How Come We Never See Huge Zercher Lifts?

[quote]rrjc5488 wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]rrjc5488 wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]Hallowed wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
wtf happened here[/quote]

I dunno LOL.

I’m just here to get my curl on… [/quote]

See, I told you![/quote]

You’re lucky you were able to edit that real quick, I was gonna say “KID CAN’T EVEN QUOTE GOOD!”[/quote]

It was tha damned “bolding” that I was trying to do… Almost Effed it all up
[/quote]

Dude, IDK why you’re still dead set on curls. It’s obvious your right arm (the one that’s visible in your avatar) is your jerk off arm and your other arm is 13 inches around.

Stop acting like it was the curls that gave you that one big arm - it was the masturbation.[/quote]

Gregs hero

[quote]rrjc5488 wrote:

[quote]debraD wrote:

[quote]DoveofWar08 wrote:
In the end, exactly what happened to letting people train in thier own way and do thier own shit?? I mean, if you want to do zerchers, do zerchers. If not, then don’t. I guess live and let live just doesn’t exist on the internet.

[/quote]

On the other hand, the arguments make a lot of points that anyone reading can pick and choose what makes sense and who they think is credible and make a better decision on their value. Since we have a few different people with different goals duking it out, you can see how it aligns with your own.[/quote]

This, along with what maraudermeat is why I’ve made an assload of posts in this thread.

Like MM said, no one knows who’s reading this, and it’s no surprise that many people take prof X’s word as gospel on a lot of things - I mean, he’s obviously a big dude - he just doesn’t know what he’s talkin about in this thread.

If I wasn’t here ‘defending’ the zercher lift and wasn’t pointing out how ridiculous it is for him to even begin to think that his opinion even remotely supported by basic facts, then there’s potential that said possible readers to completely dismiss zerchers when in reality, there’s no reason to.

There’s a term used for when “I’m bigger/stronger” is used as ‘proof’ that they’re right on a matter… it’s called ‘bro-knowledge’ and it’s the most ridiculous type of "knowledge"on the intarwebzzz.

Also, I PMed “stormthebeach” earlier and asked him to give his opinion on zerchers in this thread (while avoiding all the bullshit, obviously.) As the dude has proven himself to be one of the strongest people on this site, I’m really curious as to what he thinks of them.

Hopefully he’ll give his two cents. :/[/quote]

It seems beyond you to understand that there were people in this thread discussing PHYSIQUE DEVELOPMENT and not powerlifting and that the conversation we had about the effectiveness for PHYSIQUE DEVELOPMENT got rained down on by powerlifters acting like the thread is off limits to any other discussion.

Do you even understand this?

No one gives a flying shit if you like zerchers or want to do them. Not ONCE in this thread has anything I’ve written been in the vein of POWERLIFTING…so what the fuck are you talking about?

If you wanted a thread where ONLY powerlifters discussed this lift, it should have been in that fucking forum.

You don’tn even seem to understand the basics of what is going on…but keep up the good fight.

Defending zerchers? From whom? Since when have zerchers been the go to exercise of any routine working on building the most size possible?

You’ve talked shit now for pages…and for what?

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]DoveofWar08 wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
The average person working on physique development is training biceps and back alone once or twice a week
[/quote]

[quote]Stronghold wrote:
Most of the powerlifters and strongmen that I know (we’re talking high level amateurs and pros here, and I know quite a few) train their biceps with heavy weights at least once per week.
[/quote]

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
The average person working on strength (and moreover, doing zerchers) is not training biceps once or twice a week. That ends your point, assuming you had one.
[/quote]

wait so which is it? Are strongmen & powerlifters training their biceps weekly or not?[/quote]

My guess is that you would need to ask them individually. For the most part, few people train in the exact same manner.[/quote]

yeah I agree that everyones training is different (obvi) but come on… who doesnt like to get their curl on every now and then? :)[/quote]

What I like is how PHYSIQUE DEVELOPMENT seems to not be noticed…as the others argue on and on.

I like how bodybuilding was mentioned to Loudog in my response to him ON THE FIRST FUCKING PAGE…but somehow this needed to be argued by powerlifters for pages as if that wasn’t written.

