The Bodybuilder Bunker

So new topic.

What are all of your thoughts on creating your own supplements by buying product in bulk and either mixing, capping, etc all the products you’d want in your personal supplement?

Today when researching how many people brew their own test, etc. They buy test powder in bulk (I’m dumb when it comes to this and I’m trying to make it as simple as possible because it’s not my point. ) When they get the powder through several steps they end up making their own steroids.

Sooo…I was thinking why not buy certain products like caffeine/arginine, etc to make your own pre-workout supps. Buy bulk in bcaa/creatine, etc to make your postworkout supps. This can all be capped or mixed, etc.

It was just a thought and I haven’t researched it yet but I was told that there are places online where you can buy specific product in bulk instead of buying some supplement company’s product.

It might be a way to make the product exactly as you’d want it and possibly save a bunch of $$ in the process. Hopefully the Biotest people don’t get mad at me for this. They make a great product, off topic.

So does anybody do this or did this post just sound confusing as hell? lol

Gerdy

[quote]SSC wrote:
A question to everyone who’s using BCAAs: Did you guys purchase them from Biotest, or if not, what are your most economical recommendations?[/quote]

I’m a certified Biotest whore.

[quote]Dirty Gerdy wrote:
So new topic.

What are all of your thoughts on creating your own supplements by buying product in bulk and either mixing, capping, etc all the products you’d want in your personal supplement?

Today when researching how many people brew their own test, etc. They buy test powder in bulk (I’m dumb when it comes to this and I’m trying to make it as simple as possible because it’s not my point. ) When they get the powder through several steps they end up making their own steroids.

Sooo…I was thinking why not buy certain products like caffeine/arginine, etc to make your own pre-workout supps. Buy bulk in bcaa/creatine, etc to make your postworkout supps. This can all be capped or mixed, etc.

It was just a thought and I haven’t researched it yet but I was told that there are places online where you can buy specific product in bulk instead of buying some supplement company’s product.

It might be a way to make the product exactly as you’d want it and possibly save a bunch of $$ in the process. Hopefully the Biotest people don’t get mad at me for this. They make a great product, off topic.

So does anybody do this or did this post just sound confusing as hell? lol

Gerdy[/quote]

I know a shit ton of guys who did this before Operation Raw Deal. Downside is you are more than likely buying your powders from China if you are getting them very cheap. I don’t want to get into a discussion about foreign trade relations, but China hasn’t really mastered the idea of quality control.

But that said - lots of guys do it as a hobby. They enjoy making their own supps. I can’t get within 5 feet of raw powder with making a mess, so I can’t imagine myself capping anything.

But as I stated in a previous post - I’m a Biotest whore.

[quote]Lonnie123 wrote:
Can we have a “post up or shut up” rule in this thread that in order to give advice you need to post a picture in the thread or your profile?

[/quote]

Excellent idea!

I think this suggestion meshes perfectly with the “Results speak loudest” philosophy that is promoted on this thread.

Ideally this would be eventually adopted by the entire forum, but in order to show naysayers what a valid concept this is it would have to be proven on a smaller scale.

This thread could be the pilot project.

Hopefully Lonnie123 idea will not be conveniently ignored (as it already appears to have been).

[quote]Professor X wrote:
LiveFromThe781 wrote:
Fulmen wrote:

The same basics work for everyone. I am not sure why you believe a tall guy should train completely different than a shorter guy. Whether something works AS WELL for you is based more on genetics than limb length or some poor concept of body type. Short guys build legs really easy? The same things they would do to build their legs are generally the same things anyone else should be doing.

The belief that they can’t gain is the same bullshit you are expelling about training differently simply because you are tall.[/quote]

well originally i was talking about cortisol and how its supposed to be released from ectos if they train heavy. but then everyone got all mad at the word ecto like im dropping the n bomb or something so instead of saying “ecto” i was saying tall guys with fast metabolisms. i was just bringing up something that i read on this site and was wondering what you guys thought about it. if it is true then yes, you would train differently from a short guy. ive also hear a lot of shorter guys say that they respond much better to low rep training than higher rep training so all im trying to do is clear some stuff up but all im hearing is “dont say ecto its blasphemy”

[quote] CT wrote:

How should ectos train?

