Which Martial Art?

Wukey here is your first martial arts lesson: T-Nation is an awful place to ask for martial arts advice and it is not a place to have intelligent discussions of the arts.

Why? Because this board is full of egotistical fifteen year olds who talk a bunch of hard ass shite in order to stroke their immature ego’s.

The best thing you can do is just check out the schools that are in your area and see what the teachers are like, see what the students are like.

Kickboxing, boxing, wrestling are limited because they are sports.

[quote]texasguy2 wrote:
IMO, go with some form of grappling. The striking arts are fun and look flashy but are way too one dimensional. 95% of all fights wind up on the ground anyways, so if you can learn to take a punch, take people down and control ground action, you will win almost every time.

Watch the old school UFCs on video. For the most part, the old school fighters were trained in one discipline or another with out much cross training.

With the exception of lucky punches, grapplers usually won. Even if they lost, they controlled the fight the entire time, only to be caught with an unlucky flying knee or some shit.

[/quote]

You fucking people amaze me.

Number 1- The street is not the octagon. Go ahead, get me in the guard with your jiu jitsu, but I’m going to rip your nuts off with one hand and then punch you in the throat with the other. Or one of my buddies is going to kick you in the head as soon as your on your back. In a real fight, the last place you want to be is on the ground. A good striker murders a good wrestler in the street. A good streetfighter hits you with a chair. They are all not one in the same.

Number 2- Yes, there are forms that are not meant for competition. In the style I study the most, many of the shots are throat and groin shots. This isn’t something that you can just throw middling belts in and tell them to go at it. Self defense is different than competition. I have done tournaments, and I hated them because I am either on or off- I can’t pull punches, nor do I want to learn to.

Number 3- All of them have some kind of value, every single type of martial art aside from the McDojos. They’ll teach you discipline, balance, and coordination. Some are better than others for self defense- like he said, infighting styles are good for most situations. The teacher, however, will make the art worthwhile or not.

Number 4- Listen to what Sifu writes. He’s never led me wrong.

Finally, if the OP just wants to get in shape, box. I do this on the side, and it’s more useful than anything else as far as hand speed and getting in shape.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
You fucking people amaze me.

Number 1- The street is not the octagon. Go ahead, get me in the guard with your jiu jitsu, but I’m going to rip your nuts off with one hand and then punch you in the throat with the other. Or one of my buddies is going to kick you in the head as soon as your on your back. In a real fight, the last place you want to be is on the ground. A good striker murders a good wrestler in the street. A good streetfighter hits you with a chair. They are all not one in the same.

Number 2- Yes, there are forms that are not meant for competition. In the style I study the most, many of the shots are throat and groin shots. This isn’t something that you can just throw middling belts in and tell them to go at it. Self defense is different than competition. I have done tournaments, and I hated them because I am either on or off- I can’t pull punches, nor do I want to learn to.

Number 3- Listen to what Sifu writes. All of them have some kind of value, every single type of martial art aside from the McDojos. They’ll teach you discipline, balance, and coordination. Some are better than others for self defense- like he said, infighting styles are good for most situations. The teacher, however, will make the art worthwhile or not.

Finally, if the OP just wants to get in shape, box. I do this on the side, and it’s more useful than anything else as far as hand speed and getting in shape.

[/quote]

Fucking WORD.

No MA is going to put the fighting aggression into you that you need to win a street fight with a real evil mofo.

I got out of TKD in the UK when it went pussy and away from full contact but I also trained in Aikido, Ju Jitsu and boxing.

There’s NO WAY I’m going to pull a punch in any fight and I’ve been in enough (in the ring and out) to know that MA training is awesome and will teach many skills, but without a high level of aggression and mixed disciplines mixed with pure violence you’re going to get eaten alive in a back city Manchester fight.

For conditioning there are many good arts but it really depends on the club you attend.

[quote]Sifu wrote:

Kickboxing, boxing, wrestling are limited because they are sports.

[/quote]

True, but since Wukey stated that he was looking for a MA primarily for the conditioning aspect, I don’t really think that’s all that valid of an argument in this scenario.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

You fucking people amaze me.

Number 1- The street is not the octagon. Go ahead, get me in the guard with your jiu jitsu, but I’m going to rip your nuts off with one hand and then punch you in the throat with the other. Or one of my buddies is going to kick you in the head as soon as your on your back. In a real fight, the last place you want to be is on the ground. A good striker murders a good wrestler in the street. A good streetfighter hits you with a chair. They are all not one in the same.

