[quote]Wector wrote:
As I mentioned before they think average people are COMPLETELY inferior. [/quote]
I have never meet a person that thinks this…Not one single person. Heightism is not a real thing.
[quote]Stinkfist wrote:
.[/quote]
Damn…
Kangaroos are such assholes.
[quote]flipcollar wrote:
[quote]Wector wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Wector wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Wector wrote:
[quote]MikeRich928 wrote:
extremely, extremely dumb. Like, you’re a rock[/quote]
No its not.[/quote]
[/quote]
If I am idiot, you are egoistic and narsistic piece of crap. You cant accept these because probably you are tall and think you are superior and have it all. Sorry sir, you dont have it all…And also, I am not the one who crying and bitching around in forums, telling people that “I am too tall, cant build muscle, cant fill out, please help”. Usually taller people do. Why are they so depressed? Since they are tall, they thought they will be much better than shorter people in bodybuilding, but the truth, is not what they wanted.
I am sorry, richest guy is still 5 Ft 10", and Can Purchase lots of 6 Ft + guys and whole their f… family. [/quote]
Lol, I’m 5’9" bro.
Take a basic statistics class.[/quote]
I still cant understand what do you mean.
I know 5 Ft 10" guy is average, and is MORE LIKELY that GIVEN EQUAL SITUATIONS , there will be more AVERAGE People in those successfull people.
But, my point is, people dont think like that. As I mentioned before they think average people are COMPLETELY inferior. Thats why I am talking like this. So this prooves there is no correlation between being wealthy and height. Yes I agree with you on that. Thats why I wanted to show Richest Men having average height.
But for bodybuilding, I dont agree with you. The reason that best bodybuilders are around average height, is NOT BECAUSE Average Male height is around 5 Ft 10".
Because, taller people fill out harder, and due to Square Cube Law ( Which I explained in first page ) , they need much more mass to appear proportional.
Your argument is invalid. Because , when those guys were competing at Professional Level, at the contest, they were taller guys than them, but none of them win the show. If there was no taller bodybuilders in IFBB and Mr. Olympia Contests, you would be right, if that was the case, I would agree with you, but its not. There were taller bodybuilders, but shorter ones beat them. Its not because average height is 5 Ft 10". [/quote]
According to your theory about bodybuilding, as it relates to the square cube law, 5’3 bodybuilders should fill out better than 5’10 bodybuilders. Why aren’t short bodybuilders winning the O?[/quote]
Franco Columbu, Dexter Jackson and Chris Dickerson won Mr. Olympia and they were below average height. ( If you say why average height of Mr. Olympia is not 5 Ft 3", I think thats related to bone structure. Bones may too small at that height. 5 Ft 10" ideal height for mass building. Maybe thats the reason why 5 Ft 10" average height for males, its evolutionary the fittest I believe.
Shorter Mr. Olympias outnumber Taller ones if you noticed. But there is not any guy at 6 Ft 4" or 5" and won Mr. Olympia. Why do you think its happening?
You also mention Hitler and mussolini as the “toughest.” (not sure where the hell you got that from.) But, FDR was 6 '2 and I think we all know who ended up being tougher. Height has no bearing on a person’s “toughness,” or general success at all. If your going to talk specifically about certain sports then sure, basketball players will be taller, gymnasts will be shorter, football players will be both depending on position, rich people are both short and tall.
If you would have restricted your argument to bodybuilding only, you maybe could have at least made a valid argument, but you are going way beyond that and basically saying that “shorter people are more likely to be more successful, tougher, and overall better off in life in all areas.” That is ridiculous.
Then we look at things like basketball players, track and field athletes, World’s Strongest Man competitors, etc.
[quote]Stinkfist wrote:
Kangaroos are such assholes.[/quote]
Funny assholes.