Ectos’ bodies are not built to carry a lot of muscle bulk so for that reason the body needs a darn good reason to add additional muscle tissue. In other words, for ectos to add muscle to their frame they need a very powerful growth stimulus. The growth stimulus is a function of several factors:

Volume: The more physical work you perform, the more important the stimulus is. I’ve mentioned in the past that the more you can train without exceeding your body’s capacity to handle physical work, the more you’ll progress. However ectos have a very low tolerance to strength work. So for them, increasing the severity of the training stimulus via more volume is out of the question. In fact, if anything, ectos will always need to reduce training volume to the bare minimum necessary to stimulate growth.

Ecto variable: Perform a total of 4-6 work sets for most muscle groups, with the "possible’"exception of going up to 8 sets for back since it’s a more complex “group.” Avoid the temptation to increase training volume, however tempting it may be at first. Focus on working harder during those sets, not on doing more sets.

Frequency: Another way of putting the body through a more important growth stimulus/adaptive need is to increase the frequency of training. Basically, if you train a given muscle group twice per week or even three times per week you are forcing your body to adapt to a greater extent. However, just like with volume, ectos will not respond well to an increase in total training frequency. Their body not being built to tolerate strength work, the release of stress hormone will be significant with every session. Ectos need their 3-4 days of rest per week to grow, may it simply be to restore hormonal balance and facilitate the onset of an anabolic state instead of a catabolic one.

Ecto variable: Train at the most 3-4 days a week, which means taking at least 3 days off per week on non-consecutive days. Each individual session should last no longer than 60 minutes, preferably closer to 45. Each muscle group is to be trained once every 6-7 days.

Load/intensity: One can also increase the importance of the growth stimulus by lifting heavier weights. And that is something ectos should do, within reason. As it was mentioned oh, about a zillion times, an ecto body is not built for strength work. They have a smaller bone structure, thinner bones, narrower pelvic and scapular belts, smaller joints an generally longer limbs. They are at the exact opposite of being built for strength. So lifting maximal weights, in the 90-100% range is not ideal for them and once again represent a significant stress on their body. However, light load lifting might not be a powerful enough stimulus to force their body to grow. So they need to lift relatively heavy (75-85% range), without making maximal lifting the cornerstone of their program.

Ecto variable: It is important to challenge the body by always trying to increase the amount of weight lifted, but because of their structure, ectos should not go into the maximal weights zone of 90%+. However going lower than 75-80% will not be a strong stimulus enough to maximize their growth.

“Hardness”: I do not know another word to express this factor. I am talking here about the perceived difficulty of a set. Basically the closer you go to your physical limit on a set, the higher is the “hardness” factor. Ectos should focus mainly on this factor to increase the growth stimulus. If they are training hard enough and have a high pain threshold, they can put the muscle through a growth stimulus powerful enough to force their ecto body to add on muscle without having to do more than 3-6 sets per muscle group.

Ecto variable: This is the key to success for ectos. They should strive to make the few sets they are doing as hard as humanly possible. If he wants to progress optimally the ecto must become the hardest working guy in his gym, he must become an animal!

So an ecto should stick to 3-8 total sets per muscle group (1-2 sets of 2-4 exercises) and gradually work his way up the “hardness” ladder. Obviously, the higher up you go on the ladder, the less total sets you should perform. Also note that I include “8” among the sets only because of back which is a more complex muscle structure and might require more exercises. But for all other muscles groups, 3-6 sets should be done.

Ectos need plenty of rest to grow. As such they should include at least three non-consecutive ‘off’ days per week. Four is even better for the hardest gainers among the ectos. Each muscle should be trained once a week directly, although some indirect work a second time is acceptable. [/quote]

[quote]rainjack wrote:
Dirty Gerdy wrote:
So new topic.

What are all of your thoughts on creating your own supplements by buying product in bulk and either mixing, capping, etc all the products you’d want in your personal supplement?

Today when researching how many people brew their own test, etc. They buy test powder in bulk (I’m dumb when it comes to this and I’m trying to make it as simple as possible because it’s not my point. ) When they get the powder through several steps they end up making their own steroids.

Sooo…I was thinking why not buy certain products like caffeine/arginine, etc to make your own pre-workout supps. Buy bulk in bcaa/creatine, etc to make your postworkout supps. This can all be capped or mixed, etc.

It was just a thought and I haven’t researched it yet but I was told that there are places online where you can buy specific product in bulk instead of buying some supplement company’s product.

