Giving Up on Women

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

That normally does not lead me to believe he is a pushover put the pussy on a pedestal type person. [/quote]

Oh, that could very well be, because I was the exact same way.

If they can make you ego invest into pussy pedestalizing from a very early age onwards, your own strength works against you.

Also, from what I have read here, http://dalrock.wordpress.com/ , the cult of churchianity grows at an alarming rate and via the use of feminist her-meneutics they reinterpret the bible as a proto feminist text.

Maybe he was brainwashed early on to believe in heresies?

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]Nman wrote:
This is a really sad discussion. I don’t usually respond because I don’t spend a lot of times on forums, i usually read the articles and get back to work but this thread name caught my attention and I wanted to see what it was about. I didn’t read it all but I feel like I read enough and I feel like I should give my two cents. A few things, I was a virgin until I got married and was glad. I’m a religious person and was taught about sexual purity and know that it’s a true doctrine. I have two little girls and I’m scared to death of them finding guys like you. Guys that don’t care about who my daughters are, guys that think my daughters are just a good time and have no respect for them. It’s sad! It’s no wonder that the Family in the US is breaking down and the consequences of that are the real problems behind the issues in our country. Men aren’t men anymore. Sure everyone on this site lifts and talks big but how many would give up everything for their wife? How many men selflessly put their wives needs/wants in front of their own? How many men are fully committed to their wives/marriages? Look at the divorce stats and you’ll see not many. Being a man to me means being fully committed to your wife, to your kids and to marriage. There are reasons for a divorce (not saying there isn’t) but the current trend is disturbing and shows that men and women aren’t as dedicated to each other as they could/should be. Whenever I have issues in my marriage the best solution is to turn away from my wants and my needs and to put my wife’s wants/needs above my own. Women are unique and special and need to be treated as such! [/quote]
Post more or read more, you may find you are not alone on these boards.[/quote]

Yeah,yeah, yeah, yeah.

“Women are unique and special”- All of them, nice trick if you can pull it off, he is snowflaking for them, mwua…

“Men are not comitted”- Unfortunately we will never know, because they file the overwhelming majority of divorces.

“How many men selflessly put their wives needs/wants in front of their own? …Whenever I have issues in my marriage the best solution is to turn away from my wants and my needs and to put my wife’s wants/needs above my own”

Whats in it for me?

Or has the definition of “real man” been changed to freaking idiot?

[/quote]
Lol, you still cant get it can you?

If you never sacrifice yourself for someone no one is going to reciprocate, period, end of story, yes that takes risk. Some of us choose well and keep it going.

[/quote]

Lol, you did not read what he wrote did you?

If he always gives in, there is no reciprocating.

There cannot be.

It is logically impossible.[/quote]

Can we please see a pic of the chick who emotionally maimed you please? I mean she better have been a dime for you to have invested that much of yourself for her to break.

[quote]Derek542 wrote:
If you never sacrifice yourself for someone no one is going to reciprocate, period, end of story, yes that takes risk. Some of us choose well and keep it going.
[/quote]
Haven’t you had a bad experience as well though?

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]Nman wrote:
This is a really sad discussion. I don’t usually respond because I don’t spend a lot of times on forums, i usually read the articles and get back to work but this thread name caught my attention and I wanted to see what it was about. I didn’t read it all but I feel like I read enough and I feel like I should give my two cents. A few things, I was a virgin until I got married and was glad. I’m a religious person and was taught about sexual purity and know that it’s a true doctrine. I have two little girls and I’m scared to death of them finding guys like you. Guys that don’t care about who my daughters are, guys that think my daughters are just a good time and have no respect for them. It’s sad! It’s no wonder that the Family in the US is breaking down and the consequences of that are the real problems behind the issues in our country. Men aren’t men anymore. Sure everyone on this site lifts and talks big but how many would give up everything for their wife? How many men selflessly put their wives needs/wants in front of their own? How many men are fully committed to their wives/marriages? Look at the divorce stats and you’ll see not many. Being a man to me means being fully committed to your wife, to your kids and to marriage. There are reasons for a divorce (not saying there isn’t) but the current trend is disturbing and shows that men and women aren’t as dedicated to each other as they could/should be. Whenever I have issues in my marriage the best solution is to turn away from my wants and my needs and to put my wife’s wants/needs above my own. Women are unique and special and need to be treated as such! [/quote]
Post more or read more, you may find you are not alone on these boards.[/quote]

Yeah,yeah, yeah, yeah.

