Who would win: prime Ali vs prime Tyson

In Tyson’s hypothetical prime, before the Douglas fight, fighters could last through the first half of the fight and around the middle rounds Tyson always slowed down by then. The speed closing the distance wasn’t there and neither was the great lateral movement. He looked for shots and relied more on his power. Let’s say prime pre-banned from boxing Ali feels him out for two rounds, Tyson is going to use up a lot of energy chasing him down. What are the chances he takes Ali out in those rounds? Ali took worse shots from Foreman and Shavers and didn’t get stopped.

A best case scenario for Tyson would be carrying that success through five or six rounds, a worst case scenario is Ali gets started earlier. Either way you’ve the same point of failure. Eventually Ali is going to be landing a lot of shots and avoiding most of Tyson’s punches, how long is Tyson going to be able to take that kind of punishment? More importantly, what significant shots could Tyson land when he’s head hunting?

[quote]Robert A wrote:

2.)Ali COULD fight backing up-

Tyson ate guys who tried to box/circle out on him for lunch. Spinks is the prime example. Ali however was simply in another class at backing up, but still being able to land damaging shots. I contend that Tyson was always vulnerable when he closed and started to launch a punch. His footwork, speed, timing, and overall menace minimized this opening, but it was always there. When most guys are forced to back up they lost any ability to capitalize on Tyson’s vulnerability (Holifield did this by stepping in, rather than back). Ali could still land telling shots.

Regards,

Robert A [/quote]

I alluded to this in my post and could not really explain how it would have benefited Ali against Tyson. I appreciate your eloquent explanation.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
This kind of sucks because it’s going to devolve into a thread where a lot of people who don’t know shit about boxing are talking about boxing, and as someone who boxes that’s pretty difficult to listen to.

But that being said, it’s a pretty classic matchup that all of us - boxing fans, fighters, and non-fans alike - would have loved to see, because it’s the ultimate boxer against the ultimate puncher. The two of them in their primes, going at each other, would be awesome.

After all, Ali had the speed, technique, movement, footwork, and the timing to beat him, but Tyson had the power, speed and style to get inside and definitely had a puncher’s chance.

That being said, there’s one factor that can’t be ignored - Ali’s mouth, and his style of winning the fight before it even started. He did it to Joe Frazier in their three fights, and he did it most notably to Foreman before the Rumble in the Jungle. He would have pulled out every possible stop in going after Tyson before the fight - said shit about everything from his momma to his rape convictions to his pigeons - and would have had Mike so fucking tight, and so fucking angry, before the fight that Tyson would want to just tear his head off.

This sounds great, right? But it’s not, cause in pro boxing, when you’re tense, you get tired, and when you’re pissed off, you make HUGE mistakes.This, of course, would have played directly into Ali’s hands.

Also, Ali was, at 6’3", much taller than most give him credit for. In reality, even though he’s always portrayed as smaller than Foreman, they were about the same size, and Ali had a bigger fist and a longer reach. Foreman was just wider and more intimidating. Ali would have a MASSIVE reach advantage over the 5’10" or 5’11" Tyson, and he would have known how to use it.

Tyson was awesome at using his peekaboo style to get inside, that’s true, but as fast as he would come forward, Ali would have slipped away, especially at 22 years old, when he was arguably at his best after the Patterson/Liston victories. Patterson, of course, was also trained by Cus D’Amato, and used the same peekaboo style (although not so perfectly as Tyson did.)

And, even though his angle were incredible - he could shift around your lead hand, hit you with a right hook in the ribs, follow with an uppercut, and all from a spot where you couldn’t hit him - they only worked on the inside because he was too damned short. As a result, that would have been seriously neutralized against a fleet-footed opponent.

And then there is Ali’s chin, which he rarely gets credit for but was actually incredible. He stood up to Joe Frazier’s wildly devastating left hook for 36 rounds and only got knocked down once (and he barely took a count before popping up) and stood in with and convincingly defeated some of the hardest punchers the game’s ever seen in Liston, Foreman, Shavers, and Frazier.

So Ali-Tyson I always see going one way.

The first few rounds are Ali moving and dancing, jabbing and talking, and occasionally hitting Tyson with a couple of solid rights, just to let him know that coming in is a bad idea. Tyson comes forward, maybe lands a few shots, but Ali is moving away all the time and rolling them. He’s gonna tire Mike out before he decides to fight him.

