Full Body Training Doesn't Work?

Training Bodybuilding
61

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
Ah, I think I understand now:

Want to look like brad pitt in fight club and squat 205 atg?
→ Yes, it is possible! WITH TBT!

Want to get past the beginner stage?
→ Do one of them ugly split routines

:wink:
[/quote]

My first of this thread was sarcastic.

On a more serious note, the original poster looks like he’s been lifting weights for 2 months, and is smaller than an average guy.

This kid isn’t the best example of what TBT can do. Let me state that I think splits are king for bodybuilders. But as we all know, TBT can work for newbies and intermediates for strength, and some size. It helped me get my squat past 3 plates, and my muscles always felt full and I was a bit leaner than usual, with a mediocre diet.

Just changing up the routine and trying something for 4-6 months is good once in a while.

62

[quote]Antares wrote:
Professor X wrote:

Like stated before, he is a good shape…but being ripped without the muscle mass is NOT a goal in bodybuilding.

We’ve said it many times before that many of these people seem to be confusing “fitness” with “bodybuilding”. I don’t understand why they are so turned around about this.

The term ‘fitness’ is on the WORST FUCKING TERMS IN SPORTS list. In the top 3.

‘Fit’ for fucking what man?!

A ‘fat’ PL’er and or BB’er, who is getting new PR, and or more overall muscle is ‘fit’, as this guy who qualifies for the US Marines. Each camp is ‘fit’ for their own goals.

OP, your goals do not seem, to be really in line with the spirit of this forum. I am not sorry. It is what it is kid.

However if ‘TBT’ is keeping you in the gym, I guess it can’t be that bad…Still open your mind…I was ‘raised’ on an odd-system that is nowhere on the net. I don’t think it is optimal for BB’ing without ‘tweaking.’

‘TBT’ has worn out it’s usefulness, maybe? I don’t know. Are you wanting to look as close to Arnold or Ronnie as you can? Or do you think P-Diddy is swole?

My Uncle/Mentor is my fucking hero, but he didn’t have it all down. I took from him what was useful, and moved on…

PS to PX: I have read your posts before PX, and this not a dig or nothing on you.

I just hate the term ‘fitness’ and or ‘fit.’ To vague, drives me nucking futz. BTW ‘Strongman’ is horrible too ( Strongmen are cool though! ), isn’t every half-way-decent-and-beyond-weight-trainee a ‘strong man?’

Again, ‘fit for fucking what man?!’

[/quote]

You thought I disagreed with you? Tim basically stated that he didn’t want a “fitness forum” on the site because he was trying to move away from that “functional” mentality. It appears many here still haven’t gotten the memo.

I used the term because what else do you call people who claim to lift weights for several years but are still weaker than the average regular serious gym goer and who have little to show for all of that time and effort other than abs?

Trust me, it used to be worse here with every other newbie logging in claiming that “bodybuilding” now meant whatever they wanted it to mean…which justified their 15" arms after 8 years of lifting.

I personally would feel like a fucking failure if I spent half a decade or more in the gym and all I had to show for it was a body that no one could tell was even trained if I wore anything heavier than a size medium tee-shirt.

63

Dankid is like one of those dudes on the fatty forums, except the opposite end of the spectrum. NAH DUDE YOU LOOK FUCKIN SWOLE, DROP 5 MORE POUNDS THOUGH CAUSE YOU STILL CAN’T SEE YOUR FULL 6 PACK AND I DON’T SEE STRIATIONS IN YOUR NONEXISTENT DELTS AND CHEST. YOU EARNED THAT PIECE OF LETTUCE BRO, EAT IT UP.

64

ITT fat bodybuilders are mad that the OP looks better than them

65

[quote]mojo_ wrote:
ITT fat bodybuilders are mad that the OP looks better than them[/quote]

No one is surprised that you don’t have a picture posted.

Put one up or shut your e-mouth.

66

Dankid, WTF are you talking about? A BEAST at 150? Mini-me would be a beast at 150.

The OP needs to eat something, Quit the mannerexia, and toss the TBT in the D-U-M-P.

137 man? you do realize that the average adversarial of your prized workout method weighs over 100 lbs more than you (including me) and are NOT FAT!?

67

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
mojo_ wrote:
ITT fat bodybuilders are mad that the OP looks better than them

No one is surprised that you don’t have a picture posted.

Put one up or shut your e-mouth. [/quote]

U mad fatty?

68

[quote]mojo_ wrote:
BONEZ217 wrote:
mojo_ wrote:
ITT fat bodybuilders are mad that the OP looks better than them

No one is surprised that you don’t have a picture posted.

Put one up or shut your e-mouth.

U mad fatty?[/quote]

BONEZ217 has a six pack, ass.