“Women are unique and special”- All of them, nice trick if you can pull it off, he is snowflaking for them, mwua…

“Men are not comitted”- Unfortunately we will never know, because they file the overwhelming majority of divorces.

“How many men selflessly put their wives needs/wants in front of their own? …Whenever I have issues in my marriage the best solution is to turn away from my wants and my needs and to put my wife’s wants/needs above my own”

Whats in it for me?

Or has the definition of “real man” been changed to freaking idiot?

[/quote]
Lol, you still cant get it can you?

If you never sacrifice yourself for someone no one is going to reciprocate, period, end of story, yes that takes risk. Some of us choose well and keep it going.

[/quote]

Lol, you did not read what he wrote did you?

If he always gives in, there is no reciprocating.

There cannot be.

It is logically impossible.[/quote]

Again I read more into things from my perspective, just like you do.

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:
If you never sacrifice yourself for someone no one is going to reciprocate, period, end of story, yes that takes risk. Some of us choose well and keep it going.
[/quote]
Haven’t you had a bad experience as well though?[/quote]

Bad experiences dont mean you shelter yourself or avoid ever trying again because of fear avoidance.

If every great man and entrepreneur took the same stance on failure with their quest or business as a woman scorn man does for love this world would be fucked.

Orion- What would I have to do to get you to change your avatar to the No Ma’am logo? I am open for negotiation here.

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Nman wrote:
Whenever I have issues in my marriage the best solution is to turn away from my wants and my needs and to put my wife’s wants/needs above my own. Women are unique and special and need to be treated as such! [/quote]

[/quote]
Have we not discussed this ad nauseum?

I will say again that BOTH partners in a relationship of success do what he just posted.

Dude you do realize there are successful relationships in the world, happy healthy relationships? [/quote]

So I hear.

But thats not what he wrote.

He advocates supplication and he snowflakes.

[/quote]
Maybe, but he has posted 12 times in how long?

I may have read into it more than you. Looking at his avi 1. he lifts 2. he is a father 3. he is strong in his convictions

That normally does not lead me to believe he is a pushover put the pussy on a pedestal type person. [/quote]

Seems kind of a stupid argument, this.

In a successful relationship, BOTH partners have to do that.

If only one partner does that, male or female, it’s not a successful relationship. Granted, many women these days have a sense of entitlement and don’t feel they should do their part. We can debate all day why, but in the end if both partners don’t do their part, it doesn’t work.

If the guy is doing his part, and she isn’t, he needs to move on (before she does), or find a way to get her to do her part. And counterintuitively, “doing more for her” often just makes it worse, so different strategies are required.

But in this case, in his marriage, if his wife is the same way toward him as he is toward her, I’m very happy for him.

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:
If you never sacrifice yourself for someone no one is going to reciprocate, period, end of story, yes that takes risk. Some of us choose well and keep it going.
[/quote]
Haven’t you had a bad experience as well though?[/quote]
Yes sir, as bad as you can get.

I had two children with my high school sweet heart, caught her fucking half the Navy, stayed to long for the childrens sake.

But going from one extreme to the other is not healthy, balance in all things in life is what should be worked for.

[quote]LoRez wrote:
In a successful relationship, BOTH partners have to do that.

If only one partner does that, male or female, it’s not a successful relationship. Granted, many women these days have a sense of entitlement and don’t feel they should do their part. We can debate all day why, but in the end if both partners don’t do their part, it doesn’t work.

If the guy is doing his part, and she isn’t, he needs to move on (before she does), or find a way to get her to do her part. And counterintuitively, “doing more for her” often just makes it worse, so different strategies are required.

