I’m referring to my study, not yours
There is the notion of a scientific body of evidence, data can be conflicting depending on the sample size, environment (socioeconomic status, upbringing of the women/men, IQ, level of education and more)
My study that I’ve linked demonstrates a clear link between both, given the reliability regarding both portions of the data it’s difficult to come to an adequate conclusion.
As a matter of fact regarding my study not all parameters relating to women/number of partners were considered statistically significant. Whilst ALL variables in the men’s category were, indicating a stronger positive correlation regarding men, number of sexual partners and divorce.
Given the differing nature betwixt both studies I don’t see how an adequate conclusion could be made. Both of us can harbour differing ideology, and perhaps mine will change with age… or not.
I’m aware the neurology, biology of women vs men differ. But I don’t believe this is grounds for stigmatisation on the mere notion of “I’m a woman and I like to have sex”.
There are certain irrefutable facts, such as due to skeletal anatomy, hormonal influence men generally have greater upper body strength than their female counterparts, I’ll never deny that. But if someone tries to preach to me “women should be stigmatised/treated differently regarding sex whilst men can reign free” I’ll either get angry or walk away… this opinion is held by much of the male youth my age
As generations progress, the younger crowds of each aforementioned generation generally tend to harbour more progressive ideology. This isn’t a certainty, but a generalisation. We can all certainly disagree with one another however, and an intellectual debate similar to the way we are currently conversing is the best way for both parties to see/understand differing viewpoints.