[quote]Professor X wrote:
NZ RABBIT wrote:
Professor X wrote:
NZ RABBIT wrote:
if you have to bring up lagging legs X, would you not agree that a push/pull/legs or simply an upper/lower split would have to be the only way to go unless you further want to imbalance?
You need an upper lower split just to prioritize legs? Really? There is no way to train legs twice a week without doing an “upper lower split”?
Fully agree that you can increase the frequency of the ‘legs’ days however I assume you would still have a chest day, shoulders day, arms day, back day etc?!
If you then counted the number of sets for the upper body compared to the lower, there would be massively more for the upper (and thus further increasing the imbalance).
Unless of course you only intend to train for 20-30 mins on each upper day?
Are you serious with this? You thought we needed to train legs an equal amount of times in a week that we train every muscle of the upper body? WTF?
I train my legs on average once a week. They measure over 30". How about yours?
Yeah, I seriously doubt how heavy you are training if you are truly doing heavy squats multiple times a week. My guess is your overall progress is way less than those who don’t think in such a small box.[/quote]
Yeah my wheels (well quads to be specific) are stubborn as fuck but basically every muscle in my upper body grows like a weed.
I may be an exception to the rule but I genuinely think I would look ridiculous if I went on a 4 or 5 day split atm.
Eventually I realise it will be possible but I need a lot more mass in the quads first.
Do you not agree that there are stubborn muscles to growing and others that grow much more easily?
