[quote]In Pro Form wrote:
Thib,
I enjoyed your latest article on program dominance, but after reading the volume dominance recommendations they seemed to contradict your approach in the HSS program. For the HSS program you recommend a high number of sets per muscle group while also utilizing supersets and special techniques even during the intensification phases, however in your latest article you state:
“Lastly, when you’re using a high-volume approach, you shouldn’t use intensive techniques such as drop sets, supersets, and the like. This is sure to put even the freakiest genetic phenom in a state of under-recovery and stagnation.”
Have your philosophies regarding volume training changed since HSS, and if so how would you change HSS?
Would these volume dominance recommendations change according to somotype and would these also change the approach taken when using HSS?
[/quote]
I do not consider HSS a high-volume workout. It includes between 9 and 12 work sets per muscle-group (3-5 for the heavy exercise, 3 supersets, 3-4 sets of the special exercise … I do not count the 100 reps set as a ‘‘set’’ because it is actually a restorative technique to initiate the recovery process).
High volume, to me, is AT LEAST 16 sets per muscle-group. but more often around 20 sets.