Is it normal for calculated vs tested fT to be this far off? Calculated shows I’d be at 7.94, which would be below range - but tested shows 21.2.
From what @systemlord is saying, it sounds like direct fT testing doesn’t work well and obviously the calculated method doesn’t either. So it leaves me either below range, or at the high end of the range… doesn’t make for easy diagnosing.
I only have what’s above… I guess I thought they’d tested for lipids then - I was wrong.