Are Bodypart Splits Useless?

[quote]pumped340 wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Don’t forget to mention warm ups and pyramiding the weight up… Just to be on the safe side.
Some people seem to think that 3 sets per exercise means walking into the gym, grabbing their 6-8"RM" and doing 3 sets to failure with that very weight…

Agreed. I always pyramid up in weight. Not doing so is a great way to injure yourself once you move to much heavier weight.

i would hope most people at least do some warm ups for the muscle. Personally i generally pyramid up on the first exercise but if the next one is using the same muscle i go into the 2-4 straight sets.
Professor X wrote:

People like you are irritating. No one gives a shit if you can find ONE exception to absolutely everything. That doesn’t change what works for MOST.

It’s not one exception, i just used that particular guy because he happens to be huge and very strong who said himself he cant recover as well from 4 days a week. Obviously if a guy that big who has built up his recovery capacities over the years cant do as well on a 4 day split there are TONS of others who cant.

I’m not saying your 4-5 day recommendation is even bad. I’ve done 4 day splits before and liked them. I’m just saying i don’t agree with your comment that 3 days is definitely not enough
[/quote]

The point is, what did he do to BUILD that size, not what is he doing now that he has it.

I keep writing this…and you keep missing it.

[quote]Westclock wrote:
OctoberGirl wrote:
Westclock wrote:
I have also heard that eventually all serious natural lifters will go to a 3 day split.

Recovery long term is simply impossible with anything else.

I have used the 3 day split in the past, and its great, although its difficult for me to take that man off days and not feel like crap, have to do cardio or play pickup or anything to stay active.

where did you hear this from and do you really believe anything that says “all do this”? Only believe everyone or all do something if they are talking about death.

and a lot of things are considered impossible until someone does it

Meant serious natural power lifters actually, left that part out

Bodybuilders dont usually place quite the strain on their joints or bodies in general.[/quote]

WHY IS ANYONE TALKING ABOUT POWERLIFTERS IN THIS CONTEXT?!

[quote]Professor X wrote:
pumped340 wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Don’t forget to mention warm ups and pyramiding the weight up… Just to be on the safe side.
Some people seem to think that 3 sets per exercise means walking into the gym, grabbing their 6-8"RM" and doing 3 sets to failure with that very weight…

Agreed. I always pyramid up in weight. Not doing so is a great way to injure yourself once you move to much heavier weight.

i would hope most people at least do some warm ups for the muscle. Personally i generally pyramid up on the first exercise but if the next one is using the same muscle i go into the 2-4 straight sets.
Professor X wrote:

People like you are irritating. No one gives a shit if you can find ONE exception to absolutely everything. That doesn’t change what works for MOST.

It’s not one exception, i just used that particular guy because he happens to be huge and very strong who said himself he cant recover as well from 4 days a week. Obviously if a guy that big who has built up his recovery capacities over the years cant do as well on a 4 day split there are TONS of others who cant.

I’m not saying your 4-5 day recommendation is even bad. I’ve done 4 day splits before and liked them. I’m just saying i don’t agree with your comment that 3 days is definitely not enough

The point is, what did he do to BUILD that size, not what is he doing now that he has it.

I keep writing this…and you keep missing it.[/quote]

You’re beating a dead horse. The point about split’s superiority has been made. People are too ignorant to accept that fact and will ignore anything that will damage there position. They have no credibility and at this point arguing is giving me too much of a head ache. Let them do TBT, let them preach rubish, cause I know it won’t affect your training, my training and anyone else with a the goal to succeed’s training.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
pumped340 wrote:
Professor X wrote:

The point is, what did he do to BUILD that size, not what is he doing now that he has it.

I keep writing this…and you keep missing it.[/quote]

Missing or ignoring?

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Westclock wrote:
OctoberGirl wrote:
Westclock wrote:
I have also heard that eventually all serious natural lifters will go to a 3 day split.

Recovery long term is simply impossible with anything else.

I have used the 3 day split in the past, and its great, although its difficult for me to take that man off days and not feel like crap, have to do cardio or play pickup or anything to stay active.

where did you hear this from and do you really believe anything that says “all do this”? Only believe everyone or all do something if they are talking about death.

and a lot of things are considered impossible until someone does it

Meant serious natural power lifters actually, left that part out

Bodybuilders dont usually place quite the strain on their joints or bodies in general.

