Upper Chest

[quote]strangemeadow wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]strangemeadow wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]strangemeadow wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:
99% of the routines I’ve seen on this site have used incline press before flat… and I remembered CT said something like that too, from a shoulder health standpoint. When I saw someone say the reverse: “I do flat before incline”, I wanted affirmation on the vertical → horizontal thing.

Or does it even really matter?[/quote]
It does matter. Incline 1st. We are in the BB forum.[/quote]

If you’re doing overhead press the same day too… would you do that before the incline?

(Personally, I’ve been doing overhead presses, flat presses, lateral raises, tricep work. If that should be changed up for whatever reason, I’d like to know.)[/quote]
I wouldn’t do OH press the same day as I bench. Your shoulders and tri’s are big part of your OHP and bench. Lifting in the order you state above seems counter productive. Your shoulders and tri’s are going to be smoked before you get to your chest. Some might say then that your pecs are going to have to work harder because of it, but in reality, your bench will suck. If you wanted to pre exhaust your pecs you’d do a bunch of cable flies before benching, not OHP.
Are we still in the BB forum?[/quote]

And… that exactly why I’m confused.

On the one hand: chest/shoulders/tris is the split, in that order
On the other hand: the vertical pressing before horizontal pressing suggestion

They don’t seem to fit together, unless I a) drop OHP altogether, or b) ignore that suggestion, or c) work shoulders on a different day[/quote]

Do not drop OHP! I like option C.
That makes sense.[/quote]

x 1,000.

[quote]Airtruth wrote:
While on the topic of upper chest, is there anyway to fill in the dimple some people have between the shoulder and chest in the most muscular pose?
[/quote]
You mean between the clavicle and the traps? The diamond shaped area?

[quote]SSC wrote:

[quote]strangemeadow wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:
And… that exactly why I’m confused.

On the one hand: chest/shoulders/tris is the split, in that order
On the other hand: the vertical pressing before horizontal pressing suggestion

They don’t seem to fit together, unless I a) drop OHP altogether, or b) ignore that suggestion, or c) work shoulders on a different day[/quote]

Do not drop OHP! I like option C.
That makes sense.[/quote]

x 1,000.[/quote]

I figured as much. I’m just not sure how/where to fit it in then.

Assuming split like this:
A: Chest/Shoulders/Tris
B: Back/Bis
C: Legs

I guess doing Legs/Shoulders isn’t horrible. There’s just the risk that front delts and tris are still a bit fatigued for the chest day, and/or don’t get enough recovery.

Does that make sense to do Legs/Shoulders?

[quote]strangemeadow wrote:

[quote]Airtruth wrote:
While on the topic of upper chest, is there anyway to fill in the dimple some people have between the shoulder and chest in the most muscular pose?
[/quote]
You mean between the clavicle and the traps? The diamond shaped area?
[/quote]

No the part of the chest in front of the under arm.

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]SSC wrote:

[quote]strangemeadow wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:
And… that exactly why I’m confused.

On the one hand: chest/shoulders/tris is the split, in that order
On the other hand: the vertical pressing before horizontal pressing suggestion

They don’t seem to fit together, unless I a) drop OHP altogether, or b) ignore that suggestion, or c) work shoulders on a different day[/quote]

Do not drop OHP! I like option C.
That makes sense.[/quote]

x 1,000.[/quote]

I figured as much. I’m just not sure how/where to fit it in then.

Assuming split like this:
A: Chest/Shoulders/Tris
B: Back/Bis
C: Legs

I guess doing Legs/Shoulders isn’t horrible. There’s just the risk that front delts and tris are still a bit fatigued for the chest day, and/or don’t get enough recovery.

Does that make sense to do Legs/Shoulders?[/quote]

Serious question, is there something about a 3-day split that you’re attached to? I would personally probably do something like,

1 - Chest / Tris
2 - Back / Bis
3 - Off
4 - Shoulders
5 - Legs
6 - Off
7 - Repeat

But, that’s me, and generally I’ve come to realize that 2 on/1 off does a lot of good for my body. If you’re married to 3 days, it does change things though. I guess I would make it…

1 - Chest / Tris
2 - Legs
3 - Shoulders / Bis / Back

^Again, I can’t necessarily account for your individual variables but I would always work biceps before back if coupled together because my biceps will naturally take over. I can focus on pulling with my elbows as much as possible on back day but hitting them first, (and relatively quickly) will make a large difference.

