[quote]OsakaNate wrote:
[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
[quote]Moses29 wrote:
[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
For 38 weeks of 5/3/1, those numbers are very, very low…
[/quote]
I don’t think so. It’s all relevant to the weights you started with. When I started 5/3/1 I weighed 177lbs, my squat was 170 for 7, bench was 160 for 10, deadlift was 235 for 11 and OHP was 105 for 15.
Now (like stated in OP) my weight is 197lbs, Squat: 260x5 Deadlift: 315x7 Bench: 215x6 Over Head Press: 140x8
I consider that a good improvement. Now granted, My starting numbers shouldn’t of been that low with 4 years of training… but they were.[/quote]
I stand by my opinion…
Don’t get me wrong, your progress is certainly not bad, but especially due to you starting out so weak and skinny a larger increase would definitely have been possible if everything were in place (diet, assistance template, setup and technique…).
Good that you are making progress though… Just keep the points in my previous post in mind. [/quote]
I’m a bit confused here. Could you clarify this for me?
If 5/3/1 has a formulaic progression (10 pounds to the training max for lower body lifts per cycle, for example), then how could his progress have been better in the squat (for example)?
He started at 170 lbs for his top set and ended at 260 lbs, a net increase of 90 lbs, which is consistent with a 10-pound increase per cycle for nine cycles (36 weeks, he said he’s been on the program for 38 weeks–close enough).
Unless you’re just saying that he should have more reps at that weight, what am I missing?
[/quote]
Either more reps (though those should end up really high if all things went right), or by adding more weight than recommended… He actually lost reps on every lift… On the bench, that is particularly noticeable.
Normally this would not cause me to comment, but he started out as a beginner and these are pretty much his beginner gain times, despite his previous years of training.
To give you another example of how this sort of things works with periodized routines…
Take the Russian 9 week, 3 lift program (which is the 6 week squat program applied to all three powerlifts at the same time).
The deadlift in this program is to be trained once a week (other lifts twice, they get a heavy and a light/speed day):
setsxrepsxweight
6x3 x 80%
6x4 x 80%
6x5 x 80%
6x6 x 80%
5x5 x 85%
4x4 x 90%
3x3 x 95%
2x2 x 100%
1x1 x 105%
Now, you would use a 1RM which you can actually realiably hit for the calculations. So probably not your absolute best…
All things considered, a 5% increase over 9 weeks sounds mightily unimpressive for a beginner who were to do this, (especially considering that this is a dedicated strength routine) and this kind of cycle isn’t something you run for years on end either.
What actually happens is that at the end of the cycle, once you have done your 105%x1x1, you can test your actual max and that will likely be much, much higher now. As in, 105x1x1 should be an absolute cake-walk.
It’s not entirely uncommon for people to go from deadlifting 315 to 405 or so in a cycle of this, and while progress will slow down drastically as you keep repeating the training cycle, that is pretty much 90 lbs to your actual max in your first 9 weeks, something like a 25% increase rather than the 5% you would think you’d get simply from seeing the cycle written down.
The weight progression in 5/3/1 is suggested, but that’s all it is… A suggestion… Beginners are a different story from more advanced trainees, applying the same rules to both makes no sense.
You technically only need to do your top weight during wave 3 for 1 rep, but it’s already just 95% of an already reduced max (90%x0.95), so if you only were to get it for the prescribed reps you’d have lost quite a bit of strength. Usually, people end up with 5-9 reps during wave 3. If you do 15 or whatever, and you don’t neglect your deloads and eat right and all that, you may as well add a little more weight than usual. You do after all reduce the weight or at least stick with the same weight if you hit very low reps during wave 3, say 1-3 or so…
The opposite of what you do if you lose a lot of reps from one cycle to the next (+5 lbs and -2-5 reps isn’t something I’d accept, it’s not even an actual increase)