WHY IS ANYONE TALKING ABOUT POWERLIFTERS IN THIS CONTEXT?![/quote]

Mostly because Im not a bodybuilder, and I always think about things in terms of powerlifting.

Cant imagine any bodybuilder doing a 3 day split, because I haven’t met too many serious bodybuilders that weren’t drug assisted.

If your drug assisted a 3 day split is nonsense. So why we would even discuss it at high level in bodybuilding.

[quote]Westclock wrote:

Mostly because Im not a bodybuilder, and I always think about things in terms of powerlifting.[/quote]

So you jumped into the bodybuilding forum…into a thread about what works best for bodybuilding…to tell us about powerlifters?

This is why there is a T-Cell. I have never jumped into the strength forum…into a thread about powerlifting…to talk about bodybuilding unless someone brought up some specific point in that area. Yet, tons of you come here when you don’t even bodybuild.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
trextacy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
trextacy wrote:

Cosgrove

By the way, for body comp Poliquin uses his German Body Comp program, which is, you guessed, 3x per week full body.

Read Dr. Leistner’s “Sensible Training” article.

Read the article I posted twice already in this thread.

Get a clue.

Cosgrove thinks splits are superior for bodybuilding. He prefers TBT for athletes and average people that have time constraints.

http://www.elitefts.com/documents/breaking_glass.htm

No, he thinks that for pros and top level amateurs…as I’ve been saying the whole time. As far as I know, no one of that cabliber has posted on here. Certainly people like Jehovah’s fitness, zephead and other noobs would not qualify (nothing personal…I certainly don’t either).

No, you are dead wrong. We had this very conversation with him right here in these forums and he said he used splits in the exact way we have been discussing. Not limited to pros and top amateurs.

If you don’t believe me ask him yourself.

Unfortunately, he failed to state that he thought splits were better for bodybuilding in “TNROL.” ACtually, I guess he does have splits listed in his “hypertrophy” section, but they’re upper/lower body splits. Could you provide a link for the conversation you were talking about?

http://www.T-Nation.com/free_online_forum/sports_body_training_performance_bodybuilding_article/cosgroves_five_ahha_moments_1?id=2035727&pageNo=4

03-28-2008, 10:38 AM
Alwyn Cosgrove wrote:
Protoculture wrote:

If hypertrophy is systemic, then is there even a point to perform high frequency of same/similar movement throughout the week?

In other words do you think that 3 full body workouts per week would result in the same gains as performing 1 upper body push workout, 1 upper body pull workout, and 1 lower body workout per week if your goal was hypertrophy.

If the goal is just hypertrophy - initially - or if time is a challenge – full body will be preferable. Frequency is the biggest factor in success at that point.

However at some point I think you’re going to need a certain volume ‘threshold’ per muscle group. And it’s too hard to get that volume for every muscle in the session without training for hours. And the longer the workout - the more the intensity starts to suffer.

So then I think an upper-lower split is the way to go.

After that - I’d go to a further split. Maybe even going as far as to do two upper body workouts (push and pull, or horizontal and vertical) and two lower body workouts (quad and ham dominant) over 8-10 days.

A beginner can probably completely work and develop a body part with good intensity in 2-3 sets.

So if each set is about 30-60s long, with a 90s or so rest period - you can get a lot done (20+ sets) in a one hour session.

As you develop - you need more volume per muscle group or movement - and as you are stronger - probably more warm up sets and additional exercises. (If you are bench pressing 135 - a warm up set of 45 and one at 95 is enough. If you’re benching 315 - then you’ll need a few more warm up sets - all of which takes time).

It just becomes a time issue at that point so some type of a split is preferable unless you have all day to train!

Also - as you progress - your intensity per exercise goes up. Heavier loading requires longer rests between sets – so you can’t get it all done in one session.

Besides - it’s pretty hard for an advanced lifter to do much of anything after heavy squats - let alone try to do heavy back work or chest work – so it makes sense to split up the routine at that point so that a) you are fresh and b)you can get the workout done in a reasonable time frame.


AC

[/quote]

Slight retraction. AC does discuss splits in “TNROL.” He discusses upper/lower body, a 3 day split, four-day Ian King style split, and a Westside split. When it comes to “bodybuilding splits,” he says this on page 43:

“The idea is to isolate muscle groups (“bodyparts”)and work them to exhaustion, as if they were revolutionary insurgents in a third-world country who have to be divided and conquered. I’ve seen bodybuilding routines with 12 workouts a week-two a day for six days. Entire workouts might be devoted to biceps or triceps or hamstrings, isolating these muscles from the ones they’re designed to work with. If Alwyn and I believed in this type of training, we’d show you how to do it. But we don’t, so we won’t.”

