Young Lee Priest

[quote]Free2Be wrote:
Genetics are over played, they have an effect yes, but way over played![/quote]

Nah - not on that elite level.

I laugh at a lot of the kids on here who swear they’ll be Mr. O someday. If you take a good look at the guys who actually do reach the O stage, you’ll see that they looked pretty amazing even as teenagers.

Sure, lots of people have the potential to build great physiques thru hard work and perseverance, but to be among the 15 best bodybuilders in the entire world, it takes a combination of great genetics, incredible dedication to training and diet, and drugs.

People get all pissy about that because they want to believe that their shitty structure and average genetics can be overcome to one day be crowned Mr. O, but fact is, they can’t…


Yates, mates!

.

Yea - and as soon as he started training you can see his potential, and the round muscle bellies and the fullness he displays, even at the beginning…

I always tell people that you don’t know what your genetics will allow, until you try to hit their potential. Too many new trainers start out crying about their ‘bad genetics’ these days.

S

Genetics make a HUGE difference at an elite level in ALL disciplines

Lifelong training, sometimes starting at AGE THREE, makes a HUGE difference at elite level, in all disciplines

Please show me examples of people who have achieved phenomenal results at an elite level but a) started really late in life and / or b) were average in their teens and / or c) have average or just good genetics

OK so bodybuilding is a bit different to being a golfer or pianist, maybe you can start in your teens. But this is a very competitive world and to compete at that level, you have to have it all going for you, and psychotic discipline that lasts decades.

Not to mention drugs. Which are everywhere, like it or not, even in academic pursuits let alone sports.

Note, I am only talking about elite level. At advanced level, pretty much anything goes.

Please, show me examples that counter my points. I’d find those people far more inspiring than I do people who are genetically gifted, chemically enhanced, or psychotically disciplined (actually that last one, gotta respect that).

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:
Wow, seeing Arnold and Serge Nubret,… really shows what a young pup he was. I’m assuming he had already won a few titles, because I know he was the youngest Mr. Universe when he won it (23 I think?). Amazing to see how much more he would add.

S[/quote]

You should get his 1976 autobiography, “The Education of a Bodybuilder”. Great read!

[quote]sid132 wrote:
15[/quote]

umm photoshop on that one

[quote]Magarhe wrote:
Genetics make a HUGE difference at an elite level in ALL disciplines

Lifelong training, sometimes starting at AGE THREE, makes a HUGE difference at elite level, in all disciplines

Please show me examples of people who have achieved phenomenal results at an elite level but a) started really late in life and / or b) were average in their teens and / or c) have average or just good genetics

[/quote]

More common in the martial arts world. Many known masters are known to have started between 20-30 with some minus-average genetics. Ma Hong, a teacher of Chen Tai Chi, started when he was 40 years old.

Here he is age 76:

Just proof there exist some physical disciplines that can contradict this claim.


Finally a reason to post these bad boys.

Lee with his mother (he is 17, I believe).


Back shot.

One more.

Lou Ferrigno was quite skinny as a teenager? Remember that early shot of him with his father? Looked like a textbook ecto…dad was fairly buff though so he must have been a bit of a late bloomer.

Lee has always been phenom though.

[quote]the.israeli wrote:
Magarhe wrote:
Genetics make a HUGE difference at an elite level in ALL disciplines

Lifelong training, sometimes starting at AGE THREE, makes a HUGE difference at elite level, in all disciplines

Please show me examples of people who have achieved phenomenal results at an elite level but a) started really late in life and / or b) were average in their teens and / or c) have average or just good genetics

More common in the martial arts world. Many known masters are known to have started between 20-30 with some minus-average genetics. Ma Hong, a teacher of Chen Tai Chi, started when he was 40 years old.

Here he is age 76:

Just proof there exist some physical disciplines that can contradict this claim.
[/quote]

Generally in that side of the MA world, rising up ranks of teaching, is a lot different to competitive fighting. Many are never really tested in their skills, not against other disciplines or even within their own discipline against others, not tested in a way that is highly competitive.

Unless there is a lot of money involved, and the sport is very popular and well known, and then you give people decades to prepare, you are not getting the best of the best.

Or to put it another way, let’s say the top master of Chen Tai Chi was paid tens of millions of dollars per year, and it was one of the top 5 sports in the USA, up there with baseball for the next 40 years. How do you think Ma Hong would compare to those who would come through the ranks over the next 40 years? People with gifted genetics, training from age 3, driven by obsessed parents and lusting after the massive cash?

No disprespect to Ma Hong and as I said before I have a lot of respect for that discipline especially when the money and fame are not involved.

And highly skilled practices do take decades of refinement of skill.

And there are quite a few sports that are not highly paid, not as popular and not as competitive, which offer an opportunity to someone not as gifted or disciplined.

