[quote]John S. wrote:
Depends on how bad the sandwich is.[/quote]
MLIB
[quote]John S. wrote:
Depends on how bad the sandwich is.[/quote]
MLIB
[quote]gregron wrote:
[quote]hungry4more wrote:
Slightly off-topic, mentioned by OG about the military jobs…
I still, to this day, do not understand why the hell we have different physical fitness standards for men and women. It doesn’t make any damn sense. If women want to hold the same jobs, and get paid the same wages, shouldn’t the same things be expected of them? In combat, the enemy won’t cut women slack if she is less physically fit than her male counterpart, and on the job the same applies. So why do the job requirements differ?
/rant[/quote]
I never understood this either. The physical standards should be the same across he board depending on the job. Women aren’t allowed to do all the jobs in the military and they SHOULDN’T be.
When I was at SERE school (Survival Evasion Resistance Escape) they teach you how not to get caught and what to do if you are caught. You spend a week in the field along with being in a POW camp where you are slapped around, waterboarded and interrogated.
We had two women in our class and the “captors” (instructors) would make examples of them in order to get the male prisoners to talk. Using the logic that men feel more compassion for females and will talk to stop the beatings.
That example above is one reason why women shouldn’t have job equality when it comes to military.
/rant based off of H4M’s rant
[/quote]
You were Aircrew?
And as someone else said…if you want the same pay and benefits as I get, you should held to the same standards, end of story.
Call it sexism, I don’t give a shit. Of course some companies will be less likely to hire females…they get pregnant, and generally aren’t as physically capable. It’s called being fucking realistic about real life situations and their effects on you as a worker. Just like with DADT, people need to stop letting their silly emotions get all involved in these matters, and look at it from a practical perspective.
[quote]Pump_Daddy wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
Oh right. So punching her would be better right choice?[/quote]
No. Living in a society that doesn’t give women a free pass to be insane is the better choice. Watch any live performance of ANY comedian and if a comment is stated about a woman hitting a man, the crowd filled with women will likely cheer.
Why is that?
Violence is violence and if my life is at stake, why shouldn’t I be able to defend myself as I see fit? If a woman pulls a knife, I should wait until she stabs me to defend myself?
LOL. What are you talking about? Most of the people I treat daily are lower income. I don’t need life lessons from you about giving back to the community. In fact, what the hell are YOU doing on your own outside of following orders? Please list how YOU help those around you individually so we can all learn from a master. I’m Air Force. I respect the Marines to no end but the crap you just wrote is just that.
Further:
[quote]
My friend waved at us to stand down, walked to her, dodged and parried her kick and thrusting stab and then tiwsted her arm while kicking her knee on the side, bringing her down on one knee, wrist locked, his other hand pressing down the elbow as if to snap it and holding her arm at a mean armbar, and shaking her hand to make her let go of the knife.[/quote]
This one instance of a takedown going in a pleasant direction for the end is RARE. In this city, most women like that would also be carrying…and my guess is, your friend can’t put a bullet in a sleeper hold. You do what is necessary to survive, period. What if her 5 friends had jumped your friend? What if they were all women weighing 250lbs? Is he Batman?
Not one person here is talking about hitting women randomly for no reason so what makes you the moral superior to anyone else here?
You are talking about advanced tactics to neutralize a person carrying a weapon that even law enforcement and the military realize need training. Yet here you are acting like ANYONE can easily take down any woman no matter her strength or experience level.
That means you don’t think much about women if you really see them ALL as being that weak and uncoordinated.
Some of the white knights here seem patently sexist.
I am not a fan of violence.
I do believe in self defense.
I hope that anyone that truly feels their lives are threatened will defend themselves.
If you can avoid violent drunks, you really should.
[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:
I am not a fan of violence (unless directed at men).
I do believe in self defense (unless directed at women).
I hope that anyone that truly feels their lives are threatened will defend themselves (unless defending against a woman).
If you can avoid OctoberGirl, you really should.
[/quote]
[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:
If you can avoid violent drunks, you really should.
[/quote]
Really, that should all but eliminate the issue for most. I think this thread will still continue though! ![]()
[quote]krazykoukides wrote:
[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:
I am not a fan of violence (unless directed at men).
I do believe in self defense (unless directed at women).
I hope that anyone that truly feels their lives are threatened will defend themselves (unless defending against a woman).
If you can avoid OctoberGirl, you really should.
[/quote]
[/quote]
this just shows what a total waste of skin you are. You are the load you mother should have swallowed.
[quote]krazykoukides wrote:
[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:
I am not a fan of violence (unless directed at men).
I do believe in self defense (unless directed at women).
I hope that anyone that truly feels their lives are threatened will defend themselves (unless defending against a woman).
If you can avoid OctoberGirl, you really should.
[/quote]
[/quote]
hahaha touche!
[quote]krazykoukides wrote:
[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:
I am not a fan of violence (unless directed at men).
I do believe in self defense (unless directed at women).
