cannot force feed myself to strength gains. The bright side is that I can chin up 5 reps with 75lbs strapped. (also my wingspan is just about 5’5 but my arms look long cause of short torso.)

That is a very interesting concept.Do you remember when you got to 260,how long you stayed at that weight to establish the set point?I experience this on a much smaller scale at 205 pounds.

[quote]law8 wrote:

That is a very interesting concept.Do you remember when you got to 260,how long you stayed at that weight to establish the set point?I experience this on a much smaller scale at 205 pounds.

[/quote]

From what I remember reading from that thread in the T-Cell, it can be many months, sometimes spanning into years. I know it took me about 8 months at or above 220 before my set point stabilized at around 212 like it is now. If I have a week of crappy eating for whatever reason I only drop down to 209 or so, whereas before this I would have plummeted back to the high 190s.

However, I’d imagine that as you get bigger, it takes longer to establish new set points. Just from a basic physiological look at it, you have to force the body to accept a new standard, and the more weight that is, it surely must take longer to establish. I’d be willing to bet I’ll have to sit at 230 for at least a year to get a new set point.

[quote]

From what I remember reading from that thread in the T-Cell, it can be many months, sometimes spanning into years. I know it took me about 8 months at or above 220 before my set point stabilized at around 212 like it is now. If I have a week of crappy eating for whatever reason I only drop down to 209 or so, whereas before this I would have plummeted back to the high 190s.

However, I’d imagine that as you get bigger, it takes longer to establish new set points. Just from a basic physiological look at it, you have to force the body to accept a new standard, and the more weight that is, it surely must take longer to establish. I’d be willing to bet I’ll have to sit at 230 for at least a year to get a new set point.[/quote]

oh ok,makes sense.thanks for the reply.I know hitting my smallfry 205 pounds just before summer in college to now,I reckon I would have to try to if I wanted to get under 200 pounds so it makes sense that if I was 60 pounds heavier it would take longer for my body to adjust to carrying it than it had to take to adjust to 200 pounds.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

[quote]AccipiterQ wrote:

[quote]desolator wrote:
Well he is extremely lean right now and obviously when he gain 40 lbs there will be a huge difference. But this increase is at least 1/3 of his max. On a non beginner that’s really really hard. Just think if someone makes that progress for 10 years (not the same ofc, 100lbs in one year, 50 the other, 25 etc) will be near 600 lbs.[/quote]

I guess we’ll find out lol. I’m sifting back through my records right now, and last time I went from 215 it looks like, to 285. So that was a good 70 lbs. in 4 months I believe it was. [/quote]

Yeah… 135 → 225 often only takes a few months, → 315 + 1 year or so perhaps, can def. be done in less (you can make it from your starting point to 315 in a year total if you do most things right and your setup on the bench is ok, but due to the learning aspect of bodybuilding people just usually don’t manage), → 405 takes quite a bit more effort, but still doable in 2-3 years total training time (it depends) but most don’t make it there at all because they simply don’t improve their diet enough and such, don’t have the resources (are in college or whatever), or some such thing, or they take way longer because they have to learn stuff first, maybe relearn how to bench correctly for their frame, etc…

Then on to 495 is really difficult and can take years of additional training time and usually you’ll have to weigh like 245-250 at average height perhaps… Plus/minus depending on leverages and setup.

585 is something even most really serious trainees never reach. Unless you have a genetic gift for benching like Hoornstra and co, you’ll have to weigh quite a lot to get there (even so, if you don’t have at least decent leverages, you’re probably going to get stuck between 500-550 or so even if you do absolutely everything right, diet, training and setup wise and are weighing a drug-free 280 or 300… Guess you may blow past that if you made it to a seriously fat 325+ with a huge arch on the bench lol), have a setup going that’s works perfectly for you, lots of tri and shoulder strength (pecs only depending on your setup style really, but of course some)…

Gotta say though, I don’t see gains like that happening on madcow 5x5 :wink:
Your routine certainly matters to an extent here, too.

