The Body Weight Factor 2

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]setto222 wrote:

My question was why, then, would you do the same? What does the way someone looks have anything to do with their knowledge on a matter?

I assure you I can support my argument and am very willing to debate it.[/quote]

?? This is about EXPERIENCE. If you have never helped someone else get huge and never did it yourself, don’t pretend that “physiology” alone tells you how…because if it did, your MD would be the best “personal trainer”.

You supported that argument…not so well.[/quote]

And what about people who have helped others get huge but aren’t huge themselves? Would they know what their talking about despite not having the “development”?

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

X do you have Stu on ignore, or did you not care to respond to his most eloquent post?
[/quote]

I didn’t respond to Stu because I don’t care if he doesn’t like me…and don’t care if anyone else doesn’t like me.

My goal is to discuss the topic of this thread…not to respond to some overly drawn out post about why someone doesn’t like me. He can think what he wants just like you can.[/quote]

His post had NOTHING to do with anything you just wrote. Literally nothing.[/quote]

His post was all about why he thinks people are justified for turning every thread to shit.

I flatly disagree.

This thread isn’t about Stu and what he think of me. [/quote]

YOU are turning every thread to shit. Go find me another shit storm thread in this forum without your name all over it.[/quote]

Find me one without your name in it.

[quote]setto222 wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]setto222 wrote:

My question was why, then, would you do the same? What does the way someone looks have anything to do with their knowledge on a matter?

I assure you I can support my argument and am very willing to debate it.[/quote]

?? This is about EXPERIENCE. If you have never helped someone else get huge and never did it yourself, don’t pretend that “physiology” alone tells you how…because if it did, your MD would be the best “personal trainer”.

You supported that argument…not so well.[/quote]

And what about people who have helped others get huge but aren’t huge themselves? Would they know what their talking about despite not having the “development”? [/quote]

Uh, in the very post you just responded to…this was written

If you have never helped someone else get huge and never did it yourself,

Did you miss it?

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

X do you have Stu on ignore, or did you not care to respond to his most eloquent post?
[/quote]

I didn’t respond to Stu because I don’t care if he doesn’t like me…and don’t care if anyone else doesn’t like me.

My goal is to discuss the topic of this thread…not to respond to some overly drawn out post about why someone doesn’t like me. He can think what he wants just like you can.[/quote]

His post had NOTHING to do with anything you just wrote. Literally nothing.[/quote]

His post was all about why he thinks people are justified for turning every thread to shit.

I flatly disagree.

This thread isn’t about Stu and what he think of me. [/quote]

YOU are turning every thread to shit. Go find me another shit storm thread in this forum without your name all over it.[/quote]

Find me one without your name in it.[/quote]

LOL

I just started responding to you like this within the last few months. You have been causing shit storms for 11 YEARS.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

I have no idea what your true bf% is, but his guess is probably pretty accurate. You have your shorts under your shorts hiked up to blunt the visual impact of your love handles, there’s very little definition to be seen anywhere, and your face literally has fat hanging off of it. Look at your cheeks and eyelids. You’ve obviously got mass on you, but you are also carrying a lot of fat on you too.[/quote]

Please post picture of yourself showing much better growth and leanness.[/quote]

I’m NOWHERE near your size, but I walk around with clearly visible, protruding veins in my arms, shoulders, chest and abs. I’m also only 175lbs, so to you I’m probably small and skinny. I’m ok with that. Again, you’re a big dude. Have no idea what you weigh or what your bf% is, nor do I care. And, if you’re happy (or content or whatever) with your current progress, neither should you. I was just making an observation that is in line with that of some posters here.[/quote]

I asked for a picture.

For man with this much criticism for me in him, why not put yourself out there to be judged?[/quote]

I have. Several times in fact. There are several in my old training log. There’s also one in my profile (think there’s 2, it’s obviously the one where I’m leaner and more tan). I am actually a bit leaner now as I’ve stopped drinking 3+ days a week. I’m posting from a Galaxy 2, and every time I try and post a pic it freezes in the transition phase. If anyone knows how to correct that, please let me know. And again, I wasn’t criticizing you. Just pointing out an observation, an pinion that’s shared by many.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Sum of posts here:

This is “don’t care about abs” shape.
[photo]34868[/photo]

My guess is, most of the people here are in way better shape than this?[/quote]

Shape is subjective. For my goals, yes I’m in much better shape than you. You could probably say the same to me.[/quote]

If I could, then what would be the point of me telling people you are near obese?[/quote]

Again, quit using this pic as evidence of anything other that very recently. You know damn well any comment about 25% or obese wasn’t directed at THIS PARTICULAR PHOTO.