But in this case, in his marriage, if his wife is the same way toward him as he is toward her, I’m very happy for him.[/quote]
x2

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Nman wrote:
Whenever I have issues in my marriage the best solution is to turn away from my wants and my needs and to put my wife’s wants/needs above my own. Women are unique and special and need to be treated as such! [/quote]

[/quote]
Have we not discussed this ad nauseum?

I will say again that BOTH partners in a relationship of success do what he just posted.

Dude you do realize there are successful relationships in the world, happy healthy relationships? [/quote]

So I hear.

But thats not what he wrote.

He advocates supplication and he snowflakes.

[/quote]
Maybe, but he has posted 12 times in how long?

I may have read into it more than you. Looking at his avi 1. he lifts 2. he is a father 3. he is strong in his convictions

That normally does not lead me to believe he is a pushover put the pussy on a pedestal type person. [/quote]

Seems kind of a stupid argument, this.

In a successful relationship, BOTH partners have to do that.

If only one partner does that, male or female, it’s not a successful relationship. Granted, many women these days have a sense of entitlement and don’t feel they should do their part. We can debate all day why, but in the end if both partners don’t do their part, it doesn’t work.

If the guy is doing his part, and she isn’t, he needs to move on (before she does), or find a way to get her to do her part. And counterintuitively, “doing more for her” often just makes it worse, so different strategies are required.

But in this case, in his marriage, if his wife is the same way toward him as he is toward her, I’m very happy for him.[/quote]
That was my point, was that I read this as his wife had the same views as he did.

This is not enabling co-dependent relationship that I am viewing from this guy.

Again I may be wrong, however my belief in a successful marriage is that if both parties have this belief it creates balance and understanding for success.

Push, just saw this last night, when I was looking back over the thread to find the second post our virginal 26-year-old Prophet of Pathos was referring to. Don’t want you to think I have been ignoring you all this time, though. I’m considerate like that.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

However, you did implicitly throw a bone to one of the dogs. You, me, and both our dogs and their offspring know it.

Besides, it was more a good-natured ribbing than anything else.
[/quote]

I concur, and accept the ribbing in the spirit it was intended. I had actually written “people who reject the fact of evolution” but I thought it would be too obvious of a red flag. But the whole creation versus evolution thing has been done, and I’ve moved on. Evolved, you might say.

My position today is that a God clever enough and powerful enough to create a universe by speaking it into existence is also clever enough and powerful enough to author a set of principles by which life can originate from non living chemical compounds, and differentiate over time. You keep insisting that I believe this process is governed by random chance, I insist that it is not, but rather follows a very definite set of rules. You will say that God wrote these rules, and I will not disagree. So what are we arguing about?

Not sure what to make of this statement. Clarify, if you will.

Precisely my point. I love finding common ground with people who disagree with, and with people with whom I disagree. A far better man than I once said, “blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall find peace.” A little peace is good to find.

It is a consolation. And you can find it far cheaper than that. Used copies can be had on Amazon for a penny plus 3.99 shipping. They might be banged up a bit but for four bucks who cares.

Here is a review I wrote for it back in 1999.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/review/0671252046/R3JYHZO5PKZYXC?cursor=1&sort=rd

[quote]Waittz wrote:
So i havent clicked in this thread since maybe 12 pages ago. What are we still talking about? Can I get a quick summary of the current discussion pa pa pa please? [/quote]

Kissing a girl.

But now it’s mostly about hair.

Quite a few people can respect keeping sex in a marriage or committed relationship.

Other people think the OP is trying to join a fraternity for the celibate and they’d like to let him know he can skip rush week, cause he’s sooo IN.

Other people are cynical about women. They also seem to be trying to recruit the OP to join their frat.

I hope that helps.

[quote]Powerpuff wrote:

[quote]Waittz wrote:
So i havent clicked in this thread since maybe 12 pages ago. What are we still talking about? Can I get a quick summary of the current discussion pa pa pa please? [/quote]

Kissing a girl.

But now it’s mostly about hair.

Quite a few people can respect keeping sex in a marriage or committed relationship.

