Most of my peers, friends, and relatives look like Average Todd. It’s like they don’t consider the body as a viable tool in the office workplace, or in life… other than a support system for the head.
Pathetic.
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
[quote]pja wrote:
Netherlands also has a higher average education level as a country and by many different measures a much better health care system…but hey we have guns…
[/quote]
The USA is a racially diverse country, so “averages” like this are meaningless when compared to, say, Japan or the Netherlands.
At the least, it is bi-modal.[/quote]
Does this imply that (gasp), the races are not equal? (Serious question.)[/quote]
I’d say they are not. But I’d focus more on the ceiling rather than the floor.
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
[quote]pja wrote:
Netherlands also has a higher average education level as a country and by many different measures a much better health care system…but hey we have guns…
[/quote]
The USA is a racially diverse country, so “averages” like this are meaningless when compared to, say, Japan or the Netherlands.
At the least, it is bi-modal.[/quote]
Does this imply that (gasp), the races are not equal? (Serious question.)[/quote]
I am not saying there are not but, that is not implied. People of different races/cultures/ethnicities may participate in different activities. If all black men were into bodybuilding and all white men were into long distance running the avg. body type would not be the same. Same thing with eating practices. I do not think that is a race/biology thing but, a lifestyle one.
[quote]Phoenix44e wrote:
focus more on the ceiling rather than the floor.
[/quote]
What do you mean?
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
[quote]pja wrote:
Netherlands also has a higher average education level as a country and by many different measures a much better health care system…but hey we have guns…
[/quote]
The USA is a racially diverse country, so “averages” like this are meaningless when compared to, say, Japan or the Netherlands.
At the least, it is bi-modal.[/quote]
Does this imply that (gasp), the races are not equal? (Serious question.)[/quote]
No, it states that races (and cultures) are different.
“Different” does not mean “unequal.” It means “different.”
Not sure where this concept of “equal” meant “the same” came from.
[quote]Serge A. Storms wrote:
[quote]batman730 wrote:
[quote]pja wrote:
Netherlands also has a higher average education level as a country and by many different measures a much better health care system…but hey we have guns…
[/quote]
IMO it has more to do with other cultural factors (i.e. moderate food intake, frequent physical activity and a lack of interest in soda). The Dutch don’t do these things because of a higher level of education, national health care etc. Socially, overeating is considered rude, cycling is fun and black coffee is enjoyed more than soda.
Furthermore, in my experience, Dutch people tend to be very blunt and I expect they could be brutal fat-shamers. Also, if the “average” person looks like Dutch Todd, I expect there might be a tacit pressure to hold yourself to a higher standard.[/quote]
I went to Holland years ago with a crew of buddies. One of them was pretty big and kind of soft. He wasn’t even fat, but the Dutch locals we were hanging with called him the Hamburgler the whole time. Poor guy took a ton of shit for being too big. He’s been on the thin side ever since that trip.
So yeah, bring your fat kids to Holland and get them a proper fat shaming.
[/quote]
It’s not just being fat but being big as well their ideal is a skinny fat guy or skinny guy. Not big in anyway
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
[quote]pja wrote:
Netherlands also has a higher average education level as a country and by many different measures a much better health care system…but hey we have guns…
[/quote]
The USA is a racially diverse country, so “averages” like this are meaningless when compared to, say, Japan or the Netherlands.
At the least, it is bi-modal.[/quote]
Does this imply that (gasp), the races are not equal? (Serious question.)[/quote]
No, it states that races (and cultures) are different.
“Different” does not mean “unequal.” It means “different.”
Not sure where this concept of “equal” meant “the same” came from.
[/quote]
Um…
I think Brown v Board of Education, counselor.
From Miriam-Webster dictionary:
equal (adjective)
: the same in number, amount, degree, rank, or quality
: having the same mathematical value
: not changing : the same for each person
Take the black man’s fine glutes out of the average and Todd will be even sadder.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]batman730 wrote:
[quote]pja wrote:
Netherlands also has a higher average education level as a country and by many different measures a much better health care system…but hey we have guns…
[/quote]
IMO it has more to do with other cultural factors (i.e. moderate food intake, frequent physical activity and a lack of interest in soda). The Dutch don’t do these things because of a higher level of education, national health care etc. Socially, overeating is considered rude, cycling is fun and black coffee is enjoyed more than soda.
