Dude…that punch was uncalled for. Waaay uncalled for.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Dude…that punch was uncalled for. Waaay uncalled for.[/quote]
Which punch?
[quote]clinton131 wrote:
[quote]Broncoandy wrote:
[quote]clinton131 wrote:
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
Ok I just watched it. Totally enraged.
I’m going to find a skinny dude today and beat a permanent lisp in to him and its this dudes fault.
Amidoingitrite?
For the record though, she did swing first. Shall we reincarnate the super hero thread? When, if ever, is it ok to punch a woman? Should he have just held her in place to display dominance and dissuade aggression or put a quick end to it, which worked?
I’m curious about the back story too, what got them there?
And, of course, the kids are the real victim.[/quote]
The question is who is the aggressor in this altercation? He is obviously twice the size, backs her into a corner, kicks at something next to her, and then stands over the top of her in a threatening manner. If I were in her shoes I would probably swing at him too. And from the video do you think those punches she threw were meant to do any damage to him? Do you think that this women even has the capacity to hurt this idiot with a punch even if her intent was to do so? As far as I am concerned the fact that she threw the first punch is irrelevent.[/quote]
This situation started evolving long before she was cornered. Contrary to popular white knight belief, being bigger and stronger does not instantaneously make you the aggressor. Judges are white knights of corse, so in court, he’s going to be labeled the agressor, but in reality, he doesn’t seem to be. Near as I can see, he’s not backing her into that corner. She walked around him, to get into that corner and restrict HIS movement. She placed herself in between him, and his possession. WHILE THROWING HIM OUT OF HIS OWN HOME. He wants his shit. She’s trying to prevent him from taking his shit with him by blocking his path to it. I don’t think her punches were any more intended for damage than his were. Tempers were flaring, and punches were thrown, I doubt either of them stopped to think of the potential consequences. He sure as hell didn’t.[/quote]
I Agree that the situation started long before the video was rolling…Could care less. I don’t care what they were arguing about, whether it is over property, being kicked out of the home, him being caught fucking his neighbor’s dog…I don’t care. People argue. Once it goes to blows they are crossing the line.
I agree 100% that being bigger and stronger does not instantaneously make one the aggressor. My assessment of the situation was based on the totality of the circumstances that were present in the video. The fact is he is larger then her. Again, I agree that this alone does not make him the aggressor in and of its self, but accompanied by the fact that he DOES back her into the corner, kicks the tv behind her, and then in response to some pushes and half ass attempted strikes by her he cocks his fist back and punches her square in the head. All this combined makes him the aggressor in my book. His punch certainly did not look defensive in nature to me.
As for your issue over the property, I don’t know how things are done in Canada, but from where I come from if you are married (legal or common law) and live together, property is considered joint property. Both parties have a right to it until decided otherwise by a Judge. If you are willing to go to blows with your spouse over property you are a fucking idiot either way.
Does not matter if either of them considered the consequences of their actions before hand. They are still responsible for them.
And what pisses me off most about this whole thing is that they do this shit in front of their kids. Degenerates. Both of them.[/quote]
Between 0:00, and 0:20, she very clearly walks around him, and positions herself in the corner. He didn’t back her into it. She walked there to engage him. “IN RESPONSE to some pushes and half ass attempted strikes by her he cocks his fist back and punches her square in the head”. So she hits him first. If they were in the NHL that’s an extra 2 minutes FOR HER because she’s the insigator. AKA the aggressor. Plain and simple. His responce to her pussy jabs, was a pussy cross. They both go to the box, she’s their longer. Winning a fight you didn’t start does not make you the aggressor, anymore than being bigger or stronger does.
Yes, if your willing to go to blows over a playstation with your wife, your a fucking retard. But if your bigger, and stronger, and SHE is willing to go to blows with you over it, what the fuck does that make her? Dumber than you? Or smarter because she knows she can get away with it, thanks to cops who will have her back no matter what, and improve her favor with the judge because the cops only arrest him?
Arresting ONLY the man in this situation is EXACTLY why shit like this happens. She gets exactly what she wants with zero consequences. He’s gone. She’s got his shit. And when they go to the judge in family court FOREVER, HE WAS ARRESTED FOR DOMESTIC ASSUALT, AND SHE WASN’T. She will be reaping the REWARDS from hitting him for the next 20 years. And he’ll be wishing he’d hit her harder.
