[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
Yes they most certianly change. You can accomplish things on AAS that nattys simply cannot. It changes the bodies physiology. How would that make the approaches they take different?[/quote]
It increase protein anabolism. It doesn’t change how your body gains muscle. T changes the rate.
The rules works the same aside from dieting.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
Yes they most certianly change. You can accomplish things on AAS that nattys simply cannot. It changes the bodies physiology. How would that make the approaches they take different?[/quote]
It increase protein anabolism. It doesn’t change how your body gains muscle. T changes the rate.
The rules works the same aside from dieting.[/quote]
I am not here to be a teacher in AAS but you have more reading to do if that’s all you think they do
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
Yes they most certianly change. You can accomplish things on AAS that nattys simply cannot. It changes the bodies physiology. How would that make the approaches they take different?[/quote]
It increase protein anabolism. It doesn’t change how your body gains muscle. T changes the rate.
The rules works the same aside from dieting.[/quote]
I am not here to be a teacher in AAS but you have more reading to do if that’s all you think they do[/quote]
?? Do you understand that the rules of gaining muscle do not change?
This isn’t about every single benefit of using steroids.
The only thing that would change is the amount of progress made.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
Yes they most certianly change. You can accomplish things on AAS that nattys simply cannot. It changes the bodies physiology. How would that make the approaches they take different?[/quote]
It increase protein anabolism. It doesn’t change how your body gains muscle. T changes the rate.
The rules works the same aside from dieting.[/quote]
I am not here to be a teacher in AAS but you have more reading to do if that’s all you think they do[/quote]
?? Do you understand that the rules of gaining muscle do not change?
This isn’t about every single benefit of using steroids.
The only thing that would change is the amount of progress made.[/quote]
Please tell me what the rules of gaining muscle are…totally serious I want to hear
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
Yes they most certianly change. You can accomplish things on AAS that nattys simply cannot. It changes the bodies physiology. How would that make the approaches they take different?[/quote]
It increase protein anabolism. It doesn’t change how your body gains muscle. T changes the rate.
The rules works the same aside from dieting.[/quote]
I am not here to be a teacher in AAS but you have more reading to do if that’s all you think they do[/quote]
?? Do you understand that the rules of gaining muscle do not change?
This isn’t about every single benefit of using steroids.
The only thing that would change is the amount of progress made.[/quote]
Please tell me what the rules of gaining muscle are…totally serious I want to hear[/quote]
You mean besides stimulus plus food intake equals muscles?
Someone on steroids may gain more muscle from the effort…and may lose less muscle when dieting…but it does not change the PROCESS in which muscle is built.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
Yes they most certianly change. You can accomplish things on AAS that nattys simply cannot. It changes the bodies physiology. How would that make the approaches they take different?[/quote]
It increase protein anabolism. It doesn’t change how your body gains muscle. T changes the rate.
The rules works the same aside from dieting.[/quote]
I am not here to be a teacher in AAS but you have more reading to do if that’s all you think they do[/quote]
?? Do you understand that the rules of gaining muscle do not change?
This isn’t about every single benefit of using steroids.
The only thing that would change is the amount of progress made.[/quote]
Please tell me what the rules of gaining muscle are…totally serious I want to hear[/quote]
You mean besides stimulus plus food intake equals muscles?
Someone on steroids may gain more muscle from the effort…and may lose less muscle when dieting…but it does not change the PROCESS in which muscle is built.[/quote]
You didn’t answer the question all I want if you to define your statment
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
Yes they most certianly change. You can accomplish things on AAS that nattys simply cannot. It changes the bodies physiology. How would that make the approaches they take different?[/quote]
It increase protein anabolism. It doesn’t change how your body gains muscle. T changes the rate.
The rules works the same aside from dieting.[/quote]
I am not here to be a teacher in AAS but you have more reading to do if that’s all you think they do[/quote]
?? Do you understand that the rules of gaining muscle do not change?
This isn’t about every single benefit of using steroids.
The only thing that would change is the amount of progress made.[/quote]
Please tell me what the rules of gaining muscle are…totally serious I want to hear[/quote]
You mean besides stimulus plus food intake equals muscles?
Someone on steroids may gain more muscle from the effort…and may lose less muscle when dieting…but it does not change the PROCESS in which muscle is built.[/quote]
You didn’t answer the question [/quote]
Yes, I did…in the very first sentence.
