Crazy Eights!

Goldberg…you big meanie!!!..;o)

Ever since I switched to lower rep training for legs (ie…less than 5 reps per set), I have found the workouts much more enjoyable. Reason #1 being that my legs have grown! Before, when I was doing 10-12 reps per set, my legs never responded the way I was hoping they would. Reason #2…I don’t feel nauseated when I do low rep training. As Thunder already alluded to, the set is over within a short amount of time. I can pound out 8x3, 10x3 or 12x4 of squats, which kicks my ass, but I feel great afterwards. Whereas, if I do 3x10-12 or the like…I usually end up feeling like I am going to puke (and thats the last thing I want). However, I will say that I do throw in sets of 10-12 each week of other exercises other than squats (extensions, step-ups, leg press)…but when it comes to squats, low reps is the way to go IMO.

How about retarded 4’s? You do four sets of 4 reps with a 3:00 rest in between…Okay forget it…Just does not sound as good.

Run up this hill one hundred times carrying a tire over your head. Be sure to only rest 11 seconds at the bottom of the hill. This workout is hard. I challenge you to try it. After you do you wont question its merit.

Anything can be made hard and anything can make you sore. People get sore after a car wreck. Does that mean thats a good way to train? This workout is gimicky and makes no sense whatsoever. Yes it will be hard, yes you will feel the burn, yes you might get sore. But there are a thousand things you can do in the gym to get tired and sore and they dont help you out at all.

No its not stupid because i wont help my goals. What if you have someone whos really strong for their bodyweight? The 1.21 wont do jack for them. What if someone has poor relative strength? 1.21 would kill them. Its just a gimmick. If you need a gimmick to keep you motivated then you need to go back to underwater basket weaving or candle making or whatever it was that you did before you started lifting.

Endurance/hypetrophy…goals…for legs…mainly slow twitch fibers and or IIa fibers. I don’t know I think it will do something. Is it a great program? I don’t know. It’s more of a typical body building program. Sometimes it great to have a fun workout.

However you did bring up a good point with respect to the 1.21 factor. Possibly a few protocol changes?

I personally like low rep training that is far from failure. Lots(LOTS) of sets of 2 or 3 reps of say my 5 or 6 rep max. But thats me. :slight_smile:

Goldberg,

Still haven’t opened your mind I see.

You love powerlifting, I understand that. Just because your world revolves around powerlifting does that mean other types of training bear no fruit.

Would you call running the Navy Seal Obstacle course “gimmicky”? That workout makes “no sense whatsoever”. You could have walked the same distance as that foolsih obstacle course, and look at the energy you would have saved! And while the course might make you sore, it really does nothing to increase your one rep max. Therefore, it must be bad and a waste of time, right?

The great Olympic Gold medal Wrestler, Dan Gable used to end his workouts by cutting a deck of cards and doing as many push-ups as numbers on the card. Aces were 11. All face cards equalled 10. Gimmicky? Perhaps. Effective? Absolutely!

You need to seriously consider the many others on this site that train with weights for either body building purposes or something called “conditioning”. They couldn’t care less how much they can one rep in the squat. In fact, I would guess that there are far more on this forum who do not competitvely powerlift! Think you are helping them out with your comments?

Lets take a closer look at one rep max vs endurance strength:

A 190lb. man who can squat 200lbs for 50 consecutive repititions has no less an achievement than another man of the same weight squatting 400lbs for one repetition. In fact, it could be argued that the man who can squat 200lbs. for 50 consecutive reps has a greater accomplishemt, as he has moved 10,000 pounds in that one enormous set! Where as, the second man only moved 400lbs. once.

I train on and off with a former powerlifting champion. He was able to deadlift something on the order of 650lbs at a body weight of 181lbs. Certainly not a national record, but still incredibly good for his body weight. He is quite strong in all movements. Bench, Squat, Standing Press. I have never seen him perform a weakly in any movement.

