Why 5 Ft 6-Ft 10

Off Topic
141

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:
OP, are YOU successful?[/quote]

No, he is short. [/quote]

Perhaps thats why he feels short-changed.[/quote]

No , I am not short. [/quote]

But are you successful?

Are you rich?

Are you a top bodybuilder in your nation?

Are you a high ranking strongman?
[/quote]

Am I success full? Yes I think so, I am currently studying Computer Science in Brunel university, which is in Top 350 in World. I consider my self good.

Am I rich? Our household income before taxes is $94.000 Year. It may not sound too much for USA, but average household annual income is only $15.000 in my Country. 8 times of Country Average. Minimum Wage is $6.000 Year Before Taxes. So I consider my self above average.

Am I top Bodybuilder in my nation? No, unfortunately no. I have been training since November 2013. I dont look good at all. But stil, there is time. Currently I am 165 Lbs at %20 Bodyfat.
[/quote]

Do you actually contribute to that “household” income?

142

[quote]spar4tee wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:
OP, are YOU successful?[/quote]

No, he is short. [/quote]

Perhaps thats why he feels short-changed.[/quote]

It sucks getting the short end of the stick.[/quote]

That’s what she said[/quote]
I’m sure she didn’t even notice.[/quote]

That would be short sighted of her.

143

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:
Paul Anderson got backlift of 6270 Lbs! If he entered Wsm contest, he would easily win.
[/quote]
You are an even bigger fool than I thought if you believe Paul Anderson actually did a 6270lb back lift rofl. You need to use your head when it comes to these feats of strength way back in the old days. Most of them are total bullshit.

Paul Anderson’s only official lifts are as follows:
440lb clean and jerk
335lb snatch

Those are very strong, but they’re pretty fucking far off the best nowadays. He would be crushed like a child in any actual strongman competition in the present time. Anderson was a great man. He was a very strong man, and I am a huge fan of his. However his strength is nothing compared to the world level strongmen today. These are simply the facts.[/quote]

Than why the hell Bill Kaz mentions him as King? Even he compliments him.

Sure, if Paul Anderson was 6 Ft 2" or something, you would easily believe that he would destroy todays athletes.

But since he is 5 Ft 9", “In your opinion”, he is inferior to taller guys.

Well done! [/quote]
I never mentioned his height once. In fact I had no idea how tall he was. This just proves how insane and for some reason height obsessed you are lol. I have no idea where you’re getting that from, but it’s obviously not from me.

Bill Kazmaier said that because Paul Anderson was a wonderful man who pioneered a lot of things for future strength athletes such as Bill himself. He was just being nice.

It’s not “my opinion” it’s the facts. Numbers don’t lie. You can see Paul’s official weightlifting numbers. There is nothing there to indicate he could possibly hang with someone like Big Z. I don’t care if he was 6’2" or 5’6" or 9 feet tall. He simply wasn’t as strong as people in the game are today. If you want to believe otherwise, that is simply “your opinion” regardless of how outlandish it may be.[/quote]

But in the 1960’s , Nutrition and Gear was not good as todays standards.

Sure, Classical Bodybuilders were also on Juice, but not much as todays.

Today they also use IGF -1, Hgh , etc.

If Anderson were alive today, and used them, he would be easily blow those guys off.

144

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:
OP, are YOU successful?[/quote]

No, he is short. [/quote]

Perhaps thats why he feels short-changed.[/quote]

No , I am not short. [/quote]

But are you successful?

Are you rich?

Are you a top bodybuilder in your nation?

Are you a high ranking strongman?
[/quote]

Am I success full? Yes I think so, I am currently studying Computer Science in Brunel university, which is in Top 350 in World. I consider my self good.

Am I rich? Our household income before taxes is $94.000 Year. It may not sound too much for USA, but average household annual income is only $15.000 in my Country. 8 times of Country Average. Minimum Wage is $6.000 Year Before Taxes. So I consider my self above average.

Am I top Bodybuilder in my nation? No, unfortunately no. I have been training since November 2013. I dont look good at all. But stil, there is time. Currently I am 165 Lbs at %20 Bodyfat.

[/quote]

Then what the fuck are you whining about? Even the gear there is legal.

145

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:
OP, are YOU successful?[/quote]

No, he is short. [/quote]

Perhaps thats why he feels short-changed.[/quote]

No , I am not short. [/quote]

But are you successful?

Are you rich?

Are you a top bodybuilder in your nation?

