only 17", but absolutely ice cold. I’ll try to snap one next time I train arms, they swell at least another inch if not two.
[quote]ironmanzvw wrote:
[quote]SSC wrote:
Well, given the nature of the thread, I’ll bite.
I have 18+ inch arms but am obviously fat…
…for now.[/quote]
lol…those are not 18" dude…[/quote]
I like this guy, criticizes some guy for posting smaller arms then 18inches in this thread then proceeds to post a picture of his 17inch bicep, this guy is going places.
[quote]optheta wrote:
[quote]ironmanzvw wrote:
[quote]SSC wrote:
Well, given the nature of the thread, I’ll bite.
I have 18+ inch arms but am obviously fat…
…for now.[/quote]
lol…those are not 18" dude…[/quote]
I like this guy, criticizes some guy for posting smaller arms then 18inches in this thread then proceeds to post a picture of his 17inch bicep, this guy is going places.[/quote]
Did i say they were 18 inches cold? No…I said they are 17 inches lol, as the pic shows. dickhead.
The other guy stated that his were 18+ inches and he looked like he had never worked out in his life.
Once again, don’t understand why everyone feels the need to talk so much unnecessary shit on these forums. Did I point out a clear and obvious lie…yes lol. Did you just point out that I have 17 inch arms when that’s exactly what I claimed they were…yes. Awesome dude, congrats.
[quote]ironmanzvw wrote:
[quote]optheta wrote:
[quote]ironmanzvw wrote:
[quote]SSC wrote:
Well, given the nature of the thread, I’ll bite.
I have 18+ inch arms but am obviously fat…
…for now.[/quote]
lol…those are not 18" dude…[/quote]
I like this guy, criticizes some guy for posting smaller arms then 18inches in this thread then proceeds to post a picture of his 17inch bicep, this guy is going places.[/quote]
Did i say they were 18 inches cold? No…I said they are 17 inches lol, as the pic shows. dickhead.
The other guy stated that his were 18+ inches and he looked like he had never worked out in his life.
Once again, don’t understand why everyone feels the need to talk so much unnecessary shit on these forums. Did I point out a clear and obvious lie…yes lol. Did you just point out that I have 17 inch arms when that’s exactly what I claimed they were…yes. Awesome dude, congrats.
[/quote]
U mad bro?
Its only impressive if you can CLEARLY see the separation from Bicep to Tricep. Personally I have seen 16’ arms look much better than 18’ granted this has to do with bf% but for the arms I think peak and separation is more important than overall size.
[quote]Cron391 wrote:
Its only impressive if you can CLEARLY see the separation from Bicep to Tricep. Personally I have seen 16’ arms look much better than 18’ granted this has to do with bf% but for the arms I think peak and separation is more important than overall size.[/quote]
Over the years, I tend to agree with you much more…my arms are 17.5…look better than they ever had and they’ve been bigger…i just have more muscle and less bf now.
[quote]Cron391 wrote:
Its only impressive if you can CLEARLY see the separation from Bicep to Tricep. Personally I have seen 16’ arms look much better than 18’ granted this has to do with bf% but for the arms I think peak and separation is more important than overall size.[/quote]
X2
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]Cron391 wrote:
Its only impressive if you can CLEARLY see the separation from Bicep to Tricep. Personally I have seen 16’ arms look much better than 18’ granted this has to do with bf% but for the arms I think peak and separation is more important than overall size.[/quote]
X2[/quote]
how big are your arms, Dwarfie?
thats right, I’m calling you ooot~
[quote]rudy62 wrote:
Barely 18[/quote]
Blatant nip slip
Man not to be a dick, but most of these “18” def do NOT look like there “18”…again enforcing my point arms are to be “sculpted” not like Chest, Back and Legs where we are going for size.
Not calling anyone a liar, but arms look impressive, well if they ARE impressive looking. Just being big and “18” doesn’t atomically make them look impressive.
[quote]ironmanzvw wrote:
[quote]SSC wrote:
Well, given the nature of the thread, I’ll bite.
I have 18+ inch arms but am obviously fat…
…for now.[/quote]
lol…those are not 18" dude…[/quote]
Correct, they use to be in Summer '11, I lost ~40lbs and they had lost size as well - pic is from said previous taping. I had not measured since that point, but they were absolutely less than 18".
However, having lost 150 lbs with loads of loose skin “clear separation” between bicep and tricep is not something I’ll be able to experience for some time.
I am certainly thankful for your diligent attention to the matter and look forward to seeing more representations of your wonderful physique that take up my entire screen, though.
[quote]SSC wrote:
[quote]ironmanzvw wrote:
[quote]SSC wrote:
Well, given the nature of the thread, I’ll bite.
I have 18+ inch arms but am obviously fat…
…for now.[/quote]
lol…those are not 18" dude…[/quote]
Correct, they use to be in Summer '11, I lost weight and they had lost size as well - pic is from said previous taping.
However, having lost 150 lbs with loads of loose skin “clear separation” between bicep and tricep is not something I’ll be able to experience for some time.[/quote]
Solid work on the massive drop in bodyfat. And it is obvious you are adding quality muscle in your recent pic. Good luck brotha.
[quote]paulieserafini wrote:
[quote]SSC wrote:
[quote]ironmanzvw wrote:
[quote]SSC wrote:
Well, given the nature of the thread, I’ll bite.
I have 18+ inch arms but am obviously fat…
…for now.[/quote]
lol…those are not 18" dude…[/quote]
Correct, they use to be in Summer '11, I lost weight and they had lost size as well - pic is from said previous taping.
However, having lost 150 lbs with loads of loose skin “clear separation” between bicep and tricep is not something I’ll be able to experience for some time.[/quote]
Solid work on the massive drop in bodyfat. And it is obvious you are adding quality muscle in your recent pic. Good luck brotha.[/quote]
Thanks man. I tried to edit my post to make it more clear but kinda failed. ^This picture above is from summer '11, whereas the one on Page 1 is after a long bout of being piss poor and eating probably ~2,000 cals a day tops. Arms are now back over 18" but I am on much better condition now.
What a difference lighting and food makes, yeah?
No idea what mine are measuring now…
[quote]Edgy wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]Cron391 wrote:
Its only impressive if you can CLEARLY see the separation from Bicep to Tricep. Personally I have seen 16’ arms look much better than 18’ granted this has to do with bf% but for the arms I think peak and separation is more important than overall size.[/quote]
X2[/quote]
how big are your arms, Dwarfie?
thats right, I’m calling you ooot~[/quote]
Small. But on me they look good.
I weigh 155 and my arms fluctuate between 15.5 and 15.75".
[quote]austin_bicep wrote:
…
lol…
[quote]austin_bicep wrote:
wut did i just watch.