When it comes to Chin-Ups, he can hang a 100lb plate around his belt and crank out 4 or 5 dead hang chins, and this is at his current body weight of only 175lbs! I tried this (I weigh 188lbs) and could not complete even one rep! However, when it comes to just body weight only Chin-Ups I can do over 30. While my friend can only get 21 or 22. Point being, there are different types of strength. Just because you are exceptional in one does not necessarily mean that you are equally exceptional in another!

One could also make the argument that “real world” strength involves endurance strength a great deal more than it does one rep max efficiency. For example, who would be better at the following tasks, someone who is only efficient at one rep lifting, or a strength endurance man:

Wood Chopping, Snow/dirt Shoveling, Grappling/fighting, Masonry (block carrying) work, general warehouse loading/unloading and a host of other similar things. I think we all know the answer to this. Life is not one rep Goldbeg!

My program, Crazy Eights, is intense and quite beneficial depending upon your goals. While it may not suit a powerlifters regular needs, it is a worthwhile program. It assists the trainee in learning how to train through the pain barrier. It increases the trainees work capacity. And it also can add size to to the muscles. Here is what Dr. Fred Hatfield has to say about such training:

"Beginners find it more difficult to apply maximum intensity to their training, not because they aren’t able to use maximally hevy weights, but they have yet to learn how to train through the pain barrier!

As lactate concentrations rise, or as heart rate speeds up, effort becomes harder to apply. Total concentration as well as a learned response to fatigue signals that allow further reps to be performed (via greater neuronal input) allows advanced trainees to train past the point where beginnners may falter.

High reps and sets generally yield increases in mitochondrial mass within a muslce cell. Such mass will often account for as much as 20%-30% of the gross size of a muscle!

Performing these high reps with almost continuous tension will force a greater number of capillaries to form. Thus, the vascular bed surrounding each cell becomes more comprised of a protein substance called sarcoplasm will also increase, contributing as much as 25%-30% of the muscle cell’s total size!"

As you can see Dr. Fred Hatfield has great respect for intense higher rep training. And it is important to note that Dr. Hatfield has squatted 1014 pounds! And Deadlifted 766 pounds! He is also the author of 60 books on weight training.

There are many ways to train with weights and I am thankful that T-Mag is here to encourage this. It is unfortunate that everyone cannot add to this site by being open minded to various training methodologies.

I have great respect for Godberg and the sport of powerlifting. However, it’s time for Goldberg to respect other forms of weight training and the possibilitys that they may offer those of us who are not inclined to practice low rep lifting exclusively.

Well its obvious you know nothing about how i train. I routinely do reps over 10 and do things that are more in line with the repetition method. You didnt listen to anything that i said at all. I told you that the fact that the routine did nothing for my goals had nothing to do with my assessment of the program. Its not about me thinking every other program besides a powerlifting program sucks. Its not about thinking anything other than powerlifting goals are stupid. You didnt listen to a word i said.

  1. You take pick the weight off of how much you weigh. How much sense does this make? If you were gonna do anything you would take it off of your 1RM.

  2. Why 88 seconds? That makes no sense and is just some arbitrary number you came up with in your head.

  3. Why 1.21? Whats the significance of this? It again is an arbitrary number.

  4. Why close stance? You said just because it is harder. Most need work on their hamstrings. Wouldnt a wide stance and a sitting back technique work better for most people.

5.If your a big guy, this workout will be impossible for you to do. Especially with a close stance.

  1. The weight I would use for this routine would be 47 percent of my 1RM. In your routine I would be doing 64 reps with this percent. This is way over what prilipen recommends for the top end range not to even mention the optimal range.

It has nothing to do with the fact I dont like the routine. It has to do with the fact that it makes no sense. Again i say. Anything can be made hard. That does not make a good program.

I think this program could be revised a bit. As I said in a earlier post I missed the 1.21 deal. I also mentioned earlier why not rest 90 sec and 10 respectively? Therefore use 65 to 70% of your 1 rep max. As a GVT uses 60% if I remember and it’s 10 sets of 10 so if your doing 8 sets of 8…I think 65 to 70% makes sense. Yes no???

