Domestic Violence Against Men

Off Topic
1

“A poll by equal rights charity Parity shows that more than 40 per cent of domestic violence victims are male.”

Now, I have read a few posts on these forums saying that men should never hit women - men should be strong enough to restrain women without resorting to violence.

But with such a large number of women insisting on equal rights, if a woman strikes out at you, are you justified in striking back? I’m sure most of us would if we were being beaten by another guy.

If a woman, in a drunken state or otherwise, starts aiming punches at my face, biting me, etc, am I classed as the scum of the earth for what is essentially self defence?

I don’t have any personal experience of this, it’s just that the 40% was higher than I was expecting.

2

You don’t have to break her jaw over it, but don’t let let her break yours either!

3

Why is 40% higher than you were expecting? Because you expected more men to be shamed into silence, or because you’ve been drinking the feminazi koolaid?

If a woman hits you, take it like a man, and don’t hit her back. “Justification” is irrellivant. Their will be consequnces for you regardless of the circumstances.

4

[quote]TigerTime wrote:
If she so much as looks at you, give her a tomb stone pile driver !

[/quote]

I fixed your post.

5

[quote]nocturnus wrote:
“A poll by equal rights charity Parity shows that more than 40 per cent of domestic violence victims are male.”

Now, I have read a few posts on these forums saying that men should never hit women - men should be strong enough to restrain women without resorting to violence.

But with such a large number of women insisting on equal rights, if a woman strikes out at you, are you justified in striking back? I’m sure most of us would if we were being beaten by another guy.

If a woman, in a drunken state or otherwise, starts aiming punches at my face, biting me, etc, am I classed as the scum of the earth for what is essentially self defence?

I don’t have any personal experience of this, it’s just that the 40% was higher than I was expecting.[/quote]
If a woman hit me seriously. I’d probably hit her back even if it didn’t hurt. I think if women want equal rights then they should deal with the consequences that brings.

I’ve sparred with some women and that kind of changes your perception on hitting women. I was also taught you should never hit a woman and blah blah blah. But women aren’t as soft and fragile as men think. Most probably are but there are some strong ones out there that can handle themselves.

A lot of women though think they can hit a man anytime they want because it doesn’t physically hurt them. They also laugh when they see men get physically abused by a woman and think men who get beat up by women are pussies (because they don’t hit back and subsequently get their asses kicked), but when a woman gets her ass kicked by a man it’s because he’s an abusive asshole. No one ever asks what provoked the attack and whether the man was defending himself or was hit first.

You’re only classified as scum by dumb women and white knight fags. Sure there are a ton of them but who cares what they think.

6

LOL

7

[quote]Broncoandy wrote:
Why is 40% higher than you were expecting? Because you expected more men to be shamed into silence, or because you’ve been drinking the feminazi koolaid?

If a woman hits you, take it like a man, and don’t hit her back. “Justification” is irrellivant. Their will be consequnces for you regardless of the circumstances.[/quote]

It’s just that society always seems to hear about the ‘big strong man beating on the poor, defenceless woman’ and not so much the other way round.

How many times is she allowed to hit me and how much damage am I allowed to take (like a man, obviously) before she needs to realise that there are consequences to her actions? After I have broken bones and she is (maybe) charged with assault? After she has picked something up and hit me over the head with it and I am lying on a cold slab in a morgue?

Just interested.

8

This is neither complicated nor complex. Just handle your business. Simple.

9

Every time I hear shit about women’s rights, I refer myself to this video. Even though we have completely different religious views, he’s a smart dude who knows what he’s talking about.

CS

10

[quote]CSEagles1694 wrote:

Every time I hear shit about women’s rights, I refer myself to this video. Even though we have completely different religious views, he’s a smart dude who knows what he’s talking about.

CS[/quote]
LOL but also disturbing

11

[quote]Grimlorn wrote:

[quote]nocturnus wrote:
“A poll by equal rights charity Parity shows that more than 40 per cent of domestic violence victims are male.”

Now, I have read a few posts on these forums saying that men should never hit women - men should be strong enough to restrain women without resorting to violence.

But with such a large number of women insisting on equal rights, if a woman strikes out at you, are you justified in striking back? I’m sure most of us would if we were being beaten by another guy.

If a woman, in a drunken state or otherwise, starts aiming punches at my face, biting me, etc, am I classed as the scum of the earth for what is essentially self defence?

