No I don’t take that as rude man. I do take it as HIGHLY misunderstood on your part.
I did NOT tell him to be careful of diabetes. I did tell him to be careful of excessive consumption of fruits.
Some of you guys just don’t seem to get it. This is a PUBLIC forum. As such, there are people that are stumbling onto some of these threads just by shear chance and a quick google search. If some Joe Blow reads what he lists as breakfast in an out of context manner, which is mostly fruit based btw, and they get the misguided impression that “hey, I’ve heard fruits are good, and this guy has a heavy fruit influence in his diet and he’s doing ok. Hell I love fruits!”, then said person could could actually (again misguidedly) take that as que to go nuts.
Now what if said person was someone like me that is already prediabteic? This could be some very bad information to be misinformed about.
Look man, I’m not trying to save the world here. I just want to make sure that anybody that possibly may not know any better can see the other sides of the coins. Some of us throw some pretty general statements around here and don’t realize how badly that can effect someone who is just at the end of their rope when those comments are read in passing. Is that right? Hell no but it is what it is. It’s the world we live in and I for one would feel like shit if… (Exaggerated Example Time)
I read about some kid who decided to try a cycle of 300mg because he read something like this…
(No offense @alldayeveryday…this is just an example and I’m not trying to imply you said or did anything wrong!)
And then lo and behold the kid had an underlying heart disease and that 300mg shot of test killed him. I know, extreme, but it’s not out of the realm of possibility. I just try to make sure that if I read something that COULD be taken out of context, that I present the OTHER side of the argument. That’s all brother.
Sorry for the long explanation, but I didn’t want to be taken out of context…