As the middle rounds progress, Tyson gets in a couple times, lands some hard shots, some good 5-6-3’s, some hooks and uppercuts that shake Ali a little… but as the rounds keep passing, and you get into the eighth, ninth, and tenth, Tyson - who could NEVER go the distance against a good fighter, and didn’t know what to do when someone could not only stand up to his punch, but fight back - would start getting hit with a lot of the same punches that Joe Frazier did - a lot of 2-3-2’s, straight shots that keep him too far to punch back without taking a lot of punishment.

Ali would time his slips, start punching towards his shoulders so Mike put his face right into them, and would follow with combinations that stung just enough before dipping back out and making Tyson try to cut off the ring.

By the championship rounds, Tyson is probably exhausted, and his right eye is probably swelling. More importantly, though, he’s demoralized, like all punchers get when they’re used to the guy in front of them disappearing after one blow. Ali knows this, and now he’s tearing into him - look at round 14 of Ali-Frazier III, where Joe is just getting absolutely murdered by lead rights and hooks - and I suspect that some point in the 11th, 12th, or 13th round (if we’re talking about an old-school 15 rounds), Ali knocks him out or makes him quit.

Who knows. I could be wrong. But I’ve thought about this one for a long time, and I just do not see Ali - who never, ever, ever got knocked out - losing this one.

GOAT. All day.[/quote]

Wow! On the mark, well thought out and written. I don’t think an ESPN dude could have put it any better. On the point of Ali getting him worked up I don’t know if that would help. Iron Mike fought mad so it may not phase him.

Good read!

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
Not sure why all my points have been ignored, but I find it hysterical that some brought up Liston in comparison to Tyson’s power and how Ali would fare when it’s obvious to anyone with a brain that Liston threw that fight. [/quote]

Say what you want, but there was no doubt amongst anyone that Sonny Liston could punch.

And really, as far as outright power, it’s more about Foreman/Frazier/Shavers as proof that Ali could take any punch from any heavyweight… simply put, he DID.

[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:
But it actually brings me to the point I want to make about people saying Tyson beat no one: Before prison tyson beat everyone there WAS to beat. The reason nobody remembers most fighters from that era is because no-fuckin-body remembers any fighters of that era BEFORE tyson.

Its not that they are “scrubs” - they are not name fighters because boxing was no longer a name sport at the time. It was in a huge downturn popularity wise, you had gone from a bunch of great personalities and rivalries to boxing politics and boring thugs fighting for various belts.

Everyone who claims Tyson ducked person doesn’t seem to want to acknowledge that person wasnt even fucking around to fight Tyson at the time. For example, Lennox was still a fuckin amateur when Tyson unified the belts. Holyfield was a cruiserweight no one gave a shit about.

Like it or not, the Tyson media storm turned boxing into a household sport again, for a time. What happened after tyson left the game?

Well, what does the HW division look like today? :[/quote]

Gotta say brother, I disagree here.

Was boxing not as popular? Maybe - but I seem to remember four names from that time period that stand out: Marvin Hagler, Tommy Hearns, Roberto Duran, and Sugar Ray.

Boxing was plenty popular, but the heavyweight divsion was full of shitty fighters. Who was champ? Trevor fuckin Berbick? Larry Holmes was a million years old and came back after four years… it was a joke.

It’s like Marciano. Lotta guys say he was the best, but he doesn’t have the resume to be called the best. It’s not his fault, he literally beat EVERYONE there was to fight at that time and ducked absolutely nobody, but that’s just the way shit shakes out.

Young Mike Tyson fought nobody. Not one great fighter on that resume until he hit Holyfield.

Ali came up fighting legendary champs - whips Patterson twice, butchers Liston twice, Frazier three times, Foreman once, Norton twice… the names go on and on. He got lucky because he fought in the greatest era in boxing since the 20s, but he still fought.

Tyson fought a lot of scrubs, even though I don’t like really calling pro fighters that, they were really not very good.

Read this article many years ago, really good imo. Anyone who’s a Ali fan should find it pretty interesting.

http://www.alex-haley.com/alex_haley_cassius_clay_interview.htm

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:
But it actually brings me to the point I want to make about people saying Tyson beat no one: Before prison tyson beat everyone there WAS to beat. The reason nobody remembers most fighters from that era is because no-fuckin-body remembers any fighters of that era BEFORE tyson.