On another note, if you’re grouping it as such ^, there will be no “spill-over” for your rear delts between back / shoulder day. I would personally probably only go for heavy OHP’s (as a primary exercise) every other session if going as designed above, and use them as an accessory exercise maybe after doing all lateral / front delt work on the day. (i.e. 50lb dumbbell shoulder presses for like 30+ reps at the end rather than going heavy as a primary mover.)

But, then again, I don’t consider a 3-day split optimal for bodybuilding intents and purposes - but that’s my personal opinion in the matter.

[quote]SSC wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]SSC wrote:

[quote]strangemeadow wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:
And… that exactly why I’m confused.

On the one hand: chest/shoulders/tris is the split, in that order
On the other hand: the vertical pressing before horizontal pressing suggestion

They don’t seem to fit together, unless I a) drop OHP altogether, or b) ignore that suggestion, or c) work shoulders on a different day[/quote]

Do not drop OHP! I like option C.
That makes sense.[/quote]

x 1,000.[/quote]

I figured as much. I’m just not sure how/where to fit it in then.

Assuming split like this:
A: Chest/Shoulders/Tris
B: Back/Bis
C: Legs

I guess doing Legs/Shoulders isn’t horrible. There’s just the risk that front delts and tris are still a bit fatigued for the chest day, and/or don’t get enough recovery.

Does that make sense to do Legs/Shoulders?[/quote]

Serious question, is there something about a 3-day split that you’re attached to? I would personally probably do something like,

1 - Chest / Tris
2 - Back / Bis
3 - Off
4 - Shoulders
5 - Legs
6 - Off
7 - Repeat

But, that’s me, and generally I’ve come to realize that 2 on/1 off does a lot of good for my body. If you’re married to 3 days, it does change things though. I guess I would make it…

1 - Chest / Tris
2 - Legs
3 - Shoulders / Bis / Back

^Again, I can’t necessarily account for your individual variables but I would always work biceps before back if coupled together because my biceps will naturally take over. I can focus on pulling with my elbows as much as possible on back day but hitting them first, (and relatively quickly) will make a large difference.

On another note, if you’re grouping it as such ^, there will be no “spill-over” for your rear delts between back / shoulder day. I would personally probably only go for heavy OHP’s (as a primary exercise) every other session if going as designed above, and use them as an accessory exercise maybe after doing all lateral / front delt work on the day. (i.e. 50lb dumbbell shoulder presses for like 30+ reps at the end rather than going heavy as a primary mover.)

But, then again, I don’t consider a 3-day split optimal for bodybuilding intents and purposes - but that’s my personal opinion in the matter.[/quote]

When I said 3-day split, that’s a little vague. I’m repeating it during the week, so I lift 6 times a week, not 3.

Mon: chest/shoulders/tris
Tue: back/bis
Wed: legs/calves
Thu: chest/shoulders/tris
Fri: back/bis
Sat: legs/calves
Sun: off

My reasoning for now:

  • many beginner routines hit muscle groups 3x a week; my own recovery shows I do better with hitting a muscle group 2x a week
  • as long as I can continue to make regular progress every session or two (measured by reps/weight) with that frequency, my body’s showing it can recover fast enough
  • I won’t be able to sustain 2x a week indefinitely, at which point it makes sense to move to less frequency, and a standard bb routine (at least after working through a few deloads)

From a volume standpoint, it’s just a touch more than a 2x week full-body routine.

Unfortunately, chest has been kind of neglected (as you can see from my photos). This is due to elbow issues I’m getting closer to sorting out. Having my tris and anterior delts too fatigued from OHP hasn’t been the weak link. If anything, the overhead pressing actually helps my elbow handle the flat bench with less pain.

Maybe I’m heading down the wrong path. It’s been working so far, and – besides the fact that it’s “different” – it still seems to adhere to the right principles. And (possibly more importantly), I’ve been able to lift consistently doing it this way.

But I could very easily be making huge mistakes I just can’t see.

