[quote]johnmurray2 wrote:
I’m about 6’4 and 212 and I wouldn’t consider myself small, we have no clue what this guy looks like, at 6’ 208 he might be a decent size?[/quote]
Unless he’s just really dieted down, which he said he isn’t, he wouldn’t look good at that weight and height. He should keep bulking. Eight months ago I was 185 with a decent amount of fat on me and cutting. I decided to stop the cut and start bulking because I realized how small I was. I’m 240 now and just starting to cut again because the love handles got out of hand and I know once I get to my desired bodyfat,(probably 200-210. It’s always more than you think.) I’ll still look small.
[quote]Vanilla-Gorilla wrote:
Professor X wrote:
johnmurray2 wrote:
Well I am def not 4% bf and I have 22 inch arms so I don’t think I’m on the smaller side?
HA!!
It helps to have some clue of how much most people weigh at certain proportions before you claim you own the same.
Someone at your height with true 22" arms would be hitting close to 300lbs unless he had zero development in all other muscle groups.
Please post pics of 22" arms so I can apologize.
I think he’s confused.
212 lbs @ 6’4" with 22" arms? WTF?
Dude, are you sure you didn’t mean legs?[/quote]
He’s not confused. He’s another newbie lying his ass off.
We should require pics of the poster before they can put anything up in this forum.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Vanilla-Gorilla wrote:
Professor X wrote:
johnmurray2 wrote:
Well I am def not 4% bf and I have 22 inch arms so I don’t think I’m on the smaller side?
HA!!
It helps to have some clue of how much most people weigh at certain proportions before you claim you own the same.
Someone at your height with true 22" arms would be hitting close to 300lbs unless he had zero development in all other muscle groups.
Please post pics of 22" arms so I can apologize.
I think he’s confused.
212 lbs @ 6’4" with 22" arms? WTF?
Dude, are you sure you didn’t mean legs?
He’s not confused. He’s another newbie lying his ass off.
We should require pics of the poster before they can put anything up in this forum.[/quote]
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Vanilla-Gorilla wrote:
Professor X wrote:
johnmurray2 wrote:
Well I am def not 4% bf and I have 22 inch arms so I don’t think I’m on the smaller side?
HA!!
It helps to have some clue of how much most people weigh at certain proportions before you claim you own the same.
Someone at your height with true 22" arms would be hitting close to 300lbs unless he had zero development in all other muscle groups.
Please post pics of 22" arms so I can apologize.
I think he’s confused.
212 lbs @ 6’4" with 22" arms? WTF?
Dude, are you sure you didn’t mean legs?
He’s not confused. He’s another newbie lying his ass off.
We should require pics of the poster before they can put anything up in this forum.[/quote]
relax big guy I don’t really care about bodybuilding all like that, i do it for fun, i just like to look good, i don’t follow any weird diet or eat x amount of protein or blah blah, i was just saying at 6’ this kid could have decent size at 210 that’s all
I can’t really tell what is what by looking at photos online but my arm is about 17 and it def seems a lot smaller than this kids? I wouldn’t be surprised if they were 19 or 20 but who the fuck knows
I don’t know why this became a competition where everyone is talking shit but I’m the only one posting photos? But regardless, like I said before, I was only stating that without seeing the op I can’t tell how his weight looks on him. Personally, most people think I weigh more than 208-212 (at height 6’4) which is where I am generally at.
[quote]bryant93 wrote:
I can’t really tell what is what by looking at photos online but my arm is about 17 and it def seems a lot smaller than this kids? I wouldn’t be surprised if they were 19 or 20 but who the fuck knows[/quote]
I’d guess 17-18 (inches) and decently lean. Kind of hard to say, as he hasn’t actually given us a double-bi of any kind.
What your arms look like depends a lot on your muscle-shape/attachments, arm length etc… And your height, of course.
I’m really not trying to argue about this anymore but my arms are NOT 17 inches, not even close
[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
bryant93 wrote:
I can’t really tell what is what by looking at photos online but my arm is about 17 and it def seems a lot smaller than this kids? I wouldn’t be surprised if they were 19 or 20 but who the fuck knows
I’d guess 17-18 (inches) and decently lean. Kind of hard to say, as he hasn’t actually given us a double-bi of any kind.
What your arms look like depends a lot on your muscle-shape/attachments, arm length etc… And your height, of course.