Number 2- Yes, there are forms that are not meant for competition. In the style I study the most, many of the shots are throat and groin shots. This isn’t something that you can just throw middling belts in and tell them to go at it. Self defense is different than competition. I have done tournaments, and I hated them because I am either on or off- I can’t pull punches, nor do I want to learn to.

Number 3- All of them have some kind of value, every single type of martial art aside from the McDojos. They’ll teach you discipline, balance, and coordination. Some are better than others for self defense- like he said, infighting styles are good for most situations. The teacher, however, will make the art worthwhile or not.

Number 4- Listen to what Sifu writes. He’s never led me wrong.

Finally, if the OP just wants to get in shape, box. I do this on the side, and it’s more useful than anything else as far as hand speed and getting in shape.

[/quote]

Irish, the above points are all true (though I’d be careful of saying that if someone got you in their guard you’d just rip their nuts off and punch them in the throat, you’re not going to be able to do that against someone who knows what they’re doing) and if the topic was in regards to actual combat (or street self defense), then they would all be very valid.

But, Wukey mentioned in his OP that he was looking primarily for a MA to improve his conditioning. Yes, he said that he would like to be able to handle himself if the need arose, but that wasn’t his primary goal.

Also, people need to keep in mind that grappling arts like wrestling (though sports) can be very effective in an actual fight. A takedown that would just be points on a mat (against another wrestler who knows how to fall) could be potentially lethal on concrete (especially if the opponent doesn’t know how to break fall). The same goes for a lot of Judo/jiu-jitsu throws. Not to mention that many throws are also designed to damage the opponent if done for real (a hip throw for example, if done correctly, will break the opponents leg as well as throw him to the ground).

There is no one superior art. They all have strengths and they all have weaknesses. Someone who is truly serious about learning self defense would train in as many of them (and as wide a variety of them) as possible to prepare themselves for any situation. But, that’s another topic.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Number 1- The street is not the octagon. Go ahead, get me in the guard with your jiu jitsu, but I’m going to rip your nuts off with one hand and then punch you in the throat with the other. Or one of my buddies is going to kick you in the head as soon as your on your back. In a real fight, the last place you want to be is on the ground. A good striker murders a good wrestler in the street. A good streetfighter hits you with a chair. They are all not one in the same.
[/quote]

The odds of someone who practices BJJ pulling guard in a street fight are pretty slim, there’s not much of a reason to do it. The guard has a place in sport JJ, but everything relating to self-defense that I’ve learned and seen taught has been based around where a fight would start (standing).

[quote]Dijon wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
Number 1- The street is not the octagon. Go ahead, get me in the guard with your jiu jitsu, but I’m going to rip your nuts off with one hand and then punch you in the throat with the other. Or one of my buddies is going to kick you in the head as soon as your on your back. In a real fight, the last place you want to be is on the ground. A good striker murders a good wrestler in the street. A good streetfighter hits you with a chair. They are all not one in the same.

The odds of someone who practices BJJ pulling guard in a street fight are pretty slim, there’s not much of a reason to do it. The guard has a place in sport JJ, but everything relating to self-defense that I’ve learned and seen taught has been based around where a fight would start (standing).[/quote]

I have done it in a fight, foolishly. I was very drunk, so it was force of habit when it went to the ground. I don’t like the idea of being on the ground in the street… too much bad shit can happen, you know?

Sento as the OP said he is intersted mainly for the conditioning, not to go around being a hardass.

Boxing and kickboxing are like running. They are not something you do to get into shape as much as they are something you must first be in shape to do.

Martial arts is something you can do for a lifetime and it’s interesting.

Boxing and kickboxing take their toll. All those blows to the head are not healthy. Eventually you reach a point where you are too old to do it anymore.

Now of course you can continue hitting bags for a while. But that just get monotonous and unchanging.

A young mans sport that you are supposed to retire from at a young age is not the best choice for conditioning.

With kickboxing you aren’t going to be like this when you are ninety.

Here is some Chin NA which is something you aren’t going to learn from boxing or kickboxing. And wrestling doesn’t teach the various stances that you use to make this stuff more effective.

Oss

[quote]Sifu wrote:

With kickboxing you aren’t going to be like this when you are ninety.

[/quote]

Impressive, although to be honest I still find myself drawn to MMA and its variants. The whole culture and philosophy of the oriental arts seems alien and impractical to me. I’m sure they’re a great source of enjoyment to others though.

Damn, I wrote out a long and detailed response to your post that got swallowed by cyberspace.

[quote]Sifu wrote:
Sento as the OP said he is intersted mainly for the conditioning, not to go around being a hardass.

Here is some Chin NA which is something you aren’t going to learn from boxing or kickboxing. And wrestling doesn’t teach the various stances that you use to make this stuff more effective.

