[quote]bushidobadboy wrote:
[quote]LevelHeaded wrote:
[quote]boyinpain wrote:
LOL, sorry, but I consider ‘clinical relevance’ to be what you achieve in the clinic, with real patients in the real world (and yes, there may be some placebo effect in there, not that it matters IMO), NOT what some journal article tells you is ‘clinically relevant’.
I long ago learned the limitations of being completely ruled by studies and RCTs. One poorly designed or executed study can be the death-knell of a technique or approach. But that doesn’t mena it’s not valid. You (the experienced clinician) have to blend science (studies, RCTs, A & P, etc) with what actually works.
[/quote]
Did you really just rip off BBB’s response verbatim from his response in this other thread?..
WOW! I was just thinking “that looks familiar”. Don’t think this has ever happened to me before (my words blatantly plagarised and as a response to the same poster they were used for initially!).
I’m speechless.
BBB[/quote]
I know. Oddly, I had just read your original post right before reading the plagarised post and had to do a double take on it. Pretty pathetic if you ask me. I’m usually open minded to people’s points of views, regardless of if I completely agree with them or not, but the blatant plagarism makes me lose all respect for any of boyinpain’s responses/posts.