I don’t have any personal experience of this, it’s just that the 40% was higher than I was expecting.[/quote]
If a woman hit me seriously. I’d probably hit her back even if it didn’t hurt. I think if women want equal rights then they should deal with the consequences that brings.

I’ve sparred with some women and that kind of changes your perception on hitting women. I was also taught you should never hit a woman and blah blah blah. But women aren’t as soft and fragile as men think. Most probably are but there are some strong ones out there that can handle themselves.

A lot of women though think they can hit a man anytime they want because it doesn’t physically hurt them. They also laugh when they see men get physically abused by a woman and think men who get beat up by women are pussies (because they don’t hit back and subsequently get their asses kicked), but when a woman gets her ass kicked by a man it’s because he’s an abusive asshole. No one ever asks what provoked the attack and whether the man was defending himself or was hit first.

You’re only classified as scum by dumb women and white knight fags. Sure there are a ton of them but who cares what they think.[/quote]

This. I’ve been hit so much more times by women than I have been by men and they have all been unprovoked or unnecessary violence. So many girls know that most men won’t hit back, so they think its alright to hit a man without receiving any repercussions. I think that if anyone has to resort to unnecessary violence, and they hit you, you have a right to hit them back. Any woman who hits people ceases to be a woman in my eyes, but a piece of scum, so I treat them as such.

12

Morally, if someone hits me with any real conviction, malice etc, then yeah, I reserve the right to hit her/him etc back.

Legally/socially, is this a good idea?..maybe not, then again, if someone totally flys off the handle at you & starts trying to do you damage, you gotta do what you gotta do!

13

I dont get the whole idea that women think they can hit men and not expect to be hit. If most men decided to hit them even once it would be game over for the woman.

I said this to one of my friends and she had no answer.

14

But really if you can restrain an average woman then you must by the law of the universe have a vagina.

15

Though of course if you walk away from the woman that’s best, as no one will call you a coward for not sticking around to fight a woman.

16

You’re a man with sensitive testes. Woman know that. Its only a matter of time before they place a knee to them and disable you.

Then what? You’re on the ground about to puke and she’s stepping all over you .

Fuck that. Take her out as soon as she swings at your face.

I will give a pass to drunk people in general though. They can barely walk lol just distance yourself from them.

17

I’ve yet to see a chick trying to fight a guy that looks like he can actually handle himself. It’s always Joe Average that looks like he just left a coffee shop, where he was working on his “screenplay”. Or it’s some dude that can’t even bring himself to hold his head up and look the bitch in the eye, much less raise a hand to protect himself.

People can sense weakness, and they will exploit it if they want to. Don’t be weak and you won’t be the victim.

18

Gender doesn?t matter. The situation and threat level do, which by and large, correlates with gender, but the decision to strike someone in defense isn’t directed by it. If you are in a situation where you reasonably fear for your own safety you have the right to defend yourself. If some 105 pound skinny fat person is threatening to fight you or even does hit you, you should be able to control the situation without really hurting anyone. Be that person male or female. If the person is a lean 220, defend yourself, again male or female.

That said, there aren’t a lot of 105 pound guys starting fights in bars and there aren’t a lot of 220 pound strong females. Most of the time, the weakling trying to pick a fight is a woman and the person who could be a serious threat is a male. Those situations should be handled differently, but not for the reason of gender.

19

[quote]CSEagles1694 wrote:

Every time I hear shit about women’s rights, I refer myself to this video. Even though we have completely different religious views, he’s a smart dude who knows what he’s talking about.

CS[/quote]

I absolutely loved that video 100 percent. Sums up the vast majority of my thoughts on the issue.

20

That’s the founder of the first women’s shelter in UK. She already reported that women were initiating violence quite often. Feminists terrorized her, including slaying her dog, so she left the country and moved to USA.

A few months ago I read a report of domestic violence in Estonia. It was very good because it included all data including the medical report on the agressions, so in example it would say how many women had reported being hurt from being punched, chocked, etc. Or how many men had been attacked with sharp objects.

What I gathered from this report is that women initiate violence at home much more often than people think, but they are still weaker physically in most cases. This means that if the woman initiates, punches the guy, but gets a slap retaliation, she’s most likely to have to visit a hospital than the guy.

Alcohol was also present in a very important % of those incidents. They were also more common at low class environments, but I remember one detail that was surprising about the class and economic level, but can’t remember. I’ll see if I find the report and post it here, because I think it had bits in English.