Why Is My Testosterone High?

I am 36 years old and I have health issues. A few weeks ago I had my testosterone checked, and my total testosterone is actually high normal. My shgb is very high, which has my free testosterone in normal range. I’m curious if anyone has any insight as far as why my testosterone would be high normal at my age and given my health issues? When I had my testosterone checked about a couple years ago, the total testosterone was actually outside of high normal range. Is there some reason that the body would try to compensate by producing extra testosterone?

A few years ago, I was on trt because at the time my testosterone tested as low. I didn’t realize that I was being exposed to mold and that’s the reason for the low testosterone as well as my subsequent health issues. I did not benefit from trt, so I discontinued it. I don’t think I even did it for an entire year.

This is why, high SHBG usually leads to high TT.

The metric you actually should care about is Free Testosterone (fT), and testing for fT is pretty hit or miss. If you’ve got low T symptoms, even with ‘normal’ fT, you should consider TRT.

3 Likes

These usually go hand in hand. Higher TT in natural guys I see higher SHBG, which kinda makes sense.

As for why is yours high? No idea. What were LH/FSH levels at? Prolactin?

1 Like

How long were you on TRT?

I didn’t test for FH or lsh. I will consider getting that done. Is there anything I can do to lower shbg?

How is testing for free testosterone hit or miss? Is there any way I can lower my shbg?

I’m not 100% on how long. Probably about six months. I was being exposed to mold so it was no benefit aside from maybe some increased muscle mass.

Yeah, excess androgens.

You should be asking yourself what’s causing your high SHBG, because maybe if you can figure out what it’s high, only then can you form a plan to lower it.

Your diet affects SHBG, vegan diets has been shown to increase SHBG. Also cutting, starvation can increase SHBG substantially.

Usually when a guy has high SHBG, more often than not there’s nothing you can do about it except drown it in excess androgens to suppress it.

SHBG is a difficult hormone to manipulate.

The high SHBG could also be genetic.

3 Likes

In most cases, it’s like 70% accurate.

@systemlord covered this pretty well

1 Like

FT number you posted above is Quest equilibrium dialysis test, yes?

How about the TT assay?

Post the assay details and we can discuss the concept of hit or miss.

Better to calculate it

1 Like

Fortunately it appears OP didn’t run the direct RIA fT assay. Good post.

Gory details for those interested:

Dear Interested Reader,
Can you make it all the way through the thread? Dare you.

Tell me more about this please.

  • 30% error? [accuracy]
  • accurate 70% of the time? [precision]
  • ??
1 Like

However, we have demonstrated that even the calculated fT values derived from the prevailing equations, based on linear law-of-mass action models or empiric equations, differ systematically from free testosterone measured by equilibrium dialysis by as much as 40%.

Perhaps I am misunderstanding this, but it sounds like there is 60% accuracy in most methods, if measurements can differ as much as +/-40%.

You’re the expert here though, so I’ll defer to you.

Nope. Just studied this a bit. Check out the thread linked above in interested.

1 Like

This is one reason why some doctors fixate on the Total T and ignore the Free T. This is why diagnosing a testosterone deficiency can be challenging and why so many men get blown off.

2 Likes

It almost makes more sense to just use the calculated fT in these situations. At least if we stick to one measuring stick, we could harmonize TRT in a way that actually helps people. (not that I agree with calculated fT, but this is beside the point)

(note that my tested-fT is almost 3x higher than my direct tested-fT)

One is below range, and the other is just under the high-bar of 26.5 ug/dL.

You have to put in the work if you want proficiency. Otherwise misinformation just continues to get propagated.

2 Likes

There can’t be one number for everyone, doctors need a little bit of leeway. The normal range is exist for a reason, otherwise everybody would have the same exact numbers.

1 Like

I think we’re saying the same thing here =)

We should stick to one means of measuring as a standard. We should also revise and harmonize this means of measuring to accurately match what we should be treating to. That doesn’t really mean 1 number for all, moreso 1 range for all - otherwise we have vitrually no objective treatment criteria.

1 Like