in a relationship, if a man brings home his full paycheck, is involved in the family emotionally, takes care of all things expected, yet has a relationship on the side, is that to be considered cheating?
if a man spends his paycheck on gambling, drinking and hobbies, leaves his family destitute monetarily and emotionally, yet does not have relationships on the side, is that to be considered cheating?
i am having a hard time figuring this out.
nowhere in the marriage vows is there a reference to remaining sexually faithful, just love,honor,cherish, sickness and in health, death do us part kinda stuff.
the unspoken marriage contract, at least in the west, does expect fidelity, but is that how it is supposed to be? Historically, there were liberties given to both sides in a relationship, maybe itās time revisit this experience?
anyway, i need your thoughts, cause i am either on to something here, or way off base, and discussing this relationship quandary with a bunch of weight lifting meat heads may clear this up.
[quote]Edgy wrote:
nowhere in the marriage vows is there a reference to remaining sexually faithful, just love,honor,cherish, sickness and in health, death do us part kinda stuff.[/quote]
As long as itās not an idiotic double-standard where whenever a woman cheats sheās a whore/bitch/āinsert creative word hereā but for the man itās just him being a man.
Romantic emotional or physical intimacy with anyone other than your spouse is cheating and the end of the relationship for me. Iām not good with open relationships.
[quote]csulli wrote:
Romantic emotional or physical intimacy with anyone other than your spouse is cheating and the end of the relationship for me. Iām not good with open relationships.[/quote]
If someone is truly in doubt about what is or is not cheating, they should just ask their significant other. Iām sure they could clear up any confusion pretty quickly.
[quote]Edgy wrote:
if a man spends his paycheck on gambling, drinking and hobbies, leaves his family destitute monetarily and emotionally, yet does not have relationships on the side, is that to be considered cheating?[/quote]
I wouldnāt call it cheating, but it would be another deal-breaker for me. Itās also a betrayal.
Integrity and reasonable self-control, please. And Iāll offer the same in return.
By some standards using any aas in your marriage would be considered cheating, but some are more permissible about the issue than others. It goes back to the same old thing- Everybody loves the pro performance then act disappointed when they find out that there was some assistance.
[quote]Edgy wrote:
in a relationship, if a man brings home his full paycheck, is involved in the family emotionally, takes care of all things expected, yet has a relationship on the side, is that to be considered cheating?
if a man spends his paycheck on gambling, drinking and hobbies, leaves his family destitute monetarily and emotionally, yet does not have relationships on the side, is that to be considered cheating?
i am having a hard time figuring this out.
nowhere in the marriage vows is there a reference to remaining sexually faithful, just love,honor,cherish, sickness and in health, death do us part kinda stuff.
the unspoken marriage contract, at least in the west, does expect fidelity, but is that how it is supposed to be? Historically, there were liberties given to both sides in a relationship, maybe itās time revisit this experience?
anyway, i need your thoughts, cause i am either on to something here, or way off base, and discussing this relationship quandary with a bunch of weight lifting meat heads may clear this up.
thanks![/quote]
I have an ex-fiance I need you to call to patch things up for me.
[quote]Edgy wrote:
in a relationship, if a man brings home his full paycheck, is involved in the family emotionally, takes care of all things expected, yet has a relationship on the side, is that to be considered cheating?
[/quote]
Yes
No
[quote]
i am having a hard time figuring this out.
nowhere in the marriage vows is there a reference to remaining sexually faithful, just love,honor,cherish, sickness and in health, death do us part kinda stuff.
the unspoken marriage contract, at least in the west, does expect fidelity, but is that how it is supposed to be? Historically, there were liberties given to both sides in a relationship, maybe itās time revisit this experience?
anyway, i need your thoughts, cause i am either on to something here, or way off base, and discussing this relationship quandary with a bunch of weight lifting meat heads may clear this up.