It might be a way to make the product exactly as you’d want it and possibly save a bunch of $$ in the process. Hopefully the Biotest people don’t get mad at me for this. They make a great product, off topic.

So does anybody do this or did this post just sound confusing as hell? lol

Gerdy

I know a shit ton of guys who did this before Operation Raw Deal. Downside is you are more than likely buying your powders from China if you are getting them very cheap. I don’t want to get into a discussion about foreign trade relations, but China hasn’t really mastered the idea of quality control.

But that said - lots of guys do it as a hobby. They enjoy making their own supps. I can’t get within 5 feet of raw powder with making a mess, so I can’t imagine myself capping anything.

But as I stated in a previous post - I’m a Biotest whore.

[/quote]

Ya I was more into it for the hobby thing because it sounds kind of fun.

As you said earlier your supplement box looks like a tool box, mine does too. lol I look at a lot of my supplements and say man I wish I could combine these together and take certain stuff out of certain products. So the idea of making my own would be cool because they would contain exactly what I want in them. lol

Yeah Raw Deal seems to have slowed down some stuff or actually skyrocketed everything locally.

The only supplement ever made here was Fina and that was for $$. Doubled what was invested in it :stuck_out_tongue: lol That seemed fun so making other supplements seems fun as well. lol

Gerdy

[quote]Lonnie123 wrote:
This may very well be the new reason to visit T-Nation.

I want to talk frankly about the matter of genetics. How much does it play a role? Is it a cop out or a serious issue?

I speak as someone who had basically no physical activity growing up and come from a family of guys who are kinda small… Thus I started this journey about 4 years ago as a total softy, weighing about 210 and nothing but fat… couldnt even bench 115.

I’m still progressing every month and am getting stronget/bigger/leaner, but its sllloooww, which I’m fine with as I learn its slow for most people. But it seems others just blow me out of the water in terms of speed of progression and do so while goofing around with their training.

A buddy of mine is a good example, he would go in, train whatever he felt like training with very little effort and he was getting veins and a six pack in a matter of weeks. Almost made me a little mad.

Just wandering what everyone elses opinions are. Regardless, the guys who OBVIOUSLY train…The guys who make you clear your throat before speaking to them… always answer with “10 years” “15 years” “20 years” whenever I ask them how long they have been training. So time and effort will always be the great equalizer.[/quote]

I was going to read all the pages I missed over the last few days, but I feel the need to respond to this.

Genetics is a cop-out. plain and simple. Yeah, there’s really about 1-2% of the population that’s either really screwed or really gifted. Basically, 2 Std. devs outside the norm. It DOES play a role when you’re talking about Olympias, Olympics, etc. Some people don’t have the required symmetry for Olympia titles, etc. But it’s not the be all/end all. I’ve never met someone that was at their genetic limit. They just sucked at training and/or eating. Even the big guys.

I’m getting sick of all this excuse making I hear. I have as much right as any person to complain about genetics: I was always gangling and skinny, but no six-pack or definition. I was always scary weak, and I had exercise induced asthma that prevented me from doing really well in youth athletics even though I played several sports and loved them a lot. The first time I started training (at 18 years old) my maxes were----bench–90 lbs, squat (high, of course) 115, deadlift (120). And yes, these were all 1 rep maxes. I failed trying 95 lbs in the bench. Pathetic. I know girls who were stronger than I was the first time they picked up weights.

So what did I do? I read, ate, trained, slept, and repeated ad nauseum and then some. Now my parallel box squat is 500, deadlift 560, bench >300 (still sucks), parallel good morning 500. I’ve worked my ass off for each little gain I scraped out over the years.

Education

Hard work

Eating

Sleeping

Focus. Not pissing it all away with beer, drugs, and partying.

= achieved goals.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
SSC wrote:
A question to everyone who’s using BCAAs: Did you guys purchase them from Biotest, or if not, what are your most economical recommendations?

I’m a certified Biotest whore. [/quote]

Damn, at Level 5, I’d certainly hope so.

[quote]Lonnie123 wrote:
As far as rest times go:

I rest until I feel I can perform my absolute best on the next set. For heavy squats this can be a solid 4-5 minutes sometimes… For curls maybe 2 minutes. Who knows if this is because of fiber stimulation or lactate build up or blah blah, but I just think if you can perform 100% of the set because you arent tired you will get better results.

