Thats when the legal battle ensues, while the life of the person in question hangs in the ballance.
Fwiw- a friend of mine that is gay got married (in part) specifically because he knows that his parents would act in contradiction to his & his significant others wishes.
I dated my wife for years before marrying her. Years longer than I needed to know that I wanted to commit. We lived together, planned long term ideas together and on and on. We were conjoined, committed, together.
We did decide to get married before having kids, largely due to traditional pressure behind the idea, but I can tell you that going through the motions and publicly declaring commitment to each other through all the traditional vows, and meaning them, brought a new level to what we already had.
I canāt give an objective reason why, but reaching a point in a relationship begetting ritualistic signs of commitment carries significant weight.
For a lot of people, speaking something aloud brings it to life.
In its simplest form- Saying thank you. Seems simple right? Coould even be ignored and left unsaid.
Until the recipient starts to feel unappreciated or used.
Saying āI love youā. Left unsaid, can leave a relationship to decay or disolve. But once said aloud to the other can lead to a long lasting, emotionally fulfilling relationship.
Declaring your vows to God, friends, family, etc- definitely next level dedication. You have 100 or so people and one supernatural entity to be accountable to if you change your mind or sober up in 6 months.
What does your word mean after youāve done that then gone back on it?
Thats the kind of familial and community accountability that I think @BrickHead talks about when the subject comes up.
I donāt know. I think I would feel silly if I were middle aged and was still introducing the woman Iād been living with for years (and possibly had kids with) as my girlfriend, or worse, my partner and not my wife.
Itās always the people who are not married who say itās just the same as being married while those who are married, and would obviously know better, say it isnāt.
I see a robustly healthy relationship as consisting of two people who are able to see to their own happiness and who also prioritize the otherās.
So: I think Iām a good person. Iām never late to work, am a team player and good worker there, am generally kind, and try hard to be an all-around good egg. I think I deserve happiness to the greatest extent I am able to create that for myself. Right up to 100% happy, if I can achieve it. Luckily, I know how to make myself pretty happy. Itās about a warm, clean home; a healthy, fit body or sometimes a time away from that focus; books; friends to laugh or share secrets with; friendly random social interactions; and work that feels important along with the competence to honor that importance.
I want a similarly happy person. So I have a man who was happy when I met him and is able to see to his own happiness. He loves being outdoors. He bought a large, inexpensive parcel of land and has been working to improve it for like 20 years now. He takes down trees, puts in roads and retaining walls, grades fields and builds structures made from lumber heās felled and milled. He hikes, he cooks, he makes weird gadget-y things, he welds things together, he makes wooden bowls out of āgoodā knots he finds doing the other tree stuff. He plays golf.
I havenāt asked him, but my impression is that he believes that he deserves to be happy at top levels. I certainly think he does. Heās kind and generous; hard working; a good father and stepfather; and very hygienic.
So I prioritize my happiness at top levels and so does he his own happiness. But hereās the lovely thing: we each prioritize the otherās happiness as well! I want me to be happy all the way at the top of the scale, but I also want that for him. I want him to be the happiest husband ever, and am pleased to help with that in any way I can. Because happy him makes for an even happier me. I believe my husband feels the same way, so when we were talking about his very limited time home this weekend he suggested eating out because Iāve been āstuck at homeā while I think we should stay in. Heās had enough restaurant food and will be leaving again at 1 am on Monday. He must crave home time. Also (back to my happiness) Iām really trying to cut and thatās easier at home. Iām very, very content to stay in. Win/win.
This comes into play when I ask him to say mushy things back. Itās not transactional because Iām happy to babble on about how much I love him, how handsome or strong he is, etc. Sometimes I just want to hear those things, too. So I ask. Itās not a challenge to his autonomy unless he frames it as such. And he doesnāt. No one can be made to feel inferior without their consent.
How much effort we each put in changes depending on circumstance. Sometimes Iām irritable and have to make effort not to be a jerk. Sometimes heās irritable and I have to make an effort not to start a fight. When I started a private practice he had to take up slack because I was spending a lot of time focused on work. Sometimes heās consumed by something and it comes at my expense. Thatās marriage.
Interestingly, a great number of men are surprised by this initiation despite being able to say some variation on āyes, she did talk to me about those things, but I didnāt think it was serious.ā
I recently came across a letter my mother wrote to my father when I was very young. It was distressing to read, and most distressing was how much it resembled letters I wrote to my ex-husband.
LOLā¦according to whom? Upon what data is this based?
Yeah, this.
I agree with @SkyzykSā take on it. I view my marriage as something much more than āboyfriend.ā Itās a promise made before God and family. It took me more than 20 years to leave my first marriage because I so believe in keeping vows, but he was simply unable to keep his own vows, and I didnāt want to drown with him. He wasnāt ultimately capable of being a husband in my view (fidelity, other forms of integrity).