[/quote]

Damn man, it took me like 4 years to get to 350lb bench and I thought that was pretty solid. If you’re not a fan of a specific set up like macdow 5x5 is there anything in particular you like for it? (I’ve only read the 1st page so far, so sorry if this was mentioned). I see so few guys training with 315+ (even the bigger/biggest guys at my college) it always surprises me when I see your point of view on the matter (not saying that it’s wrong)

For bulking goals, finally just finished a cut a few weeks ago but have continued to lose a few more pounds for the past 2-3 weeks even adding back some calories and completely eliminating cardio (which was up to 4-5 hours per week at the end of the cut)…crazy stuff. Strength is finally starting to get moving again though.

230 and nom nom nom.

Picking up on that Pumped: I read a while ago (so it might not be correct anymore) that one of the biggest mofos on this site who goes by the name of Morepain “only” benches 315 in his sets. I dont wont to go all Scott Able on you though and say that very high volume is the way to grow and that poundages do not matter at all because literally every big fucker is very strong, but I think there is a cut off point if you are very strong. What do I mean?

Once you have reached good strength levels I think you have to decide which way to go sort of. If you want to get stronger you probably have to focus on going a “strength specialized way” focusing on lock outs, low reps whatnot, everything geared towards making you stronger but not necassarily bigger. I you wnat to grow you will probably have to up your volume (more isolations exercises is more volume)This article also picks up on that: http://www.elitefts.com/documents/size_strength.htm http://www.elitefts.com/documents/size-strength2.htm

Plus what also astounded me is the poundages Ronny Rockel uses. I have seen him train live in person and must say for being that outright huge he is not as strong as one would of thought. Video:

(“only” 130kg/300lbs Chest presses as his top set)

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

[quote]twiggy1 wrote:

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Maybe hold your weight occasionally, at 230-240 or so, then 260 etc… Def. hold before you consider dieting or anything like that<

[/quote]

I’ve heard this said a lot. What exactly does it mean to hold your bodyweight? Does it mean lose a bit of fat and slowly gain muscle? How long would you have to “hold” a certain bodyweight for?

Thanks![/quote]

I can’t give you exact numbers unfortunately. I (and many, many others long before me) have noticed that when you, say, go from 180 to 260 and then right the next day start dieting back down to 220 or so… You will likely get low net results… Lose strength/muscle… Your body I guess isn’t used to the new weight, it’s been forced to gain, gain, and gain more and now suddenly the opposite happens…

Instead it seems to be more effective to establish certain set points in your bodyweight… I.e. for me that was something like 200 lbs or so at first or 180 or whatever, then something like 240… Now I can basically stop training and start eating fairly crappy but I have to give it serious effort to end up below 260-270lbs of bodyweight (i.e. not talking about an actual diet, but basically what happens when things just don’t go so well)… My body is used to weighing 260-270 because I was around that weight a lot… I can go up to 300 but quickly lose that weight as well and restabilize at 260+.
I can in fact hold that weight on less calories and way less protein than I needed to reach a bodyweight 20 lbs lower…

It’s nice to have these set-points so that when you aren’t/don’t want to gain all-out and you want to relax a bit on your dietary intake, you won’t just lose a ton of weight, strength and muscle… I can “cruise” at that weight for a bit, take it easy, get my metabolism back under control and all that.

There is a thread about it in the t-cell I think.

There are several reasons for why so many people mess up on their bulks and do something like:
Go from 200 to 260, then diet down and end up with a 5-10 lbs net gain only.
One is the lack of adequate strength gains (I don’t mean getting the bar up via lots of cheating or a huge arch or whatever, but strength gains with the right kind of technique/exercises for the intended purpose) vs. bodyweight gain as mentioned before… Another is not allowing your body time to get used to the new weight and mass and just immedately doing a 180 when it coems to diet etc.

Note: I’m not sure how it works for guys on gear.

[/quote]

Thanks for clearing that up more! I only ask because my first “bulk” was pretty sloppy so the thought of being fat again for up to a year or more kind of makes me shudder :wink:

in about a year I went up to 207lbs (I think thereabouts) up from around 150lbs (6 ft tall) and my bodyfat went up quite a bit…can’t say exact numbers but the calliper readings were around the 20 point at the end and I guess that I was somewhere under 10% at the start (very lean and skinny).

Benching = 150lbs up to 280lbs (don’t go all the way down to chest though! get bad shoulder pain when I go all the way down)
Deadlifts = 200lbs up to 300lbs (got stuck around 300lbs because injured lower back…can’t seem to do normal deadlifts while keeping lower back straight??? I think it’s something to do with my build?)
Squat = 150lbs up to 300lbs (parallel or just above - going lower causes me to badly lose balance?)