While I am slowly abandoning the idea of “fat loss training”, I think that unless you are training FOR fat loss, meaning for maximal calorie burn in minimal time, the rest periods should be long enough to allow near-maximal recovery. The bigger guys in my gym have taught me this as well. If the goal is to huff-and-puff then keep the weights semi light and the rest periods very short.

[/quote]

I’d agree with this. Most of the big guys around me don’t time rest periods. Some do (a buddy of mine does a lot of supersets, etc), most don’t. I don’t, but I’m not the biggest guy around. I just feel better with lots of rest, even for isolation stuff. I haven’t noticed any real stagnation of gains, and I’ve gotten bigger over the years by doing it this way. On a related note, I rarely go above 6 reps for anything except accessory lifts.

I dunno if it’s a good thing for older lifters, but I believe that the more years you spend under heavy iron the better size increase you get when you switch to ‘pure’ hypertrophy—examples: look at Dave Tate and Arnold. Dave did PLing for 20 years, no when he goes for the pump he gains muscle while losing 30 lbs of fat (his transformation). Arnold, same thing. Years under basic exercises and heavy weights, and then when he moved to other stuff he got a great size increase out of it.

i’ve noticed it in limited terms in my own training.

I just read through this entire thread, and it is amazing keep it up.

[quote]LiveFromThe781 wrote:
Professor X wrote:
LiveFromThe781 wrote:
Fulmen wrote:

The same basics work for everyone. I am not sure why you believe a tall guy should train completely different than a shorter guy. Whether something works AS WELL for you is based more on genetics than limb length or some poor concept of body type. Short guys build legs really easy? The same things they would do to build their legs are generally the same things anyone else should be doing.

The belief that they can’t gain is the same bullshit you are expelling about training differently simply because you are tall.

well originally i was talking about cortisol and how its supposed to be released from ectos if they train heavy. but then everyone got all mad at the word ecto like im dropping the n bomb or something so instead of saying “ecto” i was saying tall guys with fast metabolisms. i was just bringing up something that i read on this site and was wondering what you guys thought about it. if it is true then yes, you would train differently from a short guy. ive also hear a lot of shorter guys say that they respond much better to low rep training than higher rep training so all im trying to do is clear some stuff up but all im hearing is “dont say ecto its blasphemy”

CT wrote:

How should ectos train?

Ectos’ bodies are not built to carry a lot of muscle bulk so for that reason the body needs a darn good reason to add additional muscle tissue. In other words, for ectos to add muscle to their frame they need a very powerful growth stimulus. The growth stimulus is a function of several factors:

Volume: The more physical work you perform, the more important the stimulus is. I’ve mentioned in the past that the more you can train without exceeding your body’s capacity to handle physical work, the more you’ll progress. However ectos have a very low tolerance to strength work. So for them, increasing the severity of the training stimulus via more volume is out of the question. In fact, if anything, ectos will always need to reduce training volume to the bare minimum necessary to stimulate growth.

Ecto variable: Perform a total of 4-6 work sets for most muscle groups, with the "possible’"exception of going up to 8 sets for back since it’s a more complex “group.” Avoid the temptation to increase training volume, however tempting it may be at first. Focus on working harder during those sets, not on doing more sets.

Frequency: Another way of putting the body through a more important growth stimulus/adaptive need is to increase the frequency of training. Basically, if you train a given muscle group twice per week or even three times per week you are forcing your body to adapt to a greater extent. However, just like with volume, ectos will not respond well to an increase in total training frequency. Their body not being built to tolerate strength work, the release of stress hormone will be significant with every session. Ectos need their 3-4 days of rest per week to grow, may it simply be to restore hormonal balance and facilitate the onset of an anabolic state instead of a catabolic one.

Ecto variable: Train at the most 3-4 days a week, which means taking at least 3 days off per week on non-consecutive days. Each individual session should last no longer than 60 minutes, preferably closer to 45. Each muscle group is to be trained once every 6-7 days.

Load/intensity: One can also increase the importance of the growth stimulus by lifting heavier weights. And that is something ectos should do, within reason. As it was mentioned oh, about a zillion times, an ecto body is not built for strength work. They have a smaller bone structure, thinner bones, narrower pelvic and scapular belts, smaller joints an generally longer limbs. They are at the exact opposite of being built for strength. So lifting maximal weights, in the 90-100% range is not ideal for them and once again represent a significant stress on their body. However, light load lifting might not be a powerful enough stimulus to force their body to grow. So they need to lift relatively heavy (75-85% range), without making maximal lifting the cornerstone of their program.