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
I’m on the fence over the authenticy of the vid. I’m cynical to the core, but I can’t decide if this is a real couple on the verge of a divorce commentating on their actions knowing that it’s going to be played in front of a judge, or if they are actors doing a skit on domestic violence with a bad script (“you punched me”…“No! YOU punched ME”).
If it’s real, the husband is toast (cornering the wife then dragging her off to the camera to switch it off).
I’m calling fake. He knew the camera was there, he wouldn’t have hit her at all.
Maybe I’m giving too much credit though. Kids shouldn’t get married.
Oh, and they have ‘his and her’ Playstations: “This is mine!”…“Where’s MY fucking Playstation then?” (hubby makes a beeline for TV).[/quote]
There is a child in the room, sorry Roy, hard to think it was staged.
Personally would love about 5 minutes with this asshole alone. [/quote]
Man, totally!
[quote]Broncoandy wrote:
[quote]clinton131 wrote:
[quote]Broncoandy wrote:
[quote]clinton131 wrote:
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
Ok I just watched it. Totally enraged.
I’m going to find a skinny dude today and beat a permanent lisp in to him and its this dudes fault.
Amidoingitrite?
For the record though, she did swing first. Shall we reincarnate the super hero thread? When, if ever, is it ok to punch a woman? Should he have just held her in place to display dominance and dissuade aggression or put a quick end to it, which worked?
I’m curious about the back story too, what got them there?
And, of course, the kids are the real victim.[/quote]
The question is who is the aggressor in this altercation? He is obviously twice the size, backs her into a corner, kicks at something next to her, and then stands over the top of her in a threatening manner. If I were in her shoes I would probably swing at him too. And from the video do you think those punches she threw were meant to do any damage to him? Do you think that this women even has the capacity to hurt this idiot with a punch even if her intent was to do so? As far as I am concerned the fact that she threw the first punch is irrelevent.[/quote]
This situation started evolving long before she was cornered. Contrary to popular white knight belief, being bigger and stronger does not instantaneously make you the aggressor. Judges are white knights of corse, so in court, he’s going to be labeled the agressor, but in reality, he doesn’t seem to be. Near as I can see, he’s not backing her into that corner. She walked around him, to get into that corner and restrict HIS movement. She placed herself in between him, and his possession. WHILE THROWING HIM OUT OF HIS OWN HOME. He wants his shit. She’s trying to prevent him from taking his shit with him by blocking his path to it. I don’t think her punches were any more intended for damage than his were. Tempers were flaring, and punches were thrown, I doubt either of them stopped to think of the potential consequences. He sure as hell didn’t.[/quote]
I Agree that the situation started long before the video was rolling…Could care less. I don’t care what they were arguing about, whether it is over property, being kicked out of the home, him being caught fucking his neighbor’s dog…I don’t care. People argue. Once it goes to blows they are crossing the line.
I agree 100% that being bigger and stronger does not instantaneously make one the aggressor. My assessment of the situation was based on the totality of the circumstances that were present in the video. The fact is he is larger then her. Again, I agree that this alone does not make him the aggressor in and of its self, but accompanied by the fact that he DOES back her into the corner, kicks the tv behind her, and then in response to some pushes and half ass attempted strikes by her he cocks his fist back and punches her square in the head. All this combined makes him the aggressor in my book. His punch certainly did not look defensive in nature to me.
As for your issue over the property, I don’t know how things are done in Canada, but from where I come from if you are married (legal or common law) and live together, property is considered joint property. Both parties have a right to it until decided otherwise by a Judge. If you are willing to go to blows with your spouse over property you are a fucking idiot either way.
Does not matter if either of them considered the consequences of their actions before hand. They are still responsible for them.
And what pisses me off most about this whole thing is that they do this shit in front of their kids. Degenerates. Both of them.[/quote]
Between 0:00, and 0:20, she very clearly walks around him, and positions herself in the corner. He didn’t back her into it. She walked there to engage him. “IN RESPONSE to some pushes and half ass attempted strikes by her he cocks his fist back and punches her square in the head”. So she hits him first. If they were in the NHL that’s an extra 2 minutes FOR HER because she’s the insigator. AKA the aggressor. Plain and simple. His responce to her pussy jabs, was a pussy cross. They both go to the box, she’s their longer. Winning a fight you didn’t start does not make you the aggressor, anymore than being bigger or stronger does.