Other people think the OP is trying to join a fraternity for the celibate and they’d like to let him know he can skip rush week, cause he’s sooo IN.

Other people are cynical about women. They also seem to be trying to recruit the OP to join their frat.

I hope that helps. [/quote]

Short hair on a woman is no bueno.

[quote]Nman wrote:
This is a really sad discussion. I don’t usually respond because I don’t spend a lot of times on forums, i usually read the articles and get back to work but this thread name caught my attention and I wanted to see what it was about. I didn’t read it all but I feel like I read enough and I feel like I should give my two cents. A few things, I was a virgin until I got married and was glad. I’m a religious person and was taught about sexual purity and know that it’s a true doctrine. I have two little girls and I’m scared to death of them finding guys like you. Guys that don’t care about who my daughters are, guys that think my daughters are just a good time and have no respect for them. It’s sad! It’s no wonder that the Family in the US is breaking down and the consequences of that are the real problems behind the issues in our country. Men aren’t men anymore. Sure everyone on this site lifts and talks big but how many would give up everything for their wife? How many men selflessly put their wives needs/wants in front of their own? How many men are fully committed to their wives/marriages? Look at the divorce stats and you’ll see not many. Being a man to me means being fully committed to your wife, to your kids and to marriage. There are reasons for a divorce (not saying there isn’t) but the current trend is disturbing and shows that men and women aren’t as dedicated to each other as they could/should be. Whenever I have issues in my marriage the best solution is to turn away from my wants and my needs and to put my wife’s wants/needs above my own. Women are unique and special and need to be treated as such! [/quote]

You are a Mormon, yes? You probably live in a community of like-minded individuals. An “oasis of faith” if you will. Your wife was raised similarly to you, right? If this is the case, then congratulations, my friend. Your faith and your church are a CENTRAL part of your life, your paradigm and your existence. That is the ONLY way that your belief system will work. If you took that structure away, it would all come crashing down like a house of cards.

Look at Victorian society, or the society of many Muslim countries: the whole SYSTEM is designed to keep a woman’s baser instincts and emotions in check. The punishment for adultery ranged from social ostracism to death by stoning. The risk was not worth the reward. A woman’s instinct to SURVIVE trumped her instinct to fuck the pool boy.

But now in today’s society that “structure” is gone. What is the consequence of adultery? In the world of no-fault divorce, it means a woman can take half of your shit… And get a hefty alimony settlement on top of it! There is NO check and balance. In fact, we have the opposite: a shallow culture of, “You GO girl!” fueled by tabloids and reality television that actually PROMOTES indiscretion, “real cheating housewives”, and an attitude of unabashed ENTITLEMENT. Tiger Woods’ ex wife got 100 MILLION DOLLARS <<>> and she never touched a golf club except to physically ASSAULT him with it! (an act for which she was never charged). She was a fucking BABYSITTER, but I digress.

That’s the world that the REST of us live in. In that world, if you put a woman’s needs selflessly in front of your own, she will take it, take your shit, and expect a check for the rest of her life and for what? For spending a few minutes on her back a few times a month when she felt you “deserved” or had “earned” some pussy?

The relationship that you describe can ONLY be achieved when a woman is invested in the concept that a man is the head of the household and when she trusts him to lead his family through the treacherous minefield of life in the modern world. By treacherous, I mean filled with opportunity to “slip” on the banana peel of opportunistic infidelity. If you look at times in history when marriage actually worked, you will find a patriarchal society. Because that’s what it takes to work.

You simply CANNOT have a society where every hedonistic whim is glorified for all to see, coveted by most and open for experimentation to all and reasonably expect a greater majority of people (men and women) to NOT want a taste of that forbidden fruit. That is the society the REST of us live in…

