[quote]Nards wrote:
[quote]mr popular wrote:
I would choose to either have Erik Fankhouser calves, or Brian Buchanan’s waist.[/quote]
I googled this Erik Fankhouser you mentioned and got that pic up there. Wow. I don’t think it even matters which one is Erik. All insane calves.[/quote]
Erik is on the right.
But gimme Frank’s forearms please.
http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg7/scaled.php?server=7&filename=frankmcgrathforearms.png&res=medium
[quote]TisDrew wrote:
[quote]Nards wrote:
[quote]mr popular wrote:
I would choose to either have Erik Fankhouser calves, or Brian Buchanan’s waist.[/quote]
I googled this Erik Fankhouser you mentioned and got that pic up there. Wow. I don’t think it even matters which one is Erik. All insane calves.[/quote]
Erik is on the right.
But gimme Frank’s forearms please.
http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg7/scaled.php?server=7&filename=frankmcgrathforearms.png&res=medium
[/quote]
Frank’s got nothing on Popeye
ABZZZ…If I could get them to pop-out & stay flat no matter what I eat or how much cardio I do, that’d be great.
That’s kind of a cop-out, so I’ll say traps. Short of a collared shirt, they are always visible and make you look like you lift weights.
Delts. Then Traps.
Forearms
back,hands down.
All of ya’ll just saying ‘back’ are cheating. That’s like saying I want an over-developed ‘front’. Pick traps, lats, or erectors/midback!
COMMIT!!!
But seriously, I think HUGE lats would be pretty damn impressive.
forearms/wrists
For me, I’d have to go with delts.
[quote]Spidey22 wrote:
All of ya’ll just saying ‘back’ are cheating. That’s like saying I want an over-developed ‘front’. Pick traps, lats, or erectors/midback!
COMMIT!!!
But seriously, I think HUGE lats would be pretty damn impressive. [/quote]
Don’t be a snitch
[quote]spar4tee wrote:
[quote]Spidey22 wrote:
All of ya’ll just saying ‘back’ are cheating. That’s like saying I want an over-developed ‘front’. Pick traps, lats, or erectors/midback!
COMMIT!!!
But seriously, I think HUGE lats would be pretty damn impressive. [/quote]
Don’t be a snitch[/quote]
Snitches get stitches, yo
O rly??
Legs.
tweet
Being 6.2" I’d have to say calves (is just saying, ‘legs’ cheating 'cos you kinda get two LOL?). I’ve NEVER seen a tall guy with over developed legs (upper or lower). I think another body part like arms would just make me look ridiculously disproportionate.
The more I think about this, the more I lean toward abs. Having a giant thick wall right there would be great for so many reasons.
Lats for sure. Even though the thread is about OVERDEVELOPED body parts, I don’t think anyone can have TOO MUCH back.
Hamstrings in second place for me.
I like the idea of massive forearms and calves. Like Eric fankhouser meets popeye. 
looks like the Back is the winner…