Does this mean he doesn’t believe in “bodypart splits”? I don’t really know. He gives a tiny rationale for going to a split routine (after saying he was a “big fan of TBT” on the previous page) on page 41, but the explanation you posted above is a lot more clear and understandable.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Westclock wrote:

Mostly because Im not a bodybuilder, and I always think about things in terms of powerlifting.

So you jumped into the bodybuilding forum…into a thread about what works best for bodybuilding…to tell us about powerlifters?

This is why there is a T-Cell. I have never jumped into the strength forum…into a thread about powerlifting…to talk about bodybuilding unless someone brought up some specific point in that area. Yet, tons of you come here when you don’t even bodybuild.[/quote]

I just comment on whatever comes up on top. To be honest this forum is just something to do while I eat, its amazing that my posts are even coherent.

[quote]Westclock wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Westclock wrote:

Mostly because Im not a bodybuilder, and I always think about things in terms of powerlifting.

So you jumped into the bodybuilding forum…into a thread about what works best for bodybuilding…to tell us about powerlifters?

This is why there is a T-Cell. I have never jumped into the strength forum…into a thread about powerlifting…to talk about bodybuilding unless someone brought up some specific point in that area. Yet, tons of you come here when you don’t even bodybuild.

I just comment on whatever comes up on top. To be honest this forum is just something to do while I eat, its amazing that my posts are even coherent. [/quote]

Not that I want to get more off-topic, but, out of curiosity, what’s your total ?

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
Westclock wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Westclock wrote:

Mostly because Im not a bodybuilder, and I always think about things in terms of powerlifting.

So you jumped into the bodybuilding forum…into a thread about what works best for bodybuilding…to tell us about powerlifters?

This is why there is a T-Cell. I have never jumped into the strength forum…into a thread about powerlifting…to talk about bodybuilding unless someone brought up some specific point in that area. Yet, tons of you come here when you don’t even bodybuild.

I just comment on whatever comes up on top. To be honest this forum is just something to do while I eat, its amazing that my posts are even coherent.

Not that I want to get more off-topic, but, out of curiosity, what’s your total ?[/quote]

Personal best was 1376 raw, I’m currently trying to go up a weight class to 220, and its worth noting that I haven’t been power lifting that long.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
The point is, what did he do to BUILD that size, not what is he doing now that he has it.

I keep writing this…and you keep missing it.[/quote]

i haven’t missed it once. i assume that considering he says 4x a week hasn’t allowed him to recover well he obviously hasnt put most of his size on using it

[quote]austin_bicep wrote:

You’re beating a dead horse. The point about split’s superiority has been made. People are too ignorant to accept that fact and will ignore anything that will damage there position. They have no credibility and at this point arguing is giving me too much of a head ache. Let them do TBT, let them preach rubish, cause I know it won’t affect your training, my training and anyone else with a the goal to succeed’s training.[/quote]

i dont know if that was talking about me but were not even arguing about tbt vs. splits…i was just talking about 3 days vs. 4-5 days

[quote]pumped340 wrote:
Professor X wrote:
The point is, what did he do to BUILD that size, not what is he doing now that he has it.

I keep writing this…and you keep missing it.

i haven’t missed it once. i assume that considering he says 4x a week hasn’t allowed him to recover well he obviously hasnt put most of his size on using it

austin_bicep wrote:

You’re beating a dead horse. The point about split’s superiority has been made. People are too ignorant to accept that fact and will ignore anything that will damage there position. They have no credibility and at this point arguing is giving me too much of a head ache. Let them do TBT, let them preach rubish, cause I know it won’t affect your training, my training and anyone else with a the goal to succeed’s training.

i dont know if that was talking about me but were not even arguing about tbt vs. splits…i was just talking about 3 days vs. 4-5 days

[/quote]

I can’t keep up witht his thread lol. I had work, came back and it was 5 pages longer. I just assumed.

[quote]Westclock wrote:
Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
Westclock wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Westclock wrote:

Mostly because Im not a bodybuilder, and I always think about things in terms of powerlifting.

So you jumped into the bodybuilding forum…into a thread about what works best for bodybuilding…to tell us about powerlifters?