Our society systematically castrates men financially, legally and by default emotionally. This leads to men who have never known what it’s like to lead, or even PRETEND to act like a man. They live in a masturbatory world of irresponsibility coupled with immediate gratification. It’s no wonder most women wouldn’t trust them deep down to lead - they don’t deserve that trust. And without that trust, a woman’s fancy is fleeting. Her attraction and attention will bounce around like a rubber ball from one bright shiny thing to another. In her thirties when her youth fades and she figures out that she WON’T be the next CEO of Yahoo (despite what the MEDIA had TOLD her: that it was her birth right, that she was all-powerful, and that her pussy made the world go round) she will bitterly settle down with a beta provider, cut her hair short and squeeze out a couple of kids who she will then smother with all the self esteem bullshit required by the PC police and make sure they get their trophy for setting foot on the field as she trucks them back and forth from soccer practice. She will perpetuate the progressive cycle. Her husband, of course, will “respect her” and agree with her because of two things: he doesn’t know any better because the MEDIA has brainwashed him into thinking that he, like all men these days, is supposed to sit on the couch with our hands down our pants like Al Bundy letting the world make our decisions for us; AND the fact that it is “cheaper to keep her”. He doesn’t want to rock the boat because he knows that she will take HALF of his shit ANY TIME SHE WANT’S TO. So it’s best to stay on her good side.

That’s not a marriage, that’s a prison. And THAT’s the world that the rest of us live in. If you worry about your daughters, keep them close and don’t let them leave the “oasis” of faith and structure that the Mormon church gives you. Because if you do, they WILL take a bite of the apple.

I am NOT a religious person. I don’t believe in fairy tales, Santa Clause, the Easter Bunny or some imaginary man in the sky who loves me unconditionally, but hates homosexuals and shrimp. But I respect YOUR right to believe whatever you like. And you know what? There’s a part of me that ENVIES your faith and the fact that you have a community that is structured to preserve the nuclear family above all else. But I’m sure you will concede that YOU and YOUR COMMUNITY are the exception and not the rule, yes? That being the case, how can you logically think that selflessly putting a woman’s wants, needs and whims above our own will realistically “work” for the rest of us when we don’t have a society in place to provide the necessary negative feedback loop to keep a woman’s “curiosity” in check?

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:
If you never sacrifice yourself for someone no one is going to reciprocate, period, end of story, yes that takes risk. Some of us choose well and keep it going.
[/quote]
Haven’t you had a bad experience as well though?[/quote]
Yes sir, as bad as you can get.

I had two children with my high school sweet heart, caught her fucking half the Navy, stayed to long for the childrens sake.

But going from one extreme to the other is not healthy, balance in all things in life is what should be worked for.
[/quote]

With your first wife, you were a good guy, right? You served your country, provided for your family and did what you were SUPPOSED to do, right? And what did you get in return? Let me hazard a guess here: Your first wife was a white, liberal who bought into all the “empower woman” shit.

Now I have the opportunity of interacting with you outside of these forums and have had the privileged to “meet” your current wife and I can say with NO doubt she is an amazing woman. But she is also not your “typical American white girl”, correct? She’s a strong, smokin’ hawt Latina who was raised with family values and knows how to take care of her man. She’s no pushover, believe me (in fact, she’s the opposite), but at the end of the day, YOU are head of your household, right? She trusts you because YOU are an exceptional MAN. Women like your wife are NOT common, Derek. You KNOW that… Just like MEN your your character are not common.

You lucky bastard! :slight_smile:

Very good post AC…

I just didn’t get the ‘shrimp’ part? Since when did the big guy start hating on shrimp? Another thing him and I just can’t agree on.

[quote]Powerpuff wrote:

[quote]Waittz wrote:
So i havent clicked in this thread since maybe 12 pages ago. What are we still talking about? Can I get a quick summary of the current discussion pa pa pa please? [/quote]

Kissing a girl.

But now it’s mostly about hair.

Quite a few people can respect keeping sex in a marriage or committed relationship.

Other people think the OP is trying to join a fraternity for the celibate and they’d like to let him know he can skip rush week, cause he’s sooo IN.

Other people are cynical about women. They also seem to be trying to recruit the OP to join their frat.

I hope that helps. [/quote]

Thanks for the update. Can’t sleep so I’m pulling out the popcorn. Some of y’all need to lighten up.

