The Andrew Tate Case

[Andrewgen_Receptors]

@unreal24278

But anyone with autism or more/less any reasonable degree of disability (including congenital issues with eyesight, deafness, blindness etc) can’t vote.

If they can be used for a position in a draft, they can vote. If not, they have no skin in the game and cannot vote. It’s principle.

@unreal24278

If you were my friend and you were saying this to my face, I’d be quite irritated with you… you are 100% gerrymandering here

I’m not your friend, I’m not saying it to your face, and i couldn’t care less if you get irritated by what my opinion is after you asked me for it.
Google gerrymandering. This is not it.

@unreal24278

You are trying to nullify the voice of the young because YOU don’t like what they have to say.

No, it’s because they’re clueless and dont know why they’re saying what they are saying.
Should we lower the voting age to 16? If you say “no because theyre clueless”, it’s gerrymandering - by your logic.

@unreal24278

Where I live the average shitty house costs upwards of 1 million dollars…

So move.

@unreal24278

There is no point talking to someone who doesn’t believe that I ought to have the right to vote. That is tremendously insulting…

You don’t even live in my country you loon.

@unreal24278

You ought to vote because you’ve served in the military, others shouldn’t have that right…

I’m saying you shouldn’t be able to vote for someone who can send everyone off to a war they dont want to fight, except you.

[unreal24278]

@Andrewgen_Receptors

You don’t even live in my country you loon.

Lived there for seven years you arrogant prick

[doogie]

@unreal24278

you are 100% gerrymandering here.

[unreal24278]

Manipulating barriers to election in favor of ones class

[zecarlo]

@Andrewgen_Receptors

No, it’s because they’re clueless and dont know why they’re saying what they are saying.

Biden can vote.

[unreal24278]

Also

18 is when someone is considered to legally be an adult

Raise the age of consent, drinking age, age to purchase a firearm, join the military, age to get married, age to own property etc to 25 and fine… voting age can be 25…

[doogie]

@unreal24278

Manipulating barriers to election in favor of ones class

Not barriers. Boundaries. Like when voting districts are drawn up. Nothing to do with barriers at all.

[unreal24278]

Now we are squabbling over details

But a barrier or boundary to voting theoretically equates to a variable that restricts your ability to vote

[Andrewgen_Receptors]

@unreal24278

Manipulating barriers to election in favor of ones class

By wanting an informed pool of voters, I’m gerrymandering? Get bent dude.

I’m out

[doogie]

@unreal24278

Now we are squabbling over details

But a barrier or boundary to voting theoretically equates to a variable that restricts your ability to vote

No. Gerrymandering does not restrict your ability to vote at all. Disenfranchising is the word you are looking for.

[unreal24278]

Ahhh

Ok

Thank you for the correction.

[Andrewgen_Receptors]

@Andrewgen_Receptors

Google gerrymandering.

@unreal24278

Ahhh

Ok

[mr.v3lv3t]

Removing women’s right to vote as well?

[BrickHead]

@zecarlo

A woman gets shamed for a behavior that required a man. That sounds like men wanting their cake and eating it too. Men hate sluts but then actively seek them out.

Men cannot have their cake and eat it too if they are blocked from easy access to sex. Hence slut shaming.

[unreal24278]

The definition still fits

You wish to manipulate boundaries in a manner that would ensure the number of conservative votes are maximised.

I.e only the wealthiest (property owners) can vote, more likely to have military service (tends to skew conservative), 25+ (more likely to vote conservative). You only want wealthy, millitary ready men and women (wait… what do you think of women being in the milliary?) To be able to vote… and of the 25+ crowd… only half of millenials own property…

In the end you’d be looking at the vast majority of those voting being 40+… meaning your side can win without pushback… that and say 80% of Gen Z under your ideas would never be able to vote… further solidifying your win.

It’s a mixture of gerrymandering and disenfranchisement.

Either way… feel free to have the last word. I’m also out.

I actually vote conservative btw…

[BrickHead]

I’d add only those with children should be able to vote. And make it one vote per household. If a child moves and has no children, he has no vote.

[zecarlo]

@BrickHead

if they are blocked from easy access to sex.

Why do they need to be blocked? They can’t control themselves?

[unreal24278]

Does someone who has adopted count as someone with children? Say the couple can’t conceive due to fertility issues or something?

Also, why is this a necessity? So everyone who votes has to take family values into account? Not that family values aren’t important (they most certainly are!) but not everyone who currently votes has a family, therefore that may reflect in the candidates they vote for.

Essentially, you both need to come out and say you want an alternative to a democratically elected constitutional republic

Which you HAVE said before, therefore I respect that.

[Andrewgen_Receptors]

@mr.v3lv3t

Removing women’s right to vote as well

If they want to sign up for the draft, they should be able to vote. I don’t see why that’s unreasonable.

[Andrewgen_Receptors]

@unreal24278

You wish to manipulate boundaries in a manner that would ensure the number of educated votes are maximised.

^this one, not what you said.