Yes, if your willing to go to blows over a playstation with your wife, your a fucking retard. But if your bigger, and stronger, and SHE is willing to go to blows with you over it, what the fuck does that make her? Dumber than you? Or smarter because she knows she can get away with it, thanks to cops who will have her back no matter what, and improve her favor with the judge because the cops only arrest him?
Arresting ONLY the man in this situation is EXACTLY why shit like this happens. She gets exactly what she wants with zero consequences. He’s gone. She’s got his shit. And when they go to the judge in family court FOREVER, HE WAS ARRESTED FOR DOMESTIC ASSUALT, AND SHE WASN’T. She will be reaping the REWARDS from hitting him for the next 20 years. And he’ll be wishing he’d hit her harder.[/quote]
Admit it… a woman once kicked your ass, right?
Wuss.
[quote]imhungry wrote:
Just another day in the life of a wholesome american family.[/quote]
Wait? So is it gay marriage or playstation that is now ruining the american family?
Please don’t say playstation because that impacts my personal life way more than the ability for gay people to get married.
My god what if it was all over a PlayStation…I mean like an original PlayStation? Thing would be about 15 years old.
[quote]Nards wrote:
My god what if it was all over a PlayStation…I mean like an original PlayStation? Thing would be about 15 years old.[/quote]
Fuck an a, what if he beaned the bitch with an Atari remote?
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
[quote]Nards wrote:
My god what if it was all over a PlayStation…I mean like an original PlayStation? Thing would be about 15 years old.[/quote]
Fuck an a, what if he beaned the bitch with an Atari remote?[/quote]
Dude…or one of those ancient Pong controllers.
He could have killed her and taken out the wall behind her.
He could then beat her up with a Duck Hunt rifle.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
[quote]Nards wrote:
My god what if it was all over a PlayStation…I mean like an original PlayStation? Thing would be about 15 years old.[/quote]
Fuck an a, what if he beaned the bitch with an Atari remote?[/quote]
Dude…or one of those ancient Pong controllers.
He could have killed her and taken out the wall behind her.
He could then beat her up with a Duck Hunt rifle.[/quote]
Yeah man, and that N64 bazooka.
He reaally took it easy, didn’t even make her bleed.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
[quote]Nards wrote:
My god what if it was all over a PlayStation…I mean like an original PlayStation? Thing would be about 15 years old.[/quote]
Fuck an a, what if he beaned the bitch with an Atari remote?[/quote]
Dude…or one of those ancient Pong controllers.
He could have killed her and taken out the wall behind her.
He could then beat her up with a Duck Hunt rifle.[/quote]
WE NEED TO GO DEEPER!
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
Admit it… a woman once kicked your ass, right?
Wuss.[/quote]
lol. No.
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]Broncoandy wrote:
[quote]clinton131 wrote:
[quote]Broncoandy wrote:
[quote]clinton131 wrote:
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
Ok I just watched it. Totally enraged.
I’m going to find a skinny dude today and beat a permanent lisp in to him and its this dudes fault.
Amidoingitrite?
For the record though, she did swing first. Shall we reincarnate the super hero thread? When, if ever, is it ok to punch a woman? Should he have just held her in place to display dominance and dissuade aggression or put a quick end to it, which worked?
I’m curious about the back story too, what got them there?
And, of course, the kids are the real victim.[/quote]
The question is who is the aggressor in this altercation? He is obviously twice the size, backs her into a corner, kicks at something next to her, and then stands over the top of her in a threatening manner. If I were in her shoes I would probably swing at him too. And from the video do you think those punches she threw were meant to do any damage to him? Do you think that this women even has the capacity to hurt this idiot with a punch even if her intent was to do so? As far as I am concerned the fact that she threw the first punch is irrelevent.[/quote]
This situation started evolving long before she was cornered. Contrary to popular white knight belief, being bigger and stronger does not instantaneously make you the aggressor. Judges are white knights of corse, so in court, he’s going to be labeled the agressor, but in reality, he doesn’t seem to be. Near as I can see, he’s not backing her into that corner. She walked around him, to get into that corner and restrict HIS movement. She placed herself in between him, and his possession. WHILE THROWING HIM OUT OF HIS OWN HOME. He wants his shit. She’s trying to prevent him from taking his shit with him by blocking his path to it. I don’t think her punches were any more intended for damage than his were. Tempers were flaring, and punches were thrown, I doubt either of them stopped to think of the potential consequences. He sure as hell didn’t.[/quote]
I Agree that the situation started long before the video was rolling…Could care less. I don’t care what they were arguing about, whether it is over property, being kicked out of the home, him being caught fucking his neighbor’s dog…I don’t care. People argue. Once it goes to blows they are crossing the line.