[quote]angry chicken wrote:

[quote]Nman wrote:
This is a really sad discussion. I don’t usually respond because I don’t spend a lot of times on forums, i usually read the articles and get back to work but this thread name caught my attention and I wanted to see what it was about. I didn’t read it all but I feel like I read enough and I feel like I should give my two cents. A few things, I was a virgin until I got married and was glad. I’m a religious person and was taught about sexual purity and know that it’s a true doctrine. I have two little girls and I’m scared to death of them finding guys like you. Guys that don’t care about who my daughters are, guys that think my daughters are just a good time and have no respect for them. It’s sad! It’s no wonder that the Family in the US is breaking down and the consequences of that are the real problems behind the issues in our country. Men aren’t men anymore. Sure everyone on this site lifts and talks big but how many would give up everything for their wife? How many men selflessly put their wives needs/wants in front of their own? How many men are fully committed to their wives/marriages? Look at the divorce stats and you’ll see not many. Being a man to me means being fully committed to your wife, to your kids and to marriage. There are reasons for a divorce (not saying there isn’t) but the current trend is disturbing and shows that men and women aren’t as dedicated to each other as they could/should be. Whenever I have issues in my marriage the best solution is to turn away from my wants and my needs and to put my wife’s wants/needs above my own. Women are unique and special and need to be treated as such! [/quote]

You are a Mormon, yes? You probably live in a community of like-minded individuals. An “oasis of faith” if you will. Your wife was raised similarly to you, right? If this is the case, then congratulations, my friend. Your faith and your church are a CENTRAL part of your life, your paradigm and your existence. That is the ONLY way that your belief system will work. If you took that structure away, it would all come crashing down like a house of cards.

Look at Victorian society, or the society of many Muslim countries: the whole SYSTEM is designed to keep a woman’s baser instincts and emotions in check. The punishment for adultery ranged from social ostracism to death by stoning. The risk was not worth the reward. A woman’s instinct to SURVIVE trumped her instinct to fuck the pool boy.

But now in today’s society that “structure” is gone. What is the consequence of adultery? In the world of no-fault divorce, it means a woman can take half of your shit… And get a hefty alimony settlement on top of it! There is NO check and balance. In fact, we have the opposite: a shallow culture of, “You GO girl!” fueled by tabloids and reality television that actually PROMOTES indiscretion, “real cheating housewives”, and an attitude of unabashed ENTITLEMENT. Tiger Woods’ ex wife got 100 MILLION DOLLARS <<>> and she never touched a golf club except to physically ASSAULT him with it! (an act for which she was never charged). She was a fucking BABYSITTER, but I digress.

That’s the world that the REST of us live in. In that world, if you put a woman’s needs selflessly in front of your own, she will take it, take your shit, and expect a check for the rest of her life and for what? For spending a few minutes on her back a few times a month when she felt you “deserved” or had “earned” some pussy?

The relationship that you describe can ONLY be achieved when a woman is invested in the concept that a man is the head of the household and when she trusts him to lead his family through the treacherous minefield of life in the modern world. By treacherous, I mean filled with opportunity to “slip” on the banana peel of opportunistic infidelity. If you look at times in history when marriage actually worked, you will find a patriarchal society. Because that’s what it takes to work.

You simply CANNOT have a society where every hedonistic whim is glorified for all to see, coveted by most and open for experimentation to all and reasonably expect a greater majority of people (men and women) to NOT want a taste of that forbidden fruit. That is the society the REST of us live in…

Our society systematically castrates men financially, legally and by default emotionally. This leads to men who have never known what it’s like to lead, or even PRETEND to act like a man. They live in a masturbatory world of irresponsibility coupled with immediate gratification. It’s no wonder most women wouldn’t trust them deep down to lead - they don’t deserve that trust. And without that trust, a woman’s fancy is fleeting. Her attraction and attention will bounce around like a rubber ball from one bright shiny thing to another. In her thirties when her youth fades and she figures out that she WON’T be the next CEO of Yahoo (despite what the MEDIA had TOLD her: that it was her birth right, that she was all-powerful, and that her pussy made the world go round) she will bitterly settle down with a beta provider, cut her hair short and squeeze out a couple of kids who she will then smother with all the self esteem bullshit required by the PC police and make sure they get their trophy for setting foot on the field as she trucks them back and forth from soccer practice. She will perpetuate the progressive cycle. Her husband, of course, will “respect her” and agree with her because of two things: he doesn’t know any better because the MEDIA has brainwashed him into thinking that he, like all men these days, is supposed to sit on the couch with our hands down our pants like Al Bundy letting the world make our decisions for us; AND the fact that it is “cheaper to keep her”. He doesn’t want to rock the boat because he knows that she will take HALF of his shit ANY TIME SHE WANT’S TO. So it’s best to stay on her good side.