It seems hypocritical to say that I take my marriage vows very seriously, but I do. If he gets sick, I will care for him. I know heāll do the same. My ex-husband, OTOH, cheated on me when I was found to have cancer at 28, which was noticed by my obgyn - I was pregnant. He was messing around with a 19-year-old (poor her!). I didnāt find out about it until many years later, when Iād discovered that he was taking viagra with him on business trips to Las Vegas and he admitted to hookers. I told a friend, and she told me about the long-ago cheating. She hadnāt at the time becauseā¦she didnāt know what to do. I wish sheād told me at the time. But anyway. Still I stayed, because his business was collapsing and he was taking a job in another state and we had young kids and I didnāt think breaking the family was the right thing. He was also expressing suicidality. (Again.) The infidelity did break the family. It just took time for it all to play out.
Yes, me too. My person before God, and in my case with my current husband, my children. Vows to them are also sacred to me. Like @Njord, we were together for years (3.5 in our case, but weāre older). Weād already bought a house together, but marrying brought a whole new feeling of commitment/rightness/permanency.
If my wife and I started keeping score on who contributes what, Iād be concerned for the health of our marriage. I have no idea who does the most, or how you even score it. Is mowing the lawn more valuable than folding sheets? Is hiring a lawn crew out of my account cheating the system? Is my significantly larger income buying credits? Is her family ranch available for my use at any time a wash?
I havenāt found marriage to be a scoreboard. In our case schedules often dictate who does what based on availability, and we do have a generally defined set of chores that more of less follows gender stereotypes
On the rare occasion someone feels overworked, overwhelmed or unfairly burdened we discuss and adjust, but itās a fairly fluid thing. I think obsessing over who did what would cause more problems than solutions for us.
The use of partner took hold among the gay community in the 70s. Then the feminists decided that wife was offensive as if, when a man referred to his wife as āwifeā he was really thinking slave or servant. Now, people use it in order to not offend the mentally ill non-binary crowd. They get offended, or more correctly, āliterallyā physically hurt, when they hear heteronormative words. In my opinion, the words husband and wife have an inherent quality of expressing love and commitment that words like partner or that other stupid term significant other, will never have. Itās similar to using birthing parent vs mother. I canāt imagine a woman wanting her childās first words to be ābirthing parentā instead of mommy.
Hereās my home right now. I think the climate could be marketed to some loveless couples who would be forced into some physical activity just to stay warm.
Iām aware they have an agenda and youāll never find ONE answer as to why people divorce. I will say that if you google ādivorce + boredomā that youāll find its not men who have this complaint.
I think i saw an Oprah link (lol) saying #2 reason was boredom and #1 reason was criminality. #3 was finances and #4 was infidelity.
How funny, the difference in our perceptions of the process by which it became mainstream. Yours is soā¦victimized. Really, how much power do you think the feminists have?
I see it as having been picked up by heterosexuals as a way to prevent harm to gays - that if we all use āpartnerā then gay couples are not forced to either lie about their status or use a term that outs them. For younger people, it seems to simply be a normative statement - Iām sure some of them assume itās used because itās no oneās business whether theyāve made religious vows. I think itās also, for gays or straights, a middle-ground between boyfriend/girlfriend and spouse. For when you live together and share a vacuum.
āThen the feminists decided that wife was offensive as if, when a man referred to his wife as āwifeā he was really thinking slaveor servantā seems a wild stretch to me. No one has ever, explicitly or implicitly, suggested to me that the use of the term āwifeā was degrading me. None of the books or mainstream articles Iāve read - and as stated above I read widely - have suggested it. Iām a social worker and required to have continuing ed. The feminists are all up in social workās business, and yet I encounter none of the campaigns against men I read about on these boards. That said, I can choose my courses, and Iām inclined to positive psychology and other solution-focused opportunities, so maybe itās out there. But gender study stuff is just a tiny portion of the whole.
I donāt like the broad use of āpartnerā because it breeds confusion, and as also stated above I like clear, direct communication and āpartnerā used to indicate something. OTOH, I probably only need to know someoneās orientation at work, so āpartnerā was handy code. Socially who gives a shit. If I get to know you and we become friends, I suppose Iāll uncover your relationship status and you mine.
In closing, I would note that the married gay people I know either through work or socially seem to like the use of āhusbandā or āwifeā if thatās the case for them. They say it with the same possessive pride I do.
The Nazis did experiments in this. Pretty skeevy; putting men out in the cold until nearly dead, then having a woman sexually stimulate them.
But anyhooā¦
Not to be argumentative, but men are generally not the ones stuck home with the kids. I could go on, but I wonāt. (Because Iām going to google divorce + boredom and also have lunch and put the clean sheets on the bed and maybe some other stuff TBD.)
Most westerners hold fundamentally feminist beliefs, even the anti-feminists and conservatives.
I think my reaction to this is telling me my steroid doses are too high
Itās a fair point, but i do believe this is mostly a choice on the womenās part - no?
Sure, some men dont want their wives working (me included), but if the woman wanted to work - there is nothing the husband could do to stop her.
I also think women staying at home to raise children is the ideal dynamic most women would want, were it not for feminism valuing the importance of work over family. I could be wrong, hard to tell.