I agree 100% that being bigger and stronger does not instantaneously make one the aggressor. My assessment of the situation was based on the totality of the circumstances that were present in the video. The fact is he is larger then her. Again, I agree that this alone does not make him the aggressor in and of its self, but accompanied by the fact that he DOES back her into the corner, kicks the tv behind her, and then in response to some pushes and half ass attempted strikes by her he cocks his fist back and punches her square in the head. All this combined makes him the aggressor in my book. His punch certainly did not look defensive in nature to me.
As for your issue over the property, I don’t know how things are done in Canada, but from where I come from if you are married (legal or common law) and live together, property is considered joint property. Both parties have a right to it until decided otherwise by a Judge. If you are willing to go to blows with your spouse over property you are a fucking idiot either way.
Does not matter if either of them considered the consequences of their actions before hand. They are still responsible for them.
And what pisses me off most about this whole thing is that they do this shit in front of their kids. Degenerates. Both of them.[/quote]
Between 0:00, and 0:20, she very clearly walks around him, and positions herself in the corner. He didn’t back her into it. She walked there to engage him. “IN RESPONSE to some pushes and half ass attempted strikes by her he cocks his fist back and punches her square in the head”. So she hits him first. If they were in the NHL that’s an extra 2 minutes FOR HER because she’s the insigator. AKA the aggressor. Plain and simple. His responce to her pussy jabs, was a pussy cross. They both go to the box, she’s their longer. Winning a fight you didn’t start does not make you the aggressor, anymore than being bigger or stronger does.
Yes, if your willing to go to blows over a playstation with your wife, your a fucking retard. But if your bigger, and stronger, and SHE is willing to go to blows with you over it, what the fuck does that make her? Dumber than you? Or smarter because she knows she can get away with it, thanks to cops who will have her back no matter what, and improve her favor with the judge because the cops only arrest him?
Arresting ONLY the man in this situation is EXACTLY why shit like this happens. She gets exactly what she wants with zero consequences. He’s gone. She’s got his shit. And when they go to the judge in family court FOREVER, HE WAS ARRESTED FOR DOMESTIC ASSUALT, AND SHE WASN’T. She will be reaping the REWARDS from hitting him for the next 20 years. And he’ll be wishing he’d hit her harder.[/quote]
Admit it… a woman once kicked your ass, right?
Wuss.[/quote]
As soon as I saw this thread I knew you’d be in here with your white knight bs. I’m not going to defend the punch, but it’s attitudes like yours that make women think they can get away with whatever they want anymore.
[quote]overstand wrote:
As soon as I saw this thread I knew you’d be in here with your white knight bs. I’m not going to defend the punch, but it’s attitudes like yours that make women think they can get away with whatever they want anymore. [/quote]
Ahh yes, Men are being physically assaulted by women everywhere because Women know they can get away with it. ITS A EPIDEMIC.
I mean just last week I saw a women in an alleyway beating up some poor dude.
After reading this thread
[quote]overstand wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]Broncoandy wrote:
[quote]clinton131 wrote:
[quote]Broncoandy wrote:
[quote]clinton131 wrote:
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
Ok I just watched it. Totally enraged.
I’m going to find a skinny dude today and beat a permanent lisp in to him and its this dudes fault.
Amidoingitrite?
For the record though, she did swing first. Shall we reincarnate the super hero thread? When, if ever, is it ok to punch a woman? Should he have just held her in place to display dominance and dissuade aggression or put a quick end to it, which worked?
I’m curious about the back story too, what got them there?