That’s not a marriage, that’s a prison. And THAT’s the world that the rest of us live in. If you worry about your daughters, keep them close and don’t let them leave the “oasis” of faith and structure that the Mormon church gives you. Because if you do, they WILL take a bite of the apple.

I am NOT a religious person. I don’t believe in fairy tales, Santa Clause, the Easter Bunny or some imaginary man in the sky who loves me unconditionally, but hates homosexuals and shrimp. But I respect YOUR right to believe whatever you like. And you know what? There’s a part of me that ENVIES your faith and the fact that you have a community that is structured to preserve the nuclear family above all else. But I’m sure you will concede that YOU and YOUR COMMUNITY are the exception and not the rule, yes? That being the case, how can you logically think that selflessly putting a woman’s wants, needs and whims above our own will realistically “work” for the rest of us when we don’t have a society in place to provide the necessary negative feedback loop to keep a woman’s “curiosity” in check?[/quote]
Pretty good synopsis

[quote]GCF wrote:
Very good post AC…

I just didn’t get the ‘shrimp’ part? Since when did the big guy start hating on shrimp? Another thing him and I just can’t agree on.
[/quote]

Shrimp and other finless, scale-less ocean-dwelling creatures are considered unclean and unfit to eat by some Jews and Muslims.

http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/

[quote]Kakarat wrote:

[quote]angry chicken wrote:

[quote]Nman wrote:
This is a really sad discussion. I don’t usually respond because I don’t spend a lot of times on forums, i usually read the articles and get back to work but this thread name caught my attention and I wanted to see what it was about. I didn’t read it all but I feel like I read enough and I feel like I should give my two cents. A few things, I was a virgin until I got married and was glad. I’m a religious person and was taught about sexual purity and know that it’s a true doctrine. I have two little girls and I’m scared to death of them finding guys like you. Guys that don’t care about who my daughters are, guys that think my daughters are just a good time and have no respect for them. It’s sad! It’s no wonder that the Family in the US is breaking down and the consequences of that are the real problems behind the issues in our country. Men aren’t men anymore. Sure everyone on this site lifts and talks big but how many would give up everything for their wife? How many men selflessly put their wives needs/wants in front of their own? How many men are fully committed to their wives/marriages? Look at the divorce stats and you’ll see not many. Being a man to me means being fully committed to your wife, to your kids and to marriage. There are reasons for a divorce (not saying there isn’t) but the current trend is disturbing and shows that men and women aren’t as dedicated to each other as they could/should be. Whenever I have issues in my marriage the best solution is to turn away from my wants and my needs and to put my wife’s wants/needs above my own. Women are unique and special and need to be treated as such! [/quote]

You are a Mormon, yes? You probably live in a community of like-minded individuals. An “oasis of faith” if you will. Your wife was raised similarly to you, right? If this is the case, then congratulations, my friend. Your faith and your church are a CENTRAL part of your life, your paradigm and your existence. That is the ONLY way that your belief system will work. If you took that structure away, it would all come crashing down like a house of cards.

Look at Victorian society, or the society of many Muslim countries: the whole SYSTEM is designed to keep a woman’s baser instincts and emotions in check. The punishment for adultery ranged from social ostracism to death by stoning. The risk was not worth the reward. A woman’s instinct to SURVIVE trumped her instinct to fuck the pool boy.