This photo is NOT a depiction of how you have looked in the past, by your own admission of leaning down RECENTLY.

The Hoss wrote:
heavythrower wrote:
Professor X wrote:
krazykoukides wrote:
Going along with everybody’s posts:

Isn’t recovery ability also a genetic ‘factor’?

Aside from metabolism, it is probably one of the most important. I can train 6 or 7 days a week because of my recovery ability.

This is one reason I cringe when I see people telling newbs that they will overtrain so easily. They won’t know one way or the other until they spend some time actually training so hard they ever get close to it.

In fact, to be honest, I don’t think any guy who has trouble training more than 3 days a week without “overtraining” will ever get that big to start with.

ya, i think that far far far more many people under train than over train.

i dare anybody to tell me i have good genetics for strength and muscle, but i built myself up to training 2 times a day 5-7 days a week at one point and made progress doing it.

What did your split look like?

oh hell, your asking an old man with a failing memory to recall a lot,

um,

early am : light conditioning, mobility drills, trowing drills, 20-30 throws at 70-80% with 1-2 implements, then dynamic weight training(olympic lifts mostly at 50-70%), then warm down and more light conditioning(sleds dragging, short sprints)

early pm: light mobility work/dynamic warm up/very light conditioning, 20-30 throws with various puds(look it up), HEAVY weight training, ie push pressing, squats, deadlifts, high pulls OR substitute the weights with heavy duty jump drills(ill explain later), then more light conditioning and warm down.

my intense jump drill sessions consisted of mostly body weight stuff, but considering my size at the time, 260-270lbs, and what i was doing they were pretty intense.

-jump squats load bar an old rusty beat up warped bar with 95-225lbs, out on the field not in a gym, clean it to my back like i am doing squats, go down about 1/4-1/2 way and jump as hard up as possible, launching the bar off my shoulders into the air and letting it free fall to the ground. pick it up and repeat after a short rest.

-bleacher hops go up the bleachers steps hopping on two legs taking 2 at a time or on one leg one at a time.

long -hops basically a series of long jumps in a row

  • med ball drills, simulate various throws with heavy med balls instead of the actual implement

-punches while on knees, with two hands, violently launch a shot or med ball from chest as far a possible

  • take a med ball or a shot and throw it underhanded straight up and back as far as possible, really tear a piece of yourself off when you do this, to the point you have no control over your body at release, you go flying backwards and land on pads.

there are a million.

whew, that was a trip down memory lane…

this is cut and pasted from question directed at me i responded to on another thread.

this is the type of workload i took on when eating the massive amounts i spoke about on my info thread on the t alpha forum. (200 plus chicken wings, 2 large pizzas, etc)

i worked up to this volume over a few years of serious competition in collegiate and AAU track and field competition and Highland Games competition. i was watched and directed at first by experienced coaches who had done this before.

this was me working extremely hard 2 times a day 5-7 times a week, and i was not sitting on machines pumping out reps. i was on the platform moving barbells and on the field propelling my 270lb frame plus added resistance (various heavy implements) through space with control, technique and speed and explosiveness.

i just want people to be careful and not end up 40 years old and seeing yourself on a video at the beach and being so disgusted with your self that you get depressed.

thats what happened to me, though i stayed pretty strong, after i quit serious competition i got very fat and nonathletic. but i kept those eating habits.

not saying anybody is right or wrong, just be careful with the huge bulks guys.

And who cares if you ARE 25% or OBESE in that photo. It’s all about “image” right?

HeavyThrower, you’re a beast. That routine is nuts.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

X do you have Stu on ignore, or did you not care to respond to his most eloquent post?
[/quote]

I didn’t respond to Stu because I don’t care if he doesn’t like me…and don’t care if anyone else doesn’t like me.

My goal is to discuss the topic of this thread…not to respond to some overly drawn out post about why someone doesn’t like me. He can think what he wants just like you can.[/quote]

And yet you will devote time and dozens of posts each day arguing with others who you have determined don’t like you (Facebook posse and BOI–looking at you). Is it instead that perhaps, Stu, as a much more accomplished lifter, more popular, more knowledgeable, more personable, and all around way cooler dude than you presented a clearly thought out deconstruction of your presence and behavior on these forums to which you had no response? Maybe that’s the case.

re. Your “goal” of discussing the topic of the thread; nope, that’s not what you’re doing. Instead you’re constantly redirecting any topic so that it becomes all about a validation of you and your continually improving (leaner and heavier and more muscular all at once) physique. If you were truly that accomplished, would you so badly need the validation from an internet forum?

