Cheating to me is breaking the rules to get an unfair advantage in some sort of competition.
You are breaking the rules in most countries because they are not legal, but it is unclear what you have an advantage in.
One could be on TRT (which is in many cases a low dose perma blast), that isn’t breaking the rules, and it is unclear what sort of competition you have an advantage in (unless you are competing in something which forbids it).
It’s an older one. Came out in '08, before Mark Bell got famous. I imagine it helped him rise to fame.
I like your phrase here. “breaking the rules to get an UNFAIR advantage”.
It implies that one can break the rules simply to have a fair advantage, or, perhaps, simply be EQUAL to the competition, and that it would NOT be cheating to do so.
As in: the genetically inferior utilizing chemical assistance to be on-par with the genetically advantaged.
For @dagill2 the film is called “bigger, faster, stronger”.
The standard for fair competition is that all are on a fair playing field as naturals in open competition (things like pro open sports: NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL). It is important that it is defined for that level of competition.
As you see it: for sure. But again, I find the phrasing you used interesting. Why would we specify breaking the rules to gain an unfair advantage. Why not “breaking the rules to get an advantage” or, even more simply “breaking the rules”.
Like, think of Tim Slyvia, who used steroids because he wanted to look better on camera while fighting in the UFC. Still breaking the rules.
What I can’t wrap my mind around is the notion of being willing to take a drug so potent that it works even if one doesn’t train* but at the same time not being willing to take 5 lbs of consequence free muscle.
I would think most anyone would accept that passing an Olympic sport’s drug test would fall into the fair category internationally. And internationally, if you failed the drug test you would be considered “cheating.”
That said, you are free to seek a federation that has its own drug rules and compete “fairly” within that federation. But for general conversation it is verbal gymnastics to claim to not be cheating.
I should state that a fair number of our supplements would fail an Olympics drug test. So there is that to consider.
Sure he cheated. But if you are going to cheat you better be good at it. Lance knew he was cheating and he was pretty good at it. So what’s your point?
I am not under the delusion that there are no Olympic athletes that cheat.
Pragmatically it is as fair as it can get.
Since drug testing began, there has been a continuous battle between the athlete trying to beat the test and the ruling body trying to catch the athlete cheating.
I agree with both of you on this. I think it’s disingenuous to then say you’re engaging in “debate” (not saying either of you did that here).
It’s why I don’t go to the politics forum - I’m not open to having my mind changed, and I’m unlikely to respect anyone else’s opinion, so why should I presume they should listen to me?
I’m absolutely happy to be a spectator, though!
On that note…