Alternative Models of T-Mandom

Now, I’m not a smart man. I know that about myself and it’s all good. I think that because my I.Q. might be lagging a bit I tend to look at things in a simpler way. For one, I tend to live and let live. It does seem that you believe that T-mag is geared towards a more heterosexual readership with all the macho writing and obscene commentary from T.C… I guess you would be right on that count. What troubles me is that you have a problem with men being macho. Also, it seems that you have a problem with men expressing thier sexuality in the contexts of T.C.'s Atomic Dog articles. I don’t know beans about philosophy but I do know that a man can be macho and perverted in one instance but can turn around and be sensitive and caring in another instance. Men walk in many paths and I think today men are expected to walk in all paths at the same time. We have to be caring and compassionate to satiate the women-folk in our lives but at the same time we’re expected to be protectors and warriors, and always the initiators. Sometimes that’s a hard path to walk. I just hope you don’t expect me to be apologetic for being a pervert and looking at women in a sexual way. It’s how I’m built and the ladies seem to like it. Also, I hope you understand if I explore my human experience in a different way that you. We’re different, so live and let live!

To address the math from a previous post:

If A=B, then B must be the same as A maybe true, but you have applied the wrong logic to this particular problem. The equation should be this:

A+B=C

Feminism (at least originally) is about an equal partnership between men and women. If Darwin is correct (and I happen to agree with him), the entire purpose of our existence is to continue the species. Thus, A+B=C. Both equal, just different parts of the equation.

There are no absolutes. Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity (no, not that word)illustrates it elegantly:

No particular object is suitable as an absolute frame of reference that is at rest with respect to space. Any object can be used as a reference with respect to movement. Is the car moving past the building? Or is the building moving past the car? In other words, all motion is relative.

Yes, it is all relative. -

wghtlftgrl

Einstien’s TOR states the nature of the relation between motion and matter. It makes an ABSOLUTE claim (which is then proven) that this relationship ABSOLUTELY exists. The existance of this physical law exists, and can be proven, only because there are absolutes. If there are no absolutes, then how can NOTHING (notice the absolute here) be absolute, EVERYTHING is relative is an absolute claim of the absence of absolutes. As far as feminism goes, they abhor their mothering/childbearing role (saying it is a societal gender role)and claim an equal sexual motivation for men and women (as if women enveloped men as oposed to men penetrating women). If men and women can have an equal partnership, then they can both be either mothers or fathers, yet I just can’t seem to get my uterus to work.

I’d read this whole thing but there’s too many big words. I’m sixty-eight years old and I’ll tell you some things I’ve learned. There’s nothing like a hot little woman who will cook and clean for you and let you rest a beer on her head while you watch tv and she orally pleasures you. Also when the feminists march by, play “Rape Me” by Nirvana on your stereo. Never go to a bar named “Temptations”, “Chances” or “Encounters.” If you do, and get caught, tell everyone it’s a good place to pick up women. Every woman could stand to lose a few pounds in the right places and have tits a little bit bigger. If people can’t tell you lift weights with your clothes on, take up a new hobby. Like beer. If you look at another guy’s ween at the urinal next to yours, you’re gay. Clean snatch beats cleans and snatches any day. Pornography is wonderful. Finally everyone was sent down to earth by God in an eight pack muffin tray. There’s a black you, a white you, a latin you, an asian you and then the four of the opposite sex. One of the eight is a homo, so always be kind to your fellow people because you never know who could be one of your muffin-brothers. And wear sunscreen.

  1. Ah the word Chauvanism, invented by femists, who generally hate men, afterall we are the enemy in the struggle (like the burgeouisie [sp?] oppressing the proletariat)?
  2. I am not a big philosophy buff, but what wghtlftgrl said defies mathematics. A+B=C ok that works. 1 +2 =3. Does 1=2, no. Different parts of the equation but not equal.
  3. I personally would like to say that all gays do not bother me at all and i am the epitome of tolerance. That i feel would not be true. I don’t mind gays except certain aspects of feminism can at times bug me. Also, if i was in college sharing a dorm room with a guy, and he was gay, well i would be uncomfortable to say the least. The thing that i don’t like and that most people get at here, is radicalism. People who make a huge deal out of being different. And then we have radical feminists (like the ones who reffered to themselves as womon or wonen or whatever cause they didn’t want to have man/men in their names). Zealots of all nature generally tend to piss people off. And that is exactly the phenomenon we have here.

Zev,
Your basic premise is this- if you don’t embrace the far left wing ideology your being programed by society. Why is every non traditional manly thing you mention part of the far left? I find it interesting for the people who preach tolerance and diversity have no tolerance and diversity for anyone with a
different opinion. Then they can’t debate any substance and have a nice catch phrase to call the person who disagrees with their ideology. Any one who doesn’t agree with the homosexual agenda is “homophobic”, if your not for some racial quota your “a racist”, if you don’t share your point of view of what men are supposed to be then your a “male chauvinist”. Personally I don’t care who you sleep with or what you do behind closed doors. If that’s the way you want to live your life that’s fine
but at the same time I don’t think children should be brainwashed about this life style at school and this is happening every where. If tomorrow every one on the planet turned homosexual what would happen? The population would be wiped out in about a hundred years. Men can not get pregnant and women can’t get pregnant with out a man. That’s how we were designed. While the woman’s movement started out as men and women being equal it is hardly that today. Some activists going so far as to say any sex is rape to a woman. Look at NOW for gods sake. They were up in arms over Anita Hill but Bill Clinton rapes Juanita Broadrick and they don’t say a thing. Talk about hypocrisy.

There was case of a college kid that went to a party, got drunk met a girl who was also drunk, and went back to his room and had sex. When the girl left she left her phone number. Apparently she regretted the encounter and he found himself being charged with rape. He was kick out of school and would have had to gone the rest of his life registering as a sex offender. I believe he fought it and won. This is why there is a back lash against political correctness. PC is Orwellian and totally against common sense.