Ha! I bet it has, congrats though.
Thanks, I had great parents.
Why do you not have a log in the over 35?
Its a great place, we have a bunch that have a group in G+, think you would fit in.
You said something about that to me on something before. Can’t remember what it was? I think something on one of my routine questions? If I remember coreectly you mentioned 5-3-1? Anyways, I have been thinking about starting a log in there. I’ve gone over there a few times. Probably get into the threads over there a little more. I have a G+ account set up, but have never really got on that.
Been on since the beginning have about 80+ plus from here on there. Real people, good people. Great social network.
Cool, I’ll look into it a little more.
Its worth it, the over 35 group is a bunch of guys with knowledge and wisdom. It also keeps you accountable to yourself for keeping up your log.
Sold!
Cool. Check out PeteS log, Matty logs and a few others, will impress you for sure.
Thanks brother!
No problem. I have made friends online with a bunch of us in this age group, its worth it. Got to stick together.
re: PX/Derek542
All I’m saying is when you’re in your 40’s with a family, career, mortgage, and the constant pain of fighting gravity and aging, if you want to be big/strong, you really have to want it.
I mean you really have to want it.
What we need is guys your age becoming my generation’s Zyzzs instead of the aesthetics bros
You old bastards 
[quote]yolo84 wrote:
[quote]gregron wrote:
The point regarding that topic is that those gyms are NOT the norm. Do they exist? Yeah but they are in no way the norm.
It is not common place to see 10+ guys better built than a professional physique model working out in the gym.[/quote]
It is at a decent sized commercial gym in a major city.
What really stands out about the pic posted on this very page?
“professional physique model” also seems pretty tenuous, although granted I don’t know his entire background. [/quote]
Zyzz was never a pro physique model. It’s all hype. The lotus eaters say he was, but all his pics were cellphone snaps. Where are the magazine covers, where are the studio pics?
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]yolo84 wrote:
[quote]gregron wrote:
The point regarding that topic is that those gyms are NOT the norm. Do they exist? Yeah but they are in no way the norm.
It is not common place to see 10+ guys better built than a professional physique model working out in the gym.[/quote]
It is at a decent sized commercial gym in a major city.
What really stands out about the pic posted on this very page?
“professional physique model” also seems pretty tenuous, although granted I don’t know his entire background. [/quote]
Zyzz was never a pro physique model. It’s all hype. The lotus eaters say he was, but all his pics were cellphone snaps. Where are the magazine covers, where are the studio pics?[/quote]
he was a stripper too lmao
[quote]roybot wrote:
Zyzz was never a pro physique model. It’s all hype. The lotus eaters say he was, but all his pics were cellphone snaps. Where are the magazine covers, where are the studio pics?[/quote]
I’ve seen some “studio” pics of him doing modeling shit on a pool table and a couch.
No, I don’t have them handy and no, I’m got going to Google them. The Guttmann method on CCleaner works slow on my computer.
But they DO exist.
Oh, no! Zyzz dangerously close to committing the Hover Hand folly.
Confirmed for overcompensating, closet beta.
[quote]anonym wrote:
…, closet beta.[/quote]
— them is fighting words, for sure…
[quote]anonym wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
Zyzz was never a pro physique model. It’s all hype. The lotus eaters say he was, but all his pics were cellphone snaps. Where are the magazine covers, where are the studio pics?[/quote]
I’ve seen some “studio” pics of him doing modeling shit on a pool table and a couch.
No, I don’t have them handy and no, I’m got going to Google them. The Guttmann method on CCleaner works slow on my computer.
But they DO exist.[/quote]
I invoke the ancient law of photographic evidence or it happend not.