Furthermore, in my experience, Dutch people tend to be very blunt and I expect they could be brutal fat-shamers. Also, if the “average” person looks like Dutch Todd, I expect there might be a tacit pressure to hold yourself to a higher standard.[/quote]
I’ve been there and my conjecture is it has everything to do with the massive amount of cycling. Everyone rides a bike, it seems, from young to the elderly. It’s a stark contrast between here and there on that alone.
[/quote]
I thought that as well, initially. Of course cycling culture is huge in Holland. However I’ve read that the average person in Holland only actually cycles 2.5km/day. I’m sure that beats tha US average, but on it’s own I don’t think it explains the difference.
My money’s still on portion sizes and soda intake.
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
[quote]pja wrote:
Netherlands also has a higher average education level as a country and by many different measures a much better health care system…but hey we have guns…
[/quote]
The USA is a racially diverse country, so “averages” like this are meaningless when compared to, say, Japan or the Netherlands.
At the least, it is bi-modal.[/quote]
Does this imply that (gasp), the races are not equal? (Serious question.)[/quote]
I would say it is a statement about nationalities, not races.
[quote]T3hPwnisher wrote:
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
[quote]pja wrote:
Netherlands also has a higher average education level as a country and by many different measures a much better health care system…but hey we have guns…
[/quote]
The USA is a racially diverse country, so “averages” like this are meaningless when compared to, say, Japan or the Netherlands.
At the least, it is bi-modal.[/quote]
Does this imply that (gasp), the races are not equal? (Serious question.)[/quote]
I would say it is a statement about nationalities, not races.
[/quote]
In this day and age, anyone of any race can reside in almost any nation they please and considering that the countries of this earth right now vary greatly in their racial demographics from nearly homogeneous to a mix of various Asians, whites, and blacks and the resulting admixtures and that the races are different from one another physically, I consider it an expression of race.
Nationalities and languages are man-made, artificial creations. Races are not.
(My take on it that is, and I might be flawed in this outlook.)
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]T3hPwnisher wrote:
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
[quote]pja wrote:
Netherlands also has a higher average education level as a country and by many different measures a much better health care system…but hey we have guns…
[/quote]
The USA is a racially diverse country, so “averages” like this are meaningless when compared to, say, Japan or the Netherlands.
At the least, it is bi-modal.[/quote]
Does this imply that (gasp), the races are not equal? (Serious question.)[/quote]
I would say it is a statement about nationalities, not races.
[/quote]
In this day and age, anyone of any race can reside in almost any nation they please and considering that the countries of this earth right now vary greatly in their racial demographics from nearly homogeneous to a mix of various Asians, whites, and blacks and the resulting admixtures and the races (and sub-races) are different from one another physically, I consider it an expression of race.
Nationalities and languages are man-made, artificial creations. Races are not.
(My take on it that is, and I might be flawed in this outlook.)[/quote]
I am not disputing this, just answering your question. I see a lot of confusion about this, especially when it comes to racism vs bigotry.
But yes, the differences in the bodies are likely expressed by matters of race, culture, lifestyle, and education.
Regardless of race, Americans are generally physically lazy and eat with reckless abandon.
I’ve actually always been very interested in the different genetic tendencies of the human race. There is a lot to look at that has nothing at all to do with nationality or culture and is purely physiological. Dr. Bass over here in Tennessee wrote a lot about that when he was at the Body Farm at the university. You can see in people of African descent that they tend to have more space surrounding their joints, especially the knees which helps with elasticity, explosiveness, and speed. They also tend to have denser bones, which is cool, but not if you want to be a swimmer lol.
It’s also no coincidence that, given their populations, the viking nations are incredibly disproportionately represented in the history of great strongman competitors. I guess you could kind of argue that was culture, but it was culture far in the past which resulted in breeding really big, robust people.
And not to mention Samoan, Pacific Islander types. Lotta those dudes are built like tanks. I have no idea why, but it’s pretty clear to see lol.