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]SSC wrote:

[quote]strangemeadow wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:
And… that exactly why I’m confused.

On the one hand: chest/shoulders/tris is the split, in that order
On the other hand: the vertical pressing before horizontal pressing suggestion

They don’t seem to fit together, unless I a) drop OHP altogether, or b) ignore that suggestion, or c) work shoulders on a different day[/quote]

Do not drop OHP! I like option C.
That makes sense.[/quote]

x 1,000.[/quote]

I figured as much. I’m just not sure how/where to fit it in then.

Assuming split like this:
A: Chest/Shoulders/Tris
B: Back/Bis
C: Legs

I guess doing Legs/Shoulders isn’t horrible. There’s just the risk that front delts and tris are still a bit fatigued for the chest day, and/or don’t get enough recovery.

Does that make sense to do Legs/Shoulders?[/quote]
What about:
A:
chest/shoulders/tri
B: back
C: legs and Bi’s
This way you can really focus on your back, it’s a crazy big muscle group. Your Bi’s will be fresh to be worked on Leg day, and you can do them in between sets saving time. And as a bonus, if your leg day is heavy enough, you will make more GH while sleeping and make your Bi’s a little bigger!
You need more pulling than pushing to keep “balanced”, so a back day would help solve that.

[quote]strangemeadow wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]SSC wrote:

[quote]strangemeadow wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:
And… that exactly why I’m confused.

On the one hand: chest/shoulders/tris is the split, in that order
On the other hand: the vertical pressing before horizontal pressing suggestion

They don’t seem to fit together, unless I a) drop OHP altogether, or b) ignore that suggestion, or c) work shoulders on a different day[/quote]

Do not drop OHP! I like option C.
That makes sense.[/quote]

x 1,000.[/quote]

I figured as much. I’m just not sure how/where to fit it in then.

Assuming split like this:
A: Chest/Shoulders/Tris
B: Back/Bis
C: Legs

I guess doing Legs/Shoulders isn’t horrible. There’s just the risk that front delts and tris are still a bit fatigued for the chest day, and/or don’t get enough recovery.

Does that make sense to do Legs/Shoulders?[/quote]
What about:
A:
chest/shoulders/tri
B: back
C: legs and Bi’s
This way you can really focus on your back, it’s a crazy big muscle group. Your Bi’s will be fresh to be worked on Leg day, and you can do them in between sets saving time. And as a bonus, if your leg day is heavy enough, you will make more GH while sleeping and make your Bi’s a little bigger!
You need more pulling than pushing to keep “balanced”, so a back day would help solve that.[/quote]

That makes sense. But how do I fit the overhead presses in with the bench pressing, without the problems mentioned above? Bench first, OHP after?

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]strangemeadow wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]SSC wrote:

[quote]strangemeadow wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:
And… that exactly why I’m confused.

On the one hand: chest/shoulders/tris is the split, in that order
On the other hand: the vertical pressing before horizontal pressing suggestion

They don’t seem to fit together, unless I a) drop OHP altogether, or b) ignore that suggestion, or c) work shoulders on a different day[/quote]

Do not drop OHP! I like option C.
That makes sense.[/quote]

x 1,000.[/quote]

I figured as much. I’m just not sure how/where to fit it in then.

Assuming split like this:
A: Chest/Shoulders/Tris
B: Back/Bis
C: Legs

I guess doing Legs/Shoulders isn’t horrible. There’s just the risk that front delts and tris are still a bit fatigued for the chest day, and/or don’t get enough recovery.

Does that make sense to do Legs/Shoulders?[/quote]
What about:
A:
chest/shoulders/tri
B: back
C: legs and Bi’s
This way you can really focus on your back, it’s a crazy big muscle group. Your Bi’s will be fresh to be worked on Leg day, and you can do them in between sets saving time. And as a bonus, if your leg day is heavy enough, you will make more GH while sleeping and make your Bi’s a little bigger!
You need more pulling than pushing to keep “balanced”, so a back day would help solve that.[/quote]

That makes sense. But how do I fit the overhead presses in with the bench pressing, without the problems mentioned above? Bench first, OHP after?[/quote]

Just two more cents here, I guess I’d still group biceps with back regardless. I know back is a “big” day and requires getting hit from all sorts of angles and taking things into account like width / thickness / upper back / mid back, etc., but (IMO!) legs should be about the densest day of the week, volume-wise, even if hitting twice weekly. I have tried only once ever grouping anything else with legs and it didn’t go well. But I suppose this could change if you were to have one leg day with “higher intensity” exercises (a la squats, hack squats, leg press,) and another day for the accessory side of leg lifts (seated curls, extension, et al) -OR- if you were splitting up quads / hams on each differing day. But then again, that’s my opinion.

