lol, I’m doing ok. Here’s pics. Like I said upfront, no idea how accurate the InBody thing is… seems sus to me that you can grab on to two metal poles and it can read so much, but i’m going off what it says!
Oh, this is also completely cold and coming off a big meal, not post-workout!
Good to know. I hope now we can do what i offered months ago - you do you, i do me, amd we just skip past each other and we will not ruin other peoples threads. Cheers
Looking swole brother. I would say the Inbody impedance is measuring you a little lower than you are but it should be good for tracking your progress regardless of in accuracies. Either way you’re heading in the right direction and looking great!
I don’t put a lot of stock in those machines outside of a Dexa Scan. The impedance machines are so inaccurate depending on hydration levels. Take my avatar as an example, I was measuring 17% on my Inbody. I thought I looked less, but couldn’t care either way. I just go by the mirror.
Then allow me to qualify. The only person I see in the mirror is myself. It is on ME to be an objective judge of what the mirror is saying. I will not tell a person what they see in the mirror. That is on them.
If they are obstructing your assessment, move.
I never asked anyone if I was cut enough. The mirror was my feedback, until judgment day; then it was in the hands of seven.
My point is that I trust absolutely NO % body fat measurement. The mirror is my final say. I stand firm that no body fat measurement is worth relying on. As to progress, if the gauge is repeatable, it is a reasonable metric (but for progress only.)
As you can tell, I am not addressing anyone’s grasp of reality. I don’t care. You can only kid yourself. And to what benefit, other than some fantasy ego fulfilment.