I hope that anyone that truly feels their lives are threatened will defend themselves (unless defending against a woman).
If you can avoid OctoberGirl, you really should.
[/quote]
[/quote]
silly pussy boy
I kinda think this changing up the answer things is stupid so no surprise you did it.
v
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
Yes, if you’re a little pussy of a man who can’t handle the fact that a woman “got one over on you”. [/quote]
So if a man “got one over on you”, would you be a pussy for hitting back?
[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:
[quote]krazykoukides wrote:
[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:
I am not a fan of violence (unless directed at men).
I do believe in self defense (unless directed at women).
I hope that anyone that truly feels their lives are threatened will defend themselves (unless defending against a woman).
If you can avoid OctoberGirl, you really should.
[/quote]
[/quote]
this just shows what a total waste of skin you are. You are the load you mother should have swallowed.
[/quote]
And you’re that gross, thick, chunky load that nobody would ever want to swallow. ![]()

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:
silly pussy boy
I kinda think this changing up the answer things is stupid so no surprise you did it.
[/quote]
.
lol @ OG and KK’s responses back and forth. That really escalated quickly
[quote]krazykoukides wrote:
[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:
[quote]krazykoukides wrote:
[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:
I am not a fan of violence (unless directed at men).
I do believe in self defense (unless directed at women).
I hope that anyone that truly feels their lives are threatened will defend themselves (unless defending against a woman).
If you can avoid OctoberGirl, you really should.
[/quote]
[/quote]
this just shows what a total waste of skin you are. You are the load you mother should have swallowed.
[/quote]
And you’re that gross, thick, chunky load that nobody would ever want to swallow. :)[/quote]
don’t you have a foreign virgin bride to marry so she can’t compare you to a real man?
I know… you want to stalk me through the threads but really, just makes you look silly and pathetic.
[quote]gregron wrote:
lol @ OG and KK’s responses back and forth. That really escalated quickly[/quote]
You’re telling me. I wasn’t expecting that, lol. I expected a reaction… but not of that sort.
[quote]gregron wrote:
lol @ OG and KK’s responses back and forth. That really escalated quickly[/quote]
OG brokes no shit…and editing other peoples posts is fucking lame.
The only time it’s ok to even THINK about hitting a woman is if they disagree with you, roll their eyes at something you say or refuse to make you a fresh sandwich after receiving a donkey punch.
Outside of that, hitting a woman is just uncalled for…
[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
I caught some of this “equality” stuff, and I refuse to read it all. I SIMPLY SUGGEST THAT ALL LIKE MINDED MALES INSTITUTE AN IMMEDIATE “EQUALITY” POLICY TOWARD WOMAN. AFTER ALL, THEY DESERVE IT.
IS SHE STRANDED ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD? KEEP DRIVING. SHE CAN HANDLE IT.
IS SHE BEING ATTACKED? DO THE DECENT THING AND CALL 911. SHE CAN HANDLE THE REST.
IS THERE SOMETHING HEAVY TO LIFT? LET HER LIFT IT. SHE’S EQUAL.
IS THERE SOMETHING THAT REQUIRES FIXING? LET HER FIX IT. SHE CAN DO IT.
CAN’T GET INTO THAT PARALLEL PARKING SPACE? LOL. LET HER TRY UNTIL SHE FIGURES IT OUT.
I could go on FOREVER. I say if they’re “equal”, let’s all act appropriately. The damn world is upside down over this damn equality crap. We now give trophies just for being on the team - you don’t even have to win anymore. We promote women and minorities regardless of performance, just for the sake of promoting women and minorities. We are NOT equal. We are all individuals with unique talents and frailties. There is a difference between being “equal” and being afforded “equal rights”. The latter has been corrupted beyond recognition.
Now, back to OP. Should we hit women? The answer obviously to most is highly situational. Fair enough. But let’s put on our “equality” goggles. No matter what the sex, I feel you should not use violence against any weaker individual, male or female, unless necessary to protect persons or property, and then, the force employed should only be enough to extinguish or thwart the threat, following a legal standard of continuum of force. That means if my crazy ass girlfriend (hypothetical) slaps me, it does not give me license to punch her in the face. If she raises up to strike me again, I can and should restrain her if escape is not a reasonable option. If she’s coming at you with a knife, she’s fair game for whatever means you must use to extinguish the threat. This isn’t rocket science.
Now in real life, in spite of what I wrote above (the equality shit pisses me off to no end b/c most of those waiving the equality flag want it both ways), I’m quite a chivalrous guy. I don’t care if it’s male or female however, if you commit violence without good cause, or commit more violence than necessary to defend, against a weaker person, you’re a god damn phucking punk and a POS coward that should have been aborted prior to birth. The world is a phucked up place b/c of people who would do harm to the weak, instead of looking out for those weaker than you - and everyone, everywhere, is strong or weak in one manner or another. [/quote]
Good post-I agree 100%. I assume you have worked as a bouncer before as well.