Fight over Playstation

Off Topic
21

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:
I’m on the fence over the authenticy of the vid. I’m cynical to the core, but I can’t decide if this is a real couple on the verge of a divorce commentating on their actions knowing that it’s going to be played in front of a judge, or if they are actors doing a skit on domestic violence with a bad script (“you punched me”…“No! YOU punched ME”).

If it’s real, the husband is toast (cornering the wife then dragging her off to the camera to switch it off).
I’m calling fake. He knew the camera was there, he wouldn’t have hit her at all.

Maybe I’m giving too much credit though. Kids shouldn’t get married.

Oh, and they have ‘his and her’ Playstations: “This is mine!”…“Where’s MY fucking Playstation then?” (hubby makes a beeline for TV).[/quote]

There is a child in the room, sorry Roy, hard to think it was staged.

Personally would love about 5 minutes with this asshole alone. [/quote]

I know. The little girl calls out when she sees mother in distress (no tears during the raised voices in the lead up to the punch), but the little boy just stands there, then walks forward slightly when his sister runs to her mother . There are certain things that don’t exactly add up to me, like the dog either not getting out of the way or cowering when the man starts shouting. The mutt just stands behind him looking on in curiosity. If his master was such a tyrant,the dog would either be gone or making a lot of noise.

The dog’s behaviour indicates that it sees the event as a new experience, but the woman’s use of the camera implies that this is a regular occurence and she anticipated the guy’s actions.

You’ve also got a situation where the man knows the camera is rolling, but still hits the female (and with the size difference I’d have expected her to have dropped like a stone, or fallen back into the TV), then drags her to the camera to switch it off. He had control of the camera at that point.

If he didn’t erase the footage there and then, instead allowing it to go viral, he must’ve thought he was in the right…both parties are playing to the camera; both are aware their actions are being recorded, so if it’s real (which I haven’t completely dismissed yet), they were both hoping to use the footage as ammo in a divorce.

In the event that you are being filmed and want to present yourself in a certain way, you check your behaviour. All the man had to do was simply not fire back. There is less movement in the physical exchange than you’d expect, and if the guy reacted out of anger (remember he knows the camera is on him as he goes straight to it without looking), an uncontrolled shot from a man his size (relative to the woman) would have sent her flying.

I’m just weighing up both possibilities, and presenting some observations that strike me as odd. I really don’t mind being wrong.

22

[quote]imhungry wrote:
Just another day in the life of a wholesome american family.[/quote]
Fucking video games.

23

Ok I just watched it. Totally enraged.

I’m going to find a skinny dude today and beat a permanent lisp in to him and its this dudes fault.

Amidoingitrite?

For the record though, she did swing first. Shall we reincarnate the super hero thread? When, if ever, is it ok to punch a woman? Should he have just held her in place to display dominance and dissuade aggression or put a quick end to it, which worked?

I’m curious about the back story too, what got them there?

And, of course, the kids are the real victim.

24

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:
I’m on the fence over the authenticy of the vid. I’m cynical to the core, but I can’t decide if this is a real couple on the verge of a divorce commentating on their actions knowing that it’s going to be played in front of a judge, or if they are actors doing a skit on domestic violence with a bad script (“you punched me”…“No! YOU punched ME”).

If it’s real, the husband is toast (cornering the wife then dragging her off to the camera to switch it off).
I’m calling fake. He knew the camera was there, he wouldn’t have hit her at all.

Maybe I’m giving too much credit though. Kids shouldn’t get married.

Oh, and they have ‘his and her’ Playstations: “This is mine!”…“Where’s MY fucking Playstation then?” (hubby makes a beeline for TV).[/quote]

There is a child in the room, sorry Roy, hard to think it was staged.

Personally would love about 5 minutes with this asshole alone. [/quote]

I know. The little girl calls out when she sees mother in distress (no tears during the raised voices in the lead up to the punch), but the little boy just stands there, then walks forward slightly when his sister runs to her mother . There are certain things that don’t exactly add up to me, like the dog either not getting out of the way or cowering when the man starts shouting. The mutt just stands behind him looking on in curiosity. If his master was such a tyrant,the dog would either be gone or making a lot of noise.

The dog’s behaviour indicates that it sees the event as a new experience, but the woman’s use of the camera implies that this is a regular occurence and she anticipated the guy’s actions.

You’ve also got a situation where the man knows the camera is rolling, but still hits the female (and with the size difference I’d have expected her to have dropped like a stone, or fallen back into the TV), then drags her to the camera to switch it off. He had control of the camera at that point.

If he didn’t erase the footage there and then, instead allowing it to go viral, he must’ve thought he was in the right…both parties are playing to the camera; both are aware their actions are being recorded, so if it’s real (which I haven’t completely dismissed yet), they were both hoping to use the footage as ammo in a divorce.

In the event that you are being filmed and want to present yourself in a certain way, you check your behaviour. All the man had to do was simply not fire back. There is less movement in the physical exchange than you’d expect, and if the guy reacted out of anger (remember he knows the camera is on him as he goes straight to it without looking), an uncontrolled shot from a man his size (relative to the woman) would have sent her flying.