You seem unable to follow most discussions.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
Yes they most certianly change. You can accomplish things on AAS that nattys simply cannot. It changes the bodies physiology. How would that make the approaches they take different?[/quote]
It increase protein anabolism. It doesn’t change how your body gains muscle. T changes the rate.
The rules works the same aside from dieting.[/quote]
I am not here to be a teacher in AAS but you have more reading to do if that’s all you think they do[/quote]
?? Do you understand that the rules of gaining muscle do not change?
This isn’t about every single benefit of using steroids.
The only thing that would change is the amount of progress made.[/quote]
Please tell me what the rules of gaining muscle are…totally serious I want to hear[/quote]
You mean besides stimulus plus food intake equals muscles?
Someone on steroids may gain more muscle from the effort…and may lose less muscle when dieting…but it does not change the PROCESS in which muscle is built.[/quote]
You didn’t answer the question [/quote]
Yes, I did…in the very first sentence.
You seem unable to follow most discussions.[/quote]
You ended it with a ? The went on to attempt to talk about other things that affect muscle gain which are part of the process of muscle gain. So it seemed quite incomplete
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
You ended it with a ? The went on to attempt to talk about other things that affect muscle gain which are part of the process of muscle gain. So it seemed quite incomplete
[/quote]
Yeah, they call that “reading comprehension”.
They also taught us what a rhetorical question was.
I guess I can tutor you later if you wish.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
You ended it with a ? The went on to attempt to talk about other things that affect muscle gain which are part of the process of muscle gain. So it seemed quite incomplete
[/quote]
Yeah, they call that “reading comprehension”.
They also taught us what a rhetorical question was.
I guess I can tutor you later if you wish.[/quote]
And the childish comments come out. You were doing so good
And this is why you get trolled and no one wants you on the site. You can’t even hold a grown up conversation. Lol
Drama is such a beautiful thing.
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
You ended it with a ? The went on to attempt to talk about other things that affect muscle gain which are part of the process of muscle gain. So it seemed quite incomplete
[/quote]
Yeah, they call that “reading comprehension”.
They also taught us what a rhetorical question was.
I guess I can tutor you later if you wish.[/quote]
And the childish comments come out. You were doing so good
And this is why you get trolled and no one wants you on the site. You can’t even hold a grown up conversation. Lol[/quote]
Dude, it is not my job to baby you through a discussion.
I answered you right off. It takes two more posts for you to understand you were answered.
Don’t blame me because you catch on slower. I am not going to pretend that you are catching on quickly to make you feel better.
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
You ended it with a ? The went on to attempt to talk about other things that affect muscle gain which are part of the process of muscle gain. So it seemed quite incomplete
[/quote]
Yeah, they call that “reading comprehension”.
They also taught us what a rhetorical question was.
I guess I can tutor you later if you wish.[/quote]
And the childish comments come out. You were doing so good
And this is why you get trolled and no one wants you on the site. You can’t even hold a grown up conversation. Lol[/quote]
I actually don’t have a problem with the guy.
Actually, I see a lot of guys purposely pick fights with PX. It is unnecessary. Its like everyone gets butthurt over nothing, and then jumps all over the guy. Calm down.
Anyone remember RogueVampire and AchillesOfWar? Same shit. Yea RV was delusional at times, but the guy was just trying to add to the conversation. Unnecessary.
[quote]trivium wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
You ended it with a ? The went on to attempt to talk about other things that affect muscle gain which are part of the process of muscle gain. So it seemed quite incomplete
[/quote]
Yeah, they call that “reading comprehension”.
They also taught us what a rhetorical question was.
I guess I can tutor you later if you wish.[/quote]
And the childish comments come out. You were doing so good
And this is why you get trolled and no one wants you on the site. You can’t even hold a grown up conversation. Lol[/quote]
I actually don’t have a problem with the guy.
Actually, I see a lot of guys purposely pick fights with PX. It is unnecessary. Its like everyone gets butthurt over nothing, and then jumps all over the guy. Calm down.