[quote]MikeRich928 wrote:
You also mention Hitler and mussolini as the “toughest.” (not sure where the hell you got that from.) But, FDR was 6 '2 and I think we all know who ended up being tougher. Height has no bearing on a person’s “toughness,” or general success at all. If your going to talk specifically about certain sports then sure, basketball players will be taller, gymnasts will be shorter, football players will be both depending on position, rich people are both short and tall. If you would have restricted your argument to bodybuilding only, you maybe could have at least made a valid argument, but you are going way beyond that and basically saying that “shorter people are more likely to be more successful, tougher, and overall better off in life in all areas.” That is ridiculous. [/quote]
I know its ridiculus. That is a counter attack against taller peoples view of life, and feeling of their superiority. ( Thats also ridiculous too!!! )
I have enough brain to understand what is correlated and what is not.
[quote]MikeRich928 wrote:
You also mention Hitler and mussolini as the “toughest.” (not sure where the hell you got that from.) But, FDR was 6 '2 and I think we all know who ended up being tougher. Height has no bearing on a person’s “toughness,” or general success at all. If your going to talk specifically about certain sports then sure, basketball players will be taller, gymnasts will be shorter, football players will be both depending on position, rich people are both short and tall. If you would have restricted your argument to bodybuilding only, you maybe could have at least made a valid argument, but you are going way beyond that and basically saying that “shorter people are more likely to be more successful, tougher, and overall better off in life in all areas.” That is ridiculous. [/quote]
Exactly. Your hypothesis is ridiculous.
getting sucked in fellas…
You’re getting sucked in
[quote]Wector wrote:
That is a counter attack against taller peoples view of life, and feeling of their superiority. ( Thats also ridiculous too!!! )
I have enough brain to understand what is correlated and what is not.
[/quote]
Better be careful, the tall people in the U.S. government are monitoring this communication. Best not to upset them. They mostly only come out at night, mostly.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
getting sucked in fellas…
You’re getting sucked in[/quote]
I think it’s funny, but you’re right.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Stinkfist wrote:
Kangaroos are such assholes.[/quote]
Funny assholes.[/quote]
Especially the short ones.
We can also look Marathon Runners, Gymnasts, Soccer Players , Etc.
In my opinion best Strongman is Mariuzs Pudzianowski.
Also, there are some guys which has never been to Strongest Men Competitions, but if they do, I think they would perform better than Mariuzs.
3 Guys are coming to my mind,
Paul Anderson ( 5 Ft 9" ) , Doug Hepburn ( 5 Ft 8.5" ) , Louis Cyr ( 5 Ft 10" ).
Personally, I think Bridget the Midget sucks the meanest dick; therefore, only midgets are good at sucking dick.
1 Like
[quote]Stinkfist wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Stinkfist wrote:
Kangaroos are such assholes.[/quote]
Funny assholes.[/quote]
Especially the short ones.[/quote]
When the one kicked that duck or whateer I about pissed my pants. I’m sure my boss was like, “dafuq is he laughing at”
OP, are YOU successful?
[quote]Wector wrote:
Arnold is exception.
Majority of succsessfull bodybuilders are under 6 Ft. I think there is a reason.
There is not only Arnold in this world.
Mike Mentzer, Flex Wheeler, Frank Zane, those are greatest bodybuilders in my opinion and they are around 5 Ft 9".
Ed Coan is listed 5 Ft 6". I have never seen him listed as short as 5 Ft 3 or 4".
But if he is 5 Ft 4", he did a MORE MASSIVE accomhplishment. The guy has 2500 Lbs total! Huge…[/quote]
No shit there’s a reason. If you’re fucking 6’5, it’s going to be way harder to fill out to current Olympia standards. Lou Ferrigno would have to be 400lbs in contest shape in comparison to 285lbs during his competition days.
[quote]Wector wrote:
In my opinion…
[/quote]
That’s all this whole thread is.
[quote]dt79 wrote:
OP, are YOU successful?[/quote]
No, he is short.