Prilepin…I had printed this chart off twice…from different years(never really used it to be honest). Do you know when the latest one has been done? And yes I didn’t follow it for my recomendations. Another question…as I only have the chart printed out with minimal text…any links to the actual tests Prilepin did. I want to read up more on this. Thanks.

i dont think much of 10 sets of 10 either. I think its a waste of time and energy. There are faster and better and less exhausting ways of getting bigger and stronger.

Let’s take them one by one:

  1. “You pick your weight off of how much you weigh, how much sense does that make?” You take your weight and multiply it by 121%. That makes a great deal of sense as you can use 121% as a “basis point” for going either higher or lower. If you display excellent strength with this routine you can obviously manipulate that figure to make it more difficult. Perhaps go to 150% or more! If you are weaker in this routine you may begin with less than the 121%.

  2. “Why :88 seconds?” I am obviously attmepting to give some rest, but not to much, to the trainee. If you notice most people who train their legs do a set and then wait a great deal of time. I suppose that some may hurry their sets, but I have personally never seen a powerlifter or anyone else “rush” their squat routine.

I would guess that the average trainee may wait anywhere from 3:00 and up between sets of squats. Most don’t even know it. I think :90 is probably more typical of what an average trainee waits between upper body movements (although that may even be fast judging by many). I simply cut it by :2 so that it would be :88. (Remember, it’s gimmicky). However, the added benefit is to get the trainee to actually focus on timing their sets with stop watch in hand.

  1. “Why 121%?” That was addressed in #1.

  2. “Why the close stance, that will not work the hamstrings” Because it is harder! If I wanted to put fourth a Hamstring routine I would have done it! Crazy Eights builds the quad muscle. It’s also great for conditioning, and pain threshold as my previous post points out.

  3. “If you are a big guy this workout (Crazy Eights) would be impossible for you to do.” Is it? If a strong trainee weighs 250lbs. that means that he would be performing the first part of the Crazy Eights routine with 300 pounds on the bar.

My first question to you would be what is your definition of a “strong trainee” at that weight? If he can squat anywhere around 600lbs. I would say that is strong, (I think the record for the 242lb. class is around 860lbs. You would know better). The 250lb. strong man would have to undergo the first part of Crazy Eights with a 300lb barbell. Looking at it another way, that would be somewhere around half his one rep max squat.

Are you stating that it is immpossible for a strong man of 250lbs. to perform Crazy Eights with 300lbs? I disagree, I weigh 188lbs and have never squatted 400lbs in my life. And I perform Crazy Eights with 228lbs. (and I’m an old guy ha).

However, even if it were impossible, as I stated in point number one, you use the 121% as a “basis point” to gauge your success. If the 250lb. trainee can only use 100%, then he can gauge his progess on this routine by using a larger percentage of his weight at each successive training session, until the 121% is either met or exceeded.

  1. “The weight I would use in your routine is way over what prilipen recommends.” I believe the prilipen sets method is based upon power output and one rep max. Again, I challenge you to think “out of the box” relative to training methodologies. This is not about training to see how much weight you can put up one time! However, a change of pace, as pointed out in my previous post, will help, not hurt you, under most conditions.

As I sated in my very first post: “If you are looking for something to shake up your leg routine, give Crazy Eights a try.” It is not for the beginner or the feint of heart!

The Crazy Eights routine benefits you in many ways, not the least of which is a net gain in the formation of capillaries. And you increase a substance called “sarcoplasm” which makes up to 30% of the muscles total size! As I stated in my previous post.

However, in addition to this,
you have an added benefit from conquering what Mel Siff describes as the “Fear of Pain” in his classic: “Supertraining.” Siff states: “The pain of effort is not necessarily a result of injury, but refers to one’s own personal interpretation of the intensity of a given effort.” As you progress with this routine you will, in fact expand your pain threshold and your progress will increase as well!

