[quote]cap’nsalty wrote:
Ugh. Hour long fights suck, and they would suck even worse now because you don’t have dominating fighters like you used to. What would end up happening is a large percentage of the fights would just be decided by conditioning. Watching tired fighters try to stay on their feet is about as exciting as watching paint dry.
I also disagree with the supposed “purity” of the beginning days of the UFC. The early days were a sideshow spectacle. A bunch of people who had no idea how to compete in this new sport beating the shit out of each other. It didn’t even look like a sport, and I can see how the UFC almost went under.[/quote]
Without trying to sound rude, I would like to ask why you think hour long fights suck? Man I think they are exciting as hell!
To me, its amazing to see how far our bodies can be pushed, and a 1 on 1 fight is an excellent way to test that limit. Even if the fighters were evenly matched, it would be similar to Ali vs Frazier/Rocky vs Ivan Drago/Stephan Bonnar vs Forrest Griffin in that it would be hard shot after hard shot and and sub attempt after sub attempt without either fighter going down, a real battle in the ring!
Unless you have a rare occasion like Shamrock vs Severn 2 (both fighters circled each other slapping for over 30 minutes with nothing happening… the fans chanted “Red Wings”).
So just wondering, why do you find them boring? Minus that last example of course! I guess you just like to see high-energy fast paced matches?
Also, I understand your point about the early days not looking like a sport. And I agree with you. It BARELY was a sport… which is why I think it is so pure.
Maybe pure is the wrong word? What I mean is that a system of combat (martial art) is supposed to be effective, otherwise why learn it?
In the mid 80s after the Karate Kid craze, and Ninja Turtles and all that fun stuff, people thought that having a black belt in Karate meant you could kick anyone’s ass.
But what was better, Karate or Kung Fu? Or wrestling? What about tough streetfighters saying martial arts are worthless? Etc. Remember in these days people thought WWF was real fighting… actually some still do… but hopefully that number has gone down now!
Anyways what UFC tried to do was to answer the question, which 1 on 1, hand to hand combat style is best?
In order to TRUTHFULLY answer that question you would need to fight to the death. Ok, well, that aint gonna happen legally. So they found the closest possible way to test out different styles with the minimum amount of rules possible.
You can’t say “Ok guys who is better? Oh by the way mr. wrestler if you are beating the shit out of the guy on the ground but the ref says you’re boring the fight will be stood back up and if he knocks you out, you lose.” See what I mean?
This is what I meant by pure.