Another thing that I do find interesting, albeit somewhat uncomfortable to talk about, is how slavery in America genetically affected those descended from African people who survived that time period. The way things were during the bad times it kinda created man-made natural selection. You had to be a tough motherfucker to make it through that. I do wonder how much impact that has on the physical genetic profile of people who can directly trace their ancestry to the days of slavery and how many black people in America that actually applies to these days.
How much does he make a year? Does he know other famous and or rich people?
[quote]csulli wrote:
I’ve actually always been very interested in the different genetic tendencies of the human race. There is a lot to look at that has nothing at all to do with nationality or culture and is purely physiological. Dr. Bass over here in Tennessee wrote a lot about that when he was at the Body Farm at the university. You can see in people of African descent that they tend to have more space surrounding their joints, especially the knees which helps with elasticity, explosiveness, and speed. They also tend to have denser bones, which is cool, but not if you want to be a swimmer lol.
It’s also no coincidence that, given their populations, the viking nations are incredibly disproportionately represented in the history of great strongman competitors. I guess you could kind of argue that was culture, but it was culture far in the past which resulted in breeding really big, robust people.
And not to mention Samoan, Pacific Islander types. Lotta those dudes are built like tanks. I have no idea why, but it’s pretty clear to see lol.
Another thing that I do find interesting, albeit somewhat uncomfortable to talk about, is how slavery in America genetically affected those descended from African people who survived that time period. The way things were during the bad times it kinda created man-made natural selection. You had to be a tough motherfucker to make it through that. I do wonder how much impact that has on the physical genetic profile of people who can directly trace their ancestry to the days of slavery and how many black people in America that actually applies to these days.[/quote]
YOURE FUCKING RETARDED AND SHOULD BE BANNED FROM USING THE INTERNET!!!
SLAVERY DID NOT CREATE A SOME KIND OF ALTERNATE SUPER RACE OF BLACK PEOPLE IN AMERICA!!!
ACTUALLY DO SOME RESEARCH ON CLIMATE AND THE EFFECTS ON THE HUMAN BODY IN TERMS ENERGY SYSTEMS AND MUSCLE FIBER COMPOSITION AND YOU WILL REALIZE HUMID CLIMATES PRODUCE MICRO EVOLUTIONARY TRAITS WHERE FAST TWITCH DOMINATE AND HIGH LEVELS OF FREE TESTOSTERONE AND SUBSEQUENTLY TESTOSTERONE RECEPTORS ARE NECESSARY FOR SURVIVAL.
YOURE AN IGNORANT RACIST MORON THAT UNDERMINES ANY POSITIVE PHYSICAL TRAITS OUTSIDE OF CAUCASIANS AS FREAKISH AND OR EXPLAINABLE THROUGH MONKEY SCIENCE GO FUCK YOURSELF.
[quote]SuperVillian wrote:
[quote]csulli wrote:
I’ve actually always been very interested in the different genetic tendencies of the human race. There is a lot to look at that has nothing at all to do with nationality or culture and is purely physiological. Dr. Bass over here in Tennessee wrote a lot about that when he was at the Body Farm at the university. You can see in people of African descent that they tend to have more space surrounding their joints, especially the knees which helps with elasticity, explosiveness, and speed. They also tend to have denser bones, which is cool, but not if you want to be a swimmer lol.
It’s also no coincidence that, given their populations, the viking nations are incredibly disproportionately represented in the history of great strongman competitors. I guess you could kind of argue that was culture, but it was culture far in the past which resulted in breeding really big, robust people.
And not to mention Samoan, Pacific Islander types. Lotta those dudes are built like tanks. I have no idea why, but it’s pretty clear to see lol.
Another thing that I do find interesting, albeit somewhat uncomfortable to talk about, is how slavery in America genetically affected those descended from African people who survived that time period. The way things were during the bad times it kinda created man-made natural selection. You had to be a tough motherfucker to make it through that. I do wonder how much impact that has on the physical genetic profile of people who can directly trace their ancestry to the days of slavery and how many black people in America that actually applies to these days.[/quote]
YOURE FUCKING RETARDED AND SHOULD BE BANNED FROM USING THE INTERNET!!!