[/quote]

First you say that you admit that Wukey is interested mainly in conditioning (you realize he means cardiovascular conditioning and not iron body training I’m sure), then turn around and say that arts like wrestling don’t teach you joint locks (which I can only assume you mean are good skill sets for self defense).

Which one is it?

Also, watching some guy demonstrate moves on a non resisting opponent like that first vid, while impressive from purely a technical standpoint, aren’t all that convincing of the arts effectiveness. Let’s see those guys try to do that stuff to Dan Gable, Cael Sanderson, Hendo, Faber, Randleman, or any other highly skilled wrestler. Then I’ll be convinced.

Don’t even have a clue what the heck you’re trying to suggest with that statement. Are you honestly telling me that you believe that people can’t use boxing/kickboxing training methods to get in shape (or running for that matter)? If so, I’d have to strongly disagree, because I’ve seen lots of people do just that.

If you meant actually competing at an elite level, they yeah, I’d agree. But once again Wukey isn’t talking about wanting to become a professional fighter.

Boxing and kickboxing are martial arts, so once again you seem to be contradicting yourself with the first two statements.

Also, if you think that boxing/kickboxing are only actually competing/sparring full out and hitting bags, then perhaps you should go train with some good coaches/fighters. Joe Lewis and Bill Wallace are both in their 60’s and are still in phenomenal shape. I’d actually put my money on Lewis over 95% of all 20 year olds out there (the whole population) in terms of conditioning (not to mention skill level).

Once again, if we were talking about winning world championships or competing professionally then I’d agree. But in terms of staying in shape, “sport” arts can continue to be practiced well into later life.

Good training.

Nikiforos I enjoy watching MMA. But in ten, twenty or thirty years a lot of those guys are going to have some real health issues. A lot of people who are in it today they won’t be around.

You will see lots of guys who were in it when they were young but had to give it up. Either because they got injured or they saw someone get injured or they got older and got responsibilities like a family and they can’t be putting their health or lives on the line like that.

Some aspects of mma are impractical also. In a real fight you are not going to have a referee, protective gear, rules, a single size matched opponent, no weapons.

Besides there is no rule that says that a person who studies an eastern art can’t compete in MMA. Some of the best fighhters come from an oriental martial arts background.

[quote]Sifu wrote:
Nikiforos I enjoy watching MMA. But in ten, twenty or thirty years a lot of those guys are going to have some real health issues. A lot of people who are in it today they won’t be around.

You will see lots of guys who were in it when they were young but had to give it up. Either because they got injured or they saw someone get injured or they got older and got responsibilities like a family and they can’t be putting their health or lives on the line like that.

Some aspects of mma are impractical also. In a real fight you are not going to have a referee, protective gear, rules, a single size matched opponent, no weapons.

Besides there is no rule that says that a person who studies an eastern art can’t compete in MMA. Some of the best fighhters come from an oriental martial arts background.

[/quote]

On that last point, absolutely agreed. I’ve actually trained in judo for a year and a half myself and I really enjoyed it.

My skepticism originates from regarding the promoters of the supposed preponderance of certain oriental martial arts that act as if Europe never had any martial arts tradition. The fact is that boxing, wrestling and MMA as we know them today have a rich heritage that is often disregarded. And yes, these have impractical aspects, but they are by and large practical and pragmatic, which appeals to me.

As for the injury aspect, sure, you can claim that about most intensive sports. Most soccer players quit in their early 30’s because their body simply can’t cope. That doesn’t mean soccer is bad for your longevity. (I hesitate to use the word health)

Longevity issues with combat athletes, I would blame on the Western lifestyle and diet as well as the fact that most western athletes simply don’t train much after their competition days.

Compare that to a form of training that is mostly practiced by people who genetically have better longevity than most other populations, have better diets, stay fit until their deathbed; well, of course you will see a major difference.

And before you mention full contact competition, I concede that that’s dangerous, but remember that most people who train in these disciplines won’t compete at a high level.

Sento if you are a teacher and you want to teach a particular technique to a class of students you have to demonstrate it. That means breaking it down. Step by step. Or maybe you will do something at full speed so your students can see how something looks at full speed. This is how you teach people. That is how it is done.

Why don’t you know that? I thought you were supposed to have studied martial arts.

Those throws in that video looked effortless and he put his uke right at his feet so he could follow up.

Just having a freefight so sensei can prove how tough he is is not how you teach a class. Especially when you are a seventy or eighty year old man.

Sento I have so much more I could write but I’m not going to bother.

