[quote]Crow wrote:
[quote]LiquidMercury wrote:
[quote]zeik09 wrote:
[quote]ultimatethor wrote:
[quote]zeik09 wrote:
what’s the general rule of thumb for starting % weight for week 1 singles?[/quote]
Yeah, I was wondering about this too. When it says add in some “heavy” singles, is there any percentage rule for this? Should you work up and come close to your max or just do singles with your top weight? Or should you bring the weight down and do some down sets of singles? It just seems a bit vague.[/quote]
i guess i’ll answer my own question. from what i’ve been able to gather, use your 90%1RM weight for heavy singles.[/quote]
Hopefully Wendler will weigh in on this soon and we can get a definitive answer, that’s been the only thing holding me back from adding them in really. I’m curious to know if the heavy singles on the 5/3/1 day are supposed to be higher % of 1RM then the 3x5 day.[/quote]
Are you all serious? Why are you so caught up on what the proper %, or rep range, or color of your feces! Just shut up and lift! Intensity is the only thing that truly matters. I’m sure Jim would tell you that also. Quit majoring in minor shit and go crush some weight.[/quote]
Call me curious. I hit it in the gym every workout, am close to an elite total, and am enjoying the progress that I’ve enjoyed on 5/3/1. Obviously following the % of his program has been working for me and for others, so why through all the “minor shit” to the wind when it’s been working? I’m pretty sure he wouldn’t say to just go for a PR every time in the gym, in fact it’s a “minor shit” detail that he says to avoid. Crushing weight and intensity can be done in smart ways, and it can be done dumb. Is it that much of an issue that some of us care what the % is on the singles that Jim would recommend? I’m pretty sure in his book Jim isn’t going to come out and say “fuck it all, don’t worry about % just go kill it in the gym on these singles.” I’m pretty sure he’ll take the time to actually give a % that has worked for him and his clients. Why? Because it’s a detail that has a bit of merit to it, otherwise there are a lot of people that most likely will just go do singles, trying for a PR every time. Get off the high horse of your super intensity. It’s those details that end up getting put in books, ultimately making Jim money.
As a side note, yes there are those that do focus too much on minor stuff, I don’t see this as being one of those things though, especially for those competing/looking to compete using this as the crux of their program.