Well “a” would very strongly imply more than one in English, but I’m not sure how applicable that is here
I had earlier mentioned “the Messiah Jesus (as), son of Mary” and “the Messiah, the Deceiver”, those being Arabic phrases from Quran and Hadith which give cause for pause on that point. I consider Arabic, Hebrew and Aramaic to have more in common with each other than they do with English
If there can be more than one “the”, it might make sense for their to be less than two “a”
The Bible and Quran contradict each other on the character of Jesus (as). I consider the Quran and Jesus (as) a part of the same thing (Divine Speech), without being a part of God. When people burn Qurans or flush them down the toilet, they are not doing so to God.
I also consider Jesus (as) and myself to be a part of the same thing. Most Muslims probably haven’t noticed it yet, but an evidence for that is in that hadith regarding “body of Christ”
Most Christians consider Jesus (as) and God “the father” as part of the same thing. The Quran calls that heresy.
With some hesitation, some resistance, some dislike, I can say that I need Jesus (as), he is a more central part of that “body” so to speak. I would not say that God Almighty is in need of Jesus (as), or that they are different parts of the same thing. In this way I may believe in Jesus (as) more than I believe in my own self, yet not in the same way most Christians do.
Need was a strong word so I left it for a while, but I would like some more information around this if it isn’t a bother.
Does this mean a sort of spiritual merging of the Church with Jesus (as) in the end times? It’s not literally eating Jesus (as)?
My narrative goes against the accepted propaganda. And finally things are beginning to turn around from the pile of bullshit you believe in and peddle.
Ahhh no…it starts before Oct 7th.
The world is starting to turn on the extreme Zionists of Israel. Even the jews of Israel.
So I didn’t get your point in asking, I would like to confirm - was your purpose to argue that Palestinian lives don’t matter, or shouldn’t matter, or something else?
Dude Ive been watching this shit play out since like 1979. And that was just when I became somewhat aware of the world. I know it goes back much further.
As a former/fellow yinzer, I beseech you- Look up Robert Bowers and Richard Baumhammer.
You do not want to be on those fuckheads side of this shit. For real. This bullshit people keep spouting is straight out the 1990’s era white supremacy movement.
Dude is so clueless he left out the whole “proportionality” of response argument, which at first blush actually sounds good.
…until you realize that these terrorists did the absolute greatest amount of disgustingly inhuman destruction they could with what they had; if they had greater firepower/weapons, bet your life they would’ve wreaked “proportionally” greater destruction.
Call me too American, but I don’t believe in proportionality.
I believe that once you start some shit, the gloves are off and the rules go out the window.
The palestinians of Gaza and Hamas should have just minded their own damn business.
Or started petitioning to create an international coalition to build themselves some power and desalination plants.
But nope. They chose rockets, mass murder, rape and hostage taking.
Not many people in history have worked so hard at being such immense assholes.
Angry me doesn’t either, but rational me sorta does.
I would try to give the other party a mulligan, and hamas has been given many mulligans, due to realpolitik concerns I’m sure; but there’s a line that simply cannot be crossed -a line which Hamas just crossed and then obliterated.
Good. I’d rather see people of reason and conviction than this crop of Castolis who arrive at what ever current trash that is floating around just because they’re “anti-mainstream”.
Speaking of the Bible, this is nonsense. It totally looses the distinction between the definite article (the) and the indefinite article (a or an). Be you examples Arabic phrases, or not, when translating to English is is nothing more than confusion. Maybe there just doesn’t exist a simple translation into English. No language has the right to change the English meaning to make a point.
This logic you are suggesting reminds me of you saying you like to be intentionally vague, or something like that. Being intentionally vague is the bed partner of guile. I find it an offensive discussion tactic that is impossible in dialog.
I like the gang of people who follow the business-like mainstream who traffic in daily propaganda then really believe it’s true. Now go and get your cup of Morning Joe.