Your Wish for Over Development?

Training Bodybuilding
41

Without a doubt,back and traps!

42

So hard to choose. Although I know what I wouldnt want over developed…pecs. Still want them big but overdeveloped pecs are not a good look.

Delts or forearms cant get big enough. Easy to show off both whilst dressed.

43

Lowerback and glutes for me. I had a hernia problem down there at the lower lumbar, upper sacrum level of the spine a couple of years back, so now I’m crazy for getting IRON HARD glutes and lowerback.

44

Pubococcygeus

45

BACK for me

46

TRICEPZ

47

LATS, no doubt about it. I want thick, sickening lats that come out so wide I could jump off a building and glide safely down to the ground.

48

In way too late for the penis jokes, then I would say calves so I could ignore them altogether.

49

I’d go with arms. Low inserted biceps and triceps.

50

Back.

51

serratus.

52

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:
My buddy who first got me into training in college had a humongous back. As you don’t really walk around most of the time in tanks, or cut off shirts, I quickly realized that a large back will make you appear larger when dressed in ‘normal’ clothing. Combine that with the fact that Yates was at the top of Mt Olympus at the time, and I had all the reason I needed to become obsessed with back training.

So IMO, Back/Delts will definitely create an imposing figure both in and out of the gym.

S[/quote]

I never thought that a larger back would make you appear ‘bigger’ in clothing I always thought it was chest and delts.

53

wrists

54

FIRST POST!

Ok, to topic.

Back, definitely.
First off, a big back looks freakin awesome, i´ve got a pretty big back for my size but a back can never be too big.
Second, a big strong back is just a plus when you are a rower!

55

Definitely back.

…Or maybe delts.

Also, if you don’t think a wide and thick back makes you look big, you have never had a tailored shirt or suit.

56

I would choose to either have Erik Fankhouser calves, or Brian Buchanan’s waist.

57

Back.

58

720×540 58.5 KB

[quote]mr popular wrote:
I would choose to either have Erik Fankhouser calves, or Brian Buchanan’s waist.[/quote]

I googled this Erik Fankhouser you mentioned and got that pic up there. Wow. I don’t think it even matters which one is Erik. All insane calves.

60

Those calfs are ridiculous!! They look sculpted with a chisel. For me, I’d definitely take the back/ as the muscle to be over the top, stopping-traffic-from-the-sidewalk-while-walking-in-a-tank-top. That would be awesome. It’s also of course my favorite body part to train lol.

61

[quote]optheta wrote:

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:
My buddy who first got me into training in college had a humongous back. As you don’t really walk around most of the time in tanks, or cut off shirts, I quickly realized that a large back will make you appear larger when dressed in ‘normal’ clothing. Combine that with the fact that Yates was at the top of Mt Olympus at the time, and I had all the reason I needed to become obsessed with back training.

So IMO, Back/Delts will definitely create an imposing figure both in and out of the gym.

S[/quote]

I never thought that a larger back would make you appear ‘bigger’ in clothing I always thought it was chest and delts.[/quote]

I’ve seen guys with big chests who don’t look imposing in typical loose fitting shirts despite having much much fuller pecs than most do. On the other hand, I’ve seen, and known some individuals with amazingly developed backs who just can’t “hide” their development in everyday clothing. Always struck me as cool when you try to play down your physique but it shows anyway :slight_smile:

S