Ecto variable: It is important to challenge the body by always trying to increase the amount of weight lifted, but because of their structure, ectos should not go into the maximal weights zone of 90%+. However going lower than 75-80% will not be a strong stimulus enough to maximize their growth.

“Hardness”: I do not know another word to express this factor. I am talking here about the perceived difficulty of a set. Basically the closer you go to your physical limit on a set, the higher is the “hardness” factor. Ectos should focus mainly on this factor to increase the growth stimulus. If they are training hard enough and have a high pain threshold, they can put the muscle through a growth stimulus powerful enough to force their ecto body to add on muscle without having to do more than 3-6 sets per muscle group.

Ecto variable: This is the key to success for ectos. They should strive to make the few sets they are doing as hard as humanly possible. If he wants to progress optimally the ecto must become the hardest working guy in his gym, he must become an animal!

So an ecto should stick to 3-8 total sets per muscle group (1-2 sets of 2-4 exercises) and gradually work his way up the “hardness” ladder. Obviously, the higher up you go on the ladder, the less total sets you should perform. Also note that I include “8” among the sets only because of back which is a more complex muscle structure and might require more exercises. But for all other muscles groups, 3-6 sets should be done.

Ectos need plenty of rest to grow. As such they should include at least three non-consecutive ‘off’ days per week. Four is even better for the hardest gainers among the ectos. Each muscle should be trained once a week directly, although some indirect work a second time is acceptable. [/quote]

That shit isn’t the end-all truth, man. What if you find that you grow better with 90% of 1rm? Then you’re fucked, because you took that as TRUTH.

[quote]LiveFromThe781 wrote:
Professor X wrote:
LiveFromThe781 wrote:
Fulmen wrote:

The same basics work for everyone. I am not sure why you believe a tall guy should train completely different than a shorter guy. Whether something works AS WELL for you is based more on genetics than limb length or some poor concept of body type. Short guys build legs really easy? The same things they would do to build their legs are generally the same things anyone else should be doing.

The belief that they can’t gain is the same bullshit you are expelling about training differently simply because you are tall.

well originally i was talking about cortisol and how its supposed to be released from ectos if they train heavy. but then everyone got all mad at the word ecto like im dropping the n bomb or something so instead of saying “ecto” i was saying tall guys with fast metabolisms. i was just bringing up something that i read on this site and was wondering what you guys thought about it. if it is true then yes, you would train differently from a short guy. ive also hear a lot of shorter guys say that they respond much better to low rep training than higher rep training so all im trying to do is clear some stuff up but all im hearing is “dont say ecto its blasphemy”
\ [/quote]

No offense, but CT tried to use “cortisol” as a reason those with lactose intolerance should avoid milk in a thread last week and that is the most ridiculous excuse especially when lactose free milk was a part of the discussion.

I like CT and he probably has the closest view to my own concerning bodybuilding, but that doesn’t make him right on every issue he discusses and I have brought this up many times to him directly. I’m a bodybuilder and a doctor (DDS/DMD degree). Some of this stuff you all swallow without question is a little over the top regardless who it comes from.

[quote]SSC wrote:

A question to everyone who’s using BCAAs: Did you guys purchase them from Biotest, or if not, what are your most economical recommendations?[/quote]

Might not wanna talk about that.

Here’s a question for you bb’ers about leg presses–do you not feel joint pain when using them? Do they feel better than squats to you? 'Cause I did them today after squats, and I got knee pain. I never get knee pain with any squat variation ever olympic or otherwise. But the presses hurt.

To be honest, I really don’t think much of the leg press, but I figured I’d give it a try for a change today. I might keep them in for a couple weeks for helping with my quads, but I don’t foresee a future for them; my previous opinion continues to hold.

[quote]Fulmen wrote:
Speaking of supps, I’ve never tried BCAA’s. Should I? Why? Why not? [/quote]

I totally think you should. But it takes a relatively large quantity to notice a big improvement (witness Thibs taking 60 g BCAA peri-workout). You don’t need that many, but still. I’d save some money up and put an experiment on. At this point they’re not really cost effective for me, but I did like them a lot when I had the money to buy them in bulk.