As an example … Arild “Hulk” Haugen (from Wiki)

Arild is 1.89 metres tall and weighs approximately 142 kg. He is capable of squatting 370 kg, a deadlift of 400 kg, and a bench press of 250 kg.

It has been suggested that Haugen has much potential, and in future Strongman competitions, will rival the impressive records set by Mariusz Pudzianowski.

In October 2008 Haugen officially retired from strongman to focus on a career in boxing. His decision was caused by the lack of prize money in strongmen competitons.

[quote]Magarhe wrote:
the.israeli wrote:
Magarhe wrote:
Genetics make a HUGE difference at an elite level in ALL disciplines

Lifelong training, sometimes starting at AGE THREE, makes a HUGE difference at elite level, in all disciplines

Please show me examples of people who have achieved phenomenal results at an elite level but a) started really late in life and / or b) were average in their teens and / or c) have average or just good genetics

More common in the martial arts world. Many known masters are known to have started between 20-30 with some minus-average genetics. Ma Hong, a teacher of Chen Tai Chi, started when he was 40 years old.

Here he is age 76:

Just proof there exist some physical disciplines that can contradict this claim.

Generally in that side of the MA world, rising up ranks of teaching, is a lot different to competitive fighting. Many are never really tested in their skills, not against other disciplines or even within their own discipline against others, not tested in a way that is highly competitive.

Unless there is a lot of money involved, and the sport is very popular and well known, and then you give people decades to prepare, you are not getting the best of the best.

Or to put it another way, let’s say the top master of Chen Tai Chi was paid tens of millions of dollars per year, and it was one of the top 5 sports in the USA, up there with baseball for the next 40 years. How do you think Ma Hong would compare to those who would come through the ranks over the next 40 years? People with gifted genetics, training from age 3, driven by obsessed parents and lusting after the massive cash?

No disprespect to Ma Hong and as I said before I have a lot of respect for that discipline especially when the money and fame are not involved.

And highly skilled practices do take decades of refinement of skill.

And there are quite a few sports that are not highly paid, not as popular and not as competitive, which offer an opportunity to someone not as gifted or disciplined.

As an example … Arild “Hulk” Haugen (from Wiki)

Arild is 1.89 metres tall and weighs approximately 142 kg. He is capable of squatting 370 kg, a deadlift of 400 kg, and a bench press of 250 kg.

It has been suggested that Haugen has much potential, and in future Strongman competitions, will rival the impressive records set by Mariusz Pudzianowski.

In October 2008 Haugen officially retired from strongman to focus on a career in boxing. His decision was caused by the lack of prize money in strongmen competitons.

[/quote]

I concur, although some Tai Chi masters in the pre-video past were known to have started ages 3-5 and brutally instructed (to the point that Yang Cheng Fu, another well known masters, tried to commit suicide AS A CHILD to escape the harsh regime). Anyway, sure if money was heavily involved specifically into Tai Chi, it could have gone a lot farther, as with every other thing you can think of.

True, true … but I have to say I respect their discipline without the money and being beaten into it by older masters / parents!

I’ve read a few times where they figured out that to get expert and even master level at anything ie:guitar,violin,karate,whatever,it takes 10,000 hours.Does anyone know offhand how many hours pro would put in?Thats in addition to great genetics and hard work of course.May be a dumb question but it got me thinking and I wouldn’t know where to begin to even guess.

[quote]Free2Be wrote:
hawaiilifterMike wrote:
Genetics is a huge factor that many people seem to disregard (saying people don’t work hard enough or are not dedicated enough). Shaq was 6’6" at 12 years old (you can’t teach height - I’m 5’10" with no jumping ability).

Jumping ability can be trained.

That statement is a little delusional. Are saying you can take anyone at Spud Webb’s height of 5’5" and have them dunk a 10’ basket because jumping ability can be trained?

What would you know about potential. You used to eat 2500 calories at McDonalds for lunch. How would you know what potential you have other than to be fat?

Genetics are over played, they have an effect yes, but way over played![/quote]

Have an effect and way over played? So you are saying that the genetic height difference between the brothers Larry Jordan and Michael Jordan (5’11" vs. 6’6") does not matter? I thought you were an engineer (like my younger brother) more analytical, logical and smarter than me.

[quote]bond james bond wrote:
I’ve read a few times where they figured out that to get expert and even master level at anything ie:guitar,violin,karate,whatever,it takes 10,000 hours.Does anyone know offhand how many hours pro would put in?Thats in addition to great genetics and hard work of course.May be a dumb question but it got me thinking and I wouldn’t know where to begin to even guess. [/quote]

“The 10,000 hours rule”
I think TC wrote about it recently in relation to a book by Malcolm Gladwell called “Outliers”.

[quote]SkyNett wrote:
Yea - and as soon as he started training you can see his potential, and the round muscle bellies and the fullness he displays, even at the beginning… [/quote]

And Yates probably had the worst genetics of any Mr. O, mind you…