I like how several others have commented about how this wouild be less effective for bodybuilding…but not one of those people are being hounded like this for pages.

This is not a “powerlifting forum”. This is the fucking off topic forum. To act like the people have in this thread because of a tangent discussion about bodybuilding is fucking stupid.

Oh, and that was not the OP in the video.

It’s funny what you learn when you actually quote what was written…instead of making shit up like some do

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]rrjc5488 wrote:

[quote]debraD wrote:

[quote]DoveofWar08 wrote:
In the end, exactly what happened to letting people train in thier own way and do thier own shit?? I mean, if you want to do zerchers, do zerchers. If not, then don’t. I guess live and let live just doesn’t exist on the internet.

[/quote]

On the other hand, the arguments make a lot of points that anyone reading can pick and choose what makes sense and who they think is credible and make a better decision on their value. Since we have a few different people with different goals duking it out, you can see how it aligns with your own.[/quote]

This, along with what maraudermeat is why I’ve made an assload of posts in this thread.

Like MM said, no one knows who’s reading this, and it’s no surprise that many people take prof X’s word as gospel on a lot of things - I mean, he’s obviously a big dude - he just doesn’t know what he’s talkin about in this thread.

If I wasn’t here ‘defending’ the zercher lift and wasn’t pointing out how ridiculous it is for him to even begin to think that his opinion even remotely supported by basic facts, then there’s potential that said possible readers to completely dismiss zerchers when in reality, there’s no reason to.

There’s a term used for when “I’m bigger/stronger” is used as ‘proof’ that they’re right on a matter… it’s called ‘bro-knowledge’ and it’s the most ridiculous type of "knowledge"on the intarwebzzz.

Also, I PMed “stormthebeach” earlier and asked him to give his opinion on zerchers in this thread (while avoiding all the bullshit, obviously.) As the dude has proven himself to be one of the strongest people on this site, I’m really curious as to what he thinks of them.

Hopefully he’ll give his two cents. :/[/quote]

It seems beyond you to understand that there were people in this thread discussing PHYSIQUE DEVELOPMENT and not powerlifting and that the conversation we had about the effectiveness for PHYSIQUE DEVELOPMENT got rained down on by powerlifters acting like the thread is off limits to any other discussion.

Do you even understand this?

No one gives a flying shit if you like zerchers or want to do them. Not ONCE in this thread has anything I’ve written been in the vein of POWERLIFTING…so what the fuck are you talking about?

If you wanted a thread where ONLY powerlifters discussed this lift, it should have been in that fucking forum.

You don’tn even seem to understand the basics of what is going on…but keep up the good fight.

Defending zerchers? From whom? Since when have zerchers been the core of any routine working on building the most size possible?

You’ve talked shit now for pages…and for what? [/quote]

Yeah, and in your first couple of posts in this thread, you went ahead and threw out the ad hominem bullshit you always do. Now, let me go ahead and warn you, I’m going to quote exactly what you said earlier, so try to keep your head from exploding when you can’t go THAT’S NOT WHAT I SAID.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

I swear, it is like some people do shit just so no one calls them a bodybuilder. If the result of a 400lbs “zercher squat” is to look like the guy in that vid, I’ll really fucking pass.[/quote]

Your first statement has been repeatedly refuted, but as usual, you just ignore any rational arguments against your stance because you know you don’t know what you’re talking about and it’s easier for you to keep pulling things out of your ass than it is to not pontificate on things that you don’t understand.

Of course, you’ve written the book on what it means to be a bodybuilder (never competing is rule number 1!), so you’re the authority on what’s valid and what’s not. As previously mentioned in this thread, there are some rather large backs on this message board alone that have been built with the aid of zercher lifts, so your point that they don’t contribute towards impressive physical development is entirely moot.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

No, it is that if “400lbs” is the weight that someone like that can do, then 400lbs isn’t that fucking impressive.

Why would I do shit that leads to lesser progress in muscle growth?

It is a movement that serves little purpose unless specifically training for something with movements like that. So, again, why do people do shit that has such little return in terms of progress?