Are you a high ranking strongman?
[/quote]

Am I success full? Yes I think so, I am currently studying Computer Science in Brunel university, which is in Top 350 in World. I consider my self good.

Am I rich? Our household income before taxes is $94.000 Year. It may not sound too much for USA, but average household annual income is only $15.000 in my Country. 8 times of Country Average. Minimum Wage is $6.000 Year Before Taxes. So I consider my self above average.

Am I top Bodybuilder in my nation? No, unfortunately no. I have been training since November 2013. I dont look good at all. But stil, there is time. Currently I am 165 Lbs at %20 Bodyfat.
[/quote]

Do you actually contribute to that “household” income?
[/quote]

No, I am not. I am spoiled little punk that spend my fathers money. I am rich bastard. I think thats what you wanted to hear ?

146

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]spar4tee wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:
Paul Anderson got backlift of 6270 Lbs! If he entered Wsm contest, he would easily win.
[/quote]
You are an even bigger fool than I thought if you believe Paul Anderson actually did a 6270lb back lift rofl. You need to use your head when it comes to these feats of strength way back in the old days. Most of them are total bullshit.

Paul Anderson’s only official lifts are as follows:
440lb clean and jerk
335lb snatch

Those are very strong, but they’re pretty fucking far off the best nowadays. He would be crushed like a child in any actual strongman competition in the present time. Anderson was a great man. He was a very strong man, and I am a huge fan of his. However his strength is nothing compared to the world level strongmen today. These are simply the facts.[/quote]

Than why the hell Bill Kaz mentions him as King? Even he compliments him.

Sure, if Paul Anderson was 6 Ft 2" or something, you would easily believe that he would destroy todays athletes.

But since he is 5 Ft 9", “In your opinion”, he is inferior to taller guys.

Well done! [/quote]
Because he was a pioneer
 Kepler was a pioneer in astronomy. That doesn’t mean he knew shit about dark matter.[/quote]

Don’t blow his mind.

Where are X’s crayons??[/quote]

Shit, maybe that’s where he went. He’s been working on a patent for X crayons this entire time. I bet it will even have client side UI capabilities. X was like 5’11-6’0, right? Hopefully, he’s not too tall to succeed.

147

[quote]Wector wrote:
If Anderson were alive today, and used them, he would be easily blow those guys off.
[/quote]

100% Conjecture.

148

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:
OP, are YOU successful?[/quote]

No, he is short. [/quote]

Perhaps thats why he feels short-changed.[/quote]

No , I am not short. [/quote]

But are you successful?

Are you rich?

Are you a top bodybuilder in your nation?

Are you a high ranking strongman?
[/quote]

Am I success full? Yes I think so, I am currently studying Computer Science in Brunel university, which is in Top 350 in World. I consider my self good.

Am I rich? Our household income before taxes is $94.000 Year. It may not sound too much for USA, but average household annual income is only $15.000 in my Country. 8 times of Country Average. Minimum Wage is $6.000 Year Before Taxes. So I consider my self above average.

Am I top Bodybuilder in my nation? No, unfortunately no. I have been training since November 2013. I dont look good at all. But stil, there is time. Currently I am 165 Lbs at %20 Bodyfat.
[/quote]

Do you actually contribute to that “household” income?
[/quote]

No, I am not. I am spoiled little punk that spend my fathers money. I am rich bastard. I think thats what you wanted to hear ?

[/quote]

I’ll take that as a no then.

149

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:
Paul Anderson got backlift of 6270 Lbs! If he entered Wsm contest, he would easily win.
[/quote]
You are an even bigger fool than I thought if you believe Paul Anderson actually did a 6270lb back lift rofl. You need to use your head when it comes to these feats of strength way back in the old days. Most of them are total bullshit.

Paul Anderson’s only official lifts are as follows:
440lb clean and jerk
335lb snatch

Those are very strong, but they’re pretty fucking far off the best nowadays. He would be crushed like a child in any actual strongman competition in the present time. Anderson was a great man. He was a very strong man, and I am a huge fan of his. However his strength is nothing compared to the world level strongmen today. These are simply the facts.[/quote]

Than why the hell Bill Kaz mentions him as King? Even he compliments him.

Sure, if Paul Anderson was 6 Ft 2" or something, you would easily believe that he would destroy todays athletes.

But since he is 5 Ft 9", “In your opinion”, he is inferior to taller guys.

Well done! [/quote]
I never mentioned his height once. In fact I had no idea how tall he was. This just proves how insane and for some reason height obsessed you are lol. I have no idea where you’re getting that from, but it’s obviously not from me.