I’ve trimmed down to a lean 185lbs now. Obviously I want to carry on adding the meat but I’ll be doing it more sensibly this time!

[quote]pumped340 wrote:

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

[quote]AccipiterQ wrote:

[quote]desolator wrote:
Well he is extremely lean right now and obviously when he gain 40 lbs there will be a huge difference. But this increase is at least 1/3 of his max. On a non beginner that’s really really hard. Just think if someone makes that progress for 10 years (not the same ofc, 100lbs in one year, 50 the other, 25 etc) will be near 600 lbs.[/quote]

I guess we’ll find out lol. I’m sifting back through my records right now, and last time I went from 215 it looks like, to 285. So that was a good 70 lbs. in 4 months I believe it was. [/quote]

Yeah… 135 → 225 often only takes a few months, → 315 + 1 year or so perhaps, can def. be done in less (you can make it from your starting point to 315 in a year total if you do most things right and your setup on the bench is ok, but due to the learning aspect of bodybuilding people just usually don’t manage), → 405 takes quite a bit more effort, but still doable in 2-3 years total training time (it depends) but most don’t make it there at all because they simply don’t improve their diet enough and such, don’t have the resources (are in college or whatever), or some such thing, or they take way longer because they have to learn stuff first, maybe relearn how to bench correctly for their frame, etc…

Then on to 495 is really difficult and can take years of additional training time and usually you’ll have to weigh like 245-250 at average height perhaps… Plus/minus depending on leverages and setup.

585 is something even most really serious trainees never reach. Unless you have a genetic gift for benching like Hoornstra and co, you’ll have to weigh quite a lot to get there (even so, if you don’t have at least decent leverages, you’re probably going to get stuck between 500-550 or so even if you do absolutely everything right, diet, training and setup wise and are weighing a drug-free 280 or 300… Guess you may blow past that if you made it to a seriously fat 325+ with a huge arch on the bench lol), have a setup going that’s works perfectly for you, lots of tri and shoulder strength (pecs only depending on your setup style really, but of course some)…

Gotta say though, I don’t see gains like that happening on madcow 5x5 :wink:
Your routine certainly matters to an extent here, too.

[/quote]

Damn man, it took me like 4 years to get to 350lb bench and I thought that was pretty solid.
[/quote] That’s not bad at all, you’ve had to learn a lot of things along the way after all. [quote] If you’re not a fan of a specific set up like macdow 5x5 is there anything in particular you like for it? (I’ve only read the 1st page so far, so sorry if this was mentioned).
[/quote] Maybe I’ll make a thread in the cell about that finally. Nothing magic though. But yeah, I really don’t like the average 5x5 routine setup for this kind of thing… [quote]
I see so few guys training with 315+ (even the bigger/biggest guys at my college) it always surprises me when I see your point of view on the matter (not saying that it’s wrong)
[/quote] Sucks if you don’t have any truly strong guys around man… Like the Prof mentioned somewhere before, training with someone stronger than you really helps get the mental block out of the way. [quote]

For bulking goals, finally just finished a cut a few weeks ago but have continued to lose a few more pounds for the past 2-3 weeks even adding back some calories and completely eliminating cardio (which was up to 4-5 hours per week at the end of the cut)…crazy stuff. Strength is finally starting to get moving again though.
[/quote]

How much do you weigh now?

[quote]twiggy1 wrote:

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

[quote]twiggy1 wrote:

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Maybe hold your weight occasionally, at 230-240 or so, then 260 etc… Def. hold before you consider dieting or anything like that<

[/quote]

I’ve heard this said a lot. What exactly does it mean to hold your bodyweight? Does it mean lose a bit of fat and slowly gain muscle? How long would you have to “hold” a certain bodyweight for?