Oh, wait…that’s the function of most “functional” training…give people who don’t look like they lift seriously something to be proud of.
[/quote]

400 lbs is impressive BECAUSE someone that weight can do it. I’m sure you expect us to be more impressed with you in all of your 280 lb glory belting yourself into a hammer strength machine and pressing 400 lbs, right? Lifts are impressive only because of the physical appearance of the person performing them? I’ve seen some videos of Cutler doing 95 lb lunges, according to that logic, those are some of the most impressive lunges ever filmed! The OP specifically stated he was interested in strength gains, not bodybuilding. Yes, I do realize that this is posted in the off-topic section, but you’re still coming into a thread about waffles swinging full force about pancakes. You know you’re hijacking and you don’t care because you’ve got to put your $.02 in on everything.

And then, as usual, you fly off the handle with your normal rambling strawmen about functional training, a term NO ONE in this thread brought up before you started ranting about it.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

I know…and most of them fall into the category I talked about before…the type who never make much physical (or even much overall strength) progress but use something arbitrary like “function” to justify the time they spend on this.

To each his own…but I think most would agree that when it comes to getting shit done and actually accomplishing something that translates as significant progress to others (whether that be bodybuilding or powerlifting) those types are NOT the ones to pull it off.[/quote]

More senile rambling and implications that people who do this lift can’t be serious about either bodybuilding or powerlifting. Once again, pontification on things of which you have ZERO understanding.

Is your problem with the zercher lift or with the functional training skintubes? If you’ve got a problem with the zercher lift, then your arguments have already been addressed in this thread, get back on topic and respond to those. If your problem is with functional training wimps, then start a new fucking thread, because this thread is specifically about a lift that makes people brutally fucking strong in ways that you don’t understand because you’re so jacked you have to seatbelt yourself into leverage machines in order to prevent your body from falling apart from lifting weights.

[quote]solidkhalid wrote:
Atlas stones![/quote]

x10,000 yes. But, understanding not everyone has easy access to these orbs of awesomeness.

One another small point, but I could see ranting about “have you done the exercise” to newbs. I could understand saying that to someone who had not lived in a gym for 1 or 2 decades. What I don’t get is saying that to someone who actually understands their own body mechanics through several years of serious weight training. I seriously doubt anyone here who has been at this like a gym rat for over a decade would have trouble looking at a movement and making a very sure decision of whether the risk is worth the effort.

If that weren’t the case, you would literally have to try every movement on the planet to see what works best for you.

This COULD have been a decent discussion between bodybuiulders and powerlifters, seeing as this was in a forum used by all of us here. It COULD have been more informative…but it turned into the same bullshit most of these threads do.

[quote]Stronghold wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

I swear, it is like some people do shit just so no one calls them a bodybuilder. If the result of a 400lbs “zercher squat” is to look like the guy in that vid, I’ll really fucking pass.[/quote]

Your first statement has been repeatedly refuted, but as usual, you just ignore any rational arguments against your stance because you know you don’t know what you’re talking about and it’s easier for you to keep pulling things out of your ass than it is to not pontificate on things that you don’t understand.[/quote]

This is dumb. So you aren’t even reading posts before responding? Me writing NOW FOUR TIMES in this thread alone that the risk of tear is NOT from the zercher itself but the addition of extremely heavy direct biceps training has missed your eyes this many times?

WTF?

Are you serious?

Look, we get it. You just want to argue…against every fucking thing I write. But you look foolish here to anyone who can read what was written.

That was why the distinction between BODYBUILDING and POWERLIFTING needed to be made.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Stronghold wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

I swear, it is like some people do shit just so no one calls them a bodybuilder. If the result of a 400lbs “zercher squat” is to look like the guy in that vid, I’ll really fucking pass.[/quote]

Your first statement has been repeatedly refuted, but as usual, you just ignore any rational arguments against your stance because you know you don’t know what you’re talking about and it’s easier for you to keep pulling things out of your ass than it is to not pontificate on things that you don’t understand.[/quote]

This is dumb. So you aren’t even reading posts before responding? Me writing NOW FOUR TIMES in this thread alone that the risk of tear is NOT from the zercher itself but the addition of extremely heavy direct biceps training has missed your eyes this many times?