Its not that they are “scrubs” - they are not name fighters because boxing was no longer a name sport at the time. It was in a huge downturn popularity wise, you had gone from a bunch of great personalities and rivalries to boxing politics and boring thugs fighting for various belts.

Everyone who claims Tyson ducked person doesn’t seem to want to acknowledge that person wasnt even fucking around to fight Tyson at the time. For example, Lennox was still a fuckin amateur when Tyson unified the belts. Holyfield was a cruiserweight no one gave a shit about.

Like it or not, the Tyson media storm turned boxing into a household sport again, for a time. What happened after tyson left the game?

Well, what does the HW division look like today? :[/quote]

Gotta say brother, I disagree here.

Was boxing not as popular? Maybe - but I seem to remember four names from that time period that stand out: Marvin Hagler, Tommy Hearns, Roberto Duran, and Sugar Ray.

Boxing was plenty popular, but the heavyweight divsion was full of shitty fighters. Who was champ? Trevor fuckin Berbick? Larry Holmes was a million years old and came back after four years… it was a joke.

It’s like Marciano. Lotta guys say he was the best, but he doesn’t have the resume to be called the best. It’s not his fault, he literally beat EVERYONE there was to fight at that time and ducked absolutely nobody, but that’s just the way shit shakes out.

Young Mike Tyson fought nobody. Not one great fighter on that resume until he hit Holyfield.

Ali came up fighting legendary champs - whips Patterson twice, butchers Liston twice, Frazier three times, Foreman once, Norton twice… the names go on and on. He got lucky because he fought in the greatest era in boxing since the 20s, but he still fought.

Tyson fought a lot of scrubs, even though I don’t like really calling pro fighters that, they were really not very good.[/quote]

I would really like to see Tyson vs Marciano in a modern ring/enforcement, but no 3 knock down rule, match.

I think if it happened during the black and white days Rocky would wreck Tyson just because Tyson really never learned to fight dirty/deal with fouling and everybody from Marciano’s day did. On the other hand Tyson could easily floor Marciano 3 times in an early round. Otherwise, serious war.

Regards,

Robert A

[quote]doublelung84 wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
This kind of sucks because it’s going to devolve into a thread where a lot of people who don’t know shit about boxing are talking about boxing, and as someone who boxes that’s pretty difficult to listen to.

But that being said, it’s a pretty classic matchup that all of us - boxing fans, fighters, and non-fans alike - would have loved to see, because it’s the ultimate boxer against the ultimate puncher. The two of them in their primes, going at each other, would be awesome.

After all, Ali had the speed, technique, movement, footwork, and the timing to beat him, but Tyson had the power, speed and style to get inside and definitely had a puncher’s chance.

That being said, there’s one factor that can’t be ignored - Ali’s mouth, and his style of winning the fight before it even started. He did it to Joe Frazier in their three fights, and he did it most notably to Foreman before the Rumble in the Jungle. He would have pulled out every possible stop in going after Tyson before the fight - said shit about everything from his momma to his rape convictions to his pigeons - and would have had Mike so fucking tight, and so fucking angry, before the fight that Tyson would want to just tear his head off.

This sounds great, right? But it’s not, cause in pro boxing, when you’re tense, you get tired, and when you’re pissed off, you make HUGE mistakes.This, of course, would have played directly into Ali’s hands.

Also, Ali was, at 6’3", much taller than most give him credit for. In reality, even though he’s always portrayed as smaller than Foreman, they were about the same size, and Ali had a bigger fist and a longer reach. Foreman was just wider and more intimidating. Ali would have a MASSIVE reach advantage over the 5’10" or 5’11" Tyson, and he would have known how to use it.

Tyson was awesome at using his peekaboo style to get inside, that’s true, but as fast as he would come forward, Ali would have slipped away, especially at 22 years old, when he was arguably at his best after the Patterson/Liston victories. Patterson, of course, was also trained by Cus D’Amato, and used the same peekaboo style (although not so perfectly as Tyson did.)

And, even though his angle were incredible - he could shift around your lead hand, hit you with a right hook in the ribs, follow with an uppercut, and all from a spot where you couldn’t hit him - they only worked on the inside because he was too damned short. As a result, that would have been seriously neutralized against a fleet-footed opponent.