Thanks![/quote]

I can’t give you exact numbers unfortunately. I (and many, many others long before me) have noticed that when you, say, go from 180 to 260 and then right the next day start dieting back down to 220 or so… You will likely get low net results… Lose strength/muscle… Your body I guess isn’t used to the new weight, it’s been forced to gain, gain, and gain more and now suddenly the opposite happens…

Instead it seems to be more effective to establish certain set points in your bodyweight… I.e. for me that was something like 200 lbs or so at first or 180 or whatever, then something like 240… Now I can basically stop training and start eating fairly crappy but I have to give it serious effort to end up below 260-270lbs of bodyweight (i.e. not talking about an actual diet, but basically what happens when things just don’t go so well)… My body is used to weighing 260-270 because I was around that weight a lot… I can go up to 300 but quickly lose that weight as well and restabilize at 260+.
I can in fact hold that weight on less calories and way less protein than I needed to reach a bodyweight 20 lbs lower…

It’s nice to have these set-points so that when you aren’t/don’t want to gain all-out and you want to relax a bit on your dietary intake, you won’t just lose a ton of weight, strength and muscle… I can “cruise” at that weight for a bit, take it easy, get my metabolism back under control and all that.

There is a thread about it in the t-cell I think.

There are several reasons for why so many people mess up on their bulks and do something like:
Go from 200 to 260, then diet down and end up with a 5-10 lbs net gain only.
One is the lack of adequate strength gains (I don’t mean getting the bar up via lots of cheating or a huge arch or whatever, but strength gains with the right kind of technique/exercises for the intended purpose) vs. bodyweight gain as mentioned before… Another is not allowing your body time to get used to the new weight and mass and just immedately doing a 180 when it coems to diet etc.

Note: I’m not sure how it works for guys on gear.

[/quote]

Thanks for clearing that up more! I only ask because my first “bulk” was pretty sloppy so the thought of being fat again for up to a year or more kind of makes me shudder :wink:

in about a year I went up to 207lbs (I think thereabouts) up from around 150lbs (6 ft tall) and my bodyfat went up quite a bit…can’t say exact numbers but the calliper readings were around the 20 point at the end and I guess that I was somewhere under 10% at the start (very lean and skinny).

Benching = 150lbs up to 280lbs (don’t go all the way down to chest though! get bad shoulder pain when I go all the way down)
[/quote] Shoulder pain, or is it the bicep tendon at the shoulders?
Do you know how to properly set up for benching?

Not touching the chest is fine, but get a good setup going anyway (no need for a huge arch, but some arching helps… Learn how to pin your shoulder blades together etc… Watch that 600x3 vid in the PL section by sincityiron, he doesn’t quite touch but uses proper setup, so that should fit your situation).

Also make sure you do some heavy rowing and/or mike wolfe style face pulls where you retract the scapulae on the positive and “relax” that position on the negative… I.e. the retraction being the main part of the rep… I’ve written about that before a lot, try the search engine or google.
Also, try getting a vid of yourself benching and post it.[quote]
Deadlifts = 200lbs up to 300lbs (got stuck around 300lbs because injured lower back…can’t seem to do normal deadlifts while keeping lower back straight??? I think it’s something to do with my build?)
[/quote] Try sumo deadlifts. You don’t have to put your toes right next to the plates, in my case it helps to just have my knees outside and my arms in… Basically get the thighs out of the way of the pelvis… Maybe part of my build, too, but a conventional stance does not allow me to get into proper setup position for a deadlift without rounding. [quote]
Squat = 150lbs up to 300lbs (parallel or just above - going lower causes me to badly lose balance?)
[/quote] Hm. Got to set up properly then.
Got a medicine ball or some such? Put it between your legs and then try to get your hands on it with arms straight and low back arched (abs braced, but not drawn in).
Basically try a wider squat stance, toes pointed out some, break at the hip joints first…

Make a video of you squatting and post it in the PL forum for help perhaps. You don’t need to squat super-deep or anything, but slightly below parallel would be nice… With a narrow stance though (like Ronnie), that’s probably hard (for me anyway).

[quote]
I’ve trimmed down to a lean 185lbs now. Obviously I want to carry on adding the meat but I’ll be doing it more sensibly this time![/quote]

(and you could use a closer grip too like I did up until recently… But setup is still paramount)

[quote]GodOfSteele wrote:
Picking up on that Pumped: I read a while ago (so it might not be correct anymore) that one of the biggest mofos on this site who goes by the name of Morepain “only” benches 315 in his sets. I dont wont to go all Scott Able on you though and say that very high volume is the way to grow and that poundages do not matter at all because literally every big fucker is very strong, but I think there is a cut off point if you are very strong. What do I mean?