Bill Kazmaier said that because Paul Anderson was a wonderful man who pioneered a lot of things for future strength athletes such as Bill himself. He was just being nice.

It’s not “my opinion” it’s the facts. Numbers don’t lie. You can see Paul’s official weightlifting numbers. There is nothing there to indicate he could possibly hang with someone like Big Z. I don’t care if he was 6’2" or 5’6" or 9 feet tall. He simply wasn’t as strong as people in the game are today. If you want to believe otherwise, that is simply “your opinion” regardless of how outlandish it may be.[/quote]

But in the 1960’s , Nutrition and Gear was not good as todays standards.

Sure, Classical Bodybuilders were also on Juice, but not much as todays.

Today they also use IGF -1, Hgh , etc.

If Anderson were alive today, and used them, he would be easily blow those guys off.
[/quote]
So you’re changing your entire opinion now? I proved you wrong so you’re redefining your belief. That’s fine. I’m glad you realize your mistake.

Your new argument is that if Paul Anderson would have had access to everything today’s strongmen have, he could have been one of the best. I don’t think anyone would disagree.

150

[quote]spar4tee wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]spar4tee wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:
Paul Anderson got backlift of 6270 Lbs! If he entered Wsm contest, he would easily win.
[/quote]
You are an even bigger fool than I thought if you believe Paul Anderson actually did a 6270lb back lift rofl. You need to use your head when it comes to these feats of strength way back in the old days. Most of them are total bullshit.

Paul Anderson’s only official lifts are as follows:
440lb clean and jerk
335lb snatch

Those are very strong, but they’re pretty fucking far off the best nowadays. He would be crushed like a child in any actual strongman competition in the present time. Anderson was a great man. He was a very strong man, and I am a huge fan of his. However his strength is nothing compared to the world level strongmen today. These are simply the facts.[/quote]

Than why the hell Bill Kaz mentions him as King? Even he compliments him.

Sure, if Paul Anderson was 6 Ft 2" or something, you would easily believe that he would destroy todays athletes.

But since he is 5 Ft 9", “In your opinion”, he is inferior to taller guys.

Well done! [/quote]
Because he was a pioneer
 Kepler was a pioneer in astronomy. That doesn’t mean he knew shit about dark matter.[/quote]

Don’t blow his mind.

Where are X’s crayons??[/quote]
Shit, maybe that’s where he went. He’s been working on a patent for X crayons this entire time. I bet it will even have client side UI capabilities. X was like 5’11-6’0, right? Hopefully, he’s not too tall to succeed.[/quote]

Genius!

151

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:
Paul Anderson got backlift of 6270 Lbs! If he entered Wsm contest, he would easily win.
[/quote]
You are an even bigger fool than I thought if you believe Paul Anderson actually did a 6270lb back lift rofl. You need to use your head when it comes to these feats of strength way back in the old days. Most of them are total bullshit.

Paul Anderson’s only official lifts are as follows:
440lb clean and jerk
335lb snatch

Those are very strong, but they’re pretty fucking far off the best nowadays. He would be crushed like a child in any actual strongman competition in the present time. Anderson was a great man. He was a very strong man, and I am a huge fan of his. However his strength is nothing compared to the world level strongmen today. These are simply the facts.[/quote]

Than why the hell Bill Kaz mentions him as King? Even he compliments him.

Sure, if Paul Anderson was 6 Ft 2" or something, you would easily believe that he would destroy todays athletes.

But since he is 5 Ft 9", “In your opinion”, he is inferior to taller guys.

Well done! [/quote]
I never mentioned his height once. In fact I had no idea how tall he was. This just proves how insane and for some reason height obsessed you are lol. I have no idea where you’re getting that from, but it’s obviously not from me.

Bill Kazmaier said that because Paul Anderson was a wonderful man who pioneered a lot of things for future strength athletes such as Bill himself. He was just being nice.

It’s not “my opinion” it’s the facts. Numbers don’t lie. You can see Paul’s official weightlifting numbers. There is nothing there to indicate he could possibly hang with someone like Big Z. I don’t care if he was 6’2" or 5’6" or 9 feet tall. He simply wasn’t as strong as people in the game are today. If you want to believe otherwise, that is simply “your opinion” regardless of how outlandish it may be.[/quote]

But in the 1960’s , Nutrition and Gear was not good as todays standards.

Sure, Classical Bodybuilders were also on Juice, but not much as todays.