WTF?

Are you serious?

Look, we get it. You just want to argue…against every fucking thing I write. But you look foolish here to anyone who can read what was written.

That was why the distinction between BODYBUILDING and POWERLIFTING needed to be made.
[/quote]

That’s not what you said in your first couple of posts. You didn’t add anything about direct biceps training. You said:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

I swear, it is like some people do shit just so no one calls them a bodybuilder. If the result of a 400lbs “zercher squat” is to look like the guy in that vid, I’ll really fucking pass.[/quote]

That’s it. You modified your argument later after the backlash and the flame war YOU started.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Stronghold wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

I swear, it is like some people do shit just so no one calls them a bodybuilder. If the result of a 400lbs “zercher squat” is to look like the guy in that vid, I’ll really fucking pass.[/quote]

Your first statement has been repeatedly refuted, but as usual, you just ignore any rational arguments against your stance because you know you don’t know what you’re talking about and it’s easier for you to keep pulling things out of your ass than it is to not pontificate on things that you don’t understand.[/quote]

This is dumb. So you aren’t even reading posts before responding? Me writing NOW FOUR TIMES in this thread alone that the risk of tear is NOT from the zercher itself but the addition of extremely heavy direct biceps training has missed your eyes this many times?

WTF?

Are you serious?

Look, we get it. You just want to argue…against every fucking thing I write. But you look foolish here to anyone who can read what was written.

That was why the distinction between BODYBUILDING and POWERLIFTING needed to be made.
[/quote]

That’s not what you said in your first couple of posts. You didn’t add anything about direct biceps training. You said:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

I swear, it is like some people do shit just so no one calls them a bodybuilder. If the result of a 400lbs “zercher squat” is to look like the guy in that vid, I’ll really fucking pass.[/quote]

That’s it. You modified your argument later after the backlash and the flame war YOU started.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.[/quote]

Why would I need to give more of a response when me and the person I was speaking to understood each other?

You do realize me and Loudog aren’t strangers or enemies?

[quote]Professor X wrote:
That was why the distinction between BODYBUILDING and POWERLIFTING needed to be made.
[/quote]

No distinction needed to be made until you threw in your dumb comments in the beginning. Here is the original post:

[quote]xjusticex2013x wrote:
I’ve noticed that heavy zercher lifts are quite a rarity. Why is that? I know about the forearms thing, but it really isn’t that bad. And sure, an odd lift like that doesn’t exactly cross everyone’s mind, but I’m sure that some strong dudes to do 500+. BTW, zercher lifts are from the floor, and zercher squats are from a rack (at least how I see it).
[/quote]

Did he ask anything about getting huge gunz or its application to bodybuilding?

Well did he?

No?

Well then why does anything about bodybuilding need to be thrown in there? Why did you feel the need to insult the physique of the guy in the video?

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Stronghold wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

I swear, it is like some people do shit just so no one calls them a bodybuilder. If the result of a 400lbs “zercher squat” is to look like the guy in that vid, I’ll really fucking pass.[/quote]

Your first statement has been repeatedly refuted, but as usual, you just ignore any rational arguments against your stance because you know you don’t know what you’re talking about and it’s easier for you to keep pulling things out of your ass than it is to not pontificate on things that you don’t understand.[/quote]

This is dumb. So you aren’t even reading posts before responding? Me writing NOW FOUR TIMES in this thread alone that the risk of tear is NOT from the zercher itself but the addition of extremely heavy direct biceps training has missed your eyes this many times?

WTF?

Are you serious?

Look, we get it. You just want to argue…against every fucking thing I write. But you look foolish here to anyone who can read what was written.

That was why the distinction between BODYBUILDING and POWERLIFTING needed to be made.
[/quote]

That’s not what you said in your first couple of posts. You didn’t add anything about direct biceps training. You said:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

I swear, it is like some people do shit just so no one calls them a bodybuilder. If the result of a 400lbs “zercher squat” is to look like the guy in that vid, I’ll really fucking pass.[/quote]

That’s it. You modified your argument later after the backlash and the flame war YOU started.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.[/quote]

Why would I need to give more of a response when me and the person I was speaking to understood each other?