Once you have reached good strength levels I think you have to decide which way to go sort of. If you want to get stronger you probably have to focus on going a “strength specialized way”
[/quote] As long as you can gain weight freely, you don’t really need anything specialized imo… Just got to have a decent routine and the right diet, plus knowledge of the right setup and whatnot for your exercises… Once you stop gaining weight at a decent pace, then yes. [quote] focusing on lock outs, low reps whatnot, everything geared towards making you stronger but not necassarily bigger. I you wnat to grow you will probably have to up your volume (more isolations exercises is more volume)This article also picks up on that: http://www.elitefts.com/documents/size_strength.htm http://www.elitefts.com/documents/size-strength2.htm

Plus what also astounded me is the poundages Ronny Rockel uses. I have seen him train live in person and must say for being that outright huge he is not as strong as one would of thought. Video:

(“only” 130kg/300lbs Chest presses as his top set)
[/quote]

I would not rely on that kind of training to get to any real kind of size, especially as a natty…

There are some things to consider here:
-Gear (depending on what he’s taking, how much etc) can help a lot with letting you gain strength on high rep, high volume routines… A drug-free guy can do the same and get nowhere past the beginner stage oftentimes.

-A lot of people gained virtually all their size getting stronger and stronger, but you often see them after 10 years of training that way suddenly telling everyone how they now only use so and so much weight and so on… Hell, Larry Scott is one of those guys… Once you have the size, you got muscle-memory on your side… It’s comparatively easy to get back to a size you’ve already been vs. a size you haven’t been yet.

-Guys with great muscle-shape/genetics (onemorerep comes to mind) can look a lot better while lifting half what you’re lifting.
Try getting your chest to look even remotely like his, size-wise, lifting similar weight, doing the same routine, whatever. No matter how much you feel the weight, it likely won’t happen.

-The whole feeling the weight thing doesn’t really require low amounts of weight though, you just have to get your technique and setup in order…

-Many people eventually progress from regular all-free-weight-type training to using more and more machines etc… I sure get beat up if all I do is heavy free-weight work.

-difference in mentality… I don’t want to go into that too much, but there are imo 2 basic mind-sets in bbing these days… You first have the people who are all about increasing their muscle size/improving their shape/sculpting their physique or whatever… The main population of every steroid forum. This is a generalization of course, but basically they just do whatever they can to build their bodies… Hell, a lot of them don’t even seem to enjoy training beyond “the burn” and “the pain” and whatever.
Not all of them use oil and site injections and such, but usually that’s the group who’ll do it (besides some pros who may have to, but don’t necessarily want to)… I’d put Sarcev into that group as far as pros go, Wheeler etc… Vastly different mind-set compared to guys like Dante, Professor X, me, and so on.
I accept drugs as part of bbing of course, but I wouldn’t ever dream of injecting syntherol or whatever they use these days just to make my muscles appear bigger… I love getting stronger first and foremost, on every exercise, and so I focus on that and what can I say… I like my way a lot better, but then again I don’t compete either.

-Statistical outliers/genetics. Plain and simple.

Most heavyweights bench 405 bodybuilding style for 6-12 or so… Super-heavies usually move 495 for a few, anywhere from 4-12 (12 def. being the exceptions, most are like 4-8 ala Ronnie in his prime, Zack Khan and so on. People don’t necessarily keep training that heavy of course, but most guys weighing 270-300 in contest shape can definitely do it as long as they just train for a bit).
There are very strong guys who, at a weight class less, match the guys above no problem… Hoornstra, Levrone back in the day, Ben White etc.

Anyway… Strength gain (I’m not really talking about this from a “only do very low reps”/powerlifting perspective though… Read PX’ thread and there you have what I mean really…) while gaining bodyweight is a fairly simple method of getting muscular (you can still mess it up a lot of ways, but yeah)… It’s not so “vague” as all those “if I reduce my rest periods/If I do 5 sets of 12 at the same weight/if I do this super-cycle/if I change it up all the damn time… -surely it will induce massive hypertrophy!” -methods you know?
I like my gains quantifiable/measurable, and not all this hoping that whatever exotic method will get me huge… somehow -kind of thing.

Then again, I’m a simple person I guess.