I want to thank Testosterone Magazine for the opportunity to debate such an issue. They are not only the cutting edge guys when it comes to supplements and information, but they are also open minded enough to allow dissent on its message board. Bravo!
We have heard from many on this thread. I have to admit that I knew there would be a harsh response regarding my stand for free speech regarding the topic of homosexuality.
I do not agree with Rumbach, Knight and some of the others, However, I respect them for taking a stance and holding such a passionate view. As Voltaire wrote: “I disapprove of what you say. but I will defend to the death your right to say it”. I may not go to my death for you on this topic, but I would certainly type my fingers to the bone.
Like all many posts, we have strayed from the original topic. However, I would like to use this post to at least summarize my original intent.
- I contend that “Homophobia” does not exist. And in fact has never existed. It has never been proven, nor are there even any strong arguments for the use of the word “phobia” in describing those who are actually “sickened” by any homosexual act.
Because the word has been in existence for quite sometime. And has been promoted (or perhaps created) by the powerful Gay lobbying goups it seems to have credence. I submit to you that just because a word has found its way into the common vernacular does not mean that it is accurate, should be respected as such and used.
Terms such as homophobia are powerful tools which are used to “brand” any opposition to the gay movement as cowardly. It helps silence anyone who may want to speak out as to their true feelings regarding the act of homosexuality, or to the various causes related to homosexuality.
There are many such “branding” methods used. How many times have we read that those who speak out against homosexuals are in reality closet homosexuals. That discourages free dialouge as no one wants to be tagged as being something that is basically “sickening” to them.
Therefore, we have one side which is somewhere between 1% and 10% of the population actively, openly pushing their agenda, while the other side, a large majority, remaing silent in fear of either being branded as a coward,(homophobic) or worse yet (in their mind) being tagged as a closet homosexual!
If the more accurate term “Homorepugnant” were used the connotation to fear would be lost. How can you poke fun at someone who is not afraid but sickened by the thought of a homosexual act? We now have some people going out of their way to show exactly how non “homophobic” that they are. It is cool to be unafraid, right? They are in essence squashing their real feelings in order to cozy up to the politically correct notion of the day. However, in this debate it seems that it is only fair when one side, homosexuals, indulge their “true feelings”.
The homosexual strategy has worked perfectly regarding the branding of anyone who is sickened by two men having sex as, simply being cowards. I ask anyone who would speak out against this contention, where is your proof that those who dislike the homosexual lifestyle are actually afraid of them rather than sickened by them? Do not merely echo the “party line”. Show me the facts. Where are the studies?
- I contend that no one has yet proven that homosexuality is something that you are born with.
I am not claiming that one consciously chooses their sexuality. Rather, I am suggesting, in the absence of contrary proof, that this could be a trait that is acquired during childhood. Whether it is from having a distant father, over protective mother, or something else entirely unknown. At this time, no one seems to know for sure. Yet, for some reason that does not prevent the Gay lobby and the politically correct from doing all in its power to push the nature over nuture theory.
As of this date there has been no conclusive proof on either side. In fact, the side that claims homosexuality to be more nuture than nature has been almost silent. Reason being they are fearful to even discuss the matter as any attempt would bring out the politically correct police in full force. This is even more reason to open up the debate!
If there is science of a psychological nature that is known, it should come to light. many of you would not take a supplement without hard science behind it, yet you are ready go forth and spew back the words fed to you by the politically correct regarding why one is gay. Again, I ask any who would speak out against this contention, where is your proof?
Until it is conclusively known whether it is nature or nuture that has made one a homosexual, those who are overbearing in their defense of the homosexuals right to display their affections in a public manner, have no right to make a claim that “they can’t help it”.
- I contend that it is the right of any individual living in a free country to comment about any matter. As long as that comment does not threaten someone physically, or infer by that comment that they are going to prevent that person from practicing their legal right.
Those of you who state that it is wrong to speak, write or even think about a negative comment regarding homosexuality are not only wrong but worse yet, hypocritical.
Have any of you ever commented on the obese person in the gym walking at two miles per hour on the treadmill? Do you feel that person got that way by eating to many dougnuts? Maybe he did. However, maybe he has a thyroid disorder which has caused him to gain an inordinate amount of weight. Perhaps he was “born that way”. Born into a faimly of obese people and has never once been given the proper methodologies to reduce his weight.
How many times have you, who would silence another, made fun of what you consider to be a ugly woman? My gosh, she was “born that way”, shouldn’t you know better?
Lets take it a step further. What about the uncoordinated “skinny bastard” who is standing in front of a mirror trying to do a simple dumbbell curl. “He looks like one of Jerrys kids” is your comment to your friend. Could he have been “born that way”, with less coordination? No amount of gym time is going to bring him up to your level, but you pound him nonetheless!
Perhaps all can be forgiven as you are merely “fataphobic” “skinnyaphobic” or “uglyaphobic”. Sound foolish? I agree.
As we move to the topic of homosexuality, and other politically correct subjects you sanctimoniously attack anyone who does not adhere strictly to the politically correct popular conclusions of the day. If fat uncoordinated women get a lobby and a little political clout many of you will be singing their praises as well. Just as some of you have swallowed hook line and sinker the Gay agenda, inaccurate branding words and all!
Gee, should we just put our collective heads down and go through out the day not thinking or speaking a word that might be offensive to anyone? Hell no! If that were the road we traveled we would not be exercising our right to free speech. This would not be America!
I want to end by commending those who have voiced their opinions on this board regarding ones right to speak out on the topic of homosexuality. I further encourage all of you to continue to do so. Those who have agreed with my stance, yet have remained silent, I can understand your apprehension in the face of the powerful politically correct. However, I encourage you to throw off the shackles of self censorship and express yourself.
“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear”.
Eric Arthur Blair
be prepared