You do realize me and Loudog aren’t strangers or enemies?[/quote]

Because it was an ignorant comment to make. The exercise is NOT a biceps tear waiting to happen, as so many others who actually do the exercise have already pointed out.

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
That was why the distinction between BODYBUILDING and POWERLIFTING needed to be made.
[/quote]

No distinction needed to be made until you threw in your dumb comments in the beginning. Here is the original post:

[quote]xjusticex2013x wrote:
I’ve noticed that heavy zercher lifts are quite a rarity. Why is that? I know about the forearms thing, but it really isn’t that bad. And sure, an odd lift like that doesn’t exactly cross everyone’s mind, but I’m sure that some strong dudes to do 500+. BTW, zercher lifts are from the floor, and zercher squats are from a rack (at least how I see it).
[/quote]

Did he ask anything about getting huge gunz or its application to bodybuilding?

Well did he?

No?

Well then why does anything about bodybuilding need to be thrown in there? Why did you feel the need to insult the physique of the guy in the video?[/quote]

How old are you?

I was speaking to LOUDOG, not the OP, not YOU, not power;lifters in general.

There was no reason to clarify a post to someone who knew exactly what I meant. I didn’t have to clarify it until all of you did the usual “Prof X Hunt”…which at this point is just making you all look repetitive and unoriginal.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
It COULD have been more informative…but it turned into the same bullshit most of these threads do.

[/quote]

And that happened when you came in and started your usual bullshit. But I know - it’s NEVER you, it’s ALWAYS everyone else.

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Stronghold wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

I swear, it is like some people do shit just so no one calls them a bodybuilder. If the result of a 400lbs “zercher squat” is to look like the guy in that vid, I’ll really fucking pass.[/quote]

Your first statement has been repeatedly refuted, but as usual, you just ignore any rational arguments against your stance because you know you don’t know what you’re talking about and it’s easier for you to keep pulling things out of your ass than it is to not pontificate on things that you don’t understand.[/quote]

This is dumb. So you aren’t even reading posts before responding? Me writing NOW FOUR TIMES in this thread alone that the risk of tear is NOT from the zercher itself but the addition of extremely heavy direct biceps training has missed your eyes this many times?

WTF?

Are you serious?

Look, we get it. You just want to argue…against every fucking thing I write. But you look foolish here to anyone who can read what was written.

That was why the distinction between BODYBUILDING and POWERLIFTING needed to be made.
[/quote]

That’s not what you said in your first couple of posts. You didn’t add anything about direct biceps training. You said:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

I swear, it is like some people do shit just so no one calls them a bodybuilder. If the result of a 400lbs “zercher squat” is to look like the guy in that vid, I’ll really fucking pass.[/quote]

That’s it. You modified your argument later after the backlash and the flame war YOU started.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.[/quote]

Why would I need to give more of a response when me and the person I was speaking to understood each other?

You do realize me and Loudog aren’t strangers or enemies?[/quote]

Because it was an ignorant comment to make. The exercise is NOT a biceps tear waiting to happen, as so many others who actually do the exercise have already pointed out. [/quote]

Really? So doing curls with a very high weight in addition creates no added risk at all?

Several people in this thread have written they disagree with that.

Why so butthurt only over me?

[quote]Professor X wrote:
But you look foolish here to anyone who can read what was written.

[/quote]

No he doesn’t. Only to you and your cadre of nutswingers. : )

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
That was why the distinction between BODYBUILDING and POWERLIFTING needed to be made.
[/quote]

No distinction needed to be made until you threw in your dumb comments in the beginning. Here is the original post:

[quote]xjusticex2013x wrote:
I’ve noticed that heavy zercher lifts are quite a rarity. Why is that? I know about the forearms thing, but it really isn’t that bad. And sure, an odd lift like that doesn’t exactly cross everyone’s mind, but I’m sure that some strong dudes to do 500+. BTW, zercher lifts are from the floor, and zercher squats are from a rack (at least how I see it).
[/quote]

Did he ask anything about getting huge gunz or its application to bodybuilding?

Well did he?

