[quote]theBeth wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]theBeth wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]theBeth wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]theBeth wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]theBeth wrote:
[quote]HeavyTriple wrote:
“everything but the sex sucked”
“I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of times I actually had an orgasm with him”
…lolwut?[/quote]
The sex was a kinky adrenalin rush. But as far as me getting off, I have to open up to someone for that and frankly, his personality turned me off. It’s a trust thing too. Intuitively I knew I couldn’t trust him. I shouldn’t have let it drag out like it did.
[/quote]
Honestly can’t see why anyone would even get that far with someone they can’t trust and whose personality turned them off.
And you were considering marriage?[/quote]
I wasn’t considering marriage. The who gun thing was fucked up and we never did clear that up.[/quote]
Okay Beth not to be a dick, like Chushin I am old and hard of understanding.
If you did not enjoy life with this guy other than bumping uglies, than why and the fuck did you stay that long? [/quote]
I was a dumb cunt and thought things would change or I could influence change - and because he kept saying, be patient with me I need some time.[/quote]
Fair enough.
Did you learn from this relationship? Or are you doomed to repeat?[/quote]
I learned. I’m not sure why I always do it the hard way. Most of all I learned a lot about myself and what I need to work on. [/quote]
Well, in the meantime, perfectly fine LTR or marriage material men are learning a lesson on their own.
You see, all that time “learning” about whatever, a lot of men are having a hard time while asswipes get drowned in poon.
It creates an emergent structure, due to millions of women having their “learning experiences” which can be summarized by the works of the great GBFM:
Alpha fux and Beta bux.
Meaning, while all the women are out their doing their “learning”, a lot of men learn that being a total asswipe gets you laid and that they have a very hard time paying full price for the leftovers they are so generously granted when women all magically have done their “learning” at around 28-30 and stampede in the direction of beta providers.
That has interesting longterm repercussions. [/quote]
Actually hard to argue with this, BUT I had my white knight learning experience. How does that fit in O[/quote]
I am assuming that you refer to the first mother of one of your numerous children?
Well, I think we both can agree that teenagers and most early twenty guys and gals are basically idiots.
However, the problem arises because what makes a woman da sexay is youth and beauty whereas what makes a man da sexay is basically social dominance which takes time to develop.
The luxury you as a man have is time, you hit your peak between 35 to 40 and then you stay there for a long time.
Youth and beauty, fertility indicators that they are, peak at around 17-24.
Problem is, girls, like guys these age are mostly idiots at that age but their SMV is sky high.
They get a brief window of peak desirability and without a culture or the law to steer them they fuck up the sexual marketplace forever, because they establish the rules, they then later decry because they sooner or later inevitably loose the upper hand.
So yes, I agree with you, men need to learn a few things too, but we have a privilege women are not granted, we have time.
Women are like a young,succesful athlete these days, drunk with power, wasting it all on bling, not considering that the party can and will be very over soon.
[/quote]
So, like I’ve said before: Women are like lettuce, men are like wine?[/quote]
Well, the most common usage is women age like milk, men like wine, but I have uncorked some bottles…
Anyhow,yes.
Hard monogamy was a good way of dealing with this, it bundled the sex drives of young males with the need for stability and security of older women in a nice little package called marriage which nobody could weasel out of easily.
Kind of fair, over the long run.