[quote]Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
JJP wrote:
Coach,
I know you don’t comment on other training programs but I would like to ask a question about the Anabolic/Metabolic diet if that’s possible. Would your low-carb post-workout recommendations interfere with the weekend carb ups as glycogen is restored through glutamine/glycine etc?
Also, what do you think of the diet in general?
Best wishes,
I commented several times on the diet in the past. The main problems with the ‘‘original’’ anabolic diet, from my experience, are:
- The carb-up is too long and not controlled enough. The human muscles can normally store up to 500g of glycogen, maybe 600g if you are a really big guy. It MIGHT be possible to surcompensate the glycogen stores by using a carb deplete/loading strategy (like the AD), but even in that case we can’t stuff much more than 600-700g of carbs in our muscles.
Many people will go hog wild on the weekend carb-up and consume 750-1500g of carbs PER DAY! This is… oh … about 800-2300g more than your body can store as glycogen and that will undoubtably be stored as fat.
And that is IF your glycogen stores are completely depleted, which they never are… so the excess is likely even greater.
You need around 300-400g of carbs MAX to replenish muscle glycogen in that situation, anything more than that increases the risk of ‘‘spilling over’’ and storing those carbs as fat. I have seen many people screw up their progress by going wild on the weekend and negating any fat loss they accomplished during the week.
For most people a 2 days carb-up is excessive and will make the diet less effective. Only those who are very lean can carb-up for two days.
- There is no recommendation on the type of carbs to consume… a lot of people end up stuffing themselves with bad carbs like sugar, pastries, donuts and other worthless junk. To quote Dr. Berardi, ‘‘a carb is not a carb’’
… in other words not all carbs are equal (this is mostly due to the insulin response). 400g of carbs from sugar and junk will not have the same physiological effect as 400g of carbs from fruits, veggies, yams, etc.
- The diet, at least the original AD, doesn’t differentiate between the types of fat consumed during the week. For example, the original work of Dr. Dipasquale not only permit the consumption of a lot of saturated fat, but actually recommend it (indirectly).
It does so by saying not to ‘‘mix diets’’ by consuming foods like fish and chicken instead of fatter cuts of meat. In other words the emphasis is placed on making sure that you get all your fats in, not on the quality of those fats.
The thing is that ‘‘good fats’’ have physiological properties that are beneficial to body composition while other fats don’t (and can even have a negative impact). For example omega-3 fatty acids (e.g. fish oil) increases insulin sensitivity (which makes your body more efficient at storing nutrients in the muscles and not as fat and improve your capacity to tolerate carbs) while saturated fat have the opposite effect.
Coconut oil increases metabolism by increasing thyroid hormone production.
Omega 3s are anti-inflamatory while saturated fat is pro-inflamatory, etc.
[/quote]
thats great to know because i ve been reading his “radical diet” it is a bit more updated…
thanks or that bit of info aswell.
in fairness to the diet, it was 14 years ago nearly that it was first written, our info has def grown since then, the anabolic/metabolic diet,and the atkins diet were both a good start and an eye opener to fats and carbohydrates for the general public.
many thanks and good luck next week