No?

Well then why does anything about bodybuilding need to be thrown in there? Why did you feel the need to insult the physique of the guy in the video?[/quote]

How old are you?

I was speaking to LOUDOG, not the OP, not YOU, not power;lifters in general.

There was no reason to clarify a post to someone who knew exactly what I meant. I didn’t have to clarify it until all of you did the usual “Prof X Hunt”…which at this point is just making you all look repetitive and unoriginal.[/quote]

I’m old enough to know when someone is full of shit.

“It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.”

Is that statement true of false?

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Stronghold wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.

I swear, it is like some people do shit just so no one calls them a bodybuilder. If the result of a 400lbs “zercher squat” is to look like the guy in that vid, I’ll really fucking pass.[/quote]

Your first statement has been repeatedly refuted, but as usual, you just ignore any rational arguments against your stance because you know you don’t know what you’re talking about and it’s easier for you to keep pulling things out of your ass than it is to not pontificate on things that you don’t understand.[/quote]

This is dumb. So you aren’t even reading posts before responding? Me writing NOW FOUR TIMES in this thread alone that the risk of tear is NOT from the zercher itself but the addition of extremely heavy direct biceps training has missed your eyes this many times?

WTF?

Are you serious?

Look, we get it. You just want to argue…against every fucking thing I write. But you look foolish here to anyone who can read what was written.

That was why the distinction between BODYBUILDING and POWERLIFTING needed to be made.
[/quote]

Did you ignore the FOUR times that argument was refuted by people who have:

  1. educational experience in biomechsnics
  2. experience doing the lift in question
  3. adequate weight training experience

You meet 1.5 of those qualifications.

No one is arguing with you because you don’t do zerchers. No one cares that you don’t do them. People are arguing with you because you keep saying that zerchers are entirely useless for bodybuilding and thst snyone who does them can’t possibly be interested in being big and strong and must obviously be a functional fitness fag.

Are you even aware of what you’re posting or are you just moving the goalposts because you have to be right about SOMETHING?

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
That was why the distinction between BODYBUILDING and POWERLIFTING needed to be made.
[/quote]

No distinction needed to be made until you threw in your dumb comments in the beginning. Here is the original post:

[quote]xjusticex2013x wrote:
I’ve noticed that heavy zercher lifts are quite a rarity. Why is that? I know about the forearms thing, but it really isn’t that bad. And sure, an odd lift like that doesn’t exactly cross everyone’s mind, but I’m sure that some strong dudes to do 500+. BTW, zercher lifts are from the floor, and zercher squats are from a rack (at least how I see it).
[/quote]

Did he ask anything about getting huge gunz or its application to bodybuilding?

Well did he?

No?

Well then why does anything about bodybuilding need to be thrown in there? Why did you feel the need to insult the physique of the guy in the video?[/quote]

How old are you?

I was speaking to LOUDOG, not the OP, not YOU, not power;lifters in general.

There was no reason to clarify a post to someone who knew exactly what I meant. I didn’t have to clarify it until all of you did the usual “Prof X Hunt”…which at this point is just making you all look repetitive and unoriginal.[/quote]

I’m old enough to know when someone is full of shit.

“It’s a biceps tear waiting to happen.”

Is that statement true of false?[/quote]

It is true, TO A FUCKING ADVANCED BODYBUILDER, who is training their biceps just as hard as someone training their deadlift with way higher volume who is already at risk of a tear.

I would say the same about doing low behind the neck shoulder presses. They lead to major risk of shoulder injury…which is why the advice in bodybuilding is usually to not go below the ears if you do them at all.

Do you get it now?

This was not just a discussion about powerlifting. It was in an off topic forum and if this is the fucking response to me making a comment to someone I consider a friend here, you all need to check yourselves.

[quote]SkyNett wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
It COULD have been more informative…but it turned into the same bullshit most of these threads do.

[/quote]

And that happened when you came in and started your usual bullshit. But I know - it’s NEVER you, it’s ALWAYS everyone else. [/quote]

My “bullshit” was making a comment to someone else?

OK. So, could you all print out a list of things I am ALLOWED to say here?

Thanks.