I’m just weighing up both possibilities, and presenting some observations that strike me as odd. I really don’t mind being wrong.[/quote]none of that circumstantial shit means much though, a true anger problem wouldn’t consider rationalities, the dog probably was curious and viewed the scenario as a pack “order” check and the little boy was stunned.

25

Parents It is sad that I must type this. But really this should be something everyone already knows.

You must stop teaching your children esp girls to Head Hunt. Do not punch the face its hard and unless you can hit with enough power to make the Head snap back causing the body to drop then you will just have someone look at you like your a pussy…Like the dude in the video.

She is also guilty of head hunting. When the dumb ass went to kick the TV she should have just went down to one knee and pushed against his leg with her bodyweight causing his dumb ass to fall and then kicked him in the testicles.

Shame how we are raising our young people these days…now someone send that guy a “HOW to Punch” DVD before he tries that again and someone kills his ass.

26

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
none of that circumstantial shit means much though, a true anger problem wouldn’t consider rationalities, the dog probably was curious and viewed the scenario as a pack “order” check and the little boy was stunned.
[/quote]

I’ve considered all of the above already…

If the guy had a true anger problem, the situation would have been more chaotic, he wouldn’t care to comment on the situation like he did and he wouldn’t want a camera trained on him.

If the guy had a true anger problem, the dog wouldn’t be right behind him, the “pack order check” would be a cue to run for the nearest corner or cower at his feet.

If the guy had a true anger problem, both kids would be distressed at the first sign of raised voices.

The “circumstantial shit” matters a lot…

27

^NO

They would all be use to him going off.

You are wrong.

28

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
Ok I just watched it. Totally enraged.

I’m going to find a skinny dude today and beat a permanent lisp in to him and its this dudes fault.

Amidoingitrite?

For the record though, she did swing first. Shall we reincarnate the super hero thread? When, if ever, is it ok to punch a woman? Should he have just held her in place to display dominance and dissuade aggression or put a quick end to it, which worked?

I’m curious about the back story too, what got them there?

And, of course, the kids are the real victim.[/quote]

The question is who is the aggressor in this altercation? He is obviously twice the size, backs her into a corner, kicks at something next to her, and then stands over the top of her in a threatening manner. If I were in her shoes I would probably swing at him too. And from the video do you think those punches she threw were meant to do any damage to him? Do you think that this women even has the capacity to hurt this idiot with a punch even if her intent was to do so? As far as I am concerned the fact that she threw the first punch is irrelevent.

29

[quote]BDSLift wrote:
^NO

They would all be use to him going off.

You are wrong.[/quote]

Why is the little girl in hysterics then if she’s used to that environment? Why is the little boy stunned? Why are they filming it if it’s that commonplace?

30

The only thing that i’m certain of, is that they’re in dire need of counseling.

31

[quote]roybot wrote:
I’ve considered all of the above already…

If the guy had a true anger problem, the situation would have been more chaotic, he wouldn’t care to comment on the situation like he did and he wouldn’t want a camera trained on him.

If the guy had a true anger problem, the dog wouldn’t be right behind him, the “pack order check” would be a cue to run for the nearest corner or cower at his feet.

If the guy had a true anger problem, both kids would be distressed at the first sign of raised voices.

The “circumstantial shit” matters a lot…[/quote]

I agree with your observation regarding the dogs and the kids.

I’m not sure whether this is staged or not but this must have been the first time the guy hit his girl in front of the kids or the dog. I’ve seen dogs dashing out of a room or cowering under tables when shit hits the fan, lol.

32

[quote]imhungry wrote:
The only thing that i’m certain of, is that they’re in dire need of sterilization.[/quote]

There fixed that for you

33

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:
Just another day in the life of a wholesome american family.[/quote]
Fucking video games.[/quote]

I swear some days you fucking get on my nerves but I won’t lie, this made me laugh out loud.

Fuck you for making me laugh.

34

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]BDSLift wrote:
^NO

They would all be use to him going off.

You are wrong.[/quote]

Why is the little girl in hysterics then if she’s used to that environment? Why is the little boy stunned? Why are they filming it if it’s that commonplace?

[/quote]

Now I’m confused in your above statement you said the Kids “Would be distressed at the first sign of raised voices” Now you are asking Why is the little girl in Hysterics?

Well it seems you are taking “TEXT Book” studies and trying to apply them to real world scenerio.
Like everything else there is a degree or an escalation to things. Maybe the guy goes off and the kids are use to it. But they were not use to him or “THEM” going at it to the above extent. Quite simple.

35

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:
Just another day in the life of a wholesome american family.[/quote]
Fucking video games.[/quote]

I swear some days you fucking get on my nerves but I won’t lie, this made me laugh out loud.

Fuck you for making me laugh.
[/quote]

HG while you two are fucking PLEASE take pics. I like pictures they make me smile.