Anyone remember RogueVampire and AchillesOfWar? Same shit. Yea RV was delusional at times, but the guy was just trying to add to the conversation. Unnecessary. [/quote]
Lol who is butt Hurt. This is the guy who whines and cries we can’t have civil discussions. I am merely pointing out exactly why. It cracks me up. Irony is amazing
I feel like the only reason that this kind of stuff is allowed to continue is: 1. X is probably bringing a bunch of traffic to this site, so he is allowed to get away with more than he should. 2. Every now and then a few posters will take his side, which in his mind makes him right. The reality is that X, after all these years, has only really been able to get a few guys to agree with him. The worst part is that, other than SteelyD, most of the guys that I’ve seen agree with him have mediocre physiques.
Seems funny that they keep trying to claim that the bulk way works, when the likelihood of it producing a desirable physique seems to be like 1 or 2 out of every 10.
Now, that does not take into account all of these “fullhousers” that may or may not be assisted. I’m talking natties. Inb4 I get told how little I matter and how little my opinion matters and how ignorable I am.
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
I feel like the only reason that this kind of stuff is allowed to continue is: 1. X is probably bringing a bunch of traffic to this site, so he is allowed to get away with more than he should. 2. Every now and then a few posters will take his side, which in his mind makes him right. The reality is that X, after all these years, has only really been able to get a few guys to agree with him. The worst part is that, other than SteelyD, most of the guys that I’ve seen agree with him have mediocre physiques.
Seems funny that they keep trying to claim that the bulk way works, when the likelihood of it producing a desirable physique seems to be like 1 or 2 out of every 10.
Now, that does not take into account all of these “fullhousers” that may or may not be assisted. I’m talking natties. Inb4 I get told how little I matter and how little my opinion matters and how ignorable I am. [/quote]
What is a fullhouser?
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
I feel like the only reason that this kind of stuff is allowed to continue is: 1. X is probably bringing a bunch of traffic to this site, so he is allowed to get away with more than he should. 2. Every now and then a few posters will take his side, which in his mind makes him right. The reality is that X, after all these years, has only really been able to get a few guys to agree with him. The worst part is that, other than SteelyD, most of the guys that I’ve seen agree with him have mediocre physiques.
Seems funny that they keep trying to claim that the bulk way works, when the likelihood of it producing a desirable physique seems to be like 1 or 2 out of every 10.
Now, that does not take into account all of these “fullhousers” that may or may not be assisted. I’m talking natties. Inb4 I get told how little I matter and how little my opinion matters and how ignorable I am. [/quote]
What is a fullhouser?
[/quote]
You have much to learn young Bauber Fett
[quote]Smashingweights wrote:
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
I feel like the only reason that this kind of stuff is allowed to continue is: 1. X is probably bringing a bunch of traffic to this site, so he is allowed to get away with more than he should. 2. Every now and then a few posters will take his side, which in his mind makes him right. The reality is that X, after all these years, has only really been able to get a few guys to agree with him. The worst part is that, other than SteelyD, most of the guys that I’ve seen agree with him have mediocre physiques.
Seems funny that they keep trying to claim that the bulk way works, when the likelihood of it producing a desirable physique seems to be like 1 or 2 out of every 10.
Now, that does not take into account all of these “fullhousers” that may or may not be assisted. I’m talking natties. Inb4 I get told how little I matter and how little my opinion matters and how ignorable I am. [/quote]
What is a fullhouser?
[/quote]
You have much to learn young Bauber Fett
[/quote]
Young padawon…sp?
[quote]Smashingweights wrote:
[quote]Bauber wrote:
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
I feel like the only reason that this kind of stuff is allowed to continue is: 1. X is probably bringing a bunch of traffic to this site, so he is allowed to get away with more than he should. 2. Every now and then a few posters will take his side, which in his mind makes him right. The reality is that X, after all these years, has only really been able to get a few guys to agree with him. The worst part is that, other than SteelyD, most of the guys that I’ve seen agree with him have mediocre physiques.
Seems funny that they keep trying to claim that the bulk way works, when the likelihood of it producing a desirable physique seems to be like 1 or 2 out of every 10.
Now, that does not take into account all of these “fullhousers” that may or may not be assisted. I’m talking natties. Inb4 I get told how little I matter and how little my opinion matters and how ignorable I am. [/quote]
What is a fullhouser?
[/quote]
You have much to learn young Bauber Fett
[/quote]
The longer I live it seems the less I know.
Apparently a “fullhouser” is someone who isn’t afraid to put on a bit of fat in order to make muscular gains. It just seems like a less efficient method than lean gaining, imo.