As for your actual question, I know many guys who have taken less emphasis off of OHP’ing HEAVILY every session - a la Meadows/MD training. Granted, it’s important to have a big OHP to have large shoulders and this needs to be important, but I really don’t think you would need to go heavy on them more than once a week. And, they should still be performed after all chest work. Chest should have little to do with OHP’ing (obviously it does, but) it has much less bearing than delts / front delts tend to when doing chest work. Your numbers may be slightly dampened, but if you continue to build up your numbers keeping this consistent, you’ll be fine regardless.

Again, all my opinion and anyone can feel free to note otherwise.

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]strangemeadow wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]SSC wrote:

[quote]strangemeadow wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:
And… that exactly why I’m confused.

On the one hand: chest/shoulders/tris is the split, in that order
On the other hand: the vertical pressing before horizontal pressing suggestion

They don’t seem to fit together, unless I a) drop OHP altogether, or b) ignore that suggestion, or c) work shoulders on a different day[/quote]

Do not drop OHP! I like option C.
That makes sense.[/quote]

x 1,000.[/quote]

I figured as much. I’m just not sure how/where to fit it in then.

Assuming split like this:
A: Chest/Shoulders/Tris
B: Back/Bis
C: Legs

I guess doing Legs/Shoulders isn’t horrible. There’s just the risk that front delts and tris are still a bit fatigued for the chest day, and/or don’t get enough recovery.

Does that make sense to do Legs/Shoulders?[/quote]
What about:
A:
chest/shoulders/tri
B: back
C: legs and Bi’s
This way you can really focus on your back, it’s a crazy big muscle group. Your Bi’s will be fresh to be worked on Leg day, and you can do them in between sets saving time. And as a bonus, if your leg day is heavy enough, you will make more GH while sleeping and make your Bi’s a little bigger!
You need more pulling than pushing to keep “balanced”, so a back day would help solve that.[/quote]

That makes sense. But how do I fit the overhead presses in with the bench pressing, without the problems mentioned above? Bench first, OHP after?[/quote]

I have been completing my chest workout before moving to shoulders. It hasn’t affected my shoulder performance much, aside from a little pre-exhaust which is good in my opinion. OHP is typically the first exercise of my shoulder routine. Working shoulders first would result in a terrible chest workout.

If I didn’t have a bum elbow, I would probably already know that. My elbow fails 2-3" from lockout. So I’ll unrack the bar, start to lower, and then my arm contorts and the bar crashes down onto me. I can press fine up until that point.

I’ve tried many different flat pressing bar paths, and I just cannot find one that works for me. I haven’t really worked with heavy enough DBs to know for sure if that’s an issue there too. With lighter DBs I was fine.

I want to use the bench press as part of my routine, but I just physically can’t.

… which is why OHP before bench never made a difference for me.

Agree with what SSC said. And Ripsaw.

[quote]LoRez wrote:
If I didn’t have a bum elbow, I would probably already know that. My elbow fails 2-3" from lockout. So I’ll unrack the bar, start to lower, and then my arm contorts and the bar crashes down onto me. I can press fine up until that point.

I’ve tried many different flat pressing bar paths, and I just cannot find one that works for me. I haven’t really worked with heavy enough DBs to know for sure if that’s an issue there too. With lighter DBs I was fine.

I want to use the bench press as part of my routine, but I just physically can’t.

… which is why OHP before bench never made a difference for me.[/quote]
I wouldn’t worry about lock out for bench or OHP. It’s no biggie, you can keep more tension on the muscle that way.
See what I did for ya? You’re welcome :wink:

[quote]strangemeadow wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:
If I didn’t have a bum elbow, I would probably already know that. My elbow fails 2-3" from lockout. So I’ll unrack the bar, start to lower, and then my arm contorts and the bar crashes down onto me. I can press fine up until that point.

