[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
[quote]Jackie_Jacked wrote:
I guess they can afford $2000 in child care costs. Good for them for wanting and planning that many children and being able to financially support them all.[/quote]
On one hand, yes, they are financially responsible. However, I wouldn’t say being able to afford $2k/month for childcare the idea that they can afford so many kids.
Stay with me as we change gears a bit.
Kids should be eating the finest food available, not processed foods, nor hormone/anti-biotic laden foods. I doubt many parents would be able to afford such a diet with so many kids. But, by making sacrifices in food quality, they are able to “afford” so many kids.
This goes for many though who only have one kid, one such reason I don’t want kids right now, we wouldn’t be able to sustain our food quality/workout time/healthy lifestyle to my standards.[/quote]
What did you eat when you were a kid?[/quote]
so you think it’s responsible for parents that can’t really afford to have kids, to have them anyways and feed them the SAD? putting organic/grass-fed aside, I’m talking lucky charms for breakfast, PB white bread sammiches and fast food dinners b/c maybe that’s all they can get by on. BTW- that literally was my diet as a kid.
[/quote]
The world needs ditch diggers too, bro. Everyone can’t be the best and brightest. As long as parents can feed, clothe, and shelter their kids (without gov’t assistance) and give them love, it’s all good in my book.
You sound like a fucking snob.