[quote]Sifu wrote:
Sento if you are a teacher and you want to teach a particular technique to a class of students you have to demonstrate it. That means breaking it down. Step by step. Or maybe you will do something at full speed so your students can see how something looks at full speed. This is how you teach people. That is how it is done.

Why don’t you know that? I thought you were supposed to have studied martial arts.

Those throws in that video looked effortless and he put his uke right at his feet so he could follow up.

Just having a freefight so sensei can prove how tough he is is not how you teach a class. Especially when you are a seventy or eighty year old man.

Sento I have so much more I could write but I’m not going to bother.

[/quote]

OOOOOKKKKKKK…

Yeah, I am well aware of the need to start at the beginning and really break down techniques. When did I say that that wasn’t a necessary step? And yes, I realize that that first video was a demonstration. My problem with such types of demonstrations is that there is absolutely no resistance (which is typical of many traditional martial arts demos). So, they’re not good demonstrations of an arts effectiveness.

Also, just breaking down a technique or demoing it on a non resisting opponent is only the first step in teaching a technique. From there you may need to break it down even further, you will need to slowly add resistance so the student knows how to react when they encounter resistance (which they will), you need to teach how to defend against it, you need to teach extensions/combinations in case the technique doesn’t work/the opponent defends against it, and finally you need to have the student try applying the technique in real time against a fully resisting opponent.

Most of the good demos that I’ve ever seen included not just techniques done on one student of theirs (who has practiced the routine with them probably hundreds of times). They also pull random people out of the audience, ask the uke to resist them, or try to defend against things at certain points in the demo. They stop and break down the techniques or answer questions if the audience/students ask. It’s not just a fancy ballet like a lot of demos that I see videos of.

I’m also not suggesting that simply because someone does a demo like the video automatically means that the techniques don’t work. What I meant was that simply because someone does a demo like that video doesn’t necessarily mean the techniques will work. In order to know if they really do work the techniques must be tested in real time against a resisting opponent.

The problem with a lot of traditional MA’s is that they don’t seem to ever actually test their techniques. Some do (Jiu-Jitsu, WC, Pankration, Pugilism, etc…) but many don’t. It’s really no surprise that the arts which dominate the MMA scene are arts that do test and prove that they work in real time against resisting opponents (boxing, kickboxing, judo, JJ, pankration, sambo, etc…). Honestly fighters have only one concern when it comes to competition and that’s winning. So, they use the arts/techniques which have proven themselves to be the most effective. If arts like Wah Lum really were superior, then you’d see Wah Lum start to show up and become prevalent in MMA. We haven’t seen that happen though, what should that tell us?

I’m also once again not suggesting that MMA is real combat. No type of training is real combat, no matter how realistic you want to make it. But, that doesn’t mean that things that work in MMA aren’t going to transfer extremely well to real combat. Sure, you need to learn cerebral, postural, and verbal self defense. Sure, you need to realize that weapons are a reality and you should learn how to both defend against them and learn how to utilize them. Sure you need to realize that in real combat there are no rules, no rounds and no ref, so anything goes. But boxing/kickboxing, wrestling, JJ, judo, etc… are still going to be very beneficial/effective skill sets for actual combat.

On the other hand, arts that use deadly or “street effective” methods, but never test or train those methods in real time against a fully resisting opponent aren’t going to be nearly as beneficial/effective for actual combat.

But, once again, Wukey isn’t talking about actual combat, he’s talking about studying MA for conditioning purposes, which you have still yet offer any superior options him training in boxing/kickboxing, wrestling, judo or jiu-jitsu (sport arts).

If you think that a given teacher isn’t teaching anything useful then don’t waste your or his time by showing up at the dojo and acting like an asshole doubting Thomas. A teacher shouldn’t have to engage in some bloodsport display to prove himself to every asshole that walks in to take lessons.

If you have a brain it is not impossible to tell if something would be effective just by watching it demonstrated.

Fighting doesn’t always prove anything. An individual with superior attributes can do a lot to overcome flaws in a given art. Some peole put way too much emphasis on style.

I like to watch mixed martial arts. Some of those guys are really tough and I am sure they could be a handful for anyone. However there are things that are done in MMA that are the exact opposite of what you would want to do in a real fight. There are things that would win you a MMA contest that would get you killed on the street.

One last thing, Joe Lewis and Bill Superfoot Wallace both studied Karate before they took up kickboxing.

[quote]Sifu wrote:

I like to watch mixed martial arts. Some of those guys are really tough and I am sure they could be a handful for anyone. However there are things that are done in MMA that are the exact opposite of what you would want to do in a real fight. There are things that would win you a MMA contest that would get you killed on the street.
[/quote]

Thank you. Bring me closer with your grappling, and you get a knife between your ribs. Nothing will always work in the street, and everything is unpredictable.