I’ve tried many different flat pressing bar paths, and I just cannot find one that works for me. I haven’t really worked with heavy enough DBs to know for sure if that’s an issue there too. With lighter DBs I was fine.

I want to use the bench press as part of my routine, but I just physically can’t.

… which is why OHP before bench never made a difference for me.[/quote]
I wouldn’t worry about lock out for bench or OHP. It’s no biggie, you can keep more tension on the muscle that way.
See what I did for ya? You’re welcome :wink:
[/quote]

Strangely, I can lock out OHP just fine.

But yeah, ok. Maybe I can figure out a way, without a spotter, to unrack the bar and get it past that threshold… maybe drop it to the safety bars, slide under, then arch up? Will see how that works with heavier weights. On Monday.

Thanks guys.

[quote]PB Andy wrote:
some good suggestions here. The 15-30 degree incline bench press works quite well, especially if you make sure you use continuous tension with a heavy weight. That means don’t go all the way down to your chest, only go down like 2 inches above. And don’t lockout your arms.

on.[/quote]

THIS

To add to this ; using an inclined machine you can do full rom and use it to hold a strerch for 1sec AND to hold a squeeze at the end of each rep. Make sure you feel your upper chest filling upnwith blood when yoi sqjeeze

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:

[quote]leon79 wrote:

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
If your intent is to target upper pecs, try this:

Set your bench to a very low incline. Now when you do barbell bench presses or DB bench presses (preferred), shrug your shoulders up to your ears as you push the weight up. Hold at the top for a moment, then lower the weight as you un-shrug your shoulders.

This hits my upper pecs like nothing else. [/quote]

ID,

Just so I’m understanding you correctly: you keep the shoulder blades pulled back and the traps locked in place, but just shrug the shoulders themselves as you press up?

Thanks[/quote]

No, no! Let the scaps go NATURALLY where they want. Don’t even think about them.
IMHO, keeping the scaps pulled back and locked in place throughout the entire ROM is not natural or healthy for the shoulders.

Again, shrug shoulders up to ears as you raise the weight, and let them come down as you lower the weight.
[/quote]

I wouldn’t recommend moving your scapulae like this as it creates an unstable base from which to bench even though you may feel the upper pec working more. The whole idea of pulling your shoulder blades back and down is to create a stable base where the head of the humerus is locked down into the glenoid fossa of the scapula. Allowing excessive movement in this relatively shallow joint while lying supine on a bench, which is interfering with normal scapulohumeral rhythm, can lead to a fubar’d shoulder joint. Even though it may feel unnatural to lock the shoulder joint back and down into position it helps prevent unnecessary movement (under load) in that joint that could lead to injury and is especially apt for benching, even more so due to the overly repetitive nature of this movement in a trainees repertoire of go to exercises.

Allowing your shoulder’s / scapulae to move freely as you press would probably be more appropriate when using cables while standing in free space but the same rules would still apply in relation to the inherent instability of the shoulder joint

[quote]SLAINGE wrote:

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:

[quote]leon79 wrote:

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
If your intent is to target upper pecs, try this:

Set your bench to a very low incline. Now when you do barbell bench presses or DB bench presses (preferred), shrug your shoulders up to your ears as you push the weight up. Hold at the top for a moment, then lower the weight as you un-shrug your shoulders.

This hits my upper pecs like nothing else. [/quote]

ID,

Just so I’m understanding you correctly: you keep the shoulder blades pulled back and the traps locked in place, but just shrug the shoulders themselves as you press up?

Thanks[/quote]

No, no! Let the scaps go NATURALLY where they want. Don’t even think about them.
IMHO, keeping the scaps pulled back and locked in place throughout the entire ROM is not natural or healthy for the shoulders.

Again, shrug shoulders up to ears as you raise the weight, and let them come down as you lower the weight.
[/quote]

I wouldn’t recommend moving your scapulae like this as it creates an unstable base from which to bench even though you may feel the upper pec working more. The whole idea of pulling your shoulder blades back and down is to create a stable base where the head of the humerus is locked down into the glenoid fossa of the scapula. Allowing excessive movement in this relatively shallow joint while lying supine on a bench, which is interfering with normal scapulohumeral rhythm, can lead to a fubar’d shoulder joint. Even though it may feel unnatural to lock the shoulder joint back and down into position it helps prevent unnecessary movement (under load) in that joint that could lead to injury and is especially apt for benching, even more so due to the overly repetitive nature of this movement in a trainees repertoire of go to exercises.