Today they also use IGF -1, Hgh , etc.

If Anderson were alive today, and used them, he would be easily blow those guys off.
[/quote]
So you’re changing your entire opinion now? I proved you wrong so you’re redefining your belief. That’s fine. I’m glad you realize your mistake.

Your new argument is that if Paul Anderson would have had access to everything today’s strongmen have, he could have been one of the best. I don’t think anyone would disagree.[/quote]

Well, not if he was 5’9". He definitely would not be successful at 5’9".

152

Yes, Paul Anderson is eternally damned because he is 5 Ft 9".

Since HGH and IGF -1 Does not cause increased height in Adults,

There is no way he would be WSM.

Shit


153

[quote]Wector wrote:
He is not pioneer, there were guys before him.
[/quote]
What the actual what? Do you not know what the word “pioneer” means? You don’t have to be first to be a pioneer. You just have to propel a certain industry, field, sport, media, or subculture in a lasting and notable way.

154

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:
OP, are YOU successful?[/quote]

No, he is short. [/quote]

Perhaps thats why he feels short-changed.[/quote]

No , I am not short. [/quote]

But are you successful?

Are you rich?

Are you a top bodybuilder in your nation?

Are you a high ranking strongman?
[/quote]

Am I success full? Yes I think so, I am currently studying Computer Science in Brunel university, which is in Top 350 in World. I consider my self good.

Am I rich? Our household income before taxes is $94.000 Year. It may not sound too much for USA, but average household annual income is only $15.000 in my Country. 8 times of Country Average. Minimum Wage is $6.000 Year Before Taxes. So I consider my self above average.

Am I top Bodybuilder in my nation? No, unfortunately no. I have been training since November 2013. I dont look good at all. But stil, there is time. Currently I am 165 Lbs at %20 Bodyfat.
[/quote]

Do you actually contribute to that “household” income?
[/quote]

No, I am not. I am spoiled little punk that spend my fathers money. I am rich bastard. I think thats what you wanted to hear ?

[/quote]

We’d just like to hear the truth. If this is the truth, then yes. It sounds like the truth, since you said you’re in school.

155

Also you never offered an explanation as to why you blamed my thoughts on height even though I never once mentioned it. Are you admitting to being insane?

Btw have you even fucking heard of Vytautas Lalas? Top level strongman? Won the Arnold Classic? He’s only like 5’9". Nobody seems to have any issue believing he can be successful in strongman, especially not considering that he’s doing it before our very eyes. You are a total space cadet dude.

156

500×757 48.9 KB

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]Wector wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:
OP, are YOU successful?[/quote]

No, he is short. [/quote]

Perhaps thats why he feels short-changed.[/quote]

No , I am not short. [/quote]

But are you successful?

Are you rich?

Are you a top bodybuilder in your nation?

Are you a high ranking strongman?
[/quote]

Am I success full? Yes I think so, I am currently studying Computer Science in Brunel university, which is in Top 350 in World. I consider my self good.

Am I rich? Our household income before taxes is $94.000 Year. It may not sound too much for USA, but average household annual income is only $15.000 in my Country. 8 times of Country Average. Minimum Wage is $6.000 Year Before Taxes. So I consider my self above average.

Am I top Bodybuilder in my nation? No, unfortunately no. I have been training since November 2013. I dont look good at all. But stil, there is time. Currently I am 165 Lbs at %20 Bodyfat.
[/quote]

Do you actually contribute to that “household” income?
[/quote]

157

My father is also Engineer , he is also 5 Ft 10". Why he is not 6 Ft 7" ?

My Grandfather was also mechanical Engineer and he is 5 Ft 8". Why he is not 7 Foot?

I am going to reject my parents because of their heights.

158

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]spar4tee wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:
OP, are YOU successful?[/quote]

No, he is short. [/quote]

Perhaps thats why he feels short-changed.[/quote]

It sucks getting the short end of the stick.[/quote]

That’s what she said[/quote]
I’m sure she didn’t even notice.[/quote]

That would be short sighted of her.[/quote]
If you keep this up, his mind is sure to short-circuit.

159

Have you written a manifesto?

160

[quote]Wector wrote:
My father is also Engineer , he is also 5 Ft 10". Why he is not 6 Ft 7" ?

My Grandfather was also mechanical Engineer and he is 5 Ft 8". Why he is not 7 Foot?

I am going to reject my parents because of their heights.

[/quote]

You should reject your parents because they tell you not to smoke dope and cavort with loose women.