This is why there is a T-Cell. I have never jumped into the strength forum…into a thread about powerlifting…to talk about bodybuilding unless someone brought up some specific point in that area. Yet, tons of you come here when you don’t even bodybuild.

I just comment on whatever comes up on top. To be honest this forum is just something to do while I eat, its amazing that my posts are even coherent.

Not that I want to get more off-topic, but, out of curiosity, what’s your total ?

Personal best was 1376 raw, I’m currently trying to go up a weight class to 220, and its worth noting that I haven’t been power lifting that long.[/quote]

Oh well, at least you prolly know your stuff about PL’ing, then.
Just look at the forum names in the future to avoid unnecessary arguments.

[quote]silverbullet wrote:
I just read an article about how full body training is better than splits. The article ALMOST but not quite went as far as to say that if you were doing splits. You wouldn�??t make gains unless you were on drugs. Now I�??ve build some descent muscle so far drug free and on a split routine. So I don�??t understand why people would say that splits are useless???

I�??m incredibly curious about this. Because if I�??m building muscle using an inferior method, then theoretically I should explode if I switch to full body or an upper lower split (the only split the article thought would be beneficial drug free)

I take a look at the guys in the powerful images. Could you build a body like that using full body training???
[/quote]

Don’t believe everything you read Verbatim. Instead of looking for the differences between TBT and splits. Try to distinguish what the similarities are. If you focus on these similarities you will find yourself developing a strong and muscular physique. Over time, experience will dictate what works best for you.

If you are still having problems deciding, then try both out. Which ever one works better or which ever one you enjoy more is the one that will work for you now.

Now go train!

[quote]austin_bicep wrote:
I can’t keep up witht his thread lol. I had work, came back and it was 5 pages longer.[/quote]

Yeah, no shit… Try reading it from the beginning, it’s like reading Heart Of Darkness :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

[quote]varnish wrote:
Don’t believe everything you read Verbatim. Instead of looking for the differences between TBT and splits. Try to distinguish what the similarities are. If you focus on these similarities you will find yourself developing a strong and muscular physique. Over time, experience will dictate what works best for you.

If you are still having problems deciding, then try both out. Which ever one works better or which ever one you enjoy more is the one that will work for you now.

Now go train!

[/quote]

You’re just about a few hundred pages late :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

[quote]pumped340 wrote:
Professor X wrote:
The point is, what did he do to BUILD that size, not what is he doing now that he has it.

I keep writing this…and you keep missing it.

i haven’t missed it once. i assume that considering he says 4x a week hasn’t allowed him to recover well he obviously hasnt put most of his size on using it

[/quote]

That is one huge fucking assumption. Had it occurred to you that he RECENTLY dropped his days down to three a week?

No, that just couldn’t happen. He obviously trained just like you see him now from day one.

This has gotten stupid. No one trains exactly the same after they gain 80lbs of muscle as they did when they first started. I train only one muscle group a day because any more than that would leave me too wiped out to sufficiently train another large muscle group. That doesn’t mean that I NEVER trained more body parts on one day.

This is shit you will NOT know unless you actually know this guy very well on a friend level and he goes into specific detail about how he trained for years.

I prefer TBT, but that’s based on my personal experience. My first 4 years were splits and the last 2 have been TBT. I’ve seen more muscle growth since moving to TBT, but what does that mean?

Maybe it’s because TBT was a change to my routine, that forced my body to adapt. If I had started with TBT and switched to splits, maybe I would have seen the same growth.

I do know that TBT is more enjoyable for me. The variety keeps my workouts interesting. I’m going to stay with it until I hit a plateau at least.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
austin_bicep wrote:
I can’t keep up witht his thread lol. I had work, came back and it was 5 pages longer.

Yeah, no shit… Try reading it from the beginning, it’s like reading Heart Of Darkness ;P[/quote]

Nice Conrad reference on a bodybuilding forum. Color me impressed.

[quote]forlife wrote:
I prefer TBT, but that’s based on my personal experience. My first 4 years were splits and the last 2 have been TBT. I’ve seen more muscle growth since moving to TBT, but what does that mean?

Maybe it’s because TBT was a change to my routine, that forced my body to adapt. If I had started with TBT and switched to splits, maybe I would have seen the same growth.

I do know that TBT is more enjoyable for me. The variety keeps my workouts interesting. I’m going to stay with it until I hit a plateau at least.[/quote]

I wonder what your split and eating during that time period looked like…