Allowing your shoulder’s / scapulae to move freely as you press would probably be more appropriate when using cables while standing in free space but the same rules would still apply in relation to the inherent instability of the shoulder joint[/quote]

I disagree… to a point.

Following that scapulae rule for so long is one of the contributing factors to my shoulder problems. Too much impingement.

By observing how the scaps work during push-ups is what freed my thinking and has allowed me to bench press again without pain after so long without pressing.

After much trial and error, this has worked the best for me.

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:

[quote]SLAINGE wrote:

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:

[quote]leon79 wrote:

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
If your intent is to target upper pecs, try this:

Set your bench to a very low incline. Now when you do barbell bench presses or DB bench presses (preferred), shrug your shoulders up to your ears as you push the weight up. Hold at the top for a moment, then lower the weight as you un-shrug your shoulders.

This hits my upper pecs like nothing else. [/quote]

ID,

Just so I’m understanding you correctly: you keep the shoulder blades pulled back and the traps locked in place, but just shrug the shoulders themselves as you press up?

Thanks[/quote]

No, no! Let the scaps go NATURALLY where they want. Don’t even think about them.
IMHO, keeping the scaps pulled back and locked in place throughout the entire ROM is not natural or healthy for the shoulders.

Again, shrug shoulders up to ears as you raise the weight, and let them come down as you lower the weight.
[/quote]

I wouldn’t recommend moving your scapulae like this as it creates an unstable base from which to bench even though you may feel the upper pec working more. The whole idea of pulling your shoulder blades back and down is to create a stable base where the head of the humerus is locked down into the glenoid fossa of the scapula. Allowing excessive movement in this relatively shallow joint while lying supine on a bench, which is interfering with normal scapulohumeral rhythm, can lead to a fubar’d shoulder joint. Even though it may feel unnatural to lock the shoulder joint back and down into position it helps prevent unnecessary movement (under load) in that joint that could lead to injury and is especially apt for benching, even more so due to the overly repetitive nature of this movement in a trainees repertoire of go to exercises.

Allowing your shoulder’s / scapulae to move freely as you press would probably be more appropriate when using cables while standing in free space but the same rules would still apply in relation to the inherent instability of the shoulder joint[/quote]

I disagree… to a point.

Following that scapulae rule for so long is one of the contributing factors to my shoulder problems. Too much impingement.

By observing how the scaps work during push-ups is what freed my thinking and has allowed me to bench press again without pain after so long without pressing. [/quote]

When you say ‘too much impingement’ what exactly do you mean?

From my understanding impingement involving the shoulder usually involves the supraspinatus tendon that passes through the subacromial space. Through repetitive abduction ‘think guillotine presses’ this can result in inflammation / pain and this is why you should keep the shoulders down and press from the nipple line.

Other typical issues resulting in shoulder pain result from hyperextension of the shoulder as it juts forward on the down phase during benching because the scapulae are unable to retract properly against the bench pad. This repeated lurching movement at the humeral head overloads the external rotators causing them gradually to become tighter and tighter in response. If you have trouble reaching up behind your back then his is indicative of decreased internal rotation flexibility as the external rotators become too tight. This results in inhibition of the subscapularis and an imbalance between the internal and external rotators. You see the scapula must retract sufficiently at the bottom portion of the bench press to give the tendon better traction and prevent the destructive anterior shear of the humeral head in the shoulder joint. This is why you should keep your scapula retracted.

If we had narrower benches to allow free scapular movement then natural protraction and retraction of the scapula would make complete sense but the reality is we don’t.

Your press up example is spot on but this movement pattern, which is a closed chain exercise with an arc pressing movement does not transfer efectively to a supine, upper back restricted position, open chain exercise that is the bench press where the bar path is usually up and down.

I get that you got positive results from changing up your movement pattern but this imo is the exception more than the rule.