36

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:
Just another day in the life of a wholesome american family.[/quote]
Fucking video games.[/quote]

I swear some days you fucking get on my nerves but I won’t lie, this made me laugh out loud.

Fuck you for making me laugh.
[/quote]
You can laugh all you want, just bend over and take it.

37

[quote]clinton131 wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
Ok I just watched it. Totally enraged.

I’m going to find a skinny dude today and beat a permanent lisp in to him and its this dudes fault.

Amidoingitrite?

For the record though, she did swing first. Shall we reincarnate the super hero thread? When, if ever, is it ok to punch a woman? Should he have just held her in place to display dominance and dissuade aggression or put a quick end to it, which worked?

I’m curious about the back story too, what got them there?

And, of course, the kids are the real victim.[/quote]

The question is who is the aggressor in this altercation? He is obviously twice the size, backs her into a corner, kicks at something next to her, and then stands over the top of her in a threatening manner. If I were in her shoes I would probably swing at him too. And from the video do you think those punches she threw were meant to do any damage to him? Do you think that this women even has the capacity to hurt this idiot with a punch even if her intent was to do so? As far as I am concerned the fact that she threw the first punch is irrelevent.[/quote]

This situation started evolving long before she was cornered. Contrary to popular white knight belief, being bigger and stronger does not instantaneously make you the aggressor. Judges are white knights of corse, so in court, he’s going to be labeled the agressor, but in reality, he doesn’t seem to be. Near as I can see, he’s not backing her into that corner. She walked around him, to get into that corner and restrict HIS movement. She placed herself in between him, and his possession. WHILE THROWING HIM OUT OF HIS OWN HOME. He wants his shit. She’s trying to prevent him from taking his shit with him by blocking his path to it. I don’t think her punches were any more intended for damage than his were. Tempers were flaring, and punches were thrown, I doubt either of them stopped to think of the potential consequences. He sure as hell didn’t.

38

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:
Just another day in the life of a wholesome american family.[/quote]
Fucking video games.[/quote]

I swear some days you fucking get on my nerves but I won’t lie, this made me laugh out loud.

Fuck you for making me laugh.
[/quote]
You can laugh all you want, just bend over and take it.[/quote]

Stop…Pause…Click…continue and thank you.

39

[quote]Broncoandy wrote:

[quote]clinton131 wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
Ok I just watched it. Totally enraged.

I’m going to find a skinny dude today and beat a permanent lisp in to him and its this dudes fault.

Amidoingitrite?

For the record though, she did swing first. Shall we reincarnate the super hero thread? When, if ever, is it ok to punch a woman? Should he have just held her in place to display dominance and dissuade aggression or put a quick end to it, which worked?

I’m curious about the back story too, what got them there?

And, of course, the kids are the real victim.[/quote]

The question is who is the aggressor in this altercation? He is obviously twice the size, backs her into a corner, kicks at something next to her, and then stands over the top of her in a threatening manner. If I were in her shoes I would probably swing at him too. And from the video do you think those punches she threw were meant to do any damage to him? Do you think that this women even has the capacity to hurt this idiot with a punch even if her intent was to do so? As far as I am concerned the fact that she threw the first punch is irrelevent.[/quote]

This situation started evolving long before she was cornered. Contrary to popular white knight belief, being bigger and stronger does not instantaneously make you the aggressor. Judges are white knights of corse, so in court, he’s going to be labeled the agressor, but in reality, he doesn’t seem to be. Near as I can see, he’s not backing her into that corner. She walked around him, to get into that corner and restrict HIS movement. She placed herself in between him, and his possession. WHILE THROWING HIM OUT OF HIS OWN HOME. He wants his shit. She’s trying to prevent him from taking his shit with him by blocking his path to it. I don’t think her punches were any more intended for damage than his were. Tempers were flaring, and punches were thrown, I doubt either of them stopped to think of the potential consequences. He sure as hell didn’t.[/quote]

Well lets cut the BS just for a sec. He had the option to walk his ass out or sit and call the cops on the crazy bitch that was not letting him take his video game. As for the BS about not cornering her. LMAO WHAT??? I’m sorry was he trying to leave thru the window behind the TV.

I’m still on the fence if the video is real but if it is He is a bitch for several reasons.

  1. He can’t hit worth a shit
  2. He kicked his own TV
  3. He let her get the best of him and on Video
  4. If he is leaving the TV what the Fuck is he going to do with the playstation. Take the TV.
40

[quote]Swolegasm wrote:
Lol at the youtubez comments defending him.[/quote]

I haven’t been to youtube to see the comments, but if you beleive that a woman should be able to BULLY, and chase a man from his home, and take all of his possessions simply on the merits of her “pussy pass”, you really should give some thought to why you believe women to be some sort of master race.

If a man walked into your house, and insisted that you leave your things, and get the fuck out, AND THAN took a swing at you, how would you react? I’m not saying it’s what I would have done (it’s certainly not). But how wrong is he really?