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]setto222 wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]setto222 wrote:

My question was why, then, would you do the same? What does the way someone looks have anything to do with their knowledge on a matter?

I assure you I can support my argument and am very willing to debate it.[/quote]

?? This is about EXPERIENCE. If you have never helped someone else get huge and never did it yourself, don’t pretend that “physiology” alone tells you how…because if it did, your MD would be the best “personal trainer”.

You supported that argument…not so well.[/quote]

Because MDs have extensive training in exercise physiology. [/quote]

It isn’t just “exercise physiology” or else every PhD in that field would be the best person to go to in order to look like a huge linemen.

Yo getting really huge isn’t just about “exercise physiology”. Every concept I have been discussing matters more and more the more extreme you take this.[/quote]

I know more than a few people who know jack shit about exercise physiology who are massive. And they got that way by listening to other big people. It’s foolish to ignore someone who has achieved something which anyone who decides to give it a shot will find out is actually pretty hard to do. I’m a big fan of using science and logic to find the best way forward, but till they run a ten year study following people who get huge and who they do it, comparing all the different ways of doing it, the best way is to learn from people who have actually done it themselves. The trick is to use your own logic to discard what makes you different, and what is a waste of time, and use the bits that will work for you.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

X do you have Stu on ignore, or did you not care to respond to his most eloquent post?
[/quote]

I didn’t respond to Stu because I don’t care if he doesn’t like me…and don’t care if anyone else doesn’t like me.

My goal is to discuss the topic of this thread…not to respond to some overly drawn out post about why someone doesn’t like me. He can think what he wants just like you can.[/quote]

The point is that you adapt a “woe is me, everyone comes to pick on me and derail my threads” attitude, then when someone constructively points out why it really happens, and that it’s not just out of spite, you completely ignore the post.

It’s not even like it’s by someone who actively DOES follow you and take threads off track. It’s Stu, arguably one of the best contributors on these forums, who never really argues with ANYONE.

and in regards to the post about me “seeing what I want to see”, you weren’t that lean throughout your weight gain, by your own admission. You can’t take a picture at the end of a recomp that ends a ten year slow bulk and use it to say “see, I cared somewhat about having abs all along.” If your leanest end point is self described as “abs coming in” , you DIDN’T really care about abs.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]setto222 wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]setto222 wrote:

My question was why, then, would you do the same? What does the way someone looks have anything to do with their knowledge on a matter?

I assure you I can support my argument and am very willing to debate it.[/quote]

?? This is about EXPERIENCE. If you have never helped someone else get huge and never did it yourself, don’t pretend that “physiology” alone tells you how…because if it did, your MD would be the best “personal trainer”.

You supported that argument…not so well.[/quote]

And what about people who have helped others get huge but aren’t huge themselves? Would they know what their talking about despite not having the “development”? [/quote]

Uh, in the very post you just responded to…this was written

If you have never helped someone else get huge and never did it yourself,

Did you miss it?[/quote]

Ah, seems you forgot what you initially argued. It’s cool. I’ll write it down for ya :slight_smile:

That certainly doesn’t sound like a non developed person coaching someone else how to get huge. Just relax and realize that I am NOT trying to attack you personally and stop it with the defensive attitude. I believe and have been programmed to believe that building muscle is a matter of science and not just experience. That is NOT a personal attack on you. I haven’t spoken ill about your methodologies, just disagreed. I haven’t insulted you looks/development/muscle/strength or body fat. I think I’ve been civil in this debate and I would request you be the same.

How are you not being civil? Well you are acting like just because I haven’t physically experienced the change in anatomy you have that my knowledge is somehow inferior to yours. I appreciate your approach and the contributions you’ve made to these forums but is that any reason to shit on people who don’t agree with you?

Just like many other things in life there is more than one way to skin a cat. Why can this not apply to putting on size?

cueball why are you so angry the entire time it is super weird

[quote]Professor X wrote:

If I could, then what would be the point of me telling people you are near obese?[/quote]

Depends on what you mean. Obesity the clinical term, you probably are just by weight. A better definition of bodyfat, maybe you are, I don’t know. But that is very different then being fat. Fat is a subjective term. It is one thing to tell someone they are probably X percent. It is something else to call them fat. You seem to take the first for the latter.