And then there is Ali’s chin, which he rarely gets credit for but was actually incredible. He stood up to Joe Frazier’s wildly devastating left hook for 36 rounds and only got knocked down once (and he barely took a count before popping up) and stood in with and convincingly defeated some of the hardest punchers the game’s ever seen in Liston, Foreman, Shavers, and Frazier.

So Ali-Tyson I always see going one way.

The first few rounds are Ali moving and dancing, jabbing and talking, and occasionally hitting Tyson with a couple of solid rights, just to let him know that coming in is a bad idea. Tyson comes forward, maybe lands a few shots, but Ali is moving away all the time and rolling them. He’s gonna tire Mike out before he decides to fight him.

As the middle rounds progress, Tyson gets in a couple times, lands some hard shots, some good 5-6-3’s, some hooks and uppercuts that shake Ali a little… but as the rounds keep passing, and you get into the eighth, ninth, and tenth, Tyson - who could NEVER go the distance against a good fighter, and didn’t know what to do when someone could not only stand up to his punch, but fight back - would start getting hit with a lot of the same punches that Joe Frazier did - a lot of 2-3-2’s, straight shots that keep him too far to punch back without taking a lot of punishment.

Ali would time his slips, start punching towards his shoulders so Mike put his face right into them, and would follow with combinations that stung just enough before dipping back out and making Tyson try to cut off the ring.

By the championship rounds, Tyson is probably exhausted, and his right eye is probably swelling. More importantly, though, he’s demoralized, like all punchers get when they’re used to the guy in front of them disappearing after one blow. Ali knows this, and now he’s tearing into him - look at round 14 of Ali-Frazier III, where Joe is just getting absolutely murdered by lead rights and hooks - and I suspect that some point in the 11th, 12th, or 13th round (if we’re talking about an old-school 15 rounds), Ali knocks him out or makes him quit.

Who knows. I could be wrong. But I’ve thought about this one for a long time, and I just do not see Ali - who never, ever, ever got knocked out - losing this one.

GOAT. All day.[/quote]

Wow! On the mark, well thought out and written. I don’t think an ESPN dude could have put it any better. On the point of Ali getting him worked up I don’t know if that would help. Iron Mike fought mad so it may not phase him.

Good read![/quote]

Irish is a damn talented sports writer.

ali lost to norton 1 time, and norton was robbed 1 time when they fought. everybody that knows anything about boxing knows this. so ali lost 2x to norton, 1 time to frazier, 1 time to spinks, who else?? went 15 rounds with nobodys and called himself the greatest. the greatest would have punched holes in the nobodys ali took 15 rounds to beat. ali is in top 5 heavyweight of all time in my book…no way # 1…

[quote]spk wrote:
ali lost to norton 1 time, and norton was robbed 1 time when they fought. everybody that knows anything about boxing knows this. so ali lost 2x to norton, 1 time to frazier, 1 time to spinks, who else?? went 15 rounds with nobodys and called himself the greatest. the greatest would have punched holes in the nobodys ali took 15 rounds to beat. ali is in top 5 heavyweight of all time in my book…no way # 1…[/quote]

To support your point, arguably he also lost to Jimmy Young. To not support your point, Ali fought for a long time during the toughest era in heavy weight boxing.

Another fight to support your point would be Chuck Wepner taking him to 15. I watched that fight and started to think I could take Chuck Wepner. The guys hands were so slow I don’t see how he could ever land a punch.

on edge… wepner was the guy i was refering to when ali took 15 rounds to beat him. i bet joe louis would have dstroyed him in a few rounds… so hard to say who is best ever, who would win this guy vs that guy… ali was great, but not the greatest. IMO…

I saw the Wepner fight. I think Ali just took it easy on him. I kind of think he wanted to make the fight last longer. Maybe for the fans or something. The fight is also pretty similar to the fight in Rocky, but that’s because Stallone basically took Wepner’s story and used it for that movie. Wepner also sued Stallone and got a settlement.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

You’re entitled to say that you don’t think he would win - that’s your opinion - but the sport has NOT evolved.

Like I said, this is a logical fallacy… other sports have evolved, but fighting is fighting. The rules haven’t changed and there haven’t been any real changes in style since the modern guard adopted some time in the 20’s or 30’s. [/quote]

Sport may not have evolved, but the athletes have. Take a look at the men’s 100M records progression : Men's 100 metres world record progression - Wikipedia

It’s pretty hard to argue that there is a simpler sport than running, yet from the 60’s, the best are almost half a second faster than 50 years ago.