[quote]Stronghold wrote:
Also, if you have patellar tendinitis that is keeping you from squatting, why are you doing split squats and leg extensions?[/quote]
Split squats don’t bother it all.
And surprisingly neither do leg extensions, but that is one reason I don’t go as heavy on the leg ext’s. Also, the #s for that are per leg.
BB Bench (again had to alter workout slightly for work competition)
8x135
8x155
8x175
BB Incline
8x115
8x135
10x155 +2 reps over last w/o
MTS HS Decline (per side)
8x55
8x60
10x65 +2 reps over last w/o
Cable Fly
12x40
12x60 + 2 reps over last w/o
I think what has happened, is I’ve been experimenting with different log methods. I found a program I like now on the iPhone (3 different way recently), which has caused me to not be able to look back on previous workouts and exceed the previous one. Hopefully, I’ll be pushing harder now I know why I did previously
You are worrying about what should be the icing on the cake more than you are about what really matters. $400/month in supplements isn’t going to make up for you training like a pussy. You need heavy slag iron more than you need fancy supplements.[/quote]
J-fit, I gotta say, I kind of agree. I like you and all, its just that once I got that idea out of my head, I started to porgress. I remember making a big deal over ion exchange isolate and CFM isolate and plain old isolate. Don’t get me wrong, I still make it a point to switch them up from time to time, but I started to really focus on the lifting.
Also, if it’s any consolation, I was in the same boat as far as knee issues is concerned. To this day, I still have trouble running/doing plyometric work. I got my legs a little over 25" at a reasonable leanness (can see separations and have abs) doing high rep leg presses, split squats, and lunges. Unfortunately, my squat suffers to this day because my torso can’t take the load that my legs can handle due to all of that leg work.
I’m really interested in how this training log turns out. So far it seems that the supps are not doing much on their own? (what I’m concluding after reading the above)
I guess nothing replaces hard work. But I will be interested to see how fast you progress with the supps now that you’re pushing yourself harder.
Do you have any sort of a control for this experiment? Any kind of an idea of how fast you normally progress with a certain program (without supps)?
[quote]Oleena wrote:
I’m really interested in how this training log turns out. So far it seems that the supps are not doing much on their own? (what I’m concluding after reading the above)
I guess nothing replaces hard work. But I will be interested to see how fast you progress with the supps now that you’re pushing yourself harder.
Do you have any sort of a control for this experiment? Any kind of an idea of how fast you normally progress with a certain program (without supps)?[/quote]
When bulking it takes around 4300-4500 calories/day to gain about one pound per week.
I’m maintaining at around 3800 cals/day.
The only new supps I’ll be introducing will be MAG-10/11-T (though I’ve gained much more than one pound per week in the past with 11-T), and I’m considering SWF as I already have a tub of it
No joke but I definately think with those supps you could be tapping higher intensity. Supersets/Mechdropsets/6-day split/double training etc (not all at once)
[quote]echelon101 wrote:
No joke but I definately think with those supps you could be tapping higher intensity. Supersets/Mechdropsets/6-day split/double training etc (not all at once)[/quote]
I haven’t started the MAG-10, 11-T yet. Planning on Monday.
Wanted to give the ReceptorMax enough time to allow the ALC to do its job
My interpretation of the marketing of the supplements that you are taking is that they enable the user to complete programs that are denser than normal programs. Doing three sets for five exercises seems like you are not using the full potential.
Hey bro, I’m still watching and like the idea of what you are going to try-I think i can definitely learn something from what you are doing, so keep it up.