I personally would guess you were in the 20%+ range, though again nobody can say for sure because there are so many variables that factor into what that amount looks like on a person.

However, I would never call your build fat. I would probably think “Large Mofo” if I met you. Some of my favorite physiques are probably higher than you.

But again, 2 different things, the clinical factual number is one thing (and to this point unknown). Personal subjective evaluation is another thing. And that part is completely opinion and un-arguable. No one can tell anyone else what does or doesn’t look good and what is or isn’t “fat”. You carry more fat than I want to carry on myself anymore. That’s as far as that can go.

I think you overestimate how much muscle you have, BUT I also think you under estimate how good that amount of muscle looks.

[quote]Blaze_108 wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

X do you have Stu on ignore, or did you not care to respond to his most eloquent post?
[/quote]

I didn’t respond to Stu because I don’t care if he doesn’t like me…and don’t care if anyone else doesn’t like me.

My goal is to discuss the topic of this thread…not to respond to some overly drawn out post about why someone doesn’t like me. He can think what he wants just like you can.[/quote]

The point is that you adapt a “woe is me, everyone comes to pick on me and derail my threads” attitude, then when someone constructively points out why it really happens, and that it’s not just out of spite, you completely ignore the post.

It’s not even like it’s by someone who actively DOES follow you and take threads off track. It’s Stu, arguably one of the best contributors on these forums, who never really argues with ANYONE.

and in regards to the post about me “seeing what I want to see”, you weren’t that lean throughout your weight gain, by your own admission. You can’t take a picture at the end of a recomp that ends a ten year slow bulk and use it to say “see, I cared somewhat about having abs all along.” If your leanest end point is self described as “abs coming in” , you DIDN’T really care about abs.

[/quote]

Best Post

[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]setto222 wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]setto222 wrote:

My question was why, then, would you do the same? What does the way someone looks have anything to do with their knowledge on a matter?

I assure you I can support my argument and am very willing to debate it.[/quote]

?? This is about EXPERIENCE. If you have never helped someone else get huge and never did it yourself, don’t pretend that “physiology” alone tells you how…because if it did, your MD would be the best “personal trainer”.

You supported that argument…not so well.[/quote]

Because MDs have extensive training in exercise physiology. [/quote]

It isn’t just “exercise physiology” or else every PhD in that field would be the best person to go to in order to look like a huge linemen.

Yo getting really huge isn’t just about “exercise physiology”. Every concept I have been discussing matters more and more the more extreme you take this.[/quote]

I know more than a few people who know jack shit about exercise physiology who are massive. And they got that way by listening to other big people. It’s foolish to ignore someone who has achieved something which anyone who decides to give it a shot will find out is actually pretty hard to do. I’m a big fan of using science and logic to find the best way forward, but till they run a ten year study following people who get huge and who they do it, comparing all the different ways of doing it, the best way is to learn from people who have actually done it themselves. The trick is to use your own logic to discard what makes you different, and what is a waste of time, and use the bits that will work for you.
[/quote]

I would never suggest ignoring experience. I just think it can work hand-in-hand with scientific methodology. The studies have been performed and there are scientific reasons as to why the big guys are big. There isn’t really much that’s unaccounted for.

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
HeavyThrower, you’re a beast. That routine is nuts.[/quote]

that was me in my early 20’s and into my early 30s.

it was typical. of the people doing what i was doing. nothing special.

there were some naturally gifted guys who were just born big strong and fast, who got away without putting as much into it as myself and the majority, but this was fairly typical of how athletes at the level i was at the time trained.

but thank you.

[quote]cueball wrote:
Again, quit using this pic as evidence of anything other that very recently. You know damn well any comment about 25% or obese wasn’t directed at THIS PARTICULAR PHOTO.

This photo is NOT a depiction of how you have looked in the past, by your own admission of leaning down RECENTLY.[/quote]
Are there any of us on this forum who would want to be judged based on how they looked in the past? I mean the whole idea is to keep improving.

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:
Again, quit using this pic as evidence of anything other that very recently. You know damn well any comment about 25% or obese wasn’t directed at THIS PARTICULAR PHOTO.

This photo is NOT a depiction of how you have looked in the past, by your own admission of leaning down RECENTLY.[/quote]
Are there any of us on this forum who would want to be judged based on how they looked in the past? I mean the whole idea is to keep improving.[/quote]

Maybe, maybe not…but if the whole thread is based on if you can gain the same amount of muscle in a leaver vs. a fatter state…it is relevant.