69

[quote]mojo_ wrote:
BONEZ217 wrote:
mojo_ wrote:
ITT fat bodybuilders are mad that the OP looks better than them

No one is surprised that you don’t have a picture posted.

Put one up or shut your e-mouth.

U mad fatty?[/quote]

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH

hahaaha

70

[quote]mojo_ wrote:
ITT fat bodybuilders are mad that the OP looks better than them[/quote]

Posts like this are the main negative to e-arguments. There is no way these little guys would say anything like this to a big guys face, yet we still have people calling X and Bonez fat.

71

[quote]ajweins wrote:
mojo_ wrote:
ITT fat bodybuilders are mad that the OP looks better than them

Posts like this are the main negative to e-arguments. There is no way these little guys would say anything like this to a big guys face, yet we still have people calling X and Bonez fat. [/quote]

Truth, but those jealous little fuckers sure do give them dirty looks in the gym.

And then they make themselves feel better for failing to achieve anything by thinking like dankid…

72

[quote]ajweins wrote:
mojo_ wrote:
ITT fat bodybuilders are mad that the OP looks better than them

Posts like this are the main negative to e-arguments. There is no way these little guys would say anything like this to a big guys face, yet we still have people calling X and Bonez fat. [/quote]

Professor X is fat, hence why you never see any topless pics of him just a cartoon picture that shows levels of leaness he wish he had.

73

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
ajweins wrote:
mojo_ wrote:
ITT fat bodybuilders are mad that the OP looks better than them

Posts like this are the main negative to e-arguments. There is no way these little guys would say anything like this to a big guys face, yet we still have people calling X and Bonez fat.

Truth, but those jealous little fuckers sure do give them dirty looks in the gym.

And then they make themselves feel better for failing to achieve anything by thinking like dankid… [/quote]

pics?

74

[quote]mojo_ wrote:
ajweins wrote:
mojo_ wrote:
ITT fat bodybuilders are mad that the OP looks better than them

Posts like this are the main negative to e-arguments. There is no way these little guys would say anything like this to a big guys face, yet we still have people calling X and Bonez fat.

Professor X is fat, hence why you never see any topless pics of him just a cartoon picture that shows levels of leaness he wish he had.[/quote]

Your pattern is obvious… Troll

And you’re a retard who doesn’t look around much before he trolls…

Jesus

75

[quote]mojo_ wrote:
countingbeans wrote:
ajweins wrote:
mojo_ wrote:
ITT fat bodybuilders are mad that the OP looks better than them

Posts like this are the main negative to e-arguments. There is no way these little guys would say anything like this to a big guys face, yet we still have people calling X and Bonez fat.

Truth, but those jealous little fuckers sure do give them dirty looks in the gym.

And then they make themselves feel better for failing to achieve anything by thinking like dankid…

pics?[/quote]

Do you know how to look in a profile?

Put up or shut up worm.

76

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
mojo_ wrote:
ajweins wrote:
mojo_ wrote:
ITT fat bodybuilders are mad that the OP looks better than them

Posts like this are the main negative to e-arguments. There is no way these little guys would say anything like this to a big guys face, yet we still have people calling X and Bonez fat.

Professor X is fat, hence why you never see any topless pics of him just a cartoon picture that shows levels of leaness he wish he had.

Your pattern is obvious… Troll

And you’re a retard who doesn’t look around much before he trolls…

Jesus[/quote]

pics or stfu.

77

[quote]mojo_ wrote:
countingbeans wrote:
ajweins wrote:
mojo_ wrote:
ITT fat bodybuilders are mad that the OP looks better than them

Posts like this are the main negative to e-arguments. There is no way these little guys would say anything like this to a big guys face, yet we still have people calling X and Bonez fat.

Truth, but those jealous little fuckers sure do give them dirty looks in the gym.

And then they make themselves feel better for failing to achieve anything by thinking like dankid…

pics?[/quote]

Mojo_, do you have any pics?

78

[quote]mojo_ wrote:
ajweins wrote:
mojo_ wrote:
ITT fat bodybuilders are mad that the OP looks better than them

Posts like this are the main negative to e-arguments. There is no way these little guys would say anything like this to a big guys face, yet we still have people calling X and Bonez fat.

Professor X is fat, hence why you never see any topless pics of him just a cartoon picture that shows levels of leaness he wish he had.[/quote]

You’re too noob to know him.

79

[quote]mojo_ wrote:

pics or stfu.[/quote]

LOL… You are full fucking retard aren’t you?

80

[quote]joe shumsky wrote:
and another thing, i believe it was professor x that asked a question about “abs” and “lean-ness” and why people would be so concerned about it on a bodybuilding forum… correct me if i’m wrong, but lean-ness is half of the bodybuilding holy grail, no?[/quote]

No.

That would be like saying that half of hitting a home run is running the last 10 feet to the plate.