SLAVERY DID NOT CREATE A SOME KIND OF ALTERNATE SUPER RACE OF BLACK PEOPLE IN AMERICA!!!
ACTUALLY DO SOME RESEARCH ON CLIMATE AND THE EFFECTS ON THE HUMAN BODY IN TERMS ENERGY SYSTEMS AND MUSCLE FIBER COMPOSITION AND YOU WILL REALIZE HUMID CLIMATES PRODUCE MICRO EVOLUTIONARY TRAITS WHERE FAST TWITCH DOMINATE AND HIGH LEVELS OF FREE TESTOSTERONE AND SUBSEQUENTLY TESTOSTERONE RECEPTORS ARE NECESSARY FOR SURVIVAL.
YOURE AN IGNORANT RACIST MORON THAT UNDERMINES ANY POSITIVE PHYSICAL TRAITS OUTSIDE OF CAUCASIANS AS FREAKISH AND OR EXPLAINABLE THROUGH MONKEY SCIENCE GO FUCK YOURSELF.[/quote]
Are you saying that slave breeding in the United States did not exist?
[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:
[quote]SuperVillian wrote:
[quote]csulli wrote:
I’ve actually always been very interested in the different genetic tendencies of the human race. There is a lot to look at that has nothing at all to do with nationality or culture and is purely physiological. Dr. Bass over here in Tennessee wrote a lot about that when he was at the Body Farm at the university. You can see in people of African descent that they tend to have more space surrounding their joints, especially the knees which helps with elasticity, explosiveness, and speed. They also tend to have denser bones, which is cool, but not if you want to be a swimmer lol.
It’s also no coincidence that, given their populations, the viking nations are incredibly disproportionately represented in the history of great strongman competitors. I guess you could kind of argue that was culture, but it was culture far in the past which resulted in breeding really big, robust people.
And not to mention Samoan, Pacific Islander types. Lotta those dudes are built like tanks. I have no idea why, but it’s pretty clear to see lol.
Another thing that I do find interesting, albeit somewhat uncomfortable to talk about, is how slavery in America genetically affected those descended from African people who survived that time period. The way things were during the bad times it kinda created man-made natural selection. You had to be a tough motherfucker to make it through that. I do wonder how much impact that has on the physical genetic profile of people who can directly trace their ancestry to the days of slavery and how many black people in America that actually applies to these days.[/quote]
YOURE FUCKING RETARDED AND SHOULD BE BANNED FROM USING THE INTERNET!!!
SLAVERY DID NOT CREATE A SOME KIND OF ALTERNATE SUPER RACE OF BLACK PEOPLE IN AMERICA!!!
ACTUALLY DO SOME RESEARCH ON CLIMATE AND THE EFFECTS ON THE HUMAN BODY IN TERMS ENERGY SYSTEMS AND MUSCLE FIBER COMPOSITION AND YOU WILL REALIZE HUMID CLIMATES PRODUCE MICRO EVOLUTIONARY TRAITS WHERE FAST TWITCH DOMINATE AND HIGH LEVELS OF FREE TESTOSTERONE AND SUBSEQUENTLY TESTOSTERONE RECEPTORS ARE NECESSARY FOR SURVIVAL.
YOURE AN IGNORANT RACIST MORON THAT UNDERMINES ANY POSITIVE PHYSICAL TRAITS OUTSIDE OF CAUCASIANS AS FREAKISH AND OR EXPLAINABLE THROUGH MONKEY SCIENCE GO FUCK YOURSELF.[/quote]
Are you saying that slave breeding in the United States did not exist?[/quote]
Youre an idiot, go to the west coast of Africa and look at the bodies and physical abilities of the people therein. Once again, DO THE RESEARCH DUMMY AND STUDY THE HUMAN BODY AND HOW IT REACTS TO CLIMATE AND IS FORCED TO ADAPT OVER THOUSANDS OF YEARS NOT A HANDFUL OF GENERATIONS THROUGH SLAVERY WHITE PEOPLE ARENT FAST DEAL WITH IT