Goldberg,

Your previous response to AC says it all:

“I don’t think much of 10 sets of 10 either. I think it’s a waste of time and energy. There are faster and better and less exhausting ways of getting bigger and stronger.”

If your only goal is gaining strength in the one rep max then apparently nothing will suit you except lower rep training in the major lifts, Fair enough. I hope at least, that the rest of the forum is well cognizant of your inherent bias. The next time you trash someones routine they need to keep in mind that nothing can live up to your ideal of low reps for major muscle groups!

I am in good company if you are putting down 10 sets of 10 as well!

I don’t post that often but I have two things to say here. This workout is stupid based on the fact it is too many sets and the 121% only would pertain to an individual at one the moment in their life that this amount of weight would be appropriate which is what Coach says above. And secondly, this discussion should end. There is nothing else to be learned from or benefitted here.

Good god, what is about the routine that pissed everybody off? Dude say he likes it and threw it out there if any one wants to try it. I don’t think he was planning to build his doctoral thesis around it or anything.

What is your program good for?

What is 10 x 10 good for that cant be better achieved by other means?

Poliquins 10 x 10 was only a bit better then his add an inch to your arms in a day program, (before sully or someone else jumps in, im not dissing Poliquin, im sure all good coaches have had ordinary programs ahhaha :slight_smile: )

"Good god, what is about the routine that pissed everybody off? Dude say he likes it and threw it out there if any one wants to try it. I don’t think he was planning to build his doctoral thesis around it or anything. "

While I cant speak for the others i think that it was the fact that in the original thread starter thing, he didnt mention what it would be good for and seemed to only state that it would be painful. Now hopefully by now we have all learnt that pain is not the desired out come of training but a side effect of it… Also, the 121% thing is only good for a person of that strength/endurance abilities… Other people genuinely feel that there are better methods for training the motor qualities that this is intended for…It also seems that a bunch of people have a general disliking for zeb for whatever reasons…

People here seem to argue rather fiercely but its all part of the fun i dont think any of us really read to much into it :slight_smile:

For a similar fun check out a couple of the “Bear” threads ahahh they were cool too

Chris,

Actually, I don’t take any of this personally. In fact, it’s fun! Hey, I can type about 60 words a minute, and appreciate the give and take. (As if you haven’t noticed).

I made the original post because this is a routine I have done, and shared with others, throughout the years. In debating the point with Goldberg I actually better understand why Crazy Eights is such a good routine. And what exactly it does and does not do.

That’s one reason this forum is so darn beneficial. When someone disagrees with you they call you out on it. In typing a response you better define for yourself the strong points.

Those who choose to read it may also learn a thing or two. I know that I have learned a great deal from this forum, and I appreciate everyone who contributes to it in a positive way!

I know that this has actually encouraged me to post my other “pet” routines. If someone doesn’t like them they can call me out on it! I’ll be waiting!

Haha

I still stand by my recommendations in my last post on how to make this program more accessible to other lifters besides ZEB.

Goldberg doesn’t like 10x10…who cares. Alot like it alot don’t. I’m indifferent.

I’m still interested where I can find more recent studies Prilipen did. So far I haven’t been able to find what I’m looking for.

im having fun too. people shouldnt take things personally. and its america we can talk about whatever we want.

You might want to ask the question over at elite as i have no clue.

I can name a few people who dont care for 10x10. All i got was weak, tired, and small from it.

Everyone responds differently to any given program. We are all individuals. I too have seen those perform routines which I thrive on and they got nothing from, and vice versa.

Sorry, this is a long thread, but did you explain where the 121% number came from? I could understand picking a number in that range, but wouldn’t 128 or 118 be a little more gimmicky?

I think a lot of the criticism has come because you didn’t provide a lot of scientific backing for the set/rep/rest period protocol. Telling why it works would have gotten a lot of the monkeys off your back. Without this, even if it worked, people would still question it. Just trying to help.