[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Proud_Virgin wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Further, unless already near your "peak, assuming you need to stay under some certain weight makes no sense. What if you can gain more than the limit you keep placing?
[/quote]
If you aren’t competing it is even more important to stay lean year-round…there is no “offseason” for non-competitive BBers. Of course, permabulkers take this as an excuse to never lean out.
[quote]
Just to say it…no one cares if you stayed super lean but you aren’t extreme at all in the size built…yet some posters here seem to think how lean they are is the main priority as if muscle gains are based on how lean you are.[/quote]
The exact same thing goes for the other extreme. Outside of fellow lifters, nobody cares how much muscle you have if its covered by fat. If you have a lot of muscle but are not lean, than you don’t look like a bodybuilder, you just look “big”. Like a construction worker, or maybe a football player.
Conditioned muscle is what looks impressive.[/quote]
Dude, have you ever walked around at 280lbs or more without a gut under 6 feet tall? Claiming people don’t find it impressive unless ripped is small minded and flat out wrong. You should get out more. It comes down to preference and claiming who does and doesn’t look like a bodybuilder based on some numbers is ridiculous.
Outside of fellow lifters, no one gives a shit about you being so muscular that regular clothes no longer fit…so claiming I or anyone else should model the body after what those outside of bodybuilding and serious weight lifting want isn’t what this is about anyway.
What is an ok level of leanness for you may not be to someone else…and once again, the semantics are getting tired. No one here is telling people to get fat. What was said was allow your gains to dictate your approach…SINCE YOUR GENETICS DICTATE WHAT YOU CAN AND CAN NOT GET AWAY WITH.
Why would I worry about staying super lean year round when my goal is to gain as much muscle as humanly possible? While I may avoid overdoing it, if the muscle gains justify it, it would make little sense to throw on the breaks due to leanness and not because muscle gains slowed.
This is not about reaching some journey with a destination right around the corner. Once again…are you huge yet?[/quote]
All I’m saying is despite your genetics, I don’t think a natural bodybuilder under 6 feet tall needs to get to 280-300 lb. Show me a 5’10’-5’11’’ bodybuilder that when fully dieted down has really made significant strides due solely to the fact that their offseason was spent at 280-300 as opposed to a more manageable weight.
Like you said, we don’t know and can’t judge how much muscle we are actually gaining…but by that same token, that also doesn’t at all mean that simply by virtue of gaining more weight you are gaining, or more importantly able to retain after a diet, any extra muscle.
If it works for you, then great. I’m just giving my opinion, because ultimately that’s all that these are.