But now in today’s society that “structure” is gone. What is the consequence of adultery? In the world of no-fault divorce, it means a woman can take half of your shit… And get a hefty alimony settlement on top of it! There is NO check and balance. In fact, we have the opposite: a shallow culture of, “You GO girl!” fueled by tabloids and reality television that actually PROMOTES indiscretion, “real cheating housewives”, and an attitude of unabashed ENTITLEMENT. Tiger Woods’ ex wife got 100 MILLION DOLLARS <<>> and she never touched a golf club except to physically ASSAULT him with it! (an act for which she was never charged). She was a fucking BABYSITTER, but I digress.

That’s the world that the REST of us live in. In that world, if you put a woman’s needs selflessly in front of your own, she will take it, take your shit, and expect a check for the rest of her life and for what? For spending a few minutes on her back a few times a month when she felt you “deserved” or had “earned” some pussy?

The relationship that you describe can ONLY be achieved when a woman is invested in the concept that a man is the head of the household and when she trusts him to lead his family through the treacherous minefield of life in the modern world. By treacherous, I mean filled with opportunity to “slip” on the banana peel of opportunistic infidelity. If you look at times in history when marriage actually worked, you will find a patriarchal society. Because that’s what it takes to work.

You simply CANNOT have a society where every hedonistic whim is glorified for all to see, coveted by most and open for experimentation to all and reasonably expect a greater majority of people (men and women) to NOT want a taste of that forbidden fruit. That is the society the REST of us live in…

Our society systematically castrates men financially, legally and by default emotionally. This leads to men who have never known what it’s like to lead, or even PRETEND to act like a man. They live in a masturbatory world of irresponsibility coupled with immediate gratification. It’s no wonder most women wouldn’t trust them deep down to lead - they don’t deserve that trust. And without that trust, a woman’s fancy is fleeting. Her attraction and attention will bounce around like a rubber ball from one bright shiny thing to another. In her thirties when her youth fades and she figures out that she WON’T be the next CEO of Yahoo (despite what the MEDIA had TOLD her: that it was her birth right, that she was all-powerful, and that her pussy made the world go round) she will bitterly settle down with a beta provider, cut her hair short and squeeze out a couple of kids who she will then smother with all the self esteem bullshit required by the PC police and make sure they get their trophy for setting foot on the field as she trucks them back and forth from soccer practice. She will perpetuate the progressive cycle. Her husband, of course, will “respect her” and agree with her because of two things: he doesn’t know any better because the MEDIA has brainwashed him into thinking that he, like all men these days, is supposed to sit on the couch with our hands down our pants like Al Bundy letting the world make our decisions for us; AND the fact that it is “cheaper to keep her”. He doesn’t want to rock the boat because he knows that she will take HALF of his shit ANY TIME SHE WANT’S TO. So it’s best to stay on her good side.

That’s not a marriage, that’s a prison. And THAT’s the world that the rest of us live in. If you worry about your daughters, keep them close and don’t let them leave the “oasis” of faith and structure that the Mormon church gives you. Because if you do, they WILL take a bite of the apple.

I am NOT a religious person. I don’t believe in fairy tales, Santa Clause, the Easter Bunny or some imaginary man in the sky who loves me unconditionally, but hates homosexuals and shrimp. But I respect YOUR right to believe whatever you like. And you know what? There’s a part of me that ENVIES your faith and the fact that you have a community that is structured to preserve the nuclear family above all else. But I’m sure you will concede that YOU and YOUR COMMUNITY are the exception and not the rule, yes? That being the case, how can you logically think that selflessly putting a woman’s wants, needs and whims above our own will realistically “work” for the rest of us when we don’t have a society in place to provide the necessary negative feedback loop to keep a woman’s “curiosity” in check?[/quote]
Pretty good synopsis
[/quote]

x2

Angry Chicken, thou art quite zen

[quote]GCF wrote:
Very good post AC…

I just didn’t get the ‘shrimp’ part? Since when did the big guy start hating on shrimp? Another thing him and I just can’t agree on.
[/quote]

Deuteronomy Chapter 14 I believe, Old Testament. Also some mention in Leviticus 11. Big tirade on clean and unclean foods.