The issue I am having is I have a really hard time believing the Dems (or the GoP) would do such a thing (ethics over politics). However, I do believe they (the Dems) do many unintentional bad political moves. Perhaps that is it.
I have. He was guarding those on the inside. Speaking of that guy: I’d love to hear what coworkers think of him.
I’m glad you learned that term. Maybe, if you use it often enough on an internet forum, it’ll be a thing.
That’s correct. Edit: Many were let in, but we won’t nitpick.
I don’t know. They were separate from the protest.
Words hurt, I guess.
Why only four now? And they were all “domestic terrorists,” according to you. Death count was 100% bad guys.
Again, they were guarding those inside. Get back to me when you have a detailed list of those injuries, anyway.
1 Like
No, I’m not an apologist.
In fact, if one were to look back at the threads in the run up to election I opined that he would absolutely push the limits of legality and most likely break a few laws, because industrialists and real business people believe that it is better to ask forgiveness than permission.
1 Like
No you are not…and I never have, and never would, even suggest it.
1 Like
Closer to 150, some with serious injuries.
“Blue Lives Matter” was forgotten by the rioters, I guess.
Thanks.
The thing that gets lost in all of this is that I wouldn’t mind, at all, to see Dems spit roast Trump.
But they need to be responsible. They need to check their work before they turn it in. Otherwise it’s just a Botox pageant with Schiff up there trying out his blinking skills.
Their first shot was just completely clownish and the second shot was equally stupid.
If they want to preach “these hallowed halls…” that’s fine. But pay more than just anesthetized lips service to it.
2 Likes
I don’t see how calling it what it is hurts. They were domestic terrorists. Of course I can’t convince you of that you view them as heroes probably. This is what I see on the definition of terrorist: “the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.” But hey I’m not going to convince you of anything.
Why? No one was in danger I heard. And from the video you can see everyone treating him nicely.
I figured any number would be nitpicked to death by Nick’s insanity anyways. Those are false flag injuries. No one anywhere had ill intentions. Cops were probably antifa plants.
It has been a thing for a long time. Red Brigades, ETA, IRA…
They are part of the peasant class. Why would an Ayn Rand cultist care about them?
Yes.
Where’d you hear that?
Doubt it. Mostly, just minor things that wouldn’t be called “injuries” if most saw them. Unionized government workers aren’t going to miss a chance.
1 Like
Actually, Knight Class.
This shit gets old in a hurry. People were in danger.
Of course this is your response. Laughable but expected.
The troll game is always on point though with him.
Which is why I use the term. It fits. Many others including the FBI have used it. You don’t like it and that’s fine. But it’s accurate.
Where’d you hear they weren’t?
Post the list of injuries when it becomes available.
1 Like
Not even close. They were foot soldiers.
1 Like
You said people inside weren’t in danger which is false. Of course they were.
Well you’ve already said deaths are in question. Here’s some:
“I have officers who were not issued helmets prior to the attack who have sustained head injuries,” Gus Papathanasiou, union chairman, said in a statement Wednesday. “One officer has two cracked ribs and two smashed spinal discs and another was stabbed with a metal fence stake, to name some of the injuries.”
“About 65 D.C. police officers also suffered injuries on Jan. 6, including several concussions from head blows from various objects, including metal poles ripped from inauguration-related scaffolding and even a pole with an American flag attached, D.C. police officials have said.”
I don’t know maybe in your fake internet badass world these aren’t injuries.
1 Like
They were being protected by the people that were injured. They were not in danger.
When? Death is pretty hard to dispute.
Looking for funding, as I pointed out.
Two injured. I said “mostly,” not all.
Again, post the list when it’s available.
1 Like
Not being issued implies they had them.
This is just a completely idiotic statement.
I don’t know if they have a list of each specific injury to each person. That’s pretty rare to hand out. But you’re already wrong so why beat you up more on it?
You’d dismiss it anyways. “8 concussions yeah right I want to see the doctor who said they were concussions.”
1 Like
That may be. The statement came from the union chairman, not someone with the Police Department. Unions are always looking for funding/benefits/whatever-you-want-to-call-it.
1 Like
Definitely not. The outcome was never in question.
No. I’ll give you those eight concussions. I’ll give you three broken pinkies. I won’t give you positive Coronavirus tests. I won’t give you scratched hands. I won’t give you scraped knees sustained during a fall while running.
1 Like