[quote]Metal Monkey wrote:
Firstly don’t get your panties in a knot. If you don’t like criticism then don’t give advice.
Goodfellow wrote:
And the program is about going to failure with a 20RM weight at 12 reps, It is not as if I am suggesting using a 8RM weight.
You said failure on every set. How does one go to failure in 12 reps with your 20RM on the first set. This does not make any sense at all.
[/quote]
Reading helps:
" (Pick your 20RM, to hit failure on the first couple of sets, do the reps slowly and contract the muscle as hard as possible) "
[quote]Metal monkey wrote:
Goodfellow wrote:
Also, just because I have not made any progress myself (mostly because of a fucking injury) does not mean I know what the fuck I am talking about, it means I am inconsistant with programs and do not eat enough food - See thread: “my own clinic” where I trained and ate as per CT’s suggestions, and again, I could not follow that through even because of my injury.
How does following someone else’s training show that you know what you are talking about? I’ve looked at you posts and that is how I came to the conclusion that you are clueless.[/quote]
Mostly because the program is appropriate for this situation, and that I have spent weeks reading about it, looking through the logs of the many people that have used it, and the results that have followed. Additionally, I have also put people that I train onto this program and observed their results.
The guy wants to do something to gain muscle and lose body fat - This will do it.
IT IS POSSIBLE to gain muscle and lose fat, it is called changing your body composition. That is what the guy wanted, so thats what I give him because it will do it.
And what posts would these be that show that ‘I am clueless?’ - The ones 7 months ago about MY LOG?
If it’s referring to my question’s about my shoulder, then I am clueless - but I am not claiming to be a physical therapist here, just half decent at giving people advice.
Also I have posted a routine similar to this and asked people to tell me what they think about it, I like discussing it, it’s a very interesting program and I merely wanted to read their thoughts.
I was also asking what more experienced guys thought of it for me, because I like to take in good information.
[quote]Metal Monkey wrote:
You honestly think because someone else told you what to do, and you still failed, that you have proof of your knowledge?[/quote]
Ok, so what do you want me to do? A theory exam? Do you want me to write out an explantion of why and how the routine works, with scientific explanations? Does having a big physique 100% show that you have knowledge in giving advice in how others should train for their goals?
And knowledge of what? I have not said that because I failed that particular routine gave me knowledge in training other people, it gave me knowledge ABOUT MY OWN BODY.
[quote]Metal Monkey wrote:
Injuries are shit, agreed. But if you are always injured and never making any progress how can you claim to know what you are talking about.[/quote]
Because training people is different from training YOURSELF. You can still train people and observe the training effects on other people when you are injured. You just can’t do it to yourself.
[quote]Metal Monkey wrote:
If your lack of progress is inconsistency and lack of food I would suggest walking the walk before you talk the talk.[/quote]
Yes, that would be useful for advertising myself so people pay me to train them. However this guy is asking for FREE ADVICE on a forum which I have gave him, and it is good advice at that. Other than that, not “walking the walk” before “talking the talk” just gives guys like you a reason to believe I’m automatically wrong.
[quote]Metal Monkey wrote:
Goodfellow wrote:
I went from 98lbs to 150lbs in about a year and a half, just because I’m not fucking 200+ doesn’t mean I don’t know my stuff, I also have a friend whos particularly gifted and followed a program and diet I made up for him, he ended up placing #2 in a strongman comp.
If i had the genetics of flex wheeler and had done the exact same training I followed myself you would probably be asking me for advice now - appearance does not mean everything.
So which is it? With a genetically gifted athlete it is your knowledge that counts, but with yourself it’s genetics not knowledge that we should pay attention to.[/quote]
I AM NOT BLAMING MY RESULTS ON MY GENETICS. I made very good progress, then the next year after I hit 150lbs it stalled.
My progress after that was poor because I used many training programs from this site on myself (in-consistancy) and did not eat enough food for my bodytype.
also, about my strongman friend/client - you hear the best success stories of the clients that top coaches trained, because they stand out more and garner more attention. OK, maybe what I posted wasn’t the best example.
However, would you give a shit if I said I’ve trained around 15 teenage guys along with several middle ages guys and helped them ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS? Probably not. But I did, so I know what I’m talking about, even if I don’t look like it.
[quote]Metal monkey wrote:
If you had successfully applied training methods to reach your goals and had some sort of experience to back up your words then yes I might listen to you. But you haven’t so Flex Wheeler genetics or lack thereof are irrelevant.[/quote]
No, it isn’t irrelevant at all.
If I had Flex Wheeler genetics you would ASSUME I had applied methods to reach my goals and had experience
But since I don’t you ASSUME the opposite.
APPEARANCE has nothing to do with your KNOWLEDGE of training OTHER PEOPLE.
If you train other people all the time and do not train yourself, then you will be good at TRAINING OTHER PEOPLE.
If you train yourself all the time and do not train other people, then you will be good at TRAINING YOURSELF.
[quote]Metal Monkey wrote:
Goodfellow wrote:
I am probably a hypocrite in saying all of this though because I personally would not take advice from someone my size, but if a big huge guy said the SAME THING then I would listen.
Yes you are.
So have you ever followed this routine? Do you think 2 hours training is really necessary 6 days a week? You want to add Cardio to this as well? Practically who wants to train one muscle group then hang around for another hour.
[/quote]
I have followed this routine for a week, it felt great, apart from the fact I could not contract one pec muscle and had to stop because of the annoyance.
I HAVE HOWEVER put 2 of my friends on this routine (18 yrs old and 26 yrs old - both starting at decent shape) and they made good results considering I put them on it for a month, after a month they started feeling shitty, which is why I put them on a low volume, low frequency program, and they felt great again in 2 days.
WHICH IS WHAT I SUGGESTED TO THE OP.
Now, why don’t I use my own advice and apply it onto myself so I could get results? Well, when I get back into training I most definitely will, I’ve had a lot of time to sit back and look at what is working and cut out the bullshit of my own routines.
I tried the T-Nation routines from Waterbury, ct etc. because they looked great and fun to do. However, I didn’t want to risk putting any of the guys I’m training onto them because if they didn’t work I’d look like an asshole, plus I’m not Waterbury or CT so I probably wouldn’t get the details right anyway - So I just stuck with what works to build muscle - different body part splits.
Which is exactly what I’m going to do when I get the OK from my PT To start training.