And, of course, the kids are the real victim.[/quote]
The question is who is the aggressor in this altercation? He is obviously twice the size, backs her into a corner, kicks at something next to her, and then stands over the top of her in a threatening manner. If I were in her shoes I would probably swing at him too. And from the video do you think those punches she threw were meant to do any damage to him? Do you think that this women even has the capacity to hurt this idiot with a punch even if her intent was to do so? As far as I am concerned the fact that she threw the first punch is irrelevent.[/quote]
This situation started evolving long before she was cornered. Contrary to popular white knight belief, being bigger and stronger does not instantaneously make you the aggressor. Judges are white knights of corse, so in court, he’s going to be labeled the agressor, but in reality, he doesn’t seem to be. Near as I can see, he’s not backing her into that corner. She walked around him, to get into that corner and restrict HIS movement. She placed herself in between him, and his possession. WHILE THROWING HIM OUT OF HIS OWN HOME. He wants his shit. She’s trying to prevent him from taking his shit with him by blocking his path to it. I don’t think her punches were any more intended for damage than his were. Tempers were flaring, and punches were thrown, I doubt either of them stopped to think of the potential consequences. He sure as hell didn’t.[/quote]
I Agree that the situation started long before the video was rolling…Could care less. I don’t care what they were arguing about, whether it is over property, being kicked out of the home, him being caught fucking his neighbor’s dog…I don’t care. People argue. Once it goes to blows they are crossing the line.
I agree 100% that being bigger and stronger does not instantaneously make one the aggressor. My assessment of the situation was based on the totality of the circumstances that were present in the video. The fact is he is larger then her. Again, I agree that this alone does not make him the aggressor in and of its self, but accompanied by the fact that he DOES back her into the corner, kicks the tv behind her, and then in response to some pushes and half ass attempted strikes by her he cocks his fist back and punches her square in the head. All this combined makes him the aggressor in my book. His punch certainly did not look defensive in nature to me.
As for your issue over the property, I don’t know how things are done in Canada, but from where I come from if you are married (legal or common law) and live together, property is considered joint property. Both parties have a right to it until decided otherwise by a Judge. If you are willing to go to blows with your spouse over property you are a fucking idiot either way.
Does not matter if either of them considered the consequences of their actions before hand. They are still responsible for them.
And what pisses me off most about this whole thing is that they do this shit in front of their kids. Degenerates. Both of them.[/quote]
Between 0:00, and 0:20, she very clearly walks around him, and positions herself in the corner. He didn’t back her into it. She walked there to engage him. “IN RESPONSE to some pushes and half ass attempted strikes by her he cocks his fist back and punches her square in the head”. So she hits him first. If they were in the NHL that’s an extra 2 minutes FOR HER because she’s the insigator. AKA the aggressor. Plain and simple. His responce to her pussy jabs, was a pussy cross. They both go to the box, she’s their longer. Winning a fight you didn’t start does not make you the aggressor, anymore than being bigger or stronger does.
Yes, if your willing to go to blows over a playstation with your wife, your a fucking retard. But if your bigger, and stronger, and SHE is willing to go to blows with you over it, what the fuck does that make her? Dumber than you? Or smarter because she knows she can get away with it, thanks to cops who will have her back no matter what, and improve her favor with the judge because the cops only arrest him?
Arresting ONLY the man in this situation is EXACTLY why shit like this happens. She gets exactly what she wants with zero consequences. He’s gone. She’s got his shit. And when they go to the judge in family court FOREVER, HE WAS ARRESTED FOR DOMESTIC ASSUALT, AND SHE WASN’T. She will be reaping the REWARDS from hitting him for the next 20 years. And he’ll be wishing he’d hit her harder.[/quote]
Admit it… a woman once kicked your ass, right?
Wuss.[/quote]
As soon as I saw this thread I knew you’d be in here with your white knight bs. I’m not going to defend the punch, but it’s attitudes like yours that make women think they can get away with whatever they want anymore. [/quote]
Admit it… a woman once kicked your ass, right?
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
Fuck an a, what if he beaned the bitch with an Atari remote?[/quote]
Dude, that’s no joke. That long joystick could put out an eye.
[quote]Ulty wrote:
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
Fuck an a, what if he beaned the bitch with an Atari remote?[/quote]
Dude, that’s no joke. That long joystick could put out an eye.[/quote]
No, It would not spin that way. I see you have never been pissed at Space Invaders before and thrown that fucker across the room.
but of course all the neck bearded virgins are gonna play captain save a ho
[quote]belligerent wrote:
but of course all the neck bearded virgins are gonna play captain save a hoe [/quote]
Great WiFi in momma’s basement, you just have to be able to manipulate the router with a skill set that only 30yo foreveralones are privy to.