[quote]Sifu wrote:
If you think that a given teacher isn’t teaching anything useful then don’t waste your or his time by showing up at the dojo and acting like an asshole doubting Thomas. A teacher shouldn’t have to engage in some bloodsport display to prove himself to every asshole that walks in to take lessons.
[/quote]

I never suggested that one should be an “asshole doubtint Thomas”. But, how are you supposed to know if a given teacher is teaching anything useful unless you actually go to that dojo and see for yourself? And to be honest, I don’t think that there is a single teacher out there with nothing useful. But, if I’m going to spend my money to learn combat (self defense) from someone, then I want to be sure that they can actually fight/defend themselves. I can’t possibly determine that from watching them demonstrate techniques on a compliant uke.

Now, if they perform the techniques on me (seeing as how I’ve never trained with them before) and can pull them off, actually address realistic applications (having a guy walk up to you from a distance and try to “chop” you like in that vid probably isn’t going to happen in a real fight), and upon asking confirm that their students do indeed spar/test their techniques in real time against resisting opponents, then I’ll certainly consider the school to be worthwhile.

I’m not suggesting that you need to challenge every martial arts teacher to a death match to know if what they teach is effective. All I’m saying is that if you’re seriously looking for self defense/combative skill then you’d better make sure that the school actually tests their techniques to make sure they work in real time.

Depends on the type of demonstration. The first UFC was basically a glorified infomercial for Gracie Jiu-Jitsu, it was basically set up as a demonstration of the effectiveness of GJJ/BJJ. Now, that type of demonstration one can illustrate if something works or not. Clearly GJJ did/does seeing as how Royce beat all comers.

However, watching someone perform techniques on a completely compliant partner (who has rehearsed those techniques with them probably hundreds of times) while defending against unrealistic attacks it is impossible to know if those techniques would actually work against a resisting opponent who wasn’t performing hugely telegraphed unrealistic attacks.

So, I agree with you, but once again it depends on the type of demonstration.

Actually, if we’re talking about fighting ability/combative skill, then fighting always proves something (in fact in many cases it proves everything). Yes, I agree that attributes are hugely important and that it’s the individual and not necessarily the art that wins fights in many cases. But, that still doesn’t mean that certain arts don’t seem to really hold up while under the pressure of resistance, while others crumble.

Me too, and honestly I agree with you. Once again I don’t think that MMA is real combat. I also know what you’re talking about in regards to it possibly teaching bad habits. If we were talking about a self defense context I think that you would have a huge argument there (one that I personally would agree with). But once again, since we’re only talking about someone looking for the conditioning benefits of MA, I don’t think it’s as relevant to the discussion.

[quote]
One last thing, Joe Lewis and Bill Superfoot Wallace both studied Karate before they took up kickboxing. [/quote]

Yes, they did, and honestly I have nothing against Karate (or any art for that matter), only against teachers/schools that don’t test their techniques in real time against resisting opponents. Lewis has stated that he used to spar in his Karate training quite regularly.

One thing to mention though, is that both Lewis and Wallace don’t practice traditional Karate anymore. They both felt that boxing/MT/MB/JKD were more effective and since have stopped training in traditional Karate.

That video is just something I came across looking through youtube so I don’t know a whole lot about the style or the man in the video. Sure there is a certain impractical aspect to the throwing demo portion.

However look at how he carries out his technique. He flips his uke like a ragdoll but you don’t see him staggering around off balance afterwards. There is a real economy to his movements. That shows technique and skill.

Also look at the second part where he is demonstrating a form. You can see his energy flowing through him like a coiled whip.

People rehearsing a demo hundreds of times before they teach is something that is very foreign to me. I guess it happens. In the schools I trained in it ususally was the senior kyu who was fortunate enough to get the honor of being Sensei’s uke.

I like fighting and the classes I have trained in usually do a lot of it. However you can still learn something from a teacher who doesn’t have free fighting as a part of his class. My Tai Chi/Chi Gong teacher doesn’t have a fighting class. I still learn things from him I can use. Besides there is nothing to stop me from going off somewhere else and trying things out for myself.

Also you can gain a lot from ippon kumite. For real world self defense, the ability to handle the opening shot from an enprepared postition, is more important than free fighting where you start off with a safe distance in an on guard position.

Fighting doesn’t prove much about a teachers ability to teach.

Randy Couture is fuckin old…I think your pseudo budo traditionalist rap is corrupting your ability to get with the times mang.