RE: supplements. I’l admit I’m slowly succumbing to S.A.S. (supplement accumulation syndrome). But I really, really, really (really) like Power Drive and Spike variants, as well as HOT-ROX. I would not want to stop taking them. I don’t consider protein powders supps, just powdered food. Same with creatine, that’s a staple. Fish oil is a staple, as high a dose as I can afford. Surge didn’t use to be a staple for me years ago, but I don’t want to go without it at this point–I personally love that stuff and noticed a huge difference between it and my gatorade/whey and whey/sugar mixes. If I had more money, I could easily find more supps to buy.

[quote]Aragorn wrote:
Here’s a question for you bb’ers about leg presses–do you not feel joint pain when using them? Do they feel better than squats to you? 'Cause I did them today after squats, and I got knee pain. I never get knee pain with any squat variation ever olympic or otherwise. But the presses hurt.

To be honest, I really don’t think much of the leg press, but I figured I’d give it a try for a change today. I might keep them in for a couple weeks for helping with my quads, but I don’t foresee a future for them; my previous opinion continues to hold. [/quote]

I would blame your form, your foot placement or your own body way before I blamed the leg press itself if squats don’t cause knee pain for you.

This damn thread is rapidly closing in on 8K views in only 5 days with over 370 posts.

You don’t see shit go viral like this even in the SAMA forum.

Great thread, even better discussion, and only 1 or 2 fight hijacks - not including the rants about Shugart’s blog.

You gotta wonder if any of the T-gods are looking at this thread.

Just wanted to thank all of you who are contributing to this thing. I’ve not seen such a grass roots movement like this since I have been a member here.

[quote]Aragorn wrote:
Here’s a question for you bb’ers about leg presses–do you not feel joint pain when using them? Do they feel better than squats to you? 'Cause I did them today after squats, and I got knee pain. I never get knee pain with any squat variation ever olympic or otherwise. But the presses hurt.

To be honest, I really don’t think much of the leg press, but I figured I’d give it a try for a change today. I might keep them in for a couple weeks for helping with my quads, but I don’t foresee a future for them; my previous opinion continues to hold.[/quote]

If it hurts, don’t do it.

[quote]Fulmen wrote:
Aragorn wrote:
Here’s a question for you bb’ers about leg presses–do you not feel joint pain when using them? Do they feel better than squats to you? 'Cause I did them today after squats, and I got knee pain. I never get knee pain with any squat variation ever olympic or otherwise. But the presses hurt.

To be honest, I really don’t think much of the leg press, but I figured I’d give it a try for a change today. I might keep them in for a couple weeks for helping with my quads, but I don’t foresee a future for them; my previous opinion continues to hold.

If it hurts, don’t do it.

[/quote]
…or at least figure out WHY it hurts so that can be avoided.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
This damn thread is rapidly closing in on 8K views in only 5 days with over 370 posts.

You don’t see shit go viral like this even in the SAMA forum.

Great thread, even better discussion, and only 1 or 2 fight hijacks.

You gotta wonder if any of the T-gods are looking at this thread.

Just wanted to thank all of you who are contributing to this thing. I’ve not seen such a grass roots movement like this since I have been a member here. [/quote]

This thread is the only reason I come here anymore, to be honest.

[quote]Aragorn wrote:
Here’s a question for you bb’ers about leg presses–do you not feel joint pain when using them? Do they feel better than squats to you? 'Cause I did them today after squats, and I got knee pain. I never get knee pain with any squat variation ever olympic or otherwise. But the presses hurt.

To be honest, I really don’t think much of the leg press, but I figured I’d give it a try for a change today. I might keep them in for a couple weeks for helping with my quads, but I don’t foresee a future for them; my previous opinion continues to hold.
[/quote]

My knee pain comes from my former life taking care of cattle, and hanging on a horse - the lateral stress you place on your knees by bending over to open and shut gates is quite immense. I went from that to sitting on my ass as an accountant.

The lateral stress place on the knee balancing free weight on your shoulders is what kills my knees. The presses take the lateral stress out of play, and I don’t even have to wrap my knees to do them, and I put my knees on my chest.

Different strokes